« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Sorry, Steinem Stepford Feminists, But Pro-Life is Pro-Woman

I generally ignore the irrelevant bint known as Miss Gloria Steinem, but Katie Couric interviewed her on Tuesday and thrust her back into the mock-worthy spotlight.  Plus, I’m sick fed up with her and “feminists” like her. The emergence of conservative women to the forefront recently has made them particularly unbearable, as they strive to, in every repugnant way possible, diminish said women. This is just the latest from one of them, Miss Gloria Steinem, who unfortunately resurfaced from whatever Birkenstock-clad, soy latte drinking ivory tower she was hiding in:


Watch CBS News Videos Online

Firstly, good grief, Katie Couric. What an inane question: “Can you be a conservative feminist?” As if conservatives women are some odd, only woman-like creatures. Miss Steinem’s response? You can’t be a feminist if you oppose legal abortion. Can’t be one. That’s crimethink! She caps it off with the utterly ridiculous statement that one in three women need an abortion. Now, it’s not the nebulous “choice,” it’s an actual need? Because it never really was about choice, was it? They strove to make abortion the default option.

Well, guess what, Stepford Steinem Feminists? We don’t care if you don’t consider us a part of your cultish club. You see, we have minds of our own. And, unlike you, we respect women and don’t think that they are too stupid to handle life on their own, nor do we think that women are perpetual victims who must be saved from things like “inconvenient” motherhood. We are also tired of your bastardizing the term feminist beyond any recognizable meaning. You are antithetical to feminism and can no longer claim that term as your own. We are taking it back. Not to use, as it’s unnecessary; we know that we have equality already. But, only so that you can no longer use it as a way to promulgate lies in order to further an agenda harmful to all, but particularly to women.

Recently, another Stepford Feminist, Amanda Marcotte, claimed that Sarah Palin – and every other Pro-Life woman – thinks that women are stupid and doesn’t want to offer them a “choice.”  She based this on an honest statement that Palin made at a Susan B. Anthony dinner, wherein she openly and honestly stated that the idea of an abortion had fleetingly crossed her mind. She then said this:

“So we went through some things a year ago that now lets me understand a woman’s, a girl’s temptation to maybe try to make it all go away if she has been influenced by society to believe that she’s not strong enough or smart enough or equipped enough or convenienced enough to make the choice to let the child live. I do understand what these women, what these girls go through in that thought process.”

To the agenda tunnel-visioned like Marcotte, that meant that Palin thinks women are dum-dums and she then asserted this:

I’ve seen everything from mild cases of morning sickness to months confined to bed in service of bringing a baby into the world, and these kinds of sacrifices should be freely chosen out of love instead of foisted on the unwilling. To suggest that all women are equipped to make these sacrifices at any point in time is to insult those who take on the burden because they want to, not because they have to.

Oooh, the terrible sacrifice of morning sickness. Yeah, avoiding that is way more important than, you know, a life.

What’s insulting is that Marcotte and Steinem and other Stepford Feminists believe that women are incapable of being responsible for their own actions. That if they have the simple human emotions like fear of the unknown or self-doubt, then they should be relieved of that icky burden immediately because surely they can’t handle it. Motherhood is a punishment and a burden that only certain women can be expected to handle. Some aren’t “equipped” to do so, you see.

They are also the ones who want to hide information from women, for fear that women are too stupid to handle the truth; they don’t even want women to see ultrasounds before aborting their children. They have so little respect for women, that they deny the very existence of post-abortion syndrome. To them, it’s inconceivable that any woman would actually feel remorse or be racked with guilt, her entire life, after having an abortion. She got rid of that pesky, burdensome, “just a clump of cells”,  inconvenience! If she doesn’t feel joyful relief, she can’t be a “real” feminist-y woman!

This is because they feel scorn for the very act of Motherhood itself.  Gloria Steinem once said “[Housewives] are dependent creatures who are still children…parasites.” Another “feminist”, Simone de Beauvoir said: “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one. It is a way of forcing women in a certain direction.”

Hey, you know who that sounds like?

