VA Governor Bob McDonnell Hangs VA GOP Out To Dry


Is he abandoning pro-life legislators as the price of being Mitt's running mate?

[UPDATE: I'm informed by someone very much in touch with the Virginia political scene that the root of the problem is the Bob McDonnell's staff are, at the best, pro-life squishes and they are presently negotiating with themselves over the best way of selling out.]

Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, a Romney supporter and leading contender for the VP spot on a Romney-headed ticket, demonstrated his complete philosophical alignment with Romney yesterday by flipflopping on a bill he has championed and in the process hanging VA GOP delegates out to dry.

For those who haven’t been paying attention, Virginia’s legislature has been going after the abortion industry root and branch. Last year they passed a law requiring aborttoirs to be regulated as if they did what they do: perform a surgical procedure which can be life threatening. This year a bill is being finalized that requires a woman seeking an abortion to see ultrasound pictures of the baby. Somehow this bill, which does not require any medical procedure the woman was not going to receive in the first place, has the pro-abortion lobby in a tizzy. Dahlia Lithwick at Slate has predictably styled this as rape.

Up until yesterday, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell had unconditionally supported the bill

Gov. Robert F. McDonnell is backing off his unconditional support for a bill requiring women to have an ultrasound before an abortion, focusing new attention on one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in Virginia’s General Assembly this year.

Until this weekend, McDonnell (R) and his aides had said the governor would sign the measure if it made it to his desk. McDonnell, who strongly opposes abortion, will no longer make that commitment.

As the political damage has already been done to the GOP senators who have taken a courageous stand on this issue, one may rightfully ask why a governor who is barred from running for re-election wouldn’t stand behind the very people he encouraged to take up the bill in the first place?

“Something is happening,’’ Jessica Honke, a lobbyist for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia, said hopefully.

Yes, indeedy. Something is happening.

There is only one explanation that fits all the facts. McDonnell wants to be Mitt Romney’s choice for vice president should Romney almost certainly win the GOP nomination. The ultrasound bill is causing too much controversy and probably has Romney’s handlers wearing brown trousers at the thought of having to actually take a pro-life position in a general election campaign. McDonnell takes to opportunity to look moderate and abandons ship.

In fact, McDonnell’s actions are really a great metaphor for Mitt Romney’s political career.

So, again, we are on the verge of having a defeat snatched from the jaws of victory by someone who appears to be more concerned with what people who will never like him are saying rather than doing the right thing.

In a way, it is sort of fitting that this story breaks on Ash Wednesday. Maybe McDonnell should swear off political games for the next 40 days.

 



RSS feed

90 Comments Leave a comment

Exaggerating

sethellis Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:19AM EDT (link)

I hope everyone actually reads the linked article. I think this is a huge overreaction. They are simply saying that the procedure might be more invasive than thought. I disagree, and believe that myth had been throughly debunked here on redstate. At the same time I’m not opposed to a compromise that might diffuse the argument all together. The end goal of the bill can still be accomplished. I am going to wait and see what they come up with first before I decide to get upset about it.

VA Gov's: Too close to the honeypot

mizzou1776 Thursday, February 23rd at 9:00AM EDT (link)

Another VA. Govenor looking out for the main chance. I witnessed this one make a speech at CPAC. He was a short, lisping & had a strange smile on his face. Not the sort to buy a used car from. He went on about his daughter leading a platoon & how proud he was. Horrible. Is there still a South? Or a GOP?

 
 

Why are we promoting the regulation of medical care?

docaja Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:20AM EDT (link)

One very valid criticism of Obamacare is that it inserts government into the realm of medicine. The effort to require doctors to perform certain procedures, regardless of need, seems even more intrusive. What am I missing?

you're missing a lot

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:24AM EDT (link)

but as you don’t like to read I don’t know how to help you.

You do realize that medical care is regulated? Right? And you do realize that trolling inevitably results in your public humiliation and banning? Right?

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 

A libertarian argument?

Matt Genk (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:39AM EDT (link)

I think you are confusing the powers of the federal government and the state.

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946

So?

mikefromny Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:55AM EDT (link)

So government intrusion is okay, if it’s done at a state level? What’s the rationale for that, one has smaller borders?

