« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Thoughtful, On-Target Palin Responds To Attacks; Left Loses Last Grip On Reality

I know, my use of the term on-target makes me a vitriolic, hateful rhetoric espouser in the eyes of some. It’s not conducive to the “new tone” we are all supposed to embrace for some unfathomable and delusional reason. Of course, this new tone doesn’t apply if one is speaking about Sarah Palin, who is apparently the cause of All Bad Things Ever, in perpetuity. Even here, we are on day three of no school due to snow. In South Carolina. Does Palin’s evil reach have no bounds?!

The Left and the media, as always concentric circles on a Venn diagram, attempted for days to spin a false and odious narrative placing blame for the shooting in Tucson on Sarah Palin and everyone like her. Because, vitriol. Or something. Days of vile political opportunism, on the backs of the dead. Days of disgusting smears the likes of which I’ve never seen before in my lifetime. Days of giddily and gleefully exploiting deaths, including those of a federal judge and a nine year old child, all in an attempt to score political points and to silence and demonize those with whom they disagree.

That the facts did not support such claims even one iota meant nothing. In fact, they absolutely ignored all evidence and truths and proceeded to just make stuff up. All focused on Sarah Palin, who miraculously manages to be a dumb old chick from the sticks and the most evil person alive. She’s kind of like George W. Bush that way, I suppose. Chris Matthews went so far as to put a graphic up during his show last night with Sarah Palin’s picture, reading underneath “Silent: On The Lam.” On. The. Lam. As if some fugitive, implying that she, along with the tea party, is somehow responsible for a massacre perpetrated by a madman.

Today, Sarah Palin released a video statement. It is a thoughtful, inspiring, dead-on (violent rhetoric!) response (the full transcript can be found here):

A pitch perfect response, both from the heart and smart. Naturally, that then caused the Left to lose whatever tenuous grip they had left on reality. See, Sarah Palin was bad for being “silent and on the lam” last night. But, today, she is super icky for responding and not remaining silent. After being accused for days of having “blood on her hands” and of being responsible for the acts of a madman. Who, incidentally, apparently did not even watch nor listen to the news and, therefore, likely did not even have any knowledge of the supposedly evil cross-hairs graphic. Or anything else for that matter.  It was clear almost immediately that the left was actually upset because her response was exactly correct. Based not just on emotion – actual heartfelt emotion – but on facts and reason. Pesky old reason! That does not suit. The new “in” thing is complete fabrications, mixed with a healthy dose of utter delusion. Therefore, the smears continued, predictably.

First came speculation from Ben Smith at Politico, and others, that Sarah Palin was ‘stirring the pot” with the use of the phrase blood libel and that the phrase must have been fed to her by someone who “got” the context. Oh, no, that dum-dum rube obviously doesn’t know the historical context and just somehow randomly came up with that phrase while prattling inanely and brushing her hair, soon to be distracted  by something shiny. History? That’s for boys!  She was also decried for the use of the phrase itself, even though it’s been used many times by others and is a common phraseology in the political world. It is also absolutely accurate in this instance.

Next came Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC)  in a desperate act of projection. He said:

“You know, Sarah Palin just can’t seem to get it, on any front. I think she’s an attractive person, she is articulate,” Clyburn said on the Bill Press radio show, according to The Hill. “But I think intellectually, she seems not to be able to understand what’s going on here.”

I’d say it was a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but I”m sure that would be racist and political “hate speech”. Clyburn is good at inventing racist acts as well. Unfortunately, he is not intelligent enough to understand that lies are easily proven as lies when there are large groups of people around, all with some form of video capturing devices. Next came Adam Serwer, at the Washington Post who wrote the following drivel:

Now, mere days after the incident, with six people dead and Giffords still recovering, Palin is making herself the center of attention. It might please the audience for conservative talk radio or Fox News, but most people will be disgusted. As well they should be.

