« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

MTV’s Teen Abortion Sales Pitch: It’s Just “A Ball of Cells”

child-not-choice

In July of this year, leftist Feminists were openly, and proudly, rooting for an abortion to be portrayed on prime-time television. And in April of this year, leftist Feminists like Jessica Valenti of Feministing were grossly bemoaning the fact that Mtv’s show, 16 and Pregnant, did not portray any teenage girls having abortions. They wanted sixteen year old girls to have abortions. On television.  Way to be pro-woman and For The Children ™, faux feminists! By For The Children, I of course mean totally not at all for the children – unless they can be used and exploited to further an agenda, natch. You see, it’s never actually about women nor children to them; it’s always about an agenda and an ideology that treats motherhood as a yoke around a woman’s neck. Motherhood is so old school and oppressive and stuff! What with those pesky children wanting to be nurtured and loved, while providing a joy that fills one’s heart so full that it cannot be adequately put into words. Well, and wanting to, you know, live. Who do they think they are?

On Tuesday night, they got their wish. Mtv ran a special called “No Easy Decision”, in which Markai, a girl who had previously appeared on 16 and Pregnant, learned that she was pregnant again.

And she terminated the pregnancy baby’s life.

I watched the “special”, even though I didn’t think that I needed to do so in order to point out how wrong such a show is on so many levels. But, unlike Ana Marie Cox, I don’t like to talk about things that I have neither read nor watched, nor do I like to do things half-assedly. And, it turns out, the show was even worse than I suspected it would be. It was infuriating and horrifying, almost beyond words. It was also heartbreaking beyond belief. My heart aches for Markai, and for the other girls (Natalia and Katie) who appeared in the discussion portion of the show.

The pro-abortion rah-rah sisterhood, of course, praised it immediately, which should indicate just how strong the show’s bias was. If you needed any further proof than the fact that the show was aired commercial-free, in partnership with Exhale, a group who says that they wish to raise awareness that abortion “is normal in the reproductive lives of women and girls.” Yes, every woman’s “reproductive life” (love the fancy-pants euphemism) includes the killing of an unborn child. You women who don’t have abortions? Total abnormal freaks! Just look at Sarah Palin, for cripes sake. Wingnuts!

The show was entirely agenda-driven and these young girls were sickly used and exploited for that purpose only. The token nod to a pro-life position was a quick question in the discussion panel: “Did you consider adoption?” One of the girls said that wouldn’t have been an option because it wasn’t the baby part that was scary; it was that pregnancy is icky. She had an abortion to avoid pregnancy symptoms. She also spoke of the sacrifices (her word) that she had to make to pay the $750.00 abortion fee. Her prom ticket, for one.

Sacrifice was a running theme, except it appears that the word has lost any real meaning. The girls spoke of not wanting to sacrifice their college plans. Or of not wanting their partners to sacrifice by having to work two jobs to support another child. And  Markai spoke of not wanting her living infant child to “sacrifice for my mistake.” Such rationales were among the most heartbreaking because it’s what we’ve been teaching our youth with society’s insidious entitlement mentality. There is no right to life, but there is a right to college and a right to not be poor. We can’t put a child through going without food or losing electricity for a few days; losing one’s LIFE is far preferable.

It’s also another example of how leftist feminists actually think very little of women and how pervasive their disturbing mindset has become. To them, a woman is incapable of having it all. A pregnant woman or a mother is incapacitated to the point where she can’t even read a book or attend classes, apparently. They’ve turned college into a need; one can’t meet their twisted ideas of equality without it. They’ve placed a higher value on an increasingly meaningless piece of paper than on life itself and are trying to teach our daughters the same. Plus, why is college a make or break situation? Is a woman somehow lesser if she doesn’t get a college degree? They must think I’m a third class citizen!