“The chief thing is to get women to take part in socially productive labor, to liberate them from ‘domestic slavery,’ to free them from their stupefying and humiliating subjugation to the eternal drudgery of the kitchen and the nursery. This struggle will be a long one, and it demands a radical reconstruction, both of social technique and of morale. But it will end in the complete triumph of Communism.”
~ V.I. Lenin, International Working Women’s Day Speech , 1920.

You don’t understand that being life bearing nurturers is something that makes women special, not lesser. You, instead, think that women are stupid, shouldn’t be “trapped” by a child, and should be protected victims of their own actions, feminists, yet you were the useful idiots. Useful to the Left at one point, but no more – now that we all see you for what you are.

Plain old idiots.

As women who respect and support other women, because Pro-Life is Pro-Woman, this is what we “can’t be real feminists” women do. We unhinged nutty nuts help women, instead of urging them to abort. We help them truly have it all, education, career and motherhood via personal responsibility. We trust and have faith that they can do so, unlike you. I’ll tell you about one such place, as it’s in the icky South so I’m sure you’ve never heard of it.

GREENVILLE, S.C. — A building that used to be an abortion clinic has a new tenant. Little Steps has taken a lease out on the downtown Greenville property. The teen parent program offers parenting classes, mentoring, support groups, supplies and childcare to young moms and dads….

Mandy Black knows the move is a bit of a political statement but she says the space really is a perfect fit to provide classrooms, playrooms and mentoring stations. “I don’t want to forget what happened here,” she said. “There were a lot of lives lost and a lot of lives changed in this building. We don’t want to forget that, but at the same time we want to move from that and say here is what can happen now.”

A place where babies were sucked mercilessly from the former safety of their mother’s wombs, never once feeling a loving touch, never receiving succor, considered, instead, expendable for the sake of convenience, is now a place that will foster love. A place that will support women and motherhood itself, instead of diminishing it. A place that acknowledges that women aren’t helpless victims, in need of saving from their own decisions. A place that will save the lives of countless children — and their mothers.

It doesn’t take a village to raise a child. But, conservative women know that sometimes it takes one to save a child’s life. Or, 50 million of them.

So, you see, Miss Steinem – Women, and their children born and unborn, need feminists like fish need bicycles.

——

(Cross-posted from NewsReal)

COMMENTS

  • misty

    Now I finally get it. The reason the feminists on the left say that it is not possible for a conservative woman to be a feminist is because, to them a feminist is a woman who HATES the very idea of being a woman. They hate everything special about women and have spent their careers doing everything to destroy women.
    As conservatives, we celebrate life and faith. We value men and woman of all races and religions, they do not. If they had their way, women would not have normal relationships with members of the opposite sex and there would be no marriage and no children. They hate children why else are the pushing abortion (the murder of unborn children). I have listened to these feminists on the left spew their garbage for years. They burned bras, fought for equal rights and fair pay in the work place. The later was good, but they did it because they had no intention of ever leaving the work force to raise a loving family. They are kind of like Unicks (don’t know how to spell that word). They look like woman, kind of human like, but not really. And their time has come and gone. Let us ignore them and understand they are totally irrelevant.

    • NotSoBlueStater

      n/t

    • ciscoguy

      You’re a racist unless you’re a democrat. You’re not a feminist unless you’re a democrat. You’re a mindless fool unless you’re a democrat.

      When your ideology is predicated on divestiture of your Constitutional liberties and your property, you have to have some manner of sales pitch to bring people into the fold. Lies and deception are the tools of their trade.

      Notice the stupidity of these women being interviewed, particularly the second. She says it’s not all about “reproductive organs”…then goes right on talking about abortion again and the government intrusion into the home. I wonder where she stood on Obamacare. Do you think she opposed it for similar reasons? Do you think she objects to government home intrusion in cases of rape or battery? Since when do abortions take place in the home anyway? Do you think she can show me the text of the Constitution that addresses abortion?

  • From ME to You

    Contrary to TheOne™, a baby is not a burden!

  • fisk2521

    If conservative women cannot be ‘feminists’ then Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony would not qualify under Steinhem’s definition. NEITHER ever support the act of destroying a child in the womb, far from it. They abhored it…. and considered the ‘rights’ of the child to be relevant to what is moral int his world.