How does Serwer, and others like him, sleep at night? And what color is the sky in their deranged world? Palin is making herself the center of attention?  How dare she respond to continuous and constant claims that she be held responsible for mass murder!  Who does she think she is? And how dare she defend innocent people who are also being accused of fomenting a “climate of hate” – by merely voicing their thoughts and opinions – so pervasive that madmen bear no responsibility for their own actions. The depth and stench of  the manure the Left is shoveling is astounding. They made Sarah Palin the center of attention by attempting to blame her, on the backs of the dead, solely in a demented attempt to score political points.

More followed.  She was also demonized for not being apologetic by the LA Times in an article with the headline “Sarah Palin unapologetic after criticism related to Arizona shootings“.  “Criticism” must be the Newspeak way to say disgusting demonization. Further, why should she apologize? There is one person responsible for the murderous rampage in Tucson and that is Jared Loughner.  She was accused of “sullying” the nation with her very existence. Others claimed she has decided that she is one of the victims of the Tucson shooting.

The list goes on and on. The epically disgusting behavior of the Left during a time of tragedy cannot even fully be explained nor chronicled. It’s too much. One thing is clear; Sarah Palin scares them. And it’s not because she is violence foment-y or fosters a “climate of hate.” It’s because she is not afraid of them. It is because she is strong. It is because she will not let them silence American citizens. She won’t be cowed by their attempts to sneeringly dismiss a “little woman’s” intelligence. She didn’t run when they then moved onto attempts to outright dehumanize and demonize her. Is it also because her statement today showed real leadership? While the Left continues to odiously politicize tragic deaths, Sarah Palin is striving to help strengthen the country with comforting and emotion-filled words in a time of tragedy. She is choosing to stand up for, comfort and inspire her fellow citizens. She is not trying to pin the murderous acts of a lunatic on good, innocent people to further her own end.

My “new tone”? I’ll choose Sarah Palin.

cross-posted from newsreal

COMMENTS

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    and more irrationally and venomously, than anyone since Richard Nixon. I’ve never seen liberals en masse enter such a hateful fugue state than when considering all things Palin.

    And I know why: For three generations, they’ve said that those on the Right are brutish thugs who want to rape women and keep them down, tied to the kitchen sink; and that we must elect Democrats as a bulwark against such brutishness. She eloquently, gracefully, cheerfully puts the lie to this scurrilous position. And threatens their electoral viability.

    She could, quite literally, be the Abraham Lincoln of women, in that she could move an entire American population –women– into the Republican column, in much the same way Lincoln did for freed blacks for generations after the Civil War.

    So, they will stop at nothing –NOTHING– to stop her. And the really cool thing about Sarah is that she’s up to the challenge. But, a caution: The left is completely capable of the sort of violence we on the right are always accused of, and I pray she is properly guarded and prepared.

    • pgrlights

      Abraham Lincoln? you need lots of meds honey..America is going to flush this tweedel brain as soon as the Iowa convention is over.

      • gekster

        Who do want for her running mate?

        • conservativecurmudgeon

          But, I’ve come to no conclusion vis-a-vis 2012. There’s many a Slip betwixt the Cup and Lip, to wax rhapsodic. If she ran, and if she secured the nomination, heck, I’d suggest Michele Bachmann. Make it a full-blown Estrogen Ticket, and watch the left self-detonate.

          • gekster

            the reply was to pgrlights.

        • sapwolf

          See above.

      • Praying

        So this is your first day here, huh, pgrlights? If you don’t want it to be your last, I’d suggest you read this: http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/01/03/you-are-entering-a-republican-zone/. And then follow it. Because you’re 0 for 2 now…

      • lgbpop

        Is that all you know how to do, call people names? That’s not very respectful of other people or other peoples’ beliefs. Don’t you believe in and celebrate diversity? Why don’t you throw a candlelight vigil and REALLY show us what you think of her?

        The OP is right – you leftists are seriously unhinged.

      • conservativecurmudgeon

        I didn’t say Sarah Palin WAS a Lincoln– I only said her effect on the Republican Party could be such that it would change the face of the electoral map LIKE Lincoln, and the Democrats have known this from about September 4th, 2008– that’s why they despised her instantly; she could conceivably be a politcal Game Changer.