The incredibly harmful lies propagated during “No Easy Decision” were matched only by the awful truths about the pro-abortion agenda that the show unintentionally unmasked. Pro-abortionist Lynn Harris, at Salon, exposed one such awful truth and, worse, actually praised it:

Here’s Dr. Drew opening the show — and racking up stunned “FTW!”s (For The Win!) on Twitter right out of the gate: “About 750,000 girls in the U.S. get pregnant every year. And although nearly a third of these teen pregnancies result in abortion, we’ve never shown this choice on ’16 and Pregnant’ up until now. It can be a polarizing topic, and there’s quite frankly no way to talk about this and please everyone. Although controversial to some, abortion is one of the three viable options, and it’s among the safest, most common medical procedures in the U.S., so we thought it was important for us to discuss.”

Among the most common “medical procedures” in the United States. So much for that safe, legal and rare thing, huh? That lie has been completely exposed already and there are over 50 million dead fetuses that attest to that fact.  They don’t want it to be rare; they want it to be the default option as No Easy Decision, and the glee-ridden leftist feminist response to it, clearly shows. In fact, they want it to be “normal” and common. And will outright lie in order to accomplish this. Markai was told by the abortion clinic counselor as she was being prepped for the abortion, “do not think of ‘it’ as ten fingers and ten toes or anything like that or you will get too depressed. Think of ‘it’ as what ‘it’ is: a ball of cells.” I suppose that’s why children are not even allowed in the waiting room of the clinic; don’t want any of those pesky balls of cells running around confusing people.

A ball of cells. Also,wait a minute? Why would one ever risk feeling depressed? According to pro-abortionists, it’s no big whoop and there is nothing sad about it. It’s a relief, you see! Dr. Drew himself told the girls that they may be confused and stuff, but no big whoop. In two years most women realize it was the right decision. There’s a time frame and everything! In two years, all will be hunky-dory. That didn’t appear to be the case with the girls on the show, particularly Markai. Her confusion, and her pain, were palpable. Her boyfriend, the father of her living child as well, took her out to dinner after the abortion and referred to the unborn baby that was aborted as “a thing.” Markai became extremely upset and said “that thing could have turned out to be her” and pointed to their living infant child. I guess the lie about the “ball of cells” didn’t work for her. I don’t think it ever will; I ache for Markai.

Much was also made about how terrible it is that sometimes an abortion is made slightly more difficult to obtain. During the panel discussion, Natalia complained about how hard it is to have to “beg a judge for permission to make your own decision”, due to parental consent laws. She did receive a judicial bypass. The reason? She didn’t want to tell her parents and disappoint them. How on earth does that constitute a reason for a judicial bypass of parental consent? How does it supersede parental rights? That judge should be thrown off the bench. Worse, Natalia went without the love and support of her family in a time when she needed it most. Where is the compassion there? Where is the “informed” choice? Salon jumped right on the parental consent laws, calling them cruel. They also went onto say this:

(In an extended interview available online, Natalia also describes the cruelty of being legally forced to view the pre-procedure ultrasound.)

Cruelty? If actual informed choice, instead of lip service informed choice, is cruel. See, that whole ball of cells lie won’t work if a woman sees the actual baby. Of course, to Lynn Harris at Salon and pro-abortionists like her, that is cruel, yet there’s nothing cruel about making life expendable nor about disposing of a life before he or she even had a chance at A life. That matters naught to leftists. The only people who think the fear of being grounded by their parents is more important than a life itself are people who remain immature and child-like their entire lives. To wit, leftists. They never grew up, they never stopped rebelling against their parents. And they are attempting to teach the same to each subsequent generation. Don’t tell your parents! A super awesome nanny state judge will let you do whatever you want, decency be damned. It’s funny how much they dislike mommies and daddies, but they love them some Nannies.

They also love to give lip service without actually doing anything. Exhale set up a site called 16 and Loved. It was set-up to allegedly shield the girls from those wingnutty people who, you know, don’t rejoice over abortion. How cuckoo pants! Meanwhile, the whole 16 and loved website is all about praising the girls for “outing” their abortions. Because, empowerment.

What the girls really need is actual support.  They’ve been lied to and now, on top of that, they’ve been used and exploited, even if with their consent, to push an agenda. I don’t wish to do them further harm. My heart breaks for them. When they realize what they have done, and they will, the pain of their regret, remorse and guilt will be compounded by the knowledge that they did this all publicly and on display. This is the mentality the girls have been taught. In a way, they are actually victims themselves and now that they’ve served their purpose to the left, they’ll just be tossed aside.

You see, it’s pro-life people who don’t judge and who provide meaningful support. It’s pro-life people who acknowledge the pain and harm abortion also causes to women and who seek ways to embrace them and help them. Pro-abortionists deny their very existence. They deny, always, the trauma that abortion may also cause to the woman. They deny the life-long guilt and pain those women bear. They deny the very fact that a life was sucked from his or her mother’s womb, mercilessly. Never once feeling a loving touch. Never once gazing into his mother’s eyes. Never once raising a tiny hand to touch his mommy’s cheek with a love that cannot even truly be expressed.

That’s your legacy, Gloria Steinem, and that of your fellow travelers. A legacy that is a stain on the heart and soul of our country. A legacy that we must not let continue onto yet another generation. You do not “empower” girls by telling them the life they create can be tossed aside for college. You do not empower girls by telling them a sacrifice is giving up a prom ticket to pay for the aborting of the life they created. You do not empower girls by turning motherhood into a burden to be avoided at all costs; even at the cost of that life itself. You do not empower girls by exploiting them to further your agendas.

Abortion will not, and should not, ever be “normal.” Because, Motherhood is normal to humans and so is nurturing. Rejoicing in the miracle of giving life yourself and then nurturing that life once given. That is within us; it’s instinct and female human nature. It is something of which to be proud and it should be honored, not diminished. It is an attribute and a gift, not a punishment.

If Markai, Natalia and Katie realize this one day, I fear that their pain and guilt will be nearly unbearable. Not only were lives lost, but other lives were potentially traumatized forever. Somehow, I don’t think MTv, nor 16 and Loved will be there for them then. And that’s yet another horrifying aspect of No Easy Decision.

——————————

cross-posted from NewsReal

COMMENTS

  • Remington_Steele

    You capture the personal human loss to the uninformed mother that MTV and all the others cited were trying to cover up.

    I would change only one thing. To me child-like is when one acts with innocence. Childish is when one acts in a selfish wholly nieve way. Thus, I would have said, “The only people who think the fear of being grounded by their parents is more important than a life itself are people who remain immature and [childish] their entire lives.”

    Thank you for your analysis and efforts to expose the truth that so many try to cover up for the sake of personal convenience.

    • dude

      I would like to know who the person or group way up the food chain is that has been waging this 20 year ad campaign on abortion. What is to be gained? Why has the left so embraced it? Who benefits? I just dont understand it……But……
      What if a group like CARE were planted here 20 years ago with a specific goal to reduce the white and black population. What easier way to do it than to stop breeding. Here’s a perfect example – back in the early 1900′s the Rockefellers started the idea of womens rights, to be able to vote and work like men. The only reason the Rockefeller’s were secretly promoting it was to get added benefit from the tax revenue of the added workers. So you see, behind some big ideological campaign is someone promoting it weather you are aware of it or not.
      At current birth rates, whites will be a minority in 30 years.
      Are people with certain brain defects doomed to be liberals? If we could spot that defect prior to birth then we could focus the abortions to eliminate liberals. Wouldn’t that be a hoot!

  • rockynrobyn

    Due to illness and, frankly, deceit by those “supportive” abortion proponents I had an abortion when I was younger. I have never been the same and, everytime I look at my son I think about his brother/sister. My life changed for the worse as I internalized the guilt and sadness. It has taken me years to fogive myself although I know God has forgiven me. They may have been right, the baby may have died during pregnancy and, having my son was a hard road but HE LIVES! It has taken so long to accept what I did and those “supportive” planned parenthood folks were never there after the “procedure”. They just moved me on my way and forgot about me. I feel so sad for all the women who have to go through that and even more sad for those who don’t feel anything. My family has also been fortunate enough to have two adopted children in it and, trust me, they are greatful their mothers had the courage to make the harder choice.

    • glorybee

      God bless you for the courage to tell your story and admit to your pain. You are testimony to the evil & selfishness of the “women’s movement”.

  • penguin2

    felt writing it….well, I cringed too. That is what Hollywood hedonism has wrought. So sad that the young and vulnerable are at the mercy of people who hate life, hate womanhood, and must destroy it for others.

  • Tbone

    who destroy life for selfish ideology.

    Good.

    • http://www.the41stvote.org rcov092

      Send this trash into the obscurity it deserves, along with all those losers from Jersey.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    the voluntarily childless, and homosexuals need to be denied Social Security. Why should the children I raise with my current earnings be forced to support some old folks that didn’t contribute to the future worker pool providing their benefits?

    These anti-abortion zealots think they can a) not have children and yet b) enjoy an unlimited welfare state.

    • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

      …pro-abortion zealots, not anti-abortion zealots!

    • Zaber

      There are MANY people who should not have children, and many who can make a conscious decision not to have children for very good reasons. You would penalize them for that??

      For example – I have an automimmune disorder that causes very painful degenerative arthritis in parts of my body. I chose many years ago to not procreate to avoid causing another human being that same pain. Am I wrong for that? Should I be punished?

      How about someone who is not mentally capable of caring for a child? How about an alcoholic or drug addict that tries to get clean but continually relapses? Would you force them to procreate just for the sake of getting social security?

      How about people who realize they would just be bad parents? The self-centered, the ones who want to have a social life with no hindrances from children, the knuckleheads.. should they go ahead and procreate just for the government money?

      How about poor people who cannot afford to raise children? Should we perpetuate the welfare state just for the sake of getting them their social security?

      I really don’t see how in any case the decision to not pro-create should have any bearing on whether you collect social security – it should be based only on your financial contributions to the social security program, not based on your providing future workers for the pool.

      The alternative is that you promote the value government benefits over the inevitable results of forcing people to have babies to get retirement benefits later in life – poor parenting, child neglect, child abuse, and a cycle that would just continue into the next generation, and the next.

      Choosing to not procreate voluntarily, supporting abortion rights or being homosexual are religious concerns – they are not fiscal, and attempts to make them so are irresponsible.

      • mikerazar
        • Zaber

          I said nothing regarding abortion being right. I said nothing about abortion at all.

          I was pointing out that people who choose not to have children should not be penalized as DerKrieger was suggesting.

          He was referring to people who choose not to conceive children and how they should not be given social security benefits, not to people who abort babies.

          Please go back and read the thread and maybe you’ll feel like apologizing for that comment.

          • Zaber

            He also said that people who abort babies AND homosexuals should be denied social security benefits.

            *I* was responding specifically to the same sentiment directed at people who choose not to conceive children.

            Regardless of your feelings about it, you cannot deny social security benefits to people based on their sexuality, whether they have children, or even if they believe in abortion, no matter what your personal feelings are on the matter.

          • mikerazar

            women can choose not to get pregnant. I don’t get why you would think that controversial. Have you ever heard anyone advocate that all women of childbearing age should be required to have unprotected sex? This thread is about calling preborn children “a ball of cells”.

          • aesthete

            that SS benefits should be withheld from people who have paid into them all their lives simply because they haven’t procreated. While I think that such a policy would be positive in some respects by hastening the demise of a New Deal relic that is antithetical to personal liberty (and demonstrating the problematic nature of having government or “democracy” appropriate and distribute large stacks of money), it would be in and of itself unjust to withhold those benefits on such an arbitrary basis.

          • Zaber

            That’s all I was responding to – the suggestion made by DerKrieger of withholding government benefits from people who choose not to procreate, which is ridiculous…

            Unfortunately, social security will be here until it completely collapses under it’s own weight.

          • tennwriter

            If we have to cut SS down to size, the bills for it that is, it does seem reasonable to start with some sort of means testing.

            Take out the rich from the rolls.
            Then take off the rolls those who could have supported it, but chose not too….they had teh money to provide for their own retirement which others spent on children.

            If you’re looking for rationales on who to cut first from SS, that is.

  • lineholder

    This whole idea that a woman, even a single woman, has to give up everything that she might hope to accomplish and achieve in her own life if she becomes pregnant is a bunch of hooey. It’s a lie, and there are young women out there who provide evidence to the lie.

    I know of one single mother in particular that I admire a great deal for what she is accomplishing. She made some ill-advised choices late in her teens, and the result of those choices is that she is now 22 years and has two children, ages 6 and 3. Rather than wallow in self-pity and feel sorry for herself, becoming a mom has inspired her to be even more determined to succeed in her goals. She will be graduating in May of this year with a BS in Nursing, and she currently is maintaining a 3.5 GPA.

    She teaches the youngest age group class in the AWANA program at her church. She also took on the 5-year-old boys Sunday school class on Sunday mornings because none of the menfolk at this church was interested. She has been delivering paper routes every morning as a means of earning an income.

    If you even remotely suggested to this young lady that she is “suffering the consequences of her own actions”, she would bow up and let it be known that a child is NOT a consequence. A child is a human being with a heart, mind, spirit and soul of their own. A child is a blessing, not a “ball of cells”.

    She is engaged to get married in the fall of 2011 after she graduates to a young man who has known her for over seven years now. He can remember who she was and he can look at who she is becoming, and he genuinely respects the kind of woman and mother she has grown to be. He loves those children with every beat of his heart as if they were his own.

    • http://snarkandboobs.wordpress.com/ Lori Ziganto

      What a wonderful testament to the strength of women, whom the Left seem to believe are perpetual victims in need of “saving” – even from their own anatomy. It’s also a beautiful testament to the fact that motherhood is not a detriment and it doesn’t impair you somehow. To the contrary; the ways in which it enriches you are invaluable.

      • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

        Thanks for sharing it.

        I, too, have known several women with similar life stories.

        The Left is a bunch of losers with no imagination, no ability to envision what life CAN be — and then they project that onto all of us, picturing us all as losers who can’t do anything for ourselves.

        It nauseates me.

        • lineholder

          but the lies of progressives are being revealed, bit by bit and piece by piece.
          Progressives do have an incredibly limited range of vision regarding not only what life can be but also who we as individuals can BECOME.

      • lineholder

        is that she doesn’t want to become just another VICTIM of our welfare system.

        Our welfare system is there to provider assistance in times of crisis, but it can be too easy and too tempting to become overly-dependent on the support provided by the system. Given the way the regulations in our welfare system are structured, once a person becomes overly-dependent on the system it can be very difficult to get OUT of the system. They can end up becoming bound to the system, whether they want it to be that way or not, and they live a limited existence with limited opportunities.

        She doesn’t want that to become the reality in her life or her children’s lives.
        For the time being, she can’t entirely make it on her own, so she is receiving some government assistance and I won’t tell you that she isn’t. The local DHHS office keeps telling her that she qualifies for this or that program and all she has to do is apply in order to receive assistance, but she hasn’t done it.

        If she can find a creative, innovative and shrewd way to succeed in some things on her own rather than depending on the welfare system for her support, then that is exactly what she will set about trying to do.

        She’s established relationships with other single mothers and they have a system in place that helps them lower the cost of things such as housing, child care, clothing and baby necessities. They even have a coupon club on things like diapers, baby food and formula.

        She took as many foundation college courses as she could online for her first two years of school to keep her transportation and child care costs down.

        DHHS has regulations in place that limit the amount of savings someone receiving assistance can accumulate. That’s part of preventing people from abusing the system. It usually discourages people from even trying to set up a savings account. She set up one anyway. It has come in handy a few times when she’s faced emergencies like automotive repairs and paying her own medical bills. She’s a classic bargain shopper, and having the funds on hand in savings allows her to have more options.

        She and the kids planted a garden this past year to keep from accepting more food stamps. She canned a lot of it. It was the first time she had ever canned anything, but she says that she loved doing it and will be doing it again this year.

        Oh, yeah, the leftist feministas would hate her through and through. Not only is she unwilling to think of herself in the context of being a victim but she actually discourages other single mothers from thinking that way.

  • speciallist

    to block that channel…from what I’ve seen the other shows are trash also

  • aesthete

    I didn’t read this all the way through. Halfway through the article, I was too angry and saddened to continue reading the piece. I’m not an emotional person by nature, but the callous and commercialized way in which popular culture treats the murder of an innocent is one thing that will draw my ire more quickly than most anything.

    In the future, we will be judged as backwards and immoral people, and this will be one of the pieces of evidence brought forth as proof.

    • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

      and on the pro-slavery people 160 years ago,
      will be the way future generations look back on us.
      “Oh my God, you mean they actually KILLED their OWN CHILDREN?!?!” they will exclaim in disbelief.

      • runner12

        I must admit that I could not fully finish this article either. It is so disgusting and disturbing at these peoples’ cavalier attitude towards murdering little babies. To make matters worse they were advocating teen abortion. Just when you think the pro-choice movement has sunk to the lowest they can sink, they sink further.

  • SusanAnne Hiller

    Comprehensive and powerful.

    • klondike

      Well done, Lori.

      The left continues to promote victimhood, selfishness, and weakness (i.e., fear of telling one’s parents).

      I knew a woman in a state in which I formerly lived who found herself caught up in a lawsuit. Her biggest concern was that she had been a rape victim who had found herself pregnant and chose to have the baby, but her son did not yet know his paternity. She was afraid that information would be disclosed in the lawsuit. She said she wanted to be the one to determine the best time to tell her son, and at that point she had determined that he likely would be mature enough to handle the news at age 16. He was due to turn 16 the following year. I don’t remember the particulars of the lawsuit in which she found herself, but her attorneys respected her wishes and managed to detract from the issue of paternity. The following year, she ended up telling her son about his paternity. He was fine with it and mostly felt concern for his mom over the efforts she must have made to protect him from the truth until he was mature enough to accept it.

      I didn’t know her well or for very long, but I suspect she was/is a really good mom.

  • throwback59

    the “ad” accompying the article is one of the most disgusting things I’ve seen and sums up the moral bankruptcy of the left perfectly.

  • http://itsaboutfreedom.proboards.com IronDioPriest

    There is no other way to describe it in a moral context. As every facet of the Secular-Left is examined, evil is revealed in its basest form.

    The wars and battles we wage against the Left are not academic. We wage war against evil, whether we acknowledge it or not. Sooner or later, the recognition of the realities of who our enemy is – and who he serves – will hit critical mass, and only then will we treat our enemy commensurate with the evil he advocates and commits.

  • Vannek

    I watched this show with my two nieces… the 20 year-old and 14 year-old non-religious daughters of a socialist Ivy League professor. They were both horrified at the idea of “killing babies.” I asked them how they were exposed to the pro-life opinions. Both responded that they always hear pro-abortion opinions in school, on TV, in the media. Despite the outside pressure, both are staunchly pro-life. Something in their hearts tells them that abortion is wrong and to be avoided at all costs.

    • vandalii

      We all know that young people tend to rebel against things thrust at them. Is it possible the progressives have ignored that little piece of psychology in all their ranting and actually caused a bit of a conservative rebellion amongst our thinking youngsters? If only…

  • David123

    That one group would state that abortion

  • Superheater

    I’m not holding my breath

    • speciallist

      the hypocrisy on the left is endless

    • http://itsaboutfreedom.proboards.com IronDioPriest

      …and you have landed a devastating uppercut here.

      Sometimes the inherent hypocrisy of Secular-Leftism needs to be rooted out, examined and explained. But sometimes – as in this point you’ve made – the hypocrisy is plainly apparent as an intrinsic quality of the ideology, and only requires a willingness to look in order to see.

  • Superheater

    It is a snuff film.

    • mikerazar

      not that there is anything wrong with that. Preborn children can’t even vote.

  • fortcollins

    Thank you for this post. It is one of the most passionate, honest defenses of life I have seen.

    We should be horrified, but not surprised, that MTV ran this show and embraced murder-for-convenience. MTV’s worldview exalts self-centered materialistic hedonism as its core value. In the “world of me” there is no room for anyone else. It is a small, empty world, indeed.

    All the MTVs and anti-life voices cannot alter truth: every abortion kills a human being. The brutal reality of this truth is poignantly captured in a song by Christian recording artist Dominic Balli, entitled “The Morning After.” Your post and the profound questions you raise reminded me of his song.

  • romeg

    who hate every single aspect of the group they claim to ‘represent’; who despise the defining attribute of their claimed constituency; and whose every act and utterance defile and debase that constituency and all that being a member of that constituency represents, the ability to even claim that THEY speak for that constituency.

    The only entity that has the power to grant them this status is The Media in all its forms. The ONLY power this tiny, almost inconsequential collection of self-hating misfits has derives from its ability to get members of the media to pay them any attention at all, however undeserved that attention may be.

    The actual number of women they represent could be herded into a phone booth with room left over for the Royal Wedding Reception. Why, in the name of all that is Holy, do we pay them any attention at all other than the derision they so richly deserve. The intellect they posses, en masse is less than that of the entire population of Michipicoten Island as evidenced by the absurd and ridiculous statements the issue. They are as worthy of notice as the proponents of the Flat Earth Theory or “Apollo 14 was a Hoax” movement or, more recently, The Truthers.

  • vandalii

    The tragedy of 50M lost USA lives cannot be understated. God is looking after them for us. How many Beethovens, Lord Byrons, Kristi Yamaguchis, Tim Tebows, Soren Kierkegaards, John Wesley, Ethel Waters, or even Jesus Himself (terribly inconvenient to have *that* pregnancy as a young unmarried girl) have we, as a nation, killed? This isn’t just about the abortion doctors or even the women that get abortions, this is about being a lazy, satisfied nation of that now wakes up to where we let ourselves drift. For those Believers out there, II Chronicles 7:14 needs to become our focus.

    If there is an irony to any of this trajedy, it is that the children that never got to breath, also don’t get to vote. Studies have shown that the majority of those that get abortions are either liberals or are living in liberal families. We know sociologically that many children continue the political view of the parents just because we’re usually too lazy to check why we believe what we believe or why we vote like we vote.

    I saw an interesting analysis of statstics related to abortions performed since 1973 a couple of years ago that indicated that had abortions not been made legal, demographics of the abortees indicated that conservatively there would have been an additional 2,000,000 Democratic votes in the 1990 presidential election. Gore would have won hands-down without the mess he put us through fighting constitutional electoral college results. Ironically, the liberals have murdered their own voter base. Hmm. I wonder if Gore thought he’d support the very travesty that cost him the presidency…

    • vandalii

      DOH! Sorry all.

      • aesthete

        Analysis on whether less abortions would have positive or negative effects misses the point, methinks. For my part, I imagine that pro-life laws would have effects similar to an increase in the population of illegal immigrants (though with added welfare costs). That is irrelevant: when you start seeing and advocating for humans and their rights as a means to an end (more doctors, more votes, more moral society, etc), rather than an end in and of themselves, you are simply furnishing the apologia for future dictators whose ends supposedly justify their means.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

    In the end, it is a battle for the hearts and minds and souls of our women. Articles like yours are vital in our winning that battle.

    I see a great collision developing between a growing pro-life consensus among our citizenry – and an agenda-driven anti-life political establishment who will increasingly utilize the coercive power of government to manipulate and even impose abortions.

  • timelyrenewed

    That was a wonderful post. However, we can win as many hearts and minds as we like, but until the Supreme Court’s usurpation of the right of the states to regulate abortion is addressed, much of that effort will be futile (although every pregnant teenager who opts to have her baby and give it to an adoptive family is a victory). There is a possible solution. This is to correct the underlying distortion of the Constitution which has allowed the Supreme Court to use the hopelessly vague language of section 1 of the 14th amendment to read whatever social policy it wants into the Constitution. The solution to this is a constitutional amendment, not to ban abortion, but rather to return section 1 to its original purpose of banning governmental race discrimination. This will zero out all of the Supreme Court’s unrelated judicial lawmaking under that section of the Constitution. See http://www.timelyrenewed.com

  • bassethound

    Ladies, while you are in the privacy of your own home, ask yourself the following questions:

    1. Do I know this man and his character. Do I know how he treats others and honors his commitments?

    2. If I were not sexually attracted to him, would I like this man as a friend?

    3. Do I see this man as a part of my life five years down the road…or fifteen? Is this man my husband? If not, are we actively preparing for a wedding that will take place in the VERY near future?

    4. What are his work habits? Can he keep a job?

    5. What is our economic situation? Have both of us completed our educations? Are both of us together able to provide a stable home for a child?

    6. Am I comfortable saying “no thanks”, “I’m not interested” or “please don’t call me anymore”. Am I comfortable getting up, walking away and, if necessary finding my own ride home if I am in a situation that is getting to the point where I might lose control of my feelings?

    7. Am I astute enough to realize that there are a LOT worse things than not having a date on Friday night.

    If the answer to any of these questions is “no” or “I don’t know”, then a SMART woman should decide “this is not the time for me to have sex”.

    • Mike Ferguson
  • proudmarinemom

    on this television show, which I discovered whilecarrying a laundry basket through the family room on my way to the laundry. I stopped in my tracks on hearing some of the dialog and asked my 16-y.o. daughter why she had an interest in it. (This is a busy, active girl who rarely slows down to watch t.v. and long ago announced that the semi-naked people making fools of themselves at the Super Bowl Half-time show were “gross.”) She said everyone at school has been talking about it and she was just curious. I sat down immediately with her and watched the final ten minutes of an episode.

    A few days later, a group of 16-y.o. girls plopped themselves down in the family room with a bowl of popcorn to watch. I found a dozen excuses to be walking through the room, listening. One girl shared that her older half- sister had just come to visit for the first time, a young woman whom her mother had placed for adoption 25 years ago. Another talked about family friends who had just adopted from Korea. They all weighed in on the collective immaturity of the boys at their high school and what pathetic partners they would make. This opened the door for me to weigh in a little on the importance of maturity and commitment. Heads nodded in agreement all around the room. “Abortion” never came up, but I intend to be there when it does. And I can still pull the plug on cable if they cross the line.

    • http://soleynm.blogspot.com/ soleynm

      If the liberals had their way, you would only be able to pull the plug when they gave you permission to do so.

  • bassethound

    We will see a generation of baby boomers become as expendable as the unborn.

    It will be fairly easy for the “end of life counselor” to explain to the aged:

    1. You are a burden to society.
    2. Your children have obligations and families of their own. It’s not fair that you should force them to take responsibility for your care.

    especially when all of their savings have been wiped out (by Obama generated hyperinflation)…when they have no employment options (due to rampant age discrimination) and when medical procedures such as joint replacements and bypass operations that would improve their comfort and mobility will be denied them.

  • http://soleynm.blogspot.com/ soleynm

    The government should stay out of the entire abortion debate. I don’t want my tax money going to discourage/encourage abortions.

    • MF

      As soon as it can (if it ever had the numbers, which I doubt), it should pass a law stating that life begins at conception. That makes everything else moot. When that happens, abortion = murder.

    • MF

      As soon as it can (if it ever had the numbers, which I doubt), it should pass a law stating that life begins at conception. That makes everything else moot. When that happens, abortion = murder.

  • n2dstormwego

    Hey, do not think of

  • stephaniet

    I first read this story at LifeNews, and it broke my heart then. How can they just… I don’t know. I’m just too aghast to be able to say anything that even remotely makes sense. I can’t even begin to describe what I’m feeling, what’s going through my head…

    Except for this one thing: If you don’t want the baby, DON’T MAKE THE BABY. But don’t kill your own child after he’s been conceived. Those girls are going to suffer for this for the rest of their lives, with everything ranging from guilt and insomnia, to an inability to maintain later pregnancies, to increased breast cancer risk.

    So much for “for the women.” Good God, what a bunch of [insert your profanity of choice] abortionists are! I prefer calling them thieves and butchers, myself. Thieves because they heartlessly steal and innocent human life, and butchers because… well. Have you ever seen what a baby looks like, post-abortion? …yeah.

    Excuse me; I’m going to go off and cry now. The only thing that helps is knowing that those innocent babies are now in the arms of their Creator.