    I find it absolutely astounding to hear leftist libers like these two women, sound the alarm bell about conservatives coming into their home and telling women (or men for that matter) how they should live their lives.

    The past year and a half we have seen an extraordinary invasion of our privates lives and our Constitutional freedoms and supported by NOW and the self proclaimed feminists of the left. They aren’t even bothered by Sharia law and how the women of the Muslim world are treated – - even within our own Democratic country. We are now being told by the left what to eat, what healthcare we can buy or MUST buy, how much water and electricity to use and even what lightbulbs we can buy. We are threatened with taxes that will make it impossible to live as we have always lived. And we all know that taxes are a direct form of control, just like “Climate Change” or Global Warming” (whichever fits at the time). These women are all part of that take over of Democracy and freedom. Please don’t talk to me about ‘rights’.

    Katie and her friends are hypocrites. I was ‘there’ when Ms magazine was first launched, and Now told us all how miserable we really were and men were the oppressors. I read “The Feminist Mystique” by Friedan where she spoke of her misery as a poor young housewife and mother, being oppressed by a capitalist society and her husband….. Turns out she supported communism and Stalin’s march to socialims in the USSR as he murdered millions and she lived in a very loverly home with servants. and joined Now.

    I even remember when Gloria Steinhem pledged never to marry….who needed men, not her!!!!! Guess she changed her mind somewhere along the way.

    But one day I realized that the ‘feminists’ of the day were exclusionary….. women who were taking care of their families at home, or didn’t attend an academic institution but worked to support their family were mocked and dismissed as irrelevant. Only the intellectuals counted and they all burned their bras, marched in the streets and spent their time attending “consciousness raising groups’ that obsessively attacked men as the reason for all the world’s woes (still do). I had a wonderful husband (still do) and two beautiful sons and one night as I left my “conscious-raising group” to go home to my family wondered what in the hell I was doing.

    There are many feminists in this country that do not reflect these narcissistic women’s extremist views. They work hard for their husband, their children and don’t spend their time destroying….but building. they understand that children are a blessing not a curse and realize that our chldren ARE our future. .

    I don’t allow people like Gloria or Katie Couric to decide whether I’m a feminist …she doesn’t have the right.

    • eburke
    • trutexan

      and my mother, now in her 70′s, burned her bra in a demonstration in 1972. While some parts of the “feminist” movement had validity, (equal pay for equal work, getting rid of sexual discrimination, etc.) just as with any cause, you have the fringe that take it to the extreme and ruin it for everyone.

      This article is spot on. My mother can’t understand why I’m so girley. She didn’t come to my wedding because she didn’t understand me when I said, “Mom, I need a man in my life. What is so wrong with that?” The feeling is mutual in that I simply don’t understand her either.

      Oh, and she HATES Bush and the Bamster is her hero. Go figure.

  • kaonashi

    I would agree that it would be hard to be a feminist if you believe that a woman has no rights over a blastocyst growing inside her own body. I mean, being a feminist is essentially believing that a woman has the right to self-determination regardless of class or marital status. It’s not so much that motherhood is a punishment, but it is not always the right choice at a given time.

    • dwarfmama

      I don’t know what happened to your blastocysts, but mine turned into a couple of fine young adults. Motherhood is a great blessing, worth every bit of the effort I put into it.

    • eburke

      Don’t. Have. Sex.

      Blastocysts have been known to result if you do.

    • RedBeard

      It’s the only way you can justify the destruction of that inconvenient mass of cells. Don’t ever think of it as a human entity.

      Don’t you dare look at an ultrasound of the “parasitic clump of cells” in the womb. Pay no attention to that heartbeat. Irrelevant.

      Keep on chanting about a woman’s “right to choose” while categorically denying that same right to the unborn.

      As long as you define the new life as a thing, rather than human, you’ll be ok. No worries. No regrets. No haunting nightmares later in life.

      Party on.

    • 4life

      blastocyst, there would be no need for an abortion, would there?