        For eighty years, blacks voted for “The Party Of Lincoln”; then, that changed. That was that. I suggest you look up any references to The Blue Bomb of 1960.

        I need no meds. I’ve had plenty of buffalo wings, thank you. And, for my edification, what, precisely is a “tweedel”?

        • http://www.800cart.com Ron Robinson

          They are all talking to pgrlights – she is here to provide some well-needed entertainment, let’s appreciate that and enjoy it for what it’s worth.

          And I understood you – clearly – no explication needed – and you are right on! I like Palin too, but also doubt her electability, but what would we have all said about Obama’s electability in 2006?

          Anything can happen in 2 years.

      • jdw4america

        how dark will your darkness be? I paraphrase, of course.

      • dudette

        we are NOT talking about Obama, pgr

      • williamjameson

        You want to flush Palin and drown her. Will liberals then blame toilets or Joe the Plumber!!! ROFL!! People like you are a joke.

  • spainishirish

    Surely the God some White House political operative thought it a bad idea to give a “memorial” in a college gym. Then again, maybe not. The applause and cheering are out of Obama’s hands, of course, but the selection of the venue was not.

    So here we have the contrast. Palin gives a pitch perfect tribute and rebuts blood libel, and Obama is in a gym reading a speech while supporters cheer him on. Again, that’s not Obama’s fault except his folks chose the location. Maybe they should turn to Palin for advice in the future, you know, place a call to Hell or whatever.

    • LisaDe

      and not a more appalling display of inappropriateness have I ever witnessed. Cheers at a memorial service? And then after Obama professed his displeasure at placing blame they panned in on Sherriff “Dumdik” who was clapping away. It took everything I had not to throw my glass right through my tv.

      • NeoKong

        He calls Arizona a mecca of hate and bigotry and conservatives and Tea Partiers akin to murder and there he was clapping that Obama was calling for people to tone it down.

      • qixlqatl

        I thought nothing the left could do would shock me, but … I’m speechless. I mean, he is the President!!! Doesn’t he have anyone on staff with the brains to know how bad this looks?

        • carolina

          Very telling, I think. Plenty, though not all, found the rah-rah STRANGE.

          • gekster

            I don’t think they’ll edit it.

          • carolina
          • gekster

            I was just informing in case anyone wanted to watch it again.
            Who knows, someone might.

        • proudmarinemom

          My dad passed away when I was in HS. Some classmates wanted to do a memorial Mass for several families who had lost loved ones that winter.

          At Communion, a couple of teens got out guitars and sang … drumroll …”Dust In The Wind” by the band Kansas.

          My mom started laughing so hard, she had to put a hankie over her face and pretend to be crying. I was annoyed, but eventually ended up laughing, too.

          People don’t think.

          • lineholder

            Sometimes laughter is the only way to get through it.

            Otherwise, thoughtless actions could drive us insane.

  • carolina

    I found all of that rah rah cheering VERY strange.
    I guess all of the folks who have lost loved ones feel much better now. /sarcasm off
    Now to wait for the lamestream media to bow to the ONE. (barf)

    • Doc Holliday

      guess they do it different over there

      • Doc Holliday

        I also did not like the president speaking for the dead, I might have to amend my own will. Obama will not be speaking for me.

        • aesthete
      • proudmarinemom

        .

    • chihank

      Obama’s speech was decent. Watch the media fawn over how Presidential Obama is and how House GOP leaders could be tepid in challenging Obama in roder to let the nation heal.

      Could Tucson be Obama’s 9-11?