Dominion over healthcare is a State issue

Matt Genk (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:07PM EDT (link)

and as such should be the States to decide. As conservatives, we should be encouraging States to have tighter regulations on medical procedures. Surely you wouldn’t want to live in a State that would allow some quack with 19th century medical devices perform open heart surgery on you or your loved ones, would you? It is the State that establishes and enforces those standards. Secondly, this could easily be a fine argument for fiscal conservatism as well. Don’t think for a second that some abortionist would perform an unneccessary procedure on a woman who BELIEVES she is pregnant, and then bill the State untold thousands of dollars. Of course, this type of argument is rarely made because we’re always defending ourselves from the Left’s latest accusation of misogyny in the GOP.

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946

 

Dominion over healthcare is a State issue

Matt Genk (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:07PM EDT (link)

and as such should be the States to decide. As conservatives, we should be encouraging States to have tighter regulations on medical procedures. Surely you wouldn’t want to live in a State that would allow some quack with 19th century medical devices perform open heart surgery on you or your loved ones, would you? It is the State that establishes and enforces those standards. Secondly, this could easily be a fine argument for fiscal conservatism as well. Don’t think for a second that some abortionist would perform an unneccessary procedure on a woman who BELIEVES she is pregnant, and then bill the State untold thousands of dollars. Of course, this type of argument is rarely made because we’re always defending ourselves from the Left’s latest accusation of misogyny in the GOP.

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946

 
 

confusing the powers of the federal government and the state

ndisang67 Wednesday, February 22nd at 4:25PM EDT (link)

Really? Romney says RomneyCare mandates are OK because it’s a state solution and that is unconstitutional at fed level….Well methinks if something is unconstitutional, it is unconstitutional doesn’t matter whether it is at the county, state or fed level…

To get rid of any semblance of socialism, we must get rid of SS, medicare, mortgage interest deductions and all and every subsidy of any kind….else we are just pretenders…

ndisang67: Another example of the failure of public education "civics" courses

acat (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 4:46PM EDT (link)

The Federal Government has a certain number of enumerated powers.

The States have all powers not specifically enumerated and allocated to the Fed.

The Fed is *not* granted the power to require individuals to purchase a product or service. (else why, back in WWI and WWII, did the government sell war bonds instead of just forcing people to buy them?)

Therefore .. the power is allocated to the States .. and Romneycare is perfectly constitutional.

This does not make it “right” and certainly not anything I recognize as “conservative” – it seems to be straight-up socialism to me – but it *is* constitutional.

Words have meanings, y’see, and conservatism is not based upon emotion.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

 
 
 

The "elite" ??

anjinconsulting Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:53AM EDT (link)

I suppose that your insipid question warrants a response from one of the proletariate so you don’t feel so hurt.

The validity of any criticism of Obamacare lies in the administration’s underlying assumption that the federal government can compel it’s citizens to purchase something, and that as result of that purchase the federal government can compel its citizens to behave in a manner that will meet goals set by unelected individuals or by organizations who are not accountable to the congress.

Medical care is already regulated at the federal level as well as the state level. Either you were clueless or you are indeed “trolling” and as such I personally would not have any disagreement if “the elite” summarily routed any further drivel from you to the circular file.

I’m just sayin…..

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. – George Santayana

No man has any more intrinsic right to offical station than another. Those who hold government jobs for a long time are apt to acquire a habit of looking with indifference upon the public interests, and of tolerating conduct from which an unpracticed man would revolt. – Andrew Jackson

 

docaja, in the context of abortion, regulatory measures are badly needed

lineholder (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:57AM EDT (link)

I don’t know how much you understand about the abortion industry as a whole or about how the accreditation process works within the health care industry. But what Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) is attempting to do is to put themselves in a position of acting as an accreditation body for their own offices and operations.

You have to stop and think about it for a second. The government has established specific standards that health care providers have to meet, and in many ways, those standards protect us from harm. Requiring licensure. Requiring that health care orgs perform credentialing to determine who is qualified to provide what types of services within a health care organization and who is not. There are many standards of this sort that DO protect us, and in that context, we should support them.

