« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Fonda, Steinem, Feminists Beclown and Expose Themselves While Putting Out For Obama

The Left Subjugates Women

Gloria Steinem has once again resurfaced from whatever cuckoo pants mammary tower she’s been hiding in to help pen an absurd opinion piece at CNN calling for the FCC to take Rush Limbaugh off the airways. Because, meany pants. I think it was supposed to be serious. I can’t really be sure because, oh boy, did the hilarity ensue. Her ‘writing’ partners, because it apparently takes three feminists to write one op-ed (collective thinking, baby!) were Jane Fonda (I know! My sides ache, too) and radical feminist author Robin Morgan, also an editor at the ever-inane Ms. magazine.

This op-ed, as well as the actions of some other feminist/Lefty groups, are of great value in one way: They totally expose the Left as subjugators, users and abusers of women. But let’s get the side-splitting article itself out of the way first. The trio of attention-seeking irrelevancy open with quotes they didn’t bother to source. Research is hard. Then they go on to include environmentalists in a list of The Most Vulnerable whom Rush Limbaugh has allegedly ‘attacked’. By attacked they mean people with whom he disagrees. Environmentalists! Who among us hasn’t lamented the plight of the poor environmentalists, aimlessly roaming about the country only to see signs like ‘Environmentalists need not apply”? What happened to all those ‘green jobs’ Obama promised? He is oppressing the environmentalists! Who will think of the environmentalists? WHO?

The three then exhibit a staggering lack of self-awareness by claiming that Rush Limbaugh seeks to “dehumanize” people. Um. Did Gloria Steinem forget that she called housewives “dependent creatures who are still children” and “parasites”? That is the Left’s standard operating procedure. That is what they do, always, and especially with regard to women. This has been proven over and over again and only the willfully ignorant can’t see it. This is followed by the pièce de résistance of the op-ed — they equate Rush with Josef Goebbels. No, for reals. While fascistically demanding that The State’s FCC shut down Rush Limbaugh. While seeking to silence those with whom they disagree – using hysterical lies and propagandist rhetoric – they Godwin themselves with Goebbels. Irony is lost on these geniuses.

They ended with the most hilarious line of all when they claimed ‘this is not political’. Of course it is. Everything they do is political. Perhaps Robin Morgan forgot that she said “I feel that “man-hating” is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” She also said ‘Kill your fathers, not your mothers’ – yeah, no ‘issues’ there. And Feminism itself is not about women at all; it’s about serving a political ideology and agenda always. What they fail to realize, being too busy beclowning themselves constantly, is that they are subjugators of women. They are being used – willingly, no less –  to help oppress and infantilize women, making them subservient to The State and Big Daddy Government.

They are quite literally saying that women need a Daddy State to come rushing in to soothe ouchy feelings and be their white knight protecting them from icky mean boys. Which is the same thing Fluke said; the woman for whom they are prostrating themselves to Big Daddy to defend.  She said that silly little women can’t control anything, let alone their ‘reproductive justice’ (whatever in the heck that is) without someone else rescuing them and, you know, picking up the tab. It’s also the same way they infantilize women by screeching about ultrasound laws. Helpless women are too stupid to see an ultrasound before killing their child because they might be so stupid as to change their mind! Feminist heroine Simone de Beauvoir said “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one. “

The horror! Women making choices of their very own? Does not suit. In fact, Gloria Steinem also said that one cannot be a feminist and be conservative and pro-life. We aren’t real women, you see. Real women let others who ‘know best’, like The State, make their choices for them. Or, as another bunch of feminists proved this week, they empower themselves by demanding neither respect, honor nor care. A group called Liberal Ladies Who Lunch has launched a campaign to withhold sex (unladylike language at link) because ‘if our reproductive choices are denied, so are yours.” Idiocy, of course. But there is a larger point that they inadvertently exposed. The founder of the group said the following:

“American men enjoy the benefits of women making their own choices about when to get pregnant. Men get the advantage of free, easy access sex with young women of child-bearing age. It wasn’t like that sixty years ago. If women can’t get reliable birth control, they will just have to keep their legs crossed to prevent pregnancy–even married women. I don’t think anyone wants that.”