      • nivlem

        His speech was well done – very long, and sometimes repetitive, but well done. I really liked it much of it.
        Once again the mainstream media blows it by building it up so high that he is unable to meet the expectations. Let’s face it….their “man” needs a win so bad, that if he came out chewing gum and toothless they would fall over themselves to applaud him.
        Nevertheless, there are glaring differences in his Christian views and mine. I believe these views were the nuts and bolts of his speech. It is apparent to me that he believes he has been given a purpose. He believes the preaching of Jeremiah Wright and Social Justice. He believes he is here on earth to make these God given justices come to fruition.
        It is a major difference to compare his speeches to those of George Bush.
        This is why his awesome speech tonight will not survive the scrutiny of
        Americans. When they wake up in the morning and compare his actions to what they would do on a daily basis, it doesn’t match up. No passionate speech on the part of President Obama will do it because his thoughts and intentions do not line up with the majority of America.
        The really sad thing is he will never understand or comprehend why. It is because he is deep down who he is, and that fact does not allow him to connect no matter how bad he wants to.

        • lineholder

          he sounded “nice” in 2008, too. That’s before we realized what he meant when he said that he intended to “fundamentally transform” this nation.

          I hope everyone keeps in mind that this is the still the same man he was and always has been.

  • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

    Regardless of your politics it was a very good speech. Rose above the ruckus and provided some moral leadership. Its worth listening to. I would suggest it will have more impact than almost any other speech he gives during his term.

    • Jack_Savage

      “And all that I have spoken about begins with me, and my party.”

    • chihank

      Its easy for Obama to be above it all, when his supporters are out there spreading the smears against the right. I would like Obama to call his own party for using Giffords as a sympathy and fundraising tool. When Giffords is able to walk, watch Obama and other Dem candidates parade her around.

      • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

        I don’t know if you listened to the speech but what he said was “Stop the finger pointing” – We have NO idea what was in that violent man’s head, etc.

        It was what looked to me to be a sincere effort to help us all rise above the BS that we’ve been deluged with this week.

        • gekster

          And I think he adjusted accordingly.
          And you could tell it was from a script, not from the heart.
          And all the cheers were from all the lefty students in the crowd.
          Why not pick a venue that favors you.
          Thats why in a collage gym, not, God forbid, a church.
          Apropriate for a pep rally.

          • carolina
          • aesthete

            Tucson is the UA, Davis-Monthan AFB, and Raytheon. Of those locations, only the UA had the facilities, international recognition, and experience to handle an event of that magnitude. Moreover, given that Giffords was Jewish, and that the families of those slain were of different sects (one was Roman Catholic), finding a religious building or church that would be inoffensive while meeting the criterion for a Presidential event (security, logistics and the like) would have been impossible. The UA was a logical choice. The real question for me is why the stadium, rather than Centennial Hall (where Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Mike Mullen delivered his remarks)? I imagine that it was because of the size of the crowd expected.

            More disturbing to me is that these sorts of events have to be “events” in the first place.

          • gekster

            The rest stands.

          • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

            Even if he waited to see which way the wind was blowing, he came up with the correct response in my opinion: Stop the finger pointing, get over it, grow up.

            He didn’t chastise the right, talk radio, etc. That was a big step in the right direction.

            We’ll see if he unleashes his hounds to do the dirty work for him, but until he does, I say good job Mr President.

          • gekster

            I didn’t point any finger.

            I don’t want to grow up.

            And after the backlash from the left being WRONG about the causes of this tragedy for the last three days, I’m sure his handlers adjusted his speech.
            And you could tell it was from a script, not from the heart.
            It wasn’t a memorial, it was a pep rally.

          • Jack_Savage

            “We

          • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

            I don’t know Jack, I’m thinking hope is better than despair. You know, if we all just did a very simple thing – if we all just said we hate the hate, and want to hear reasoned but considerate arguments pro and con for any given topic, our politicians would have no choice but to rise to the occasion.

            We could demand that they stop the spin and just talk to us straight. We could turn off the media pundits who are more interested in agitating us into a loyal following than giving us the straight story.

            There is a problem in that we get emotional – tribal I call it. We want to “win” sometimes, and we take maybe too much joy in watching our rivals loose.

            The media is complicit in this because we tune in when our emotions are engaged. But thats not good for us, our personal health; its not good for our careers or our family. We tend to spend too much time on it – looking for emotional rewards.

            Obama was right tonight. Be skeptical, but watch the speech. It was a-political.

          • sbo6220

            to chastise the right? Wasn’t it the Left that started spewing their vitriole in less than two hours after the tragedy? Perhaps he should have praised the Right for not doing so.

        • grandma

          doing to conservatives. Yea right! “Stop the finger pointing.” Under his breath he then tells the sheriff to keep it up.

          • Mike Ferguson

            Yes, I do believe it is fear of her, because only fear could lead to the unreasoning and bordering on pathologic hate for a woman who’s only actions have been to support the candidates that she liked and had the gall to actually think she could be Vice-President.

            Though after a moments thought I don’t believe you can call most of the people on the lefts thought processes as actually….”logical”.

          • 6eorge Jetson

            I’d just love to hear Sarah say that.

          • Mike Ferguson
      • 6eorge Jetson

        nt

      • JSobieski

        If she a big lib, there is no doubt how she would use all of this. However, she is a Blue Dog (and allegedly a former Republican).

        By most accounts, she seems pretty real. I wonder what her comments on this period of time will be when she is asked. I hope she doesn’t sell out.

    • JSobieski

      If he would have been smarter his first two years, he would be far better off politically now than he is.

      • carolina

        who said he was going to try and do better and reduce his personal vitriol. If enough of the ‘true believers’ believe this speech…….. that could help.
        Here’s hoping obama will follow his own advice now.

    • bobmontgomery

      I could hear it rising and rising all the way from downstairs, and the cheering and clapping. Ruckus? Oh, yes That is a very polite word for what we have been subjected to for the past four days. Ruckus. And the reviews? Oh, yes, I expected the reviews. I fully expected “worth listening to” and i fully expected “will have more impact” and I even kind of half-expected “moral leadership”. I just didn’t expect it here.

  • jaykali

    The reporting by the MSM and left wingnuts they last week has been the most manufactured reporting I’ve ever seen. So now if a bunch of wingnuts post that the boogeyman is to blame the MSM believes that is a source they need to throw out in the mix and keep reporting on?

    One of the favorite ‘tools’ of the left is calling everybody extreme and racists bc that puts people in the defensive position of defending why they’re not racists instead of whatever the argument was.

    And I guess the MSM has run with the ‘Tea party are racists and extremists’ even tho there isn’t any evidence but for some reason this has more impact. I guess the difference is speed. It took a while for the left (2 weeks?) to string together that tea party people are angry racist extremists but this shooting tragedy turned into ‘Palin’s map kills 6′ so fast that it made my head spin.

    I honestly think it will get worse before it gets better. The left has become completely unraveled. I don’t think there are going to be any big wins for the left anytime soon which will help continue this tailspin. It’s kind of amusing but also frustrating.

    People talk ab it discourse being worse and I kind of agree in one sense (shocking!) – the vitriol was bad in the bush years but facebook/twitter are more recent phenomenons and so information isn’t just 24/7, it’s also in your face in real-time and so that makes it seem worse. Twitter is even more unfiltered than blogs. And with twitter things go viral more quickly.

    Anywho this might be the ‘good ole days’ here pretty soon. I think until the center-left decides to disown the far left crazies that things will continue to get worse.

  • Stan

    As usual, a well-written post. By the way, you should consider trade-marking “the cause of All Bad Things Ever, in perpetuity”. ;-)

  • Next93

    I would suggest that we take a page out the Alinsky/Daily Show/Saturday Night live playbook.

    My thinking is that the Tea Party, talk radio, and Sarah Palin have EXACTLY as much to do with this lunatics actions as, say, kippered herring. And, since kippers are beloved of the last group of people we had to take back Washington from (the Brits, during the war of 1812), we should outlaw kippers, too.

    And remember, once kippers are outlawed, only outlaws will have kippers.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Really? I thought they lost their grip on it in the ’60′s when the communists started taking over the left..

