« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Government At Work: Groping Children Is Preferable to Perceived Profiling

political-correctness

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) recently implemented new supposed security measures, which include a mandated trip through a full body scanner that shows you in all your naked glory, or lack thereof. It’s all cool, though, because if you don’t wish to have your naked body ogled, you can always get felt up instead via the new “enhanced pat-down” option. It’s all about choice, baby! Whichever you prefer: leering or groping.

Surely, you’d think, this wouldn’t be done randomly, but would rather be a targeted measure. And, you’d also think, certainly the absolutely random subjection of children to such “pat-downs” wouldn’t occur. Well, you’d be wrong on both counts. Of course this isn’t targeted – that would be too profile-y and stuff! Because, tolerance. Or something. You see, because we must tolerate those who wish to kill us, we cannot offend them. We cannot be perceived to be singling out a certain group. We must, therefore, waste time and resources using terrorism countermeasures against, you know, NON-terrorists. And we are to pretend that 90-year-old grandmas from Nebraska flew planes into buildings on September 11th. Or that three-year-old girls strapped bombs to their shoes or in their underwear.

The TSA should change its name to Totalitarian Sexual Abuse. This child was terrified, tormented and assaulted. And we are supposed to find this acceptable, because it is allegedly For Our Own Good ™?  “Kids, do not ever let a stranger touch you. If they try,  scream, run away and tell someone immediately. Wait, whoops! Unless it’s government molestation. Then, shaddup.”

Hey, you know what would actually be for our own good? I’m no Janet Napolitano (thank goodness), but it seems to me that we should try out that whole using targeted security measures, based on actual suspicion and clues, like they do in Israel. Oh, silly me. That would mean acknowledging that it is a specific radicalized group of people who wants to kill us and not tea partiers. And it might even entail mentioning the word Islam. Oh, the horror.

As it stands now, we do nearly the opposite. We go out of our way to ass kissily show that we are not “profiling.” Which is why I now think that I’m giong to have to start putting my 7-year-old daughter in a burqa when flying.  It is clearly the only way that I can ensure that she won’t be groped by TSA.

The above video shows something else highly disturbing. Is the public so cowed by “government knows best” strong arm tactics that they are now willing to let some low-level,  government-employed flunky assault their children, as they merely stand by and film it? People say that you can’t know how you’d react until you are in a similar situation. That is often true. But it is not true when it comes to protecting one’s children. No threat to me, especially a stupid monetary threat of a fine, outweighs protecting my child from harm. I would not have allowed that to happen and I certainly would not have stood by passively and filmed my terrified child with my little cell phone.  The only way I’d have used a camera, were that my child, would have been to teach the TSA employee a little something about what happens when a camera goes where the sun don’t shine. I’m small, but I’m scrappy.

Where the sun don’t shine, by the way, is where any terrorists would attempt to smuggle stuff. So, these pat-downs aren’t just egregious, they are worthless. They want to kill us, stupid. Assaulting our personal liberty and taking naked scan pictures of moms from South Carolina or feeling up some dude from Tennessee’s junk won’t stop that. Nor will tormenting our own children. Political correctness moved from annoying to potentially deadly. It is now also abusive.

It’s bad enough the Government constantly condescends to the American public and treats us all like half-witted children. I think the past election showed them that we will no longer stand for that. Let this be another Teachable Moment for them: do not dare try to use – and worse, harm - our children to perpetuate your own demented quests for absolute power and pathetic “multiculturalism,” politically correct acceptance.

———

cross-posted from NewsReal

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    The Government of the United States reacted to the first attack on American soil since 1812 by…

    …going trillions of dollars into further debt, ballooning the size of the federal bureaucracy, and stripping average Americans of their dignity and freedom. It’s the only by-rote response our Government has anymore to ANY problem.

    The fact that our security apparatus, which is only a reflection of our elected leaders, steadfastly refuses to pull young Middle-eastern men between the ages of 18 and 40 of Arab or African Muslim lineage, out of line for intense scrutiny shows the depths to which our cultural confidence has eroded.

    You’ve put it most succinctly (and brilliantly): As with most things in our nation, yes, we’d rather abuse and torment innocent children than climb down off our pedestal of Enlightened, Tolerant Self-Congratulations.