Huh. Can you feel the empowerment, ladies? Once again, those on the Left reduce women not only to the sum of their girly bits, but to 25 cent carnival rides requiring no respect just ‘easy and free access’. They throw themselves at pro-abortion men and laud them with tshirts saying ‘I heart pro-choice boys” because, hey, if he knocks you up, he’ll totally drive you to the abortion mill. Who cares if he’s too cheap to pick up the tab for a pack of condoms? We don’t need any respect or care, only Big Daddy Government! No responsibility for you, men. We are just here for your amusement, subservient and willing. As long as you are all pro-abortion-y and treat the children we may create without respect and as disposable, the same way you do us. That’s your legacy, Gloria Steinem. Kudos!

Conservative women can’t be Feminists, says Steinem. Thank Goodness. We’d rather be around men who respect us and honor us. And who aren’t, you know, too cheap to pick up contraceptives if we so choose. We aren’t 25 cent carnival rides. We won’t prostrate ourselves to Big Daddy Government, in fact we want him to get the hell out of our way. We won’t prostitute ourselves for Leftist politicans like Obama, to whom women are an expendable means to a political end. We’d rather think for ourselves and rely on ourselves, with the support of loving family and friends. We aren’t idiots who must think with one collective mind. We not only honor ourselves, but we honor and respect freedom and liberty.

The Left has wrongly held the For The Women card for too long and President Obama is now clearly using it as campaign strategy. It’s far past time their card was revoked. They aren’t For The Women. They are For Using The Women. They absurdly claim the GOP wants women barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. Well, they want us in hooker shoes, fearful of motherhood and in a cell servicing our Big Daddy Government masters.

 

COMMENTS

  • indieinvirginnie

    All guys should. They make us better men.

  • veritaseequitas

    Steinam is 78, Fonda is 75 and Morgan is 71. I imagine all three of them are staring mortality in the mirror and are trying very hard to remain relevant in a world that has obviously passed them by. Let them rant and rave, let them have their last hurrah, and let’s move on to more important issues, like getting Barack Obama gone.
    It will take better men than these three to take someone like Rush down.

    • gr29az

      the true definition of slots

    • renl57

      …all that bra-burning and clenched fist marching from the 1970s is just something they learn about in American History class, nothing more.

      These aging radicals are just trying to recapture the glory days of their youth, that’s all.

      They’re no longer worth getting upset about.

  • TopGun

    Wasn

  • vtxrider

    Think that being a liberal is the reat of having a mental disorder, I know in fact that it is.

  • WillWong

    And thought that she will turn over a new leaf, and then started seeing all these news about her….guess a leopold can’t change its spots!:(

    • TopGun

      must be starting to send her signals the end is near.

      The devil is waiting for her with open arms in hell.

    • WillWong

      http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/j/janefonda.htm

      • TopGun

        a point in time where no matter what you say will be believed by those who chose to lead moral and respectable lives. Jane is decades past that time.

      • TopGun

        Quote-She said she regards herself as a “feminist Christian” and is trying to reconcile that what she calls the “patriarchal, hierarchal structure” of Christianity.-End Quote

        Interpretation: Jane Fonda is trying to re-write the Bible to fit

        • jomo2009

          Trojan Horse Christians, don’t they?

          • TopGun

            Jane enjoys being a Trojan Horse Christian being she likes to brag about all of her “riding” she is taking part in as a 70 year old love child from the 60′s.

            I do not know any Christians who seek the spotlight of the public stage to brag about their sex escapades. She must be fully immersed in that Jeremiah Wright Black Liberation Theology, and it is driving her to the public stage.

            It is like watching a re-run of the Exorcist.

        • tnguy

          That is the case. When I first heard of her conversion, I was encouraged that if she can become a Christian, that’s as great an example as any that anyone can be saved.

          But soon thereafter, she reiterated her Godless beliefs on things like abortion.

          • TopGun

            who would have ever thought it would be Henry Fonda’s daughter to find so many mistakes in the #1 best selling book of all time.

          • WillWong

            And each time a stupid article on her came out, the little hope dies a little more!

  • WD

    that one of these three “thinkers” would have realized that Rush Limbaugh frequently argues that liberals and feminists are hypocrits because they pretend to be open-minded but are the first to try to censor any with whcih they disagree. They are proving his point.

    Not only that, I am sure that they are boosting Rush’s ratings. I don’t usually listen to him, but I cannot wait to tune in and to hear how he responds to this. I would love to have seen the look on Limbaugh’s face when he read this article. I bet he was downright giddy.

