« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Kermit Gosnell and Roe v. Wade: Something Evil This Way Came

Yesterday it was reported that Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist, was arrested and charged with eight counts of murder. He was charged with the murder of babies who were fully delivered; he induced labor, delivered the babies and then stuck a scissors in the back of their necks and mercilessly killed them. Their first breath, was also their last.  Lacking even the dignity of a human touch; no one holding their tiny, innocent hand coursing with life’s blood, as that life left their tiny bodies. Eyes opening, trying to focus for the first time and trustingly seek out the security of the face belonging to the voice they’d heard for many months inside the womb. Struggling to survive, as the will to live is strong, even in the most tiny and vulnerable.

He was not charged with the murders of babies he killed the same way – earning $1.8 million in one year alone for doing so – only inside the womb.

Gosnell’s abortion mill was a gruesome house of evil. When police searched Gosnell’s facilities, they found that “bags and bottles holding aborted fetuses were scattered throughout the building.  Jars containing the severed feet of babies lined a shelf.” This grotesque cretin kept severed feet as some sort of macabre serial killer trophy.

The State of Pennsylvania knew this. And ignored it. Allowing him to commit murder, time and time again, for decades. Their reasoning? Inspecting abortion mills clinics and requiring that they have basic safety standards would result in “putting up a barrier to women” and their ‘choice’. The ‘choice’ is never explicitly said because by choice they, of course, mean the purposeful killing of a baby. Barbara Boxer and even our own President would have believed the same. Barbara Boxer believes that a right to life does not exist until a mother ‘chooses’ to take her baby home, alive, from the hospital. President Obama, when a state senator in Illinois, had more concern for abortionists than for the babies whose lives they snuff out. He cared more about protecting the vile excuses for human beings like Kermit Gosnell than the babies they were attempting to kill. He believes that babies who are born alive during an abortion attempt should legally be left to die.  As a Senator in Illinois, debating a Born Alive bill, he said this:

As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus; that if that fetus, or child — however way you want to describe it — is now outside the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that it’s nonviable but there’s, let’s say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just coming out limp and dead..

Not just coming out limp and dead. Like the babies born in Gosnell’s facilities. Poor Gosnell would have too much of a burden, what with pesky babies not cooperating and insisting on having the human will to live and the strong spirit to survive.

The extensive grand jury report also said the following:

But even this total abdication by the Department of Health might not have been fatal.

Here they are wrong. That the abortion clinic existed at all, by definition means there were fatalities there. Likely thousands of them. That is the sole purpose of an abortion clinic. Already the pro-abortionist left like Amanda Marcotte, is trying to blame “anti-choicers” for “crappy abortionists“. She is, in effect, saying “Too bad a better ‘doctor’ didn’t kill the babies by stabbing in neck with scissors in a cleaner way.”  If only he’d hidden the evidence, you see. So people weren’t forced into realizing that lives, not balls of cells, are snuffed out. She cares naught for actual safety. If she did, why would she have adamantly opposed Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s conclusion that state agencies in Virginia could legally regulate abortion clinics? Do you know why she, and other pro-abortionists objected? Because some clinics wouldn’t be able to afford meeting basic safety standards and would have to close down. See, they don’t give a hoot about safety. It’s all about blood money and a sickening agenda.

Furthermore, the difference between this gruesome killing machine and a “safe” clinic is aesthetics, really.  There is no denying the horror of what was found in this “doctor’s” office. But it happens in every abortion clinic across the land. Sticking a scalpel in a baby’s neck in utero has the same result as sticking it in the neck with scissors outside the womb: Death.

In this case, people can visualize the actual babies, as they were horrifically kept in jars and bottles. In “safe” clinics, they are hidden away in haz-mat disposals or chopped up into tiny pieces before being sucked out of their mother’s womb and disposed of like trash. Hidden away, allowing people to blind themselves to what is actually happening. It is easier to remain blissfully ignorant and ignore the fact that a baby is a baby, in utero or out. It is easier to believe that a life taken inside the womb is somehow different than a life taken outside of one. It is easier to believe that ‘viability’ is a valid argument, otherwise one would have to come to the appalling realization that Roe v. Wade actually sanctions infanticide.