    On the plus side it’s always nice to watch the media meltdown. It reminds me of Orwell’s “minute of hate” on steroids. Blood libel is spot on for where the left is trying to take everyone, the truth in that comparison and the wedge the left is trying to twist her meaning into should illustrate the surrealism of the modern left’s ministry of truth and be self evident of why they need to be left behind in the dustbin of history.

  • Jack_Savage

    In his new book “Pitchforks and Torches – The Worst of The Worst, From Beck, Bill and Bush To Palin And Other Posturing Republicans”.

    I am not lying, and this is not a joke. It is the title/ subtitle of his new book.

    • aesthete
    • wrveres

      I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised to find out that this is where Keith’s chickens come home to roost.

  • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

    When my boy looks up at me like I’m the greatest person in the world, it makes me wish I was.

    Obama captured that tonight.

    I’ve never been hateful toward the people I disagree with (OK, maybe just a handful of times :-) but I’m personally going to try to do better.

    I know it can be personally gratifying to belittle some no-nothing, but this country has bigger problems than the sandal wearing hippy with dandruff in the cubicle down the hall, or my leftist professor brother-in-law who apparently knows EVERYTHING.

    Maybe I don’t agree with them, but I don’t have to hate them. I can try, patiently, and repeatedly to explain where I’m coming from. And I can demand, er, ask that they show me the same respect.

    But I don’t want to make it tribal anymore.

    • Jack_Savage

      Really?

      In my view, they have about 60 years of reckless, violent, hateful behavior and rhetroic they need to confess to and ask forgiveness for before the conversation even starts.

      • lineholder

        One incident and one speech doesn’t mean that their agenda has changed.

        They are who they are, the same kind of people today that they have always been.

        • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

          So we declare: I won’t budge until they grovel!

          I guess I don’t care if they follow suit. Its about me, after all, not them. I want to be the Dad my boy thinks I am, and what I once was. And if they don’t follow suit, then it is their loss.

          I’m a better person when I’m big. It takes a big person, a confident person, to be kind – that’s what I tell my boy. I intend to be less threatened by those I disagree with and make more of an effort to understand their perspective. I will also ask that they do the same for me.

          But I realize now that I am setting the tone for the next generation, and I want to do that with kindness in my heart – and hope that others do the same for me – and him.

          He’s a special needs kid, an easy victim. And I shudder to think of the anger I see in our society ever turned toward him. We are setting an example, with every word.

          Full disclosure: I’ve been an abrasive dick in the not too distant past. I intend to change that.

          • Jack_Savage

            And when I remember every word the left has said about Trig Palin, you will forgive me if I do not follow suit.

            They want forgiveness and reconciliation without confession and repentance. It doesn’t work that way.

          • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

            You have always acted with nothing but kindness and compassion? If not, why demand of others what you have nor been capable of?

          • 6eorge Jetson

            I hereby demand that from the Left.

          • Jack_Savage

            They are, while calling for Palin’s assassination out of the other side of their mouth.

            When the left truly examines what they have contributed to the sicknesses that plague America, then I’ll listen to this garbage. Not until then.

          • lineholder

            At least now your reasons are clearer.

            It’s not about making them grovel, HH. They want to fundamentally transform our nation and our home into their own image of a totally different kind of society.

            This has been their goal for almost a century and they aren’t going to just back down on that now.

            Be kinder if your conscience tells you to do so, but when it comes to trusting them….then that will your choice be?

          • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

            That they respect me and listen to me – no – REALLY listen to me. And I will do the same for them. And no, it won’t be easy. But I owe it to my kids (I have another from a previous marriage).

            They are not insane. I am not a genius. It is more important that we are kind than we are right.

            Its not about them, its about us. Its about me. When anger wells up it me I find that it comes from a place of insecurity. But I know that fear gets us into an intractable complication – no one is big enough to bend.

            I’ll talk to anybody about anything, but I don’t want to talk to anybody who leads with hate.

          • lineholder

            I’m too much of a realist to believe that they will simply abandon what they have been fighting to achieve for so long.

            I don’t trust them regarding the future of our nation. I have plenty of concerns about how the choices they make will influence the generations that come after us.