      And in what kind of upsidedown world is destroying the rights of the body growing inside a woman merely a woman exercizing ‘her right to self-determination’. She is determining the end of something she ACTED to create. Once you have sex, you throw your ‘self determination’ out the window. There are actually three ‘selves’ involved, the baby, the mother, and the father. It is a matter of science (sex is how babies start), not choice.

    • conservativecrusade

      true feminism is being a powerful woman who stands for her rights while taking responsibility for her own actions. In this day and age, we all know the results of sex and how to prevent unwanted results from the sex. Your obnoxious picture of the precious life in the womb destroyed any argument you may have had and shows the lack of class on that side of the argument. Don’t want a baby right now, fine. But be a real woman or man and take the necessary precautions to ensure the baby is not conceived. Killing a baby does not make a woman a feminist, it makes them scumbags. When there are over 1.2 million murdered babies a year with over 66% of those abortions being at least the second for the woman, it shows it is not about a “mistake” being rectified, it is about sluts who want to lay down anytime they please using no caution or protection, then refusing to take responsibility by killing another life. The one thing we can be sure of is that in no way is abortion about being a feminist.

    • jdw4america

      If it does – and all but the politically motivated know that it does – tht renders this a human person distinct from herself. Since when do your rights give you the power of life and death over another human being?

      Our Constitution expressly forbids denying a person of life, liberty or property WITHOUT due process. The issue of the state of that person’s development is not mentioned.

      Since human women conceive only human babies, and since according to the science of biology, this is a human blastocyst or fetus, (depending on stae of development) and the science of physics tells us it is a unique being and not an object, you have neither a political nor a scientific leg to stand upon.

      And we all know you have no moral leg to stand on, either.

      The right to end another human life is not a right, it is a perversion.
      It is especially so, when the victim is a child. The location of that other life is irrelevant. Don’t want a baby? Don’t have sex.

  • lizabtha

    Why on earth would conservative women WANT to be known as ‘feminists’? Come on, that’s plain goofy. Leave the Left it’s terms. Everyone knows the definition of a feminist, by this point, and he/she AIN’T conservative.

  • KathW

    Do they think the “scourge” of pregnancy randomly happens to women? They talk about pregnancy like it’s cancer. Have they forgotten that pregnancy is the effect and sex is the cause? All the pregnant women (except the rape victims) had a choice in the sexual cause. Do they think we’re too weak or stupid to say no? The evil men who don’t pay us enough are also somehow able to impregnate us without any thought or discretion on our part? Sheesh. You want to empower a woman? Teach her to take responsibility for her actions.

    • kaonashi

      Well, yes it is eminently preferable to employ birth control when having sex, but not everyone is taught how to use it correctly or even taught about it at all. Also, sex is a natural part of life and I don’t think it’s out of line to wish to engage in sexual activity without wanting to be a parent.

      • JadedByPolitics

        BABY is a life? are you like Obama and would throw him/her away after birth? YOU are a LOSER so take your baby killing mantra to a lefty site because eventually you lefties will ABORT yourselves out of existence!

      • Uma Richie

        You seem to disbelieve that blastocyst is a stage of life that all of us have gone through. You seem to think that consequence-free sex is an achievable goal. You seem to think that teaching people how to use birth control will make them use it correctly. You seem to find the one to ten percent failure rates (under perfect circumstances) of the most popular birth control methods acceptable.

        This is the kind of biological ignorance that Planned Parenthood wants you to have so that they can make $400 on an abortion when your birth control method not-so-surprisingly fails.

        My biology primer for you is as follows:
        Women are naturally awesome and powerful.
        The parts that make one female are not a congenital disorder.
        Pregnancy is not a disease.
        Your risk for contracting actual deadly diseases increases with every sexual partner you have.

        Please stay tuned for Lori’s future posts and continue your feminist education.

      • Achance

        “Not taught to use it correctly?” I’d think any post-pubescent female could read a calendar, after all our illiterate ancestors could do so thousands of years ago. Interestingly, many of those cultures were matriarchal since they understood that you could never be sure who the father was but there was some certainty about who the mother was. And it isn’t like the little dears aren’t bombarded with comdom use instructions, not that it takes an IQ over room temperature to either insist on one or use one. We don’t have to worry about diaphrams and such because those really are for married or at least stable couples who are capable of thinking while preparing to have sex.

        It is most telling as to just how stupid you are that you talk of sex as a natural part of life, but you want to have sex without the risk of becoming a parent. Sorry, stupid woman, you can’t do that naturally. In order to have sex without the risk of becoming a parent, you, your, partner, or both must do something which isn’t a natural part of life.

        • 4life

          last paragraph. So true!

          The other myth that liberals like to propigate is that abstinence is impossible. People do it (or don’t do it, rather) all the time.

          Do you know what I have to fill out when I go for my yearly exam? How many sexual partners in the last year? 1
          How many lifetime sexual partners? 1

  • tonyevans

    I love how you’ve been showing how “choice” to a feminist is really not choice at all. You’ve exposed them over and over again and I hope that women around the nation are and will begin to see them for what they are.

    I’m baffled by the following statement from Simone de Beauvoir.

  • tngal

    You can be active in women’s affairs in numerous ways without being a feminist. And didn’t Steinem die in the 70′s anyway? Curic is better than I thought if she can raise the dead.

  • Scope

    I thought this old, I wish I was born a male, hack has had her voice brought back from the vocal dead pile. Is Helen Reddy, I am woman watch me roar, from the same lost era, going to come out with a new song also, if she is still alive. It would be entitled- My boobs have gone south, watch me roar.

  • 4life

    If you go on the Planned Parenthood website, you can see just what they tell young girls about post abortion syndrome. They actually claim, not citing any source of course, that regret following an abortion occurs at the same rate as regret after giving birth. Yes, they absolutely want to keep girls in the dark. I can’t believe our tax dollars fund this organization.

  • Achance

    Anyway, half these old hags are vagitarians, the other half are communists, and many are both. Since the earliest days of “feminism,” it has been about leftwing politics, not about women’s rights and their position in society. The pay equity issues are simply a lie these days if you factor in absence from work; women do take time off for babies and that costs them money. Single mothers, especially young mothers with young children, miss a lot of work and with most employers that costs them money as well. It also costs them a lot of opportunity because reliability counts more than most things in promotion potential.

    In my working life, I went from the days when the only women in the workforce were some store clerks and a few secretaries to relatively equal numbers of men and women to many job classes being so dominated by women that the affirmative action goals were to find men to fill the jobs. I’ve worked with, for, and had work for me a lot of very capable, compentent, and pleasant women, and I’ve worked with my fair share of vile creatures with a chip on their shoulder and the disposition of a stepped on cat. I’ve also worked with a fair share of women who wouldn’t miss the opportunity to make the winning horizontal career move. Fortunately, I got the experience of sleeping with a woman who worked for me when I was young and dumb and before it was a crime. I paid the price and never did it again, but it sure wasn’t for lack of opportunity, and that dynamic is, unfortunately, the most lasting legacy of the Steinam iteration of feminism. They invented the female sexual predator; the woman who was just as inclined towards chasing sex as was the worst behaved man.

    I knew those bra-burners of the ’60s and Susie Creamcheese the hippy chick gave “stop, drop, and roll” all new meaning. I was making money and living fashionably in the ’70s and early ’80s back before sport screwing became a blood sport and the bars were full of adventuresome women hustleing up the career ladder but with the time to go home, squeeze into that lycra, do a line of cocaine, and fix that big hair before going on the prowl; the Cougar isn’t new, she’s just older and has a name now.

    AIDS kinda changed it all for awhile. But while AIDS and age trimmed the sails for us older people, the young people didn’t get the memo. Those femminists of the ’60s and ’70s were sending their little girls to school dressed like hookers, and at least some of those moms should have figured out that if you let them go out looking like hookers, a goodly number of them are going to act like hookers too. I watched that go from bad with my oldest daughter and her peers to simply awful with my step-daughter and her peers between the late ’80s and the late-’90s. I’ve been out a few times with my boys when they’ve come home. If you have a twenty-something daughter who goes out to the bars, it might behoove you to be curious about what she’s doing; think “Girls Gone Wild.”

    I know that back in my second single days in the late-’80s I thought more than once that the first more or less single woman I met that wasn’t either a slut or a nut, I was just going to marry and be done with it. You learn very quickly as a middle-aged divorced man that the good ones are all taken and there is a good reason most of the single ones are still single! I got lucky and met a good woman who had made a bad choice and was finally sticking up for herself and getting away from him, but there sure aren’t many of them by the time you’re in your late ’30s, early ’40s.

    The Gloria Steinam genre of feminism wrecked a lot of people’s lives. It turned a lot of women into nasty, bitter hags and it compromised marriage for each succeeding generation. We who were the contemporaries of Steinham et al. often saw our parents’ marriages come apart under the pressure of women deciding that they needed “more space” and men deciding they needed the freedom of seeking body parts yet unknown. Then we did it ourselves; I hardly know anyone my age who is still with Spouse 1.0 and I know a lot that are on Spouse v. 3.0 or even 4.0. There’s a fine line between promiscuity and serial monogamy.

    The Pill and women in the workforce brought a fundamental transformation to our society, then abortion and feminism made it a toxic mixture in which nobody had any firm idea of what appropriate gender roles were. The religious have some pretty firm ideas about it, but don’t seem much more able to put those ideas faithfully into practice than we pagans. I don’t care how “pro-life” you are, you’re going to have some powerful doubts when your 15 year old daughter tells you she’s late. Likewise, I don’t care how strongly you believe in the sanctity of marriage, if you’re alone in a hotel far from home and some really attractive person starts flirting with you, you’re going to, to use Jimmy Carter’s words, commit adultery in your heart at minimum. So, Steinem and her ilk have a proud legacy of pretty much destroying the American family; she should be applauded for that by the Left. That destruction has given the Left a very fertile field and Comrade Obama is the crop that has sprung from it.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      springs from much of what you have written. Women have been liberated in societies all over the globe. In most cases, it didn’t turn out as badly as it seemed to in the US of A.

    • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

      Much is this is the byproduct of prosperity, and when the curtain comes down on the American era (if Obama has his way) or at least major economic pain, people will rediscover the virtues of traditional family structures and the benefits of children.

      And traditional values (whatever that means – like pornography, you know it when you see it) will find more advocates, at least in theory, even if the practice falls short, as it has through the eons.

      And yes, I still cring at the use of “gender” instead of “sex” that has swept over out language. As an observer has quipped:

      “Words have gender, people have sex”

      …which can be taken several ways of course.

  • Adjoran

    . . . an empty sarcophagus is missing Steinem . . .

    • cactusjack

      on RS recently and came to the conclusion, after doing what they choose to do for a lifetime, people often get the face they deserve.

      • Adjoran

        Going by that theory, Raquel Welch at 70 must have lived very well!

      • eburke
  • Patricia_C

    You know the old saying, “Misery loves company”… Well, I don’t believe Gloria’s “fight” for the liberation of women had anything to do with other women at all. I think it had more to do with a desperate need to gain attention for herself in some child-like effort to lift her low self esteem.

    I mean, for the most part (as misty touches on above), “feminists” seem to be against anything feminine or girly. Hard core feminists even seem to groom themselves (err… maybe that should be REFUSE to groom themselves) to appear as androgynous or as masculine as possible… which is rather sad when you think about it… believing the only way you can be equal to a man is to look like one and to deny yourself the one miracle that no man can perform…To give birth to a new human being. It’s like they are ashamed of being female… Sad… really, really sad.

    In 2007 (while attending a Progressive Forum event at Wortham Theater Center in Houston (where fans reminisced about old times and the glor(ia) days of first National Women’s Conference, which took place over 30 years ago), Steinem was interviewed by the Houston Chronicle’s Claudia Feldman:

    Feldman: “Were the goals set at that historic conference actually met?”

    Steinem: “It was a great success in that the women’s movement was transformed from the minds of a few to the hearts of many. But no, not all the goals were met. For example, we’re still fighting for reproductive freedom, which is a basic human right and affects every woman’s life.”

    “… reproductive freedom”?….. “rePRODUCTIVE freedom?”
    Did she just define abortion, the intentional intervention of a live birth (killing a baby before it is born) as a “basic human right” and a “reproductive freedom”? Why is it that people like Gloria have to come up with opposite terminology for things they are really fighting for? Why call it “pro-choice” when it’s really “pro-abortion”? I mean, “choice” implies there are other options to abortion but you never hear them supporting women who opt for the “choice” to HAVE the baby.

    But, as most activists who insist they hold firm to their causes, Gloria frequently contradicts herself in both words and actions. She use to rail against women for having plastic surgery at fashion magazines who geared marketing campaigns toward their, “need to make women insecure about our looks, to feel that if we just looked right, everything would be OK.”

    Oh yeah…? So if she isn’t insecure about how she looks and not buying into some conspiracy to MAKE her feel insecure… why the plastic surgery and why are most of the photos she uses on her own books and posters for her gatherings highly air-brushed or from 30 years ago?

    In a 2006 New York Times interview, Steinem admitted that (20 years ago) she “had some fat taken out” from around her “eye area” but swore she would never have another procedure… Yeah… and Michael Jackson only had a nose job… Come on… look at the clip above… look at those hands compared to her face. Either she has had more work done on her face than she is willing to admit or her entire head stopped aging 20 years ago!

    In another interview Gloria (accidentally) revealed how she really felt about a “woman’s place” in the world… particularly women who dare to be successful:

    Q: “Do you see the world through the prism of gender?”

    A: “No, the world looks at me through the prism of gender.”

    Yet when asked in the NYT interview whether or not she felt Condoleeza Rice was an “ally of women”, Steinem said:

    “I wish someone would write an article called

    • Achance

      in the mid-’60s when she would have been about 30. That’s no small achievement considering the competition for Bunny jobs in those days. If you read her family history you get a strong sense of why she has the views she does and just how twisted those views are.

    • fisk2521

      The choice of words by Steinhem was not an accident “Reproductive Freedom” allows them to include it into healthcare legislation and fool the American Public into believing it really is about healthcare. I’ve heard Hillary use the term when she spoke about women and healthcare. “Reproductive Freedom”???? She means abortion.

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    You’ve outdone yourself on this one. Can’t recommend this officially since it’s already on the front page, so you’ll have to be content with a virtual recommended,

  • JustLeaveMeAlone

    from an unrepentant pro-life conservative woman. There are obviously a whole lot more of us that Ms Steinem suspects.

    I’m old enough to have been the token woman more than once in my life, and I’ll put my “pioneer” career record up against anyone’s. These so-called feminists like Gloria are stuck in 1968, along with the other libs who are apparently attempting to relive the glory days of both civil rights and anti-Viet Nam war with their insistence on stereotyping the right as war-mongering, racist, misogynistic bitter clingers.

    I guess no one told ‘em Woodstock is over, the farmer’s field was cleaned up, and over 40 years have come and gone. (I’ll bet even Gloria is wearing a bra these days!)

  • http://www.thussaithme.blogspot.com ptvoice

    Thank you Lori Z for a logical and coherent critic of the absurd and illogical propaganda from a leftist nut.

    1 in 3 women NEED an abortion? I think ms. Stieinem needs to check her facts. How does she “know” that? That means of the 30 + women I work with 10+ need to have abortions (during some time in their lives?).

    Thanks mom for not being a self-centered, self-serving self-absorbed loon. Thanks to teaching me to not be one either, to respect, love,and cherish my wife.

    thussaithme.blogspot.com

  • maddog

    Notice how the other woman scornfully dismisses the pro-life position as allowing the government to go in to homes and make medical decisions.

    You mean like Obamacare?

    I bet she was a big fan of The O care and made no mention about the government making medical decsions in that monstrosity of a bill. The left are always so inconsistent.

  • conservativecrusade

    feminism started out with great intentions but was hijacked many years ago. Somewhere along the way it became about being as nasty as possible, hateful towards men, hateful to opposing ideas. The unshaven women took over the club, threw out the razors, bras, and deodorant and banished real women from their ranks. They are an immoral nasty bunch of witches who would not know real feminism if it hit them square between the eyes.