Here is what is actually happening, to the babies who are aborted without being fully delivered:

My eyes shot back to the screen again. The cannula was already being rotated by the doctor, and now I could see the tiny body violently twisting with it. For the briefest moment the baby looked as if it were being wrung like a dishcloth, twirled and squeezed. And then it crumpled and began disappearing into the cannula before my eyes. The last thing I saw was the tiny, perfectly formed backbone sucked into the tube, and then it was gone. And the uterus was empty. Totally empty.

The only difference is that some of the babies Gosnell killed took a first, and last, breath. Others never even get a first, and only, breath. Their lives are snuffed out inside what should be a safe harbor. Never having a chance to breathe, never feeling a single human and loving touch. Never having a chance to see the grace and beauty of life. Never feeling the sun warming the tops of their sweet-smelling heads. Never lifting their faces into the rain to catch drops on their cheeks and tongue. Never chortling with innocence and wonder. Never giggling in the way that children do; a way that touches you so deeply and fills you with joy to your very core. Never growing up to fall in love, to marry and to have children of their own.

This is the slippery slope of Roe v. Wade and the evil it has wrought. Fifty million babies have been killed since it became law. Babies are killed every hour of every day, only more often with a vacuum or a D&C than with scissors, which makes it easier for people to choose to believe the ‘ball of cells’ lie. What happened in Gosnell’s office should hit home as an atrocity, even to people who purport to be pro-choice. To some people, being pro-choice really means they are making the choice to believe the ‘ball of cells’ or non-viable lies, because they want to be enlightened and For The Women. Because, empowerment. Feminists even seek to celebrate abortion as something that gives them their twisted idea of equality. But it is not enlightened nor high-minded; it, like Roe v. Wade, is condoning, for whatever reason, the killing of innocent life.

My rights as a woman are not predicated on a legal ability to kill my own children. To suggest otherwise does not empower women. To the contrary; it degrades and demeans women and all of society. Our hands are stained with the blood of the 50 million lives lost and we must put an end to the lie that it is a Women’s Rights issue. The pro-abortionist Left has odiously, yet effectively, made that the issue. It’s not. The issue is that we are sanctioning infanticide and it must end.

Their voices, 50 million voices, were silenced. The screams of those innocent babies are unheard. Ours cannot be.

COMMENTS

  • givemeliberty

    N/T

  • LargeBill

    There is no real difference between Gosnell and any other abortionist.
    Some kill kids at a different age. Doesn’t matter. Just as dead.
    Some kill kids in a different location. In the womb or just outside the womb. Doesn’t matter. Child is just as dead.
    Regardless of age and regardless of location abortion is equally immoral and barbaric. Anyone who defends any of them is defending all of them and are complicit in that evil.

  • queenbeemo

    Amanda Marcotte, is trying to blame

    • geah

      just poalin don’t kill babies schwa

      • geah

        I sometimes use word not english, I meant a better doc does not kill babies,

    • bassethound

      also realize that women aren’t going to want to go to the town abortionist to deliver their healthy pregnancies or for their routine gynecological care.

    • bassethound

      also realize that women aren’t going to want to go to the town abortionist to deliver their healthy pregnancies or for their routine gynecological care.

    • aesthete

      Abolitionists are pushing the merciful slaveowners out of the craft.

  • jen0517

    I know full well the true meaning of “pro-life”. If my son’s birth mother had made a different choice, I would not have this incredible child in my life. God bless her for having the courage to choose life. My husband and I are forever grateful.

    • johnhandel

      As an adoptive mother, you likely know the full level of difficulty to even adopt a child. There are waiting lists as long as Route 66 for children. About the only way to get an adoption through in a reasonable time is to petition to adopt a special-needs, foreign-born child.