Suppose there was a major conglomerate of some sort in another sector of industry that managed to gain a significant level of power and control via a mechanism such as becoming an accreditation body, and this conglomerate has a vested economic interest in seeing that specific elements of the industry succeed because in doing so it increases their own profit margin.
As an accrediting body, they ARE the entity providing oversight (supposedly). Do you see how in a situation of that sort the conglomerate could make decisions that are unscrupulous or could do harm as a way of protecting their own economic interest?

This is the direction the situation is moving in with PPFA. PPFA doesn’t want states to have the power or position to implement ANY type of regulatory measures pertaining to the abortion industry, because through those regulatory measures, it could impact their profit margin and also requires external oversight of activities within the abortion industry.

 
 

Banned!

docaja Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:26AM EDT (link)

Oh the shame. Every time someone says something that the “elite” here don’t agree with we hear we’re going to get banned. Big deal.

It, Like You, Is Not A Big Deal.

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:29AM EDT (link)

Most blogs aren’t. However, it should be pointed out that you post here on someone else’s virtual property. That means that any time you annoy them, they are perfectly justified in tossing you.

Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler

 

okay.

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:38AM EDT (link)

whatever.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

VA Legislators already lost this battle

Spiker Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:29AM EDT (link)

They specifically rejected an amendment to the bill that would have prohibited a trans-vaginal probe, when the concern was first raised. They’ve lost all legitimate standing to support the government mandating an medically unnecessary invasive procedure.

I’m as pro-life as they come, but this particular proxy battle isn’t worth fighting. It accomplishes nothing, it flies in the face of the limited government message we should be promoting, and the optics are absolutely terrible. This was a miscalculation by legislators who don’t want to be unfairly castigated by the right-wing for opposing unreasonable legislation.

I'm As Pro-Life As They Come....

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:30AM EDT (link)

Oh, the optics, dear, dear me. You need to improve the concern troll act. It was bad.

Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler

If only it was an act.

Spiker Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:45AM EDT (link)

I oppose abortion in cases of rape or incest. The life of the mother is the only exception I make. This is a symbolic proxy battle, nothing more and nothing less. It makes us look barbaric and hypocritical. No thanks.

You see how I was able to express my point without assuming your motive? Amazing.

except it isn't symbolic

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:48AM EDT (link)

What is barbaric and hypocritical is your misrepresentation of the facts.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 

Given That YOu Have Pointedly Denied The Actual Text Of The Law

Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:52AM EDT (link)

Namely, the woman is only requird to view the image. And also, the obvious medical reality that the doctor would have ordered her to undergo the procedure if that doctor believed her to be pregnant, this law in no way forces anyone to undergo a procedure that would not have already been ordered by a capable practitioner of medicine.

Nice talking points.

And BTW, I’m doing you a favor by assuming your motive. Given that the diary clearly states what I’ve reiterated above, if I weren’t assuming motive, my alternative hypothesis would involve your fundamental lack of reading comprehension skills. You make the call and if the shoe fits, go wear it.

Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler

 

Barbaric and Hypocritical?

papabear (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:59PM EDT (link)

Am I correct that you think crushing the skulls of defenseless babies by remote command to an abortion provider is “civilized”? Or I could restate your original theory – showing the mother that she is murdering a human being would be barbaric!

Perhaps society has decided that the willful ignorance of the murder of defenseless babies is civilized.

If so, I am a proud barbarian!

 
 
 

actually you really aren't correct or

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:33AM EDT (link)

terribly pro-life if you hold that view.

The fact is that the woman has to have an ultrasound to verify she is pregnant. The type used depends upon the facility and the stage of her pregnancy. The only thing the law does is require her to be given the opportunity to view the image.

Get your facts right.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

That's not correct in the case of very early pregnancies.

sharrondeer (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:17PM EDT (link)

In a very early pregnancy, there is no way to determine the dimensions of the fetus and the presence of external limbs and internal organs via abdominal ultrasound. By requiring the doctor to determine these things, it forces the doctor to do a medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasound.

Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. — John Adams.

that is simply not true

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:43PM EDT (link)

in the least. In fact, charitably, what you are saying is just an egregious untruth.

There is a period of 1 week in which vaginal ultrasound can do what abdominal can’t do.

But to the facts:

1. The woman can’t have an abortion without an ultrasound. That is medical procedure even with a positive blood/urine test.