            I do not now nor have I ever gone out of my way to be cruel, vindictive, spiteful, or malicious to those who disagree with me and I’m not about to start now.

            But I’m not willing to just give them the benefit of doubt either.

          • sbo6220

            Perhaps the 8-28 event in Washington, or the quickly arranged sojourn to Wilmington, Ohio are the best recent examples of the “best we can be” on the Right.

            My answer to the spewers on the Left is to patiently listen and to smile. Unfortunately, the smile just infuriates them more. They know they are on their way down (and out), so I don’t think it’s necessary to respond to them.

            If we ignore the left and just have faith in the goodness of our cause, and keep spreading the word whenever & wherever we can, we will take back our freedom and our country.

        • http://www.heavyhorsesfarm.com Heavy Horses

          That you’re the same kinda people you have always been. I plan to be the one they can’t say that about. And just maybe, a few of them will think twice too.

          That’s about all I can do. All the other has done nothing but made me miserable. Hasn’t changed a thing.

  • AceInTX

    now the story will be on her “blood libel” line when it should be on Berry holding a pep rally in Tuscon

    • Jack_Savage

      She had to respond. Today was as good a day as any.

      • AceInTX

        I think she was spot on…and the delivery was polished…I just think it could have waited…let the Dems and the so called objective press get a little further out on a limb before sawing it off.

        (Is sawing of limbs overheated rhetoric?)

    • lineholder

      what was your wife’s take on it?

      • AceInTX

        I was on the phone with me when I was listening to it and I heard a snarl when Sarah got to the media…

        heh glad I wasn’t in the room…

        • lineholder

          Except that I’m glad you weren’t in the room either.

          • AceInTX
    • nivlem

      The MSM and democrats have once again made her and her family a target. You bet I am going to call them out.
      Outside of Representative GIfford’s name, Sarah Palan’s name is the most connected name to this massacre. Do you even know the name of the murdered judge?
      Yes, she is going to come prepared to protect her family. She did not ask for this fight…..it was brought to her.
      Her speaking today was the only opportunity to get a word in at all. Once the MSM starts embellishing Pres. Obama’s speech, she will be lost in the shuffle.

      • AceInTX

        Her speaking today was the only opportunity to get a word in at all. Once the MSM starts embellishing Pres. Obama

  • runner12

    for Pres, but I have to say I like her coming out swinging. I have never seen a group of people hate someone as much as the Left and their media hates her. They have this weird obsession with demonizing her.

    First, they blame her for mass murder along with the Tea Party and talk radio. When that failed, they went to attacking her on “blood libel.” First of all, few people know what that means. I myself had to look it up. But even if she did, I am not sure that it is as awful as the media is portraying, I mean, the way I took it was that she was saying that the notion that she contributed to murder was as rdidiculous as the whole blood libel thing and vice versa.

  • wrveres

    How come i haven’t seen anybody mention that Obama meets with these very journ0-list/bloggers quite regularly.

    The very people who decided to “Take Advantage of the Crisis”

  • bygeorge

    Here we go again. A nutter shoots a few people including, unhappily, a member of the US House of Representatives, a Federal Judge, a child and several others and suddenly the left goes berserk and immediately starts blaming the TEA Party, Sarah Palin, talk radio, deranged ex-military types, and everybody else not on the Daily KOS e-mail list. It was an assassination attempt as the investigation has now disclosed and the target of the hit was indeed the Arizona Representative, Gabrielle Giffords. That she did

  • mspector

    will be able to bring himself to criticize Obama for making himself the center of attention in Tucson last night? Or if anyone will be able to bring themselves to point out that so far as the politics of the thing goes, Obama said not one single word that Sarah had not said earlier in the day and far more trenchantly.

  • oses

    One single word that Obama didn’t say was “blood libel”, Trenchant, perhaps, if you dislike Jews, or are trying to get them to dislike you and your cause.

    “It is more important that we are kind than we are right.” says Heavy Horses (above). Hard to disagree.