      When I was younger, my parents looked into adopting. For a fairly healthy, US-born child, the waiting list (based on availability of children) was over 15 years. The waiting list for a fairly healthy, foreign-born child was around 7-10 years. The waiting list for a US-Born special needs child was over 5 years. One of the very few ways around the waiting lists was to know the person from whom you were adopting. Since those waiting lists were entirely a function of available children, economics states that there was much more demand for babies for adoption than there was available babies to be adopted.

      Considering the birth rate, that clearly refutes the lie of ‘unwanted children’ and the rhetoric ‘Every child a wanted child’. The simple fact is that every child IS wanted, even if not by the biological mother. Even ignoring that a certain percentage of mothers change their mind about adoption pretty much immediately after birth, the demand for children to adopt would totally absorb all available babies, even if all abortions stopped tomorrow.

  • chihank

    The Philly abortionist shoiuld serve as a reminder that there should be no truce on abortion. I am glad Speaker Boehner is joining with Pence & Bachmann to cut tax funding to Planned Parenthood.

  • ladydoc

    Once a doctor turns his focus from saving and preserving lives to violently destroying them, it’s all downhill from there. Some doctors start doing abortions to pay off their education loans and some do them because they sloppily bought the unsupportable notion that pervades the collective subconsciousness: that snuffing out the life of a woman’s little child within her uterus somehow constitutes a favor to the woman. Many of these abortionists fail to actually consider the absurdity of that notion. The real answer is to help the women and teen mothers with whatever difficulties, whether medical or social or emotional, that they perceive they have with their pregnant status, not conspire with them to destroy the completely innocent little person at the center of things.

    Once a woman has subjected herself to one or more abortions, she has to live with that reality for the rest of her life.

    The same is true of the abortion doctor; however he has to live with that reality dozens or hundreds or thousands of times over. On some level, all abortionists know that they are mass murderers (despite the fact that abortion is legal). People can only deny to themselves so much. Abortionists can only tell themselves so many lies and half-truths and remain convinced.

    Many have left the abortion field, notably Dr. Bernard Nathanson (co-founder of the pro-abortion NARAL lobby), Dr. Tony Levatino, nurse/director Joan Appleton, director Carol Everett, Planned Parenthood abortion facility director Abby Johnson (whose autobiographical book and espose unPlanned debuted as a national best seller last week), Dr. Noreen Johnson, and many others who’ve slipped away quietly.

    Hopefully all the remaining abortionists will leave before they completely descend into the abject sadism evidenced by this West Philly abortionist and infanticidist. (“infantisadist”?)

  • donp

    Yesterday I tried Bing, searching for “abortion Dr arrested” I got 1 result matching the query, and thousands about “abortion Dr murderer arrested” All of those were over a year old, many about the same incident. At first I wondered if it was search engine bias, but then I realized that there is likely to be very little reportage in the msm.

  • ladydoc

    I first caught this story Wednesday when CNN covered it. The daytime anchor covered the press conference held by the Philly DA and his team and then interviewed him. Today she gave an update and interviewed the attorney of the late woman’s family and I didn’t catch any sugar-coating; rather, while remaining professional, the anchor and her legal analyst guest were clearly shocked and outraged by the crimes on which they were reporting. I assume FoxNews covered the story too; not sure yet about MSNBC but Chris Matthews should get around to covering it despite his support for legal abortion because, that said, his old boss and hero Daniel Patrick Monihan, a supporter of abortion legality, famously said that partial birth abortion was essentially infanticide and I think CM agreed with that. Also, CM hails from Philly and often comments on significant stories from Philly. Also, the DA is a Democrat so that should give fellow Dems some comfort in denouncing this West Philly “doctor”.

    Note also that the AP covered this story and did so in a journalistically professional manner.

    So, so far anyway, CNN and AP (and doubtless other mainstream media outlets) do deserve credit for covering this awful, awful story. Having said that, I’m not sure if CNN devoted any prime time coverage yet.

  • markinidaho

    I hope God has a special place in heaven for these children that have been so brutally murdered with such evil by these monsters and ghouls that call themselves “doctors”. I want to know every single child, and I hope God allows them to grow up just like they would have – I will love every one of them all the way through infancy, toddlerhood, childhood, adolescence, and into adulthood. And, I hope He has a special place in hell for the murderers that kill the children. It will need to be a place hotter than Hitler’s hell, hotter than Stalin’s hell, and a place that I – and every child that was murdered by these monsters – will completely forget. Forever.

    May God grant that no one, no where in the universe, ever remember that these horrid and evil people ever existed, and the same for those that support them. May each of them suffer eternally in complete solitude and full torment, without ever coming to mind to anyone, not even to each other.

    There is repentance, and if they repent and hate the sin, but seek forgiveness from the Lord, then I am with Him on that. But if not, may this curse be fulfilled in it’s entirety.

    • geah

      a very big rocking chair, I used to tell mothers who aborted and then fell into depression, was too late to fuss, but I did make them know God had a very large rocking chair , and a special place where they all play, like they should be doing here or paying taxes, working ,raising their own children..

  • bigmaude

    Was read at my daughter’s baby shower Sunday. I noticed David talked about bloody men, and hating them with a perfect hatred. I do. Anti God, anti life, anti anything that is love, and babies are love. God is there at their conception, He chooses life.

    • proudmarinemom

      .

  • ecwilkin

    …according to Dr. Alveda KIng, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. during an appearance at a Black History Month event in Washington, DCin 2008.

    • bigmaude

      She had four abortions before her grandfather told her she was murdering her children. I heard her speak last year at our state capital here in Oklahoma. She lives with knowledge and forgiveness. It was moving. So, you want God to bless this country?

    • kpbenware

      …than the NAZIs :

      The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies.–Adolph Hitler

      ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

      The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.–Marcus Aurelius, 14th Roman Emperor

      • kpbenware

        The big lie being that the unborn is simply a ball of cells…….

        ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

        The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.

  • jiminga

    the disgust and rage I feel towards Gosnell and those like him. Not only do they lack a heart, but also a soul. The fires of Hell await them.

  • merada1776

    No matter what they call it or how they define life in order to make it legal, abortion is murder. And Kermit Gosnell knows it as shown by his utter disregard for human life, whether inside our outside the womb.

  • laura_lee

    I heartily agree with you, Lori, as I do whenever I read your columns. I can’t help but hope that gruesome stories like this one will force open, honest discussions around dinner tables, churches, in city halls, state legislatures and in the halls of Congress. Let’s pray that this will be a time of collective disgust and rising up, of realization of this horror, and of education for those who have bought into their neat and clean “balls of cells” scenario. Like the shock at the barbarous nature of partial birth abortion, let’s make this story have a positive effect on the front lines of the battle to end abortion, helping us to gain some ground.

  • dodged5

    There was a time in this country when slavery was “legal” but it was never right or moral. What Hitler did in WW-II Germany was “legal” and what Stalin did in Russia was “legal” but neither their actions, nor the actions of many other mass murders of history, were right or moral. There is a often a wide disparity between that which is legal and that which is right and/or moral.

    Currently, abortion is legal in this country just as slavery was at one time but there will come a time when we will be judged as a people just as the slave traders and owners, Adolf Hitler, and Joseph Stalin have been judged and that judgment will condemn those that made abortion legal. It will condemn those that carried out the procedural murder of fifty million lives under the darkened cloak of it being “legal.” It will condemn those that have so strongly supported, promoted, and pushed abortion and it will condemn those that have murdered the children that were entrusted to their womb to care for and nurture. The judgment that I speak of will come as it has for other mass murders, from the people. The future will be the judge and the abortors will be condemned and vilified in the minds and speech of the people and in the words written in the history books.

    I will not speak here of the judgment of God because I am a historian and not a theologian but I know what my rivate thoughts are on that also and it will not be pleasant. .

    • bigmaude

      I notice here on RS, the comments are always relatively small in number, when the subject is abortion, compared to if someone disrespects one of the Precious Palins. I think that speaks volumes to the hearts and priority of some of us.

  • proudmarinemom

    from reading about this case, and I don’t speak metaphorically, I actually did get sick, I have had to dig down deep to find the courage to read this commentary by University of Minnesota Biology professor PZ Myers:

    http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/01/this_is_not_a_case_about_abort.php

    The readers’ comments which follow this article have left me chilled and shaken. I know these people exist in society. I can turn on the Military History channel any time of day or night and watch actual film footage of the results of their Holocaust. I can comfort myself in the platitude that “We will never forget.” But to witness this evil in the 21st Century shocks the senses.

    One reader, csreid, comments,

    “Abortion always seemed immoral in a fundamental, reactionary sort of way, until someone here mentioned that a woman’s organs are her own, and anything using those organs should at least need permission. Without permission, a woman should be able to evict the trespasser. That’s the argument that put me firmly on the pro-choice side of things. So… why shouldn’t a woman also be able to abort an 8 month fetus, regardless of health issues?
    Or, at least have it removed. If it can survive on it’s own, it could be put up for adoption, I suppose.”

    Another reader, sockonafish, writes,

    “I think the best justification for legal abortion (the one I rely on) was produced by Judith Jarvis Thomson, though I don’t think her defense of abortion would allow for the procedure that Gosnell was using.
    The women have the right to choose to disconnect life support, but to take further steps to terminate seems to overstep the principles in Thomson’s work. To draw on her violinist analogy, it would be as if you woke up, saw that you were connected to the violinist, then proceeded to first disconnect yourself, and then stab the violinist in the neck.”

    Are these people even human beings?

    • johnhandel

      Once you factor in that this is a separate and distinct human life, and that the actions taken are not ‘disconnecting and allowing to die’, but actively killing.

      Actually, There are lots of reasons such arguments fall apart. They are all explained, far better than I can, over at www.abort73.com.

      What is the solution for girls finding themselves with an unwanted pregnancy? We (the people, not the government) must get more involved in helping, comforting, and assisting these girls until the baby is born. The decision can be made to keep the child or put it up for adoption, and the girl can go one with her life. There are many, many cases of unwed mothers turning into the core for a healthy, happy, successful family that includes both parents and multiple children. There are also nearly countless familiies that have been incapable of having children that desperately want some.

      There are already groups out there that will help out the mothers in unwed pregnancies. There are many families that would be willing to cover all the medical costs for the pregnancy and delivery to have chance of adopting the baby. While we oppose this monstrous practice and groups, like Planned Parenthood, that openly promote and endorse it, we should also actively and lovingly promote the alternatives, not look down on the girls struggling with these decisions.

      • johnhandel

        Read:

        http://www.abort73.com/abortion/competing_rights/

        It sort of shreds that justification. (BTW, keep an eye out for predatory music societies. Your kidneys are your own.)

  • bassethound

    the GOP should NOT soften or modify its Pro-life stance.

  • Nevile

    Multiple murders. Doesnt this qualify as “special circumstances”? Doesnt this make this scumbag eligible for the death penalty?

    • johnhandel

      the opinion of a lawyer on that. It would be an interesting twist if such extreme violations would warrant the government ‘aborting’ the abortionist.

      Since I consider even legal/sanctioned abortion to be murder, I would endorse the law changing to make even regular abortions generally capital crimes.

      As staunchly anti-abortion as I am, I have had to evaluate a set of extremely rare circumstances that might warrant an abortion. I am not talking about rape or incest. I opposed penalizing the child for the crimes of the father in those regards. My almost hypothetical circumstance has to do with true medical emergencies, of which I have heard of exactly one case, though I suspect that a few happen every year.

      In this case, a clear (and irrefutable) diagnosis is made of a condition. Left untreated for the duration of a pregnancy, even a shortened one, will kill the mother. Treating the condition will kill the baby. No matter what course is taken, one of the two is dying. (In some of these cases, it is even possible that attempting to leave the condition untreated for the duration of the pregnancy will also kill the baby.) Such situations are extremely rare, but I have heard of one such case from an extremely reliable source.

      In such cases, I would hold that it is the choice of the mother (AND father) what to do. I have known some women that would take the risk still for the chance of saving the babies life. In these cases, the life of the mother and baby are both at very real risk. It has ceased to be come a convenience issue.

  • g0yboy

    Disgrace…Fox News didnt cover the abortionist story at all!!!! Tailor made yet someone…Oreilly,..et all….completely messed up…

    • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

      is someone on the right thinking the same thing.

      FOX News, like all other cable news channels is entertainment first, and actual reporting a very distant second. If they don’t think the story will improve ratings, they aren’t going to cover it.

  • g0yboy

    CBS and Katie Couric had the abortionist story…OREIlly has had anti-Planned Parenthood exposes in the past. Pity that we the viewer cannot reach anyone to communicate the gravity of such stories…I have tried emails and never know whether they even receive it.

  • missyjanie

    I don’t believe abortion is a political question, I believe it to be a moral one
    A woman is free to abort her child, so states the Supreme Court.
    We can’t really change that. What we can do is make certain that each and every female considering an abortion is fully aware of what happens. Each and every one should watch an infant being aborted. All of it. They should look at a fetus at different stages.
    Then make an informed decision. Murder is murder no matter you choose to call it abortion.

    • rightwingmom52

      We can, we should and we must change it. The article at http://www.conservapedia.com/Roe_v._Wade sets forth the legal argument for doing so much better than I can.

      God hates hands that shed innocent blood. Proverbs 6:16-17

      • johnhandel

        According to the Constitution, there is no set of circumstances under which any court can legally write a law. Throw in how much clear and evident fraud and perjury happened in that case and how much the decision of the court has been misinterpreted, it’s beyond time for the court to review that case and the evidence. It would land some people in jail for perjury and open up the issue for the government or the people to write laws limiting or prohibiting abortion.

  • warrior300

    This abortion story is so abhorrent, it should have been big news. The fact that not even Fox News covered it is egregious. But with half the tea party people being libertarians, who want to side-step the social/moral issues, should we be surprised by the lack of news coverage?

    The social conservatives have been losing ground for over a half a century. Other than the short-lived no federal funds for abortions under the George W. Bush administration, which has since been rescinded under Obama’s administration; social conservatives once the majority of Americans have become increasing a smaller proportion of the population.

    With the abandonment of the morality of the Judeo-Christian tradition, we should not be surprised that the true trinity most Americans actually trust and worship in this country consists of the gods of rampant hedonism, greed (materialism), and narcissism. Until the wretched immorality of modern day Western Civilization is addressed, all the talk about tax cuts and economic progress wil be meaningless, and we will not remain a free society, not that we really are at this point.

  • leehazel

    This is the only term I could think of that can encompass the full extent of the Horror and Barbarism that is the practice of Abortion-on-Demand as done in the United States today.

    Not since the days when disembowelment with a sword, slaughter of mother and child singularly or as one in pregnancy were practiced as part making war, has anything approached the terrible act of murder and infanticide done in our Planned Parenthood Clinics et al. If so desired one could include the priestly practice of removal of the beating heart as part of the the act of human sacrifice to be of equal horror.

    How anyone can defend these acts as the acts of a “Civilized” and moral people is incomprehensible.

    This blot must be erased from our nation’s book of deeds and adequate penalties be put in place to stop it from ever repeating.

    My God how far have we strayed.
    regardless of one’s attitude toward God, Jesus, Mohammad et al murder is always murder and infanticide is also murder. It must be stopped.

  • johnhandel

    I have heard, repeatedly, the argument that banning abortion would return us to back-alley, coat hanger abortions and women dying of poorly-done procedures.

    While this is not, in my mind, a valid justification for continuing the practice of abortion, I have to clearly state that I do not believe it to be true for a number of reasons. Most of these revolve around moral decay in our country.

    First, as much as certain moral niceties, such as avoiding unwed pregnancy, were nice window dressing back in the fifties and maybe sixties, out-of-wedlock sex happened a lot back then. It happens a lot more, now, though, and with fewer constraints of moral review or concern about outside judgments of being pregnant and unmarried. There is very little moral outrage over such matters these days unless there are unusual circumstances, such as statutory rape or abuse of position.

    Second, there is little stigma about being an unwed mother in today’s society. Indeed, some women make an industry out of it and live on the taxpayer’s tab.

    Third, there are women’s shelters all across this country. While they mostly aim for abused women, I’ve never heard of one turning away a woman needing emergency help. (I’m sure it has probably happened somewhere, but I’ve never heard of it happening.)

    Fourth, if the shelters aren’t enough, a niche industry of assistance programs would spring up.

    Fifth, as I have noted elsewhere, there are groups already out there offering to help the mothers in cases of unexpected, unwed pregnancies. In some cases, this includes people willing to pay all the pregnancy-related medical expenses for a chance to adopt the baby.

    Sixth, there are, all over the country, support groups that will accept and help pretty much anyone for any reason.

    For these, and many other reasons, the general moral decline in our country has created an environment where very few would have reason to feel so desperate if facing an unexpected pregnancy. Now imagine if groups like Planned Parenthood and NOW put half as much money and effort into helping girls that have unwed pregnancies instead of just pushing for them to have abortions. That is a huge amount of time and resources to create a new support structure for girls that need help and understanding, not getting pushed into abortions.

    • johnhandel

      Many regular birth control pills, which even teenagers can get judgment-free thee days, can even prevent implantation of fertilized embryo and/or create a miscarraige. Would women be using a coat hanger when many of today’s readily-available drugs will do the same?

  • WilliamPennybanks

    After reading the horrible tales from Gosnell’s abortion mill, the discussion safety standards, and a recent bizarre news story, the utterly senseless reasoning behind the Roe decision smacked me in the face again. Safety was one of the sentimental justifications given for legalized abortions (see Ted Kennedy’s “Robert Bork’s America” Speech). What passed for legal justification was that a woman’s privacy interest in deciding what medical procedures should be performed on her body supersedes the state’s interest in protecting the unborn child. In a recent news story, a wannabe pop star from the UK flew to Philadelphia to have an illegal buttock augmentation procedure performed in some hotel room. Those performing the procedure allegedly used the silicone found in kitchen and bath caulk instead of the type used in breast implants and the poor young lady was dead within days. In the same city as Gosnell’s legalized abortion mills, a woman was in a hotel room getting an illegal cosmetic procedure. I wondered, how can abortion be legal while butt implants are illegal under Roe. The person getting the implants has a privacy interest in medical procedures performed on his or her body. The only difference is there is no unborn child to justify a state interest when prohibiting buttock implants. When you see that Roe’s justification for a constitutional right to abort also justifies a constitutional right to get buttock implants, the absurdity of the decision becomes even more obvious.

  • Pingback: Something evil this way came: 40 years of Roe; Cardinal Dolan leads mass before prayer vigil | Twitchy

  • Pingback: Something evil this way came: 40 years of Roe; Cardinal Dolan leads mass before prayer vigil

  • Pingback: Ghastly: Lawsuit alleges Planned Parenthood forced abortion; Left baby parts inside woman | Twitchy

  • Pingback: Brit Hume tweets on Gosnell horrors: ‘This is where the culture of abortion can lead’

  • Pingback: Obama ignores Gosnell horrors with media’s aid: Pesky babies didn’t ‘just come out limp and dead’ | Twitchy

  • Pingback: Abortion’s Back in the News. Wonderful. | The Philly Post

  • Pingback: Brit Hume tweets on Gosnell horrors: ‘This is where the culture of abortion can lead’ | Twitchy

  • Pingback: Actor Nick Searcy slams pro-aborts: How can they feign outrage at Gosnell? Was he ‘too messy?’

  • Pingback: Salon’s sad attempt at smearing the Right wrt Kermit Gosnell. | Irascible Musings

  • Pingback: Ghastly: Lawsuit alleges Planned Parenthood forced abortion; Left baby parts inside woman

  • Pingback: Searcy called it: Sen. Reid says Gosnell was too messy; We need ‘clean, sterile’ murder, guys | Twitchy