« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Left: Misogyny Apologists Under the Guise of Tolerance

The Left constantly claims the mantle of being Pro-Women’s Rights. Yet, they prove time and time again that it is lip service only. In fact, they are often either misogynists or misogyny apologists themselves, all in the name of some sort of  call for a perverted version of “diversity” and “tolerance.”

They’ve recently gone so far as to condone genital mutilation. They have defended child rape in the case of Roman Polanski.  They are silent on Iran gaining a seat on the United Nation’s Commission on the Status of Women. Why? Because it’s never actually about people to them. It’s all agenda-driven, always.

The latest instance, specifically Amanda Marcotte’s defense of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recent decision to embrace genital mutilation is beyond infuriating. It is twisted, sickening and disturbing beyond belief. How can anyone in their right mind defend such an inhumane thing? Granted, “right mind” is the operative term there, but still.

The AAP, like the UN, started referring to female genital mutilation as merely “cutting” because mutilation sounds icky and may be offensive and insensitive to other cultures. Boo hoo. I’m sorry you are offended that sane people define the acts of clitoridectomy and excision as what they are: mutilation. Now, the AAP has gone one further and said a “little nick” is a nice compromise. No big whoop! Sacrifice girls and allow a misogynistic practice to occur, all in the name of appeasement. I don’t think the girls who are barbarically maimed feel very appeased, do you?

Not so, says Marcotte! Marcotte used the standard and oh-so-lame talking point of “but what about US? We are meany pants and awful too!”  Leftists/Progressives always say “but what about US?” in an attempt to act as apologists, due to their religious fervor and zealotry for the nebulously defined “multi-culturalism.” They invent an example of a perceived American wrong, one that is usually both idiotic and utterly irrelevant to the topic at hand. And, you know, cuckoo pants.

As Jenn Q. Public pointed out in her article, Marcotte had this to say, in defense of the AAP’s decision:

And it’s not like Western culture is so free of blatantly misogynist traditions, either.  Part of me wishes that we had a two minute nicking at the doctor instead of the entire painfully misogynist wedding tradition that persists in the name of tradition.

See, pointing out true evil doesn’t fit the “progressive” meme. Instead, subjugation and misogyny must be invented out of whole cloth regarding things like marriage, but the very real—and often deadly—subjugation of women under Islamic law must be tolerated and ignored. The hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance have reached epic levels.

Oh, just a little two minute nicking, says Marcotte. It’s not like it’s as awful as getting married and sharing your life with a loving partner! I can maybe see where Marcotte is coming from, personally. As self-loathing as she is, she must feel that marriage is a horrid punishment—for the man. I’d have more to say in response to Marcotte, but it makes me feel a little cheap because it’s so easy to refute the intellectually defenseless.

The left’s lack of intellectual prowess, as well as their absolute hypocrisy was also on display in regards to the child rapist known as Roman Polanski. Here is what the founder of the Feminist Majority Foundation said about that:

“My personal thoughts are let the guy go,” said Peg Yorkin, founder of the Feminist Majority Foundation. “It’s bad a person was raped. But that was so many years ago. The guy has been through so much in his life. It’s crazy to arrest him now. Let it go.”

Just let it go, will you? He makes super cool movies and he’s all arty and stuff. And like the intellectual giant, Whoopi Goldberg said, it wasn’t like it was “rape-rape.” The Hollywood Left all gathered around Polanski, even circulating a petition demanding his release. France’s Society of Film Directors said his arrest would have “disastrous consequences for the freedom of expression.”

The freedom to express pedophilia?  Drugging and raping (yes, “rape-rape”) a 13-year-old CHILD. Who repeatedly said no. Over and over. Who was scared out of her mind, yet this “man” Polanski, continued to use and abuse her in various ways. Over and over again until he “freely expressed” his own sick enjoyment, for which he felt no remorse. He didn’t even believe he had done anything wrong. And neither does the Left, apparently.

How enlightened and cultured they are. The rape of a child is perfectly acceptable, so long as you dig the rapist’s art and his liberal thought. I suppose you all figured “Well, at least he tried not to get her pregnant. What’s a little sodomy? At least that way she wouldn’t be “punished with a baby.” Sheesh! Relax, you uncultured wingnuts! Plus, it’s not like he disagrees with Obama or wants to stop illegal immigration!”