  • johnt

    Are these the people who defended Clinton as President, or tried to connect Palin to the Arizona shooting, presumably through a Vulcan mind meld or telepathy. who who ignore the routine vile obscenities of their TV personalities.
    These three hags are only a blip on the cancerous sores of the national suicide movement called liberalism, or progressivism, depending on what time of day it is.
    It’s only Rush’s conservatism that matters, the politics, not the language. There are no standards or principles from the hags, or the rest of the freaks who follow their glands, not their minds.

  • Ann_W

    they will get in our faces about providing other forms of birth control. What’s wrong with this picture?

  • macbookben

    all you will accomplish is his martyrdom.

    “You can’t win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.”

  • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

    ….tells you all you need to know about the woman.

  • TopGun

    Given the fact these Communists believe in Evolution, I sure would like for them to explain scientifically how their IQ

  • jsmills
    • jmadison

      If she wasn’t referring to stay-at-home moms in that quote, then to whom was she referring? Who are these inferiors, these housekeepers, these dependent creatures who are still children, these parasites whom this feminist said society encourages men to spend a lifetime living with?

      Who are they exactly?

      Oh yeah.

      Housewives.

      It is not a “distortion.” It is a 100% ACCURATE representation not only of what WAS said, but what was MEANT by it.

  • Juggernaut

    remaining relevant is all they are about. Hardly are the 3 poster child’s of feminism. If they were they would have gone after MSNBC for Chris Matthews and Creep Olbermann’s attacks of the past.

    Bunch of 2 faced godless souls of liberalism.

  • nepanyrush

    The three main points that I got from her talk: (1) it is wrong to
    believe in an monotheistic God because such is man’s creation; (2) we need to get rid of these artificial terms of gender, listing
    people as either male or female; and (3) we need to have our history books add the history of gay people, transgender people, etc.

    The audience of teachers, educational administrators, and professors was so impressed by this women that they started to give her a standing ovation, but thank goodness she asked them to sit down, or I might have been the only one seated.

    To offer a Republican counterpart, they had David Brooks, who used a good portion of his talk to blast Rush Limbaugh and conservatives.

    Yes, these attendees are the ones responsible for our governmental educational system.

    • tnguy

      ….system are almost completely in the service of Satan…

  • fotophun

    all this is so laughable

    I thought feminism was going to empower women to take care of themselves
    but yet Fluke wants all of us to take care of her and her needs

    plus the left where were they when Clinton was taking advantage of women, and telling the women he raped put ice on your lip
    plus
    attacking those that knew of Clinton’s infidelities
    and continuing to stick up for him with his infidelities right in the WH
    you women care nothing for women
    of course unless they lean in your direction

    • fotophun

      freedom of speech only applies to them

  • http://www.thehayride.com MacAoidh

    …who wants Limbaugh to be banned from the airwaves but doesn’t think Bill Maher’s million dollars ought to be returned because she wants Obama to win re-election…

    http://thehayride.com/2012/03/nows-war-on-rush-exclusive-hayride-video/

  • jmadison

    WOW, talk about your smash-mouth commentary. I have a 38-year-old wife with a Ph.D. and who is at the very pinnacle of her profession–and who can’t wait to get home every day to spend every possible hour with our daughter. She is conservative and Republican, and deal with it, Steinem: she’s a married, Mormon feminist who believes God created man and woman to serve and help each other IN THEIR DIVINELY ORDAINED ROLES.

    And yet, she still finds time to be the best in her profession. It would probably be different if the doc had told her she could have more children, but she’s lucky to be alive this time. Our 11-year-old has quite a role model, a mom who insists she be in church every week and at youth group every Wednesday, who serves her family and her church despite having a high-status job, and who will quite visibly vote against the feminazi crowd that deplores her choices and her opinions because she won’t be stampeded with the herd.

    I guess, Lori, I actually married your baby. She’s the portrait of the feminists’ nightmare, like Sarah Palin but a bit more educated and with a longer resume, but with the same disdain for collectivism and anti-Christian bigotry.

    Love this column.

  • LDahl752

    Where’s the “recommend” button?
    This needs to be shared with every so-called feminist we know, as well as liberal women who are of the same ilk. Really, what have feminists actually done for the betterment of women? It seems most are simply angry about everything and especially angry AT men they seem to believe are oppressing them. It’s a viscious circle. They criticize men relentlessly, then whine because they’re not respected.

  • Pingback: continue