    The real feminist in the conservative ranks should shed the label and start calling themselves Ladies.The word Ladies has such a strong ring to it and will allow the conservative women to show their strength, value, and solidarity without being dragged into the filth by association or label. Let the “feminist” keep their own club and let them continue to be despised by most normal people, let us have our Ladies and we can be proud to have them!

  • cactusjack

    signature line. This one left me (a guy) kind of misty eyed though I will admit to no more. As Paul in the NT wrote, the man is not without the woman nor vice versa. It is a divine plan. As a man I know I need(ed) my (now passed-on) mother, & now my wife, & wonderful daughters, and could not be whole without them. As the psychologists say, a young man takes a “cue” from his mother that he can get no where else as he grows up, that will determine in many ways the man he will be and how he will act in society. I live in what many consider to be a patriotic state; it is; but only figured out after a while that the sense of patriotism is instilled by the women, the mothers, in their chidren – that’s where it comes from. What on earth could make any woman think being giver of life, creator of family and shaper of boys to men is unimportant or some kind of enforced servitude? The corrupt influence of the misguided that taught young women to adopt automatic hostility towards all men. For those ensnared, it has messed up our country now but good, for a couple of generations. But read Lori and we may start recovering,

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

      Well said, sir.

      And thank you. I appreciate your kind words ever so much.

    • JadedByPolitics

      …….

    • eburke

      express my total assent to these words:

      “What on earth could make any woman think being giver of life, creator of family and shaper of boys to men is unimportant or some kind of enforced servitude? ”

      Game. Set. Match.

  • mypresident

    Conservative women, truly conservative American women would never call themselves feminists unless there was some advantage. Don’t you all just run straight into the arms of the first man who looks at you? Why would a woman who wants to emulate her grandmother and great grandmother ever think about politics or blogs or vagina monologues? Sara Barracuda “says” she is a “feminist” because doing so was politically expedient. I am honestly sorry that rants and railing on websites about strangers religious beliefs and bodily functions has not made us all better people that you would approve of but it seems like conservative woman want their cake and they want to eat it too.

    • gekster
      • gekster

        They call themselves American.
        At least the ones I know.

    • OccamsRazor

      They’re coming.

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      One who can read conservative women’s minds and know – and tell us – what they really think! Tell ya what, Sparky: you can get your comment privileges back when you email the site to tell us what number I’m thinking right now.

      Or do your hyper-mind powers only work on people with no Y chromosomes? – I’m betting that your hyper-mind powers only work on people with no Y chromosomes. You seem the type.

  • sassie lassie

    I really would like to know when and where Sarah Palin said that she was for the government to come into all of our homes?

    Again from the left, if you say it enough times, it becomes the truth. Huh!

    Feminists have always been concerned with the conservative woman; always ridiculing and trying to change us. Conservative women are intelligent, independent and more that comfortable with who we are – as women! Oh! There I said it! We are women! We don’t mind being women!

    We are blessed! We love our children to hug us at the end of the day, even with ice cream or chocolate on their faces. We love to call our parents at the end of the day, to be sure they are ok. We don’t mind nurturing and providing solid loving care to our family. We don’t mind when our man offers a hand or an open door. And we are tough. We can run a business or a bobcat.

    But really …When did it become ok to kill a baby? I don’t mean when as in what year? I mean spiritually? How did it become socially acceptable? Why do we have to not be pro-life in order to call ourselves strong. Why are we not responsible for our own acts? Why the need to end something, whether it be a life or a way of life, just to say you’re a feminist?

    It’s more difficult, but more noble to call yourself a mom, wife, daughter, grandmother – a woman – not a feminist.

    • gekster

      Aptly stated.
      And thanks.

  • jackhammer

    1 in 3 women in America NEEDS an abortion at some time…..like it is a necessary medical procedure, like an organ transplant…..

    I wonder what the son or daughter she aborted in London would have turned out to become….definitely someone better and more useful than her.

  • eburke

    eburke’s axiom that Conservative women are hot and intelligent and liberal women are ugly and stupid.