    • http://www.voteforteri2010.com teridavisnewman

      We have political correctness to thank for this bullchit. God forbid we should profile using information that Americans have died to obtain–that being that attacks on America and Americans are carried out by 17-50 year old Arabic/Muslim males and some females. To search 9-year old American children and 80-something Midwestern grandmothers in the name of diversity and political correctness is not only asinine, it’s making us the laughingstock of the very people who want to kill us. It’s ridiculous, it’s illogical and worst of all, IT IS INEFFECTIVE. I am fricking tired of being a blonde-n-blue All-American gal who is consistently strip searched in the name of political correctness while Muslim women in burquas with dynamite hanging out of their carry-ons are waved through. It’s enough to make a statue scream!

      • SoFiMil

        Stop being a rider who seeks attention. And if you must post, stop trying to cut ahead in line. Besides, your comments are far from mesmerizing or profound. No wonder you got stomped in the election. Further, your comments are not helping the difficult problem of determining who to search and why.

  • edintexas

    I decided to eliminate flying previously. The new “security” procedures simply add to the decision to not subject myself to the indignities the government heaps on people who must fly.

    • soljerblue

      My Navy time was all about flying. I have several thousand hours as air crew, and — except for the occasional white-knuckle moments — enjoyed it all. But — I have not flown commercial since 9-11, and will not do so again. The incompetent, ignorant, ham-fisted, arrogant, self-important TSA, from the top down, and the incompetent airline management who sit still for their shenanigans, have made it an exercise in futility. If you want an object lesson in how our ever-expanding government views its citizens as subjects, just head for the nearest airport.

      If I cannot drive, I won’t go.

  • NeoKong

    And we are to pretend that 90-year-old grandmas from Nebraska flew planes into buildings on September 11th.

    No more searching elderly people.

    • chipbennett

      If our oh-so-useful TSA agent had merely noticed that an apparently 90-year-old caucasian man had the hands of a 20-year-old Asian kid, he never would have gotten on the flight.

      No junk-groping or naked-body-imaging required.

      • christinakfjeffrey

        Oh yes, and allowing babies to die of AIDS is preferable to testing for AIDS in hospitals! I teach drownproofing and a lib once told me that I should not tell my students that white people float more easily than blacks because that is racism – never mind it helps my black learners understand why learning to swim is harder for them. Political correctness is evil and it kills people. But hey, there are those who are ok with that.

        • SoFiMil

          .

  • johnt

    Of course it’s nuts but what do you expect? To search according to a profile is to them prejudice. So grandmothers and small children must be grouped. It serves no purpose whatsoever but it’s the product of minds driven by self deceit and hate of Normal people, the fixation on being different & superior.

  • major_sensible

    As the holiday travel season looms, there will no doubt be many more horror stories.

    I am planning on having my cell phone video camera ready when I go through security. But who, besides my own Congressman, can I send the complaint and video to? Which congressional committee has oversight of the TSA and can put a stop to this insanity?

  • 4life

    I wrote about this earlier after a trip with my daughter. She was pulled out and bodyscanned before I even knew what was happening. I was appalled.

    However, we had another trip to Amsterdam recently, and everyone was bodyscanned at the gate. I had a completely different feeling about it then, especially looking around and seeing who else was boarding our plane. I don’t know what the answer is. It is creepy, but if it deters or catches those bent on evil, then maybe it is the price we have to pay for safety.

    • major_sensible

      …about the deterrent effect when the increased security measures were originally implemented.

      Then the measures became progressively crazier. Remove overgarments, Remove shoes. Children and the elderly being subjected to random security inspections.

      Meanwhile, bombs and weapons continue to slip past security and onto airplanes.

      It’s to the point where we need to stop looking for weapons and start looking for terrorists. Will it take another terrorist attack in US airspace for Napolitano to realize her “too little, too late” measures aren’t effective?

      • davesinsanantonio

        is a Leftist. And, everyone knows that they are so much smarter than the rest of us. If another terrorist does blow up another airplane, or fly one into some building, Napolitano will say, “the system worked”, or some such trite nonsense.
        She is just as arrogant as the rest of the far left. And, they don’t really care about what they say, because the just know that we are too stupid to see their contradictions or hypocrisy. Just as we are too stupid to realize that scanning children or grannys is for our own good. As is ignoring the radical Islamist that are at the root of the problem. To the Left any show of sense is wrong. One must be politically correct at all times. As Rush said, “the truth is not politically correct”. That is why they reject the truth about who the terrorists are, and who they are not.
        The Left would rather lose another airplane full of passengers than to “profile”. That is why the terrorists, incompetent as they have been, can still get bombs on airplanes. They are willing to change their tactics. If we inspect parcels they put the bombs in shoes. If we inspect shoes, they put them in their underwear. We inspect underwear, they will start wearing wigs. They are willing to do anything to blow us up. The Left is not willing to change. They are more willing to let the terrorists succeed than to pull them out of line for a real inspection. Political correctness will end up killing some of us.

    • major_sensible

      …about the deterrent effect when the increased security measures were originally implemented.

      Then the measures became progressively crazier. Remove overgarments, Remove shoes. Children and the elderly being subjected to random security inspections.

      Meanwhile, bombs and weapons continue to slip past security and onto airplanes.

      It’s to the point where we need to stop looking for weapons and start looking for terrorists. Will it take another terrorist attack in US airspace for Napolitano to realize her “too little, too late” measures aren’t effective?

    • aesthete

      and it is under a much more present threat of terrorist attacks than we are in the US. If we’re truly interested in the take of professionals, isn’t it wiser to ask for tips from a system which works, rather than one that hasn’t prevented a single terrorist attack (TSA)?

      • 4life

        If there is a better, less invasive way to keep us safe, we should certainly do it. I actually liked the fact that in Amsterdam everyone was treated the same. We were all body scanned, not just a random sampling. The random scan/search is ridiculous, especially when a child is selected. But the Israeli way sounds even better.

    • ihateliberals

      “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

      The TSA and the Federal Government are violating our fourth amendment Rights through the use of FEAR. Once Pandora was out of the box it became a money issue. Not that it cost us but that a government agency had been created and it gets a budget. Then they hve to continuously justify their existence. In reality world if someone wants to Hijack a Plane, bus, train etc. TSA can no more stop it from happening than I can fly like superman and see through walls with my X-ray vision. TSA is a liberal attempt at looking like they are doing something. We seem to be so afraid that we allow TSA to grope us at Air Ports yet wil allow anyone that wants to to cross the Mexican boarder without question. How stupid are we? We have to fight any attempt of loosing our freedoms. The way I see it every time a passenger has to go through a scan or be patted down the Terrorist have won. This is what terrorism is about FEAR! It is time we get over the fear and start using some common sense.

  • major_sensible

    …is the TSA regional administrator trying to explain how to make searching kids “more like a game”. I shudder at the parallels with sexual predators and their child victims.

    These guys are absolutely clueless. They are so certain that they are doing “the right thing”, searching kids, just that they need to do it with more “sensitivity”. Janet Napolitano writes an op-ed piece in USA Today that boils down to “The system is working! REMAIN CALM! ALL IS WELL!” (http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-11-15-column15_ST1_N.htm)

    Meanwhile the usual suspects bring bombs and weapons onto planes, knowing that the random search is rigged to reduce the possibility of them being searched to prevent “profiling”, or if they do get selected, to make a scene about how they are being treated unfairly by “racists”.

    This is what we get for putting Liberals in charge of national security.

    • checkinout6000

      The system is working, it just takes a lot of time to get all those pesky founding documents through such a cheap sold out shredder like the current administration. Please remain in your seats with your seatbelts fastened as we exit the plane.

      How’s that for an analogy?

  • Brian Hibbert

    He’s currently talking about the TSA searching kids.

  • creditman

    This new line of inspection is begging for a “sexual misconduct” complaint. It won’t be very long in coming.

    • izoneguy

      n/t

  • edintexas

    I thought sure, when I posted my response earlier, that someone would point this out. So now I will.

    The Father/Reporter started his piece apparently feeling obliged to make clear that there “…has to be some sacrifice…”. apparently the man has never heard of Ben Franklin’s famous statement.

    “They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

    Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

  • edintexas

    I thought sure, when I posted my response earlier, that someone would point this out. So now I will.

    The Father/Reporter started his piece apparently feeling obliged to make clear that there “…has to be some sacrifice…”. apparently the man has never heard of Ben Franklin’s famous statement.

    “They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

    Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

  • earlgrey

    there are some women (and some men) that wear hygiene or incontinent products. Some of these people may also have artificial joints which will set off metal detectors. How does TSA handle these people or are the pat downs not that invasive?

    • acat

      Look, the TSA front line blueshirts are not exactly the best and brightest. And I mean that accurately, not harshly – they’re people who are trying to make ends meet, but they’re mostly younger or otherwise career-challenged…

      They are, in other words, the older brothers and sisters of the fast food clerks who engage in kitchen experimentation….

      And as for pat-downs for the disabled, I have a friend with enough metal in her spine to set off school metal detectors… she can’t stand for very long, and can’t fly without a doctors’ release. She has to really want to go somewhere to get through the PITA of O’Hare.

      Mew

      • cam1

        You hit the nail on the head. The TSA is a jobs program for the marginally employable. Their supervisors are lucky if they show up for work.

  • checkinout6000

    I quit flying about a year ago when they started installing those x-ray naked machines in Europe. I found out what they were later and said “that’s it for me”! Only problem is it’s hard to drive across the ocean. They are easing up over there and now its here. Since they screen all arriving international passengers that would require me to go through this machine there and then several hours later go through it here for dangerous levels of radiation or get groped by some perv. In one way I am glad this happened so we can put a stop to the madness. When I would talk about this people would tell me I was being silly. Like the time where some little pervert in Brussels grabbed my crotch (I am a male) and said “what is this”. My response cannot be given here but I can tell you it was very direct and not pleasant and involved references to the little mans sexual preference.

    I want one instance where a TSA passenger inspection has found a bomb!

    Give me a break. A background check would have revealed all the in flight attempts that were thwarted by passengers! Believe me after witnessing on more than one flight an unruly drunk being restrained, I guarantee you there will be no more hijackings, screening or not!

  • ihateliberals

    and TSA and the Fed’s are doing a wrong thing. The bottom line is that there is no way to stop a determined Hijacker. There is nothing that could have stopped the 9/11 attacks. The only difference might have been the method used to hijack the planes. Instead of box cutters they might have used Ink Pens which by the way will stick a hole in your throat just a easily as a box cutter can slice it.

    • atillathehun

      “There is no right way to do a wrong thing.” This why the Israelies are doing the right thing in the right way.

    • blooch

      nor will there be any terrorists holding a plane hostage by waving a “bomb” around the cabin. Whatever bomb the terrorist has got, he’d better just blow it up in solitude and pray to Allah that he does more damage than pink mist and charred flesh all over the lavatory.

      Forget Captain Morgan…everbody’s got a little Air Marshal in ‘em now, and we’d prefer not to have a little TSA Guy in us. Like John Tyner said: The TSA needs to consider passengers as assets, instead of pixxing us off and insulting our intelligence by wasting time, effort and privacy so arrogantly.

    • chipbennett

      If not for Jamie Gorelick’s wall of separation between state and federal law enforcement and our various intelligence agencies, the dots could have been connected.

      But, unfortunately, the CIA couldn’t disclose any terrorist connections of the eventual hijackers, and the civilian feds couldn’t disclose the reports from the flight schools that a bunch of Arab men were taking flying lessons and telling their instructors that they only needed to learn how to take off, and didn’t need to know how to land.

      Likewise, the Panty Bomber could have been stopped, too. After all, his own father alerted US authorities that he was engaging in terrorist activities, and we let him get on the airplane anyway.

  • jcahill

    we should be insisting that before the TSA Goon performs a pat down on me or you, we get to conduct our own pat down of the TSA Perp. That way we can ensure that whoever is doing the pat down on passengers is not some deranged lunatic creep, with explosives in their drawers, is waiting for a large crowd to form before he/she decides to blow everyone away. It would also be necessary to pat down all TSA personnel because we wouldn’t want to offend any of them by profiling just the patter downers!!!! I wonder how many pat downs they would have to, or could, endure during the course of a single eight hour shift.

  • checkinout6000

    Everyone does realize what is next? There is only one answer to all this mess! Next thing the TSA will ban is cell phones and cameras! That should solve this problem!

  • checkinout6000

    Terrorists
    Step
    Ahead

    The rest of you folks get in line with your kids for special screening!

  • wayneepalmer

    I watched the video for it this morning on VH-1.

    They got Natasha Bedingfield to sing “Strip Me”.

    Here’s the chorus…

    If you strip me,
    Strip it all away
    I’m still the same

    Take what you want
    Steal my pride
    Build me up
    Or cut me down to size
    Shut me out
    But I’ll just scream
    Im only one voice in a million
    but you aint taking that from me
    Oh oh no you aint taking that from me

  • dwscho

    I read several articles over the past few days on this issue. I also read the accompanying comments. Many commentors state they are happy for a little inconvenience if it means improved safety. They also state that if people don’t like the TSA rules they shouldn’t fly. I am astonished at how many people willingly agree to waive their rights.

    I wonder, if a TSA employee showed up at their house the day before a flight and said they wanted to search the premises to be sure there were no bomb making materials present, would those commentors object or waive yet another right. Or, if the TSA monitored everyone’s email and telephone conversations to make sure nothing was discussed that would raise concerns. I can’t imagine they wouldn’t objuct to these illegal searches but, I could be wrong. But, I would bet they would approve.

    This madness has to stop. If the government wants to search people, they should search those with the highest potential for causing concerns and leave the rest of us alone. And, to those folks willing to give up their rights to feel safer boarding an airplane I say, take a bus because I don’t want to waive my right to privacy to make you feel safer.

  • melatr7

    but isn’t it amazing that they just happened to have these machines laying around? Who built them and why didn’t they build a computer to analyze the results? When they come up with that, requiring no human intervention except when the machine pings, perhaps I’ll fly again.

    In the meantime, forget this PC bullcrap and PROFILE!! If I were a terrorist, I’d be a lot more concerned about being profiled than about being randomly selected.

    This is like putting a whole high school into remedial reading because one can’t read!

    The day in day out MONOTONY of doing the same thing over and over is likely to cause more errors in judgement than profiling the most likely suspects. Add that to the FACT that the most likely suspects are able to opt out for ‘religious objections’ and we have a real comedy playing out in the TSA!!

    Meanwhile, EVERYONE suffers and ‘the enemy’ is ROFLing.

  • checkinout6000

    Mark Hemingway – George Soros also profiting off controversial new TSA scanners
    George Soros, the billionaire funder of the country

    • melatr7

      with my eyes closed. Thanks for verifying.

  • checkinout6000

    Five security layers down: you now finally arrive at the only one which Ben-Gurion Airport shares with Pearson

  • checkinout6000

    NEW DEPARTS
    When I travel by air now and then,
    The security staff wave me in:
    I don

  • Scope

    Here is the Aviation and Transportation Security Act Public Law-

    http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/Aviation_and_Transportation_Security_Act_ATSA_Public_Law_107_1771.pdf

    Please look at page 16 of this pdf document where it talks about S44920 Security Screening opt-out program, if the airport hires a qualified private screening company. I don’t read legalize very well. I do know that I don’t want Ugly Janet storing enhanced body images of my fellow citizens in the government, even though the scanners were not supposed to store or print those images.

    Also, please check Sec 109 Enhanced Security Measures, on page 17. There is a section that states:

    “Establish requirements to implement trusted passenger programs and use available technologies to expedite the screening of passengers who participate in such program, thereby allowing screening personnel to focus on those passengers who would be subject to more extensive screening.”

    I want the whole mess gone, yesterday. Our military has equipment to detect IED’s, we have dogs that can sniff bombs and many other things, many of them are trained at Lackland Air Force base in Texas, I know, I worked for the company that had the government contract to provide the care of those German Shepards. We have technology to detect about anything. We are the United States for God’s sake. We are better than this invasion of privacy and freedom. And, to think, according to Donald Berwick, probably full body CAT scans will be eliminated because they are too expensive.

    • Scope

      one of the original authors of the above law is recommending that aitports opt out-

      http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-safety-security/1148827-airports-can-opt-out-tsa-program.html

  • twetteroff

  • myron_j_poltroonian

    Let me see if I’ve got this right. As Americans,we’ve given up our right to not be sexually invaded or irradiated when we “Move about the country”, but, following the Israeli model is too offensive? To whom?

  • myron_j_poltroonian

    Does this mean that when Nancy loses her USAF Commandeered Jet, she’ll have to be grouped like the rest of the “Great Unwashed”?

    • checkinout6000

      The thought of that is gut wrenching. Why did you bring this up? Just think of the poor person that must perform such a search. That in itself is enough to stop the process or maybe that is what you are inferring.

  • myron_j_poltroonian

    Let me see if I’ve got this right. As Americans,we’ve given up our right to not be sexually invaded or irradiated when we “Move about the country”, but, following the Israeli model is too offensive? To whom?

    On the bright side: Does this mean that when Nancy loses her Commandeered USAF Jet, she