Most recently, their silence was telling on Iran gaining a seat on the United Nation’s Commission on the Status of Women. From Leftist camps, there was either silence or there was attempted down-playing of Iran’s horrific record towards women. Others, again, tried to equate women in Iran being stoned to death or lashed for immodest dress with being pro-life here.  No, really.

These are all just the latest examples that clearly show what some of us have always known.  To the Left, the truth does not matter. What matters is their dangerously naive agenda. Their need to further that agenda, along with the narratives that they have set in stone, trumps all. They will also, even in the face of overwhelming facts and reason, keep repeating the lies. Eventually, they hope, the lies will be perceived as reality.

They care more about pushing politically correct “tolerance” and “diversity” memes, including in the form of appeasement, in order to further their identity politics agenda. They care more about that than they care about actual people, particularly women. I’ve said this before, but it’s something we must remember:

This is the difficulty we face, as people who do have moral compasses. We face an opponent who has none.

—-

(Cross-posted from NewsReal)

COMMENTS

  • earlgrey

    I coudn’t even finish reading this post without being overcome with nausea. What can be done?

  • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

    Equality Now suggested writing, via regular mail not email, the AAP to express your outrage. I plan to do so today. This goes beyond PC appeasement. It’s is barbaric and sickening and absolutely unacceptable.

    • jimmyg

      http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/pediatrics;125/5/1088?rss=1

      • jimmyg

        I think you are wrong, and the AAP is not advocating mutilation. You are linking articles which state what they think the AAP is advocating. If you read their most recent policy statement, dated May 1, 2010, it does not advocate what you are saying it advocates.

        • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

          released 4/26/10. They even want laws changed to allow it. Quote from the policy statement found here:

          http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/peds.2010-0187v1

          “However, the ritual nick suggested by some pediatricians is not physically harmful and is much less extensive than routine newborn male genital cutting. There is reason to believe that offering such a compromise may build trust between hospitals and immigrant communities, save some girls from undergoing dis?guring and life-threatening procedures in their native countries, and play a role in the eventual eradication of FGC.

          It might be more effective if federal and state laws enabled pediatricians to reach out to families by offering a ritual nick as a possible compromise to avoid greater harm.”

          I’m sorry, but promoting a “compromise” and “not quite as bad” version of it is something we CANNOT surrender on. What’s next? It’s okay to slit your wife’s throat instead of totally beheading her in an honor killing for some perceived wrong. I mean, it’s not *as bad*, right?

      • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

        Here:

        http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/american-academy-of-pediatrics-aap-is-advocating-for-us-pediatricians-to-perform-certain-types-of-female-genital-mutilation-fgm-92871624.html

        • jimmyg

          http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/pediatrics;125/5/1088?rss=1 The policy of the AAP is that counsels its members not to perform this procedure. This was issued on May 1, 2010. Please provide evidence that the AAP has a policy that contridicts the policy you state exists.

          • glorybee

            Read the whole May text (not just the abstract) yourself if you don’t believe the ACTUAL QUOTE given above.

          • jimmyg

            On page 1092 and 1093 of the article Liz linked, they do not recemmend, or embrace mutilation, nor recomend a nick.

          • tom246

            I agree, I went to http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;102/1/153 and it clearly states the AAP Opposes all forms of female genital mutilation (FGM).
            I am more than a little surprised that so many people would let someone “get their goat” so easily.
            It is always important to SUBSTANTIATE claims before repeating them, after all we’re not liberals!

          • glorybee

            FROM THE FULL TEXT:
            “However, the ritual nick suggested by some pediatricians is not physically harmful and is much less extensive than routine newborn male genital cutting. There is reason to believe that offering such a compromise may build trust between hospitals and immigrant communities, save some girls from undergoing disfiguring and life-threatening procedures in their native countries, and play a role in the eventual eradication of FGC. It might be more effective if federal and state laws enabled pediatricians to reach out to families by offering a ritual nick as a possible compromise to avoid greater harm. ”
            QUOTE

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

            -nt-

          • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

            You are reading the one from 1998, which still refers to it as mutilation. Of course they say they oppose mutilation.

            But they are now clearly, as indicated several times, discussing and considering the alleged “compromise” of “nicking”. They’ve also renamed it the less icky sounding “cutting” as indicated in the revised policy which includes the segment I quoted above. (http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;125/5/1088)

            THAT is the issue. There can be no compromise. Yet, they are willing to consider it, are thinking about it and are even putting it in writing, as a way to not offend and to appease sensibilities. And others are defending that stance, also in the name of “appeasement” and can’t we all just get along baloney.