2. The law doesn’t require what you say it does. In short, it doesn’t require a doctor to measure what can’t be measured by the device they are using.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Thank you for clearing that up

clowngirl (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 2:59PM EDT (link)

But it does demonstrate that liberals have been somewhat effective in muddying the waters by boldly spreading misinformation.

The fact they are even picking this battle says a lot about their motives.

If they are simply “pro-choice” why would it bother them if mother’s are routinely given the opportunity to view their ultrasound?

Viewing an ultrasound does nothing to diminish a woman’s “right to choose” but has been shown to greatly increase the probability that the woman will choose not to abort – taking potential revenue away from Planned Parenthood.

There’s really no other plausible reason for them to be opposing it.

 
 
 
 
 

I don't see it.

agconservative (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:32AM EDT (link)

I just don’t see that the conclusion is warranted here. There is no evidence Romney would be against this bill, nor any proof McDonnell’s decision is connected to his desire to be Mitt’s running mate. I also don’t think it is fair to conclude McDonell is saying he won’t sign the bill in its current form, he just appears to be looking for some changes based on what is perceived as new information.

Obviously, I could be wrong and this might be hsi real rationale, but I think it is pure speculation without more evidence or more concrete actions on McDonnell’s part.

except that Romney was solidly pro-abort

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:35AM EDT (link)

as Mass Governor and has shied away from any stand on principle. Ever.

I don’t know what McDonnell will do in the end. The optics of this are terrible and the facts remain that he encouraged a very thin GOP minority in the VA legislature to take up this bill, he said he’ll sign it, and now he says he’ll have to think about signing it.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

You might be right

agconservative (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:41AM EDT (link)

I guess we will have to wait and see what he does. I assume that he will sign it at the end of the day. If he doesn’t, then it will definitely be a stain on his record.

 

Romney "has shied away from any stand on principle. Ever."

texasref (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 8:57PM EDT (link)

I *heart* you, Streiff…keep preachin’

Romney is a non-starter. It’s Gingrich or Santorum, take your pick everybody. Cuz the third choice is going to be Jeb or Mitch…not Mitt.

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

 

I don't think it's fair to say Romney was "solidly pro-abort" as Massachusetts Governor.

Martin Knight (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 6:26AM EDT (link)

Romney pointedly cut short a vacation to veto an emergency contraception bill on explicitly pro-life grounds in July 2005, and in his op-ed explaining his veto (which was eventually overturned) he strongly criticized Roe v. Wade.

Granted, this may have been positioning himself to run for President in three years time but I think it seriously undermines any argument that he was “solidly pro-abort” as Governor of Massachusetts.

It’d be much more accurate if you had said that he was “solidly pro-abort” as a candidate for Governor of Massachusetts.

 
 

Romney improperly inserted

sethellis Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:15AM EDT (link)

I also believe that it is dubious to be linking this to Romney. The article is clear that this comes on the heels of several of the bill’s supporters having second thoughts. This post is a pure political ploy to attack Romney, and it will come at the expense of McDonnell and the entire VA GOP. All this will do is make it harder for the legislators to come up with a solution. Romney had nothing to do with this, and I would prefer to leave presidential politics out of this.

I believe it is more useful to talk about the merits of the actual bill, or to advocate alternative solutions.

the solution for your problem

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:18AM EDT (link)

is tor you to start your own blog. If you don’t like this, write a diary.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Re: write a diary

sethellis Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:49AM EDT (link)

Maybe I will some day, after someone fixes the system to allow me to even create a diary.

Until then I will comment, and call things as I see it. I wouldn’t expect the same from you if you were commenting on my diary. If you don’t want people to criticize you’re posts, then don’t write.

The liabilities of posting from a smartphone

sethellis Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:55AM EDT (link)

I meant to say:

I would expect the same from you if you were commenting on my diary. In fact I’d be a little disappointed if I didn’t get such responses. If you don’t want to hear criticism then don’t write.

you are laboring under a misapprehension

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:00PM EDT (link)

that life is fair and that on this blog I have to like whatever happens to turn up in the comments on my blog. I don’t. Rest assured of that fact.

