« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

SC’s Governor and VA’s Attorney General: For The Children

This past week, Republican South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford and Republican Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli displayed how the GOP is the party who is actually For The Children, and not just in the talking points way. First up was Governor Mark Sanford, who signed bill H 3245 into law. The law now requires that women have a 24 hour waiting period before obtaining an abortion. Prior to this law, there was only a one hour waiting period. It also requires that abortionists offer women the ability to see their unborn child on an ultrasound before aborting the baby, but does not require that they view the ultrasound. They must merely be given the choice. Choice is important, right? Next, came Virginia Attorney General, Ken Cuccinelli, who concluded last week that state agencies in Virginia can legally regulate abortion clinics as medical establishments.

This should just be common sense and shouldn’t raise the ire of even the most vociferously pro-abortion, right? I mean, it does not make abortion illegal, but it does make it safer – and hopefully rarer. Safe, legal and rare is the mantra, no? Apparently, by safe, legal and rare, pro-abortionists really only mean one out of the three. They actually want it to be unsafe, legal, and not rare at all. As is indicated by their fierce opposition to such simple, decent and potentially life-saving measures.

Governor Sanford had this to say when he signed the new South Carolina law:

“I believe life is sacred, and in the debate over when life begins, I think we as a society should always err on the side of life,” Gov. Sanford said. “Given current federal law, I think it’s imperative that a decision of this magnitude only be made with the fullest and most accurate knowledge available. It’s our hope and expectation that this new law results in a substantial decrease in the number of abortions carried out in South Carolina.

How draconian, huh? I thought knowledge was power? Not so for pro-abortionists. They are infuriated over a mere 24 hour waiting period. In most states, the waiting period to simply obtain a marriage license is longer than that. Ideally, a marriage lasts a lifetime, but an abortion always does – there is no going back. Once a life is taken, it is gone. Forever. Is it too much to ensure that a woman take ONE DAY to contemplate it? A woman who may be scared and make a rash decision due to said fear – a decision that not only takes a life, but will haunt her for the rest of hers. Taking just those 24 hours of contemplation may save both those lives.

In Virginia’s case, it is clearly a measure of safety. Abortion clinics, often functioning as mills, are not regulated in Virginia as medical establishments. As such, they have no standards of safety to meet.  Says a spokesman for AG Cuccinelli:

“The state has long regulated outpatient surgical facilities and personnel to ensure a certain level of protection for patients. There is no reason to hold facilities providing abortion services to any lesser standard for their patients,” said Brian J. Gottstein, a spokesman for Mr. Cuccinelli.

“Even pharmacies, funeral homes and veterinary clinics are regulated by the state,” he said.

Right. How is it safe – at all – to have no standards for abortion clinics? According to NARAL, safety is no big whoop. What concerns them is that some clinics may not meet those standards and will have to close.

Abortion-rights advocates said they are not surprised by Cuccinelli’s decision and predicted that if the Board of Health acts on his opinion, the regulations could prompt the shutdown of 17 of the state’s 21 clinics performing abortions.

“We’ve been waiting for the attorney general to take on abortion providers, and it looks like this is his first pitch,” said Tarina Keene, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia. “These so-called regulations are only an attempt to shut down abortion clinics in the Commonwealth of Virginia.”

Good. That should help with both the whole safe and rare idea. Plus, maybe it’s just me, but even if you are pro-abortion wouldn’t you think that if a facility can’t meet minimal safety standards, then they should be forced to close? Excuse me, what am I thinking. That requires common sense, decency and actual concern for women, which is utterly lacking in the pro-abortion agenda. Susan B. Anthony List’s President Marjorie Dannenfelser’s debate with NARAL’s Tarina Keene about AG Cuccinelli’s decision proves it:

By the way, the Democrat nominee for Governor in South Carolina, Sheheen, declined to answer any questions about South Carolina’s new law. Again – there is no such thing as a pro-life Democrat.

Polling indicates that more and more Americans are identifying as Pro-Life and that changing hearts and minds is working. Now, so is changing laws.

May it continue.

For the children.

COMMENTS

  • http://wadingacross.wordpress.com logus

    Good to hear! Small steps.

  • itrytobenice

    Vet clinics have more safety standards than abortion mills? WTH?

    Like you say, it sounds like for the pro-aborts, safe, legal and rare is good enough if you get one out of three. And the one they want does nothing to protect women.

    How can they consider themselves the party of women and treat us as less valuable than a dog?

    • Menlo

      In Arizona, they just managed to get a judge to strike down a statute that would have limited the practice of abortion only to licensed doctors.

      In Iowa, “doctors” only “see” patients through a video conference and dispense abortion pills by remotely opening a locked drawer.

      Washington state’s medical board just issued regulations that now require regular state certification of all medical facilities and doctor’s offices. It provides one exception that abortionists can get certified by Planned Parenthood or the National Abortion Federation.

      And those are only a few examples.

      They can take the abortion out of the back alley, but they can’t take the back alley out of the abortion.

  • http://www.OverbrookResearch.com TheYeomanFarmer

    I thought liberals loved “cooling off periods.”

    I remember waiting ten days in California before I could pick up the shotgun I’d bought, paid for, and passed the background check for. I had to wait two or three days, and drive a long way back to the gun shop, to pick up a handgun I bought when living in Illinois.

    If it’s such a good idea to make law-abiding citizens “cool off” before exercising their Second Amendment rights (and I’m not saying it is), why is it suddenly such a burden to make someone “cool off” before making a much more momentous decision about life and death?

  • cactusjack

    procedure that is surgically invasive, carries a risk of sepsis and a risk of hemorrhaging, be as easy for a 15 year old in some states as buying a 75 cent Snickers bar in a 7-11? You can’t get a wart removed that easy if you’re an adult. Brainwashed madness. Or as Rush says follow the money, someone (NARAL, the doctors who perform this, etc. )is making a lot of money and hiding behind “rights”,

  • stephaniet

    I know Virginia has a license plate reading “Kids first.” It would seem that when it comes to good, decent, SANE people and not the pro-abortion, anti-woman idiots with the blood of innocents on their hands, that license plate is pretty accurate. Where on earth do libtards get the idea that an invasive, traumatic procedure like that actually *helps* anybody? After all, if it’s the type of abortion where the baby isn’t removed from the womb, it will have to come out of there anyway–usually at the mother’s home. And all the testimonies I’ve read have involved that moment, that gruesome passing of the destroyed little child, as being an “Oh my God, what have I done?” moment.

    Hey, if somebody doesn’t want her baby, no need to kill it; I’ll adopt it! My maternal side shrieks in protest every time somebody declares abortion to be a good thing…

    • MF

      Hey, if somebody doesn

    • dambama

      They mean which course.

  • The_Gadfly

    I’ve long thought the medical regulation angle was the weakest point of the abortion industry. If it’s about “health” it’s about a doctor and a business. If it’s about a doctor and a business both ought to be subject to the same regulations as an outpatient facility or a dentists office, if not an actual hospital. And they should therefore also be required to report on ‘adverse reactions’ and ‘complications’ related to or arising from their ‘medical practices.’ Any outfit reporting fewer adverse reactions and complications than you get from a placebo test should immediately have its licensing revoked for falsifying records required by the state.

    This is the line of reasoning Cuccinelli is following and having met him at the first Red State gathering, he’s the perfect man for the job: Unflappable, determined, and unfailingly logical.

    *STNG reference, Data to Dr. Beverly after playing some sort of futuristic game against a Galaxy champion.

    • Scope

      are currently regulated the same as dental surgery offices, and plastic surgery offices. Cuccinelli has opined that they need to be regulated the same as hospitals. The increased costs and paperwork for those new regulations will put most out of business, or drive up the cost of abortions. Many of those clinics here offer “free” abortions. Many of them are Planned Parenthood facilities.

  • http://www.rightproadvisors.com erinmist

    Even if you take everything the woman from NARAL says as fact (which even the most Kool-Aid addicted “prog-lodyte” wouldn’t do), the crux of her argument is that it’s wrong for an executive to issue an order that undermines the will of the legislature (or in this case, the more difficult to define “lack” of will). Ok, fair enough.

    Now let’s see…

    Golly…what Chief Executive recently signed an executive order that explicitly undermines the clear intent of Congress, under the Hyde Amendment, to fund abortions using federal funds, all under the pretense of health insurance “reform”? Wait…lemme think…I know his name will come to me soon….I think it starts with “O” and ends in “messiah” or something.

    The hypocrisy is simply breathtaking. I’m pretty sure the women at NARAL were getting all “tingly” with righteous indignation over THAT executive over-reach, right?

    Karma sucks, doesn’t it lady? Oh yeah, elections have consequences. The Left has schooled us well, and now it’s all blowing up in your face. Schools in session again first Tuesday in November. Looking forward to seeing you there!!!

  • Martin Knight

    The problem is that the average elected Republican seems congenitally incapable of finding the right framing, even if it’s staring him/her right in the face.

    Worse is that when they do find the right framing, the Left’s media auxillaries label the position “controversial” and proceed to write innuendo filled articles questioning their motives (what else is new?). At which point, the Republican usually adopts the fetal position and hopes it all goes away.

    I seriously do not see how parental notification initiatives or legislation can fail if framed properly and aggressively defended when Democrats act wounded and shriek at you to quit.

    School choice? Sweden (where is the Left’s admiration for Europe?) is doing it and their students are learning better and more than American kids. And if there is a need for a short slogan, what about “The money should follow the child, not the bureaucracy and not the other way around.”

    And in this case, is abortion not an invasive medical procedure? So what exactly is the argument to relieve abortion clinics from the same health and safety standards that apply to any other outpatient procedure? No liberal screaming in the comments against the Cucinelli’s determination so far at the WaPo link can defend their position – they’re just hurling invectives and accusing Cucinelli of theocracy, racism, sexism, and homophobia (again, what else is new?)

    Properly framing the issue and sticking to it forces them to fight on your terms. There simply is no way that even “moderates” can be convinced that it is “extreme” to subject abortion clinics to the same sanitary standards as an orthodontists’ practice.

    Kudos to Ken Cucinelli for his courage – I just hope he would follow through.