            Sorry if that ‘gets my goat’. I am not willing to appease barbarism. In any form.

  • hotspur

    disgusting it is to equate a voluntary act of entering into a lawful bond to a forced procedure upon unwilling young girls. Amanda Marcotte is sick and twisted. Is this what multiculturalism brings us? Knowing the most barbaric practices from other countries and saying it’s alright?

    • yoyo

      just hours out of the womb typically, where – as everyone *knows* – they were nothing more than a mass that was a darn inconvenience for the last several months (you know, no smoking, no drinking, no Crack, no Meth, no Ex, or no partying allowed) and will be nothing more than a monetary drain and a weight on the career aspirations of *Mom* for the next several decades. So, if *MOM* has to suffer through a lack of partying and actually having to WORK, why shouldn’t the daughter have to suffer too?

      If they have no rights in the womb, why should we expect them to have rights out of the womb?

      For Liberals/Progressives/Socialists/Democrats, Morality is Relative. They should run on that slogan.

  • brotherhero

    Great post Lori. I am reminded of Billy Graham’s Prayer for Our Nation.

    ‘Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask your forgiveness and to seek your direction and guidance. We know Your Word says, ‘Woe to those who call evil good, but that is exactly what we have done.

    We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values.

    We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery.

    We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare.

    We have killed our unborn and called it choice.

    We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable.

    We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self esteem.

    We have abused power and called it politics.

    We have coveted our neighbor’s possessions and called it ambition.

    We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression.

    We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment.

    Search us, Oh God, and know our hearts today; cleanse us from every sin and set us free.

    Amen!’

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    to think of what sort of marks are being placed upon the souls of these people. Remember what Jesus said. “If any man harm these little ones it would better for him that a millstone be placed around his neck and he be thrown into the sea.”

  • SirGladiator

    This is a really good reminder of why we’re fighting the good fight, to promote good Christian and conservative values, against the forces of evil. These people serve as an excellent motivation for us to keep going regardless of how close or how far away victory may seem. It is so obvious, and the author points out quite rightly, that the left are very much anti women, as well as anti morals and decency. We must always expose that, as we continue to stand for that which is right and good!

  • johnt

    Once you grasp that the rest becomes somewhat easier to accept.
    Nothing. Even a savage holds some beliefs that transcend him, a leftist only desires to feed his appetites, chief of which is power and the infliction of hardship over others.

  • Return to Revolution

    Actually, I think it is both – the left has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to throw principle under the bus when it suits them. However, the blazing hypocrisy exposed here has a philosophical basis as well. In the progressive world, “tolerance” is based on moral relativism. Thus there is no objective basis for judging people, ideas, or cultures as good or bad. It is literally a refusal to judge anything – and all aspects of life, from marital status to embracing genital mutilation, become nothing more than a matter of taste. It is merely replacing mindless bigotry with mindless acceptance.

    • davesinsanantonio

      kill the unborn and kill off the elderly who are a drain on society’s resources. When they have complete power they will then be willing to kill or brutally imprison in some sort of work camps any who disagree with them. They have no morals, they only pretend to in order to get more power. When they have absolute power, there will be no restraint on its use, because they really do not believe in anything except using power to get their way.

  • momma

    Let’s hear from her after she has her own ‘ritual nicking’ with a scalpel. Let’s hear what she thinks of the procedure then. Oh, and let’s make it INVOLUNTARY. Where a couple of big guys were holding her down. Without anesthetic. Yeah, I’m sure the AAP would approve…in the name of ‘reaching out to families.’

    Marcotte’s way of thinking turns my stomach.
    Child-hater. Girl-hater. Woman-hater. Human-hater. Freedom-hater.
    Hater.

  • vocalyokel

    The true diehards on the left have no morals whatsoever, much less a compass; their only need for any sort of compass is their laser-like focus on the acquisition and maintenance of power. Witness the sudden, deafening silence on the issue of powerful white males brutalizing vulnerable females in the workplace, once Bilious Clinton’s sexual misuse of a White House intern came (very much against the dinosaur media’s wishes) to light. Hypocrisy, thy home is the democretin party.

  • Pingback: look