Did you ask to have a diary assigned to you when you registered? If not, that is part of the problem.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

That might explain it

sethellis Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:11PM EDT (link)

I don’t remember such a thing when registering which probably means I didn’t ask for one.

easy steps to a diary

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 1:03PM EDT (link)

click User Profile
click Edit Profile
click Request Diary.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I saw this coming from a mile away...

Matt Genk (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:37AM EDT (link)

The bill, which is currently under further consideration in the House of Delegates, would cause lots of problems in the state senate. That house is divided right down the middle (20 Rs and 20 Ds). Should a vote in the senate split, LtGov Bolling would serve as the tiebreaker. Bolling is a very popular Republican and the RPV’s choice as the next Republican candidate for governor, but he endorsed Romney long before his boss. While I personally believe that this bill will not get the support from every Republican senator, Bolling’s vote on the bill would either betray his support to Gov McDonnell or give his 2013 challenger, conservative Republican Attorney General Ken Cuchinelli a significant advantage.

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946

very good points

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:41AM EDT (link)

In my myopia I missed how this plays into the coming Bolling-Cuccinelli showdown

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 

On that note

MikeG (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:27AM EDT (link)

Just got an email from the Bolling campaign with this article from the Richmond Times-Dispatch; apparently Bolling isn’t too keen on publicly taking a position on the Personhood legislation currently under consideration in the House either.

On Wednesday, supporters of House Bill 1, the “personhood” legislation that declares life begins at conception, gathered at the Bell Tower in Capitol Square to challenge McDonnell and Bolling to define their positions on it.

The Senate is scheduled to take up the bill next week. Among the lawmakers at the rally were the bill’s sponsor, Del. Robert G. Marshall, R-Prince William; Sen. Richard H. Black, R-Loudoun; and Cuccinelli.

Bolling said he is “pro-life” and opposes abortion, but he would not speculate on how he would vote should the bill emerge from committee and come before a deadlocked Senate.

No mention in the article though of the ultrasound legislation and how Bolling might vote on it. Could be significant, or it could mean nothing. But with McDonnell’s announcement today, I’m leaning towards significant.

Cuccinelli

adamd Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:05PM EDT (link)

This is going to be huge for Cuccinelli. If Bolling does not have the fortitude to take a stand, this will come to haunt him in the primary big time.

 

Guarantee both McDonnell and Bolling will be rescued

Scope (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:44PM EDT (link)

Bolling won’t have to break a tie vote, and McDonnell will never have to decide to sign the bill if it passed. At least one VA Republican Senator will be expected to take one on the chin for the good of the Bolling and McDonnell team. With both having aspirations for higher office they will avoid any controversial issues like the plague.

Based on a June 2011 survey, Cuccinelli has a higher approval rating than Bolling. Bolling- 39-20, 42% undecided. Cuccinelli- 49-31, 20% undecided.

In a December PPP poll, Cuccinelli is leading Bolling for the 2013 Gov. race by a wide margin. Cooch-44%, Bolling-25%.

Bolling has already said that he is counting on a President Romney to help him win the Gov. seat in 2013, and a sitting VP McDonnell will only sweeten the deal even more. I seriously doubt that the VA voters will see it Bollings way.

 
 
 

Called his office

Douglas Erley (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:42AM EDT (link)

No decision made yet.

 

VOTE RON PAUL in VA Primary

adamd Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:44AM EDT (link)

I am not a Ron Paul supporter.

However, with Gingrich and Santorum off the primary ballot Republicans should vote for Ron Paul to deny Mitt Romney the delegates. I am surprised more people are not making this call.

people are making that call

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:47AM EDT (link)

they just aren’t threadjacking my story to do it. Knock it off.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

easy there

adamd Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:59AM EDT (link)

I agree 100% that people should be outraged over McDonnell not signing the bill. However, you should also use this opportunity to remind Republican voters in Virginia to vote for Ron Paul.

Sad thing, McDonnell has ZERO chance of being VP. The Republican ticket needs to have a woman or minority on the ticket. McDonnell brings nothing to the ticket.

give me a break

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:06AM EDT (link)

don’t tell me how to blog, okay? I’ve been doing this for a couple of days.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 
 
 

Streiff, was McDonnel outside the VA. primary debacle?

snowshooze (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:44AM EDT (link)

Or do we need to go back and re-examine that mess in a new light?
I don’t think the Governor had much to say about it, honestly, however… a Governor is a pretty powerful fellow.
Obviously, I have to wonder since his buddy is the only ” Viable ” candidate on the ticket, and he is sucked up nice and tight…
I was unaware of the relationship.

I think that debacle was one

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:46AM EDT (link)

the campaigns brought on themselves. McDonnell is a solid guy and if Romney gets the nod he’d be a good man to have on the ticket. One is just disappointed with the way he’s handling this.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

VA Lt. Gov Bolling was right in the thick of the thing...

acat (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 10:50AM EDT (link)

and is Romney’s campaign chair in VA….. so there is at least enough to justify a question or two, eh?

I do agree the campaigns screwed up. What I question is whether the change to the rules – and there definitely was a change – had Bolling’s fingerprints on it.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

I dunno

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:08AM EDT (link)

if Ron Paul’s campaign was able to figure out how to get on the ballot it couldn’t have been all that hard

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

True, streiff. Ron Paul and Willard Romney both got 15,000 signatures...

acat (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:13AM EDT (link)

and thus avoided having them checked.

Any other campaign could also have done so .. and should have.

I view that part of the problem as more proof that “ground game” is what decides these things.

Mew

——
self-portrait

Caveat Suffragator

Well, Ron Paul is the only one who has been running longer than Romney..

snowshooze (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:18PM EDT (link)

So I am not surprised his followers turned out.

 
 
 
 
 
 

If the republican nominee for president were pro-choice....

tnguy Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:06AM EDT (link)

…would red state policy still be to vote republican in the general?

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”

conservative in the primary/GOP in the general

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:11AM EDT (link)

that has always been site policy. I can’t see that changing unless we end up with a pro defense fiscally conservative pro life Dem running.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Things we will see before a "pro defense fiscally conservative pro life Dem"

papabear (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 1:07PM EDT (link)

Easter Bunny
Tooth Fairy
TOTUS free Obama

 

I certainly will NOT support a pro-abortion GOP general election candidate!

texasref (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 9:03PM EDT (link)

And I’m sure Erickson would revisit the otherwise sound policy in the unlikely event it happened.

Arguably Mittens falls in this category. I said “arguably.” I don’t know. /sarcasm on Depends if you believe his latest viewpoint which he of course did NOT say just to get elected /sarcasm off

“The medical director who performed the autopsy on Trayvon Martin found only two injuries on his body: the gunshot wound and broken skin on his knuckles. Welcome to the Duke lacrosse case all over again.”–Rush Limbaugh, 5-16-12

Next Step: Docket Sounding on 8-8-12
Final Step: Verdict of Not Guilty

 
 
 

So if the "issue" is the transvaginal procedure

anjinconsulting Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:17AM EDT (link)

Let the patient elect the external ultrasound. If indeed the two procedure are effective, then take away the objectionable one and let him stand on his principles.

The root issue is the emotional event for anyone to see and to recognize the humanity of the image, then to make the determination to proceed. This bill apparently presents a very real threat to the continued acceptance of the practice of abortion, and abortion is a very lucrative business for the businesses and politicians involved.

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. – George Santayana

No man has any more intrinsic right to offical station than another. Those who hold government jobs for a long time are apt to acquire a habit of looking with indifference upon the public interests, and of tolerating conduct from which an unpracticed man would revolt. – Andrew Jackson

you do see the fallacy here, right?

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:23AM EDT (link)

1. The woman can’t get an abortion unless she is pregnant. I hope we can agree there.

2. Medical practice requires an ultrasound before an abortion. There are very obvious reasons for that.

3. What you are advocating doing is exactly what the left is claiming we’re doing but not, which is legislatively requiring a certain medical practice.

The law only requires that the woman be given the opportunity, underline that word, to view an ultrasound image. It doesn’t mandate any procedure that wouldn’t happen anyway.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

Maybe I misread the linked article

anjinconsulting Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:33AM EDT (link)

Where PP states that the woman gets an ultrasound; twice. The only difference I see is that under the proposed legislation she is asked to view the image before making a determination to proceed.

Where is our disagreement?

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. – George Santayana

No man has any more intrinsic right to offical station than another. Those who hold government jobs for a long time are apt to acquire a habit of looking with indifference upon the public interests, and of tolerating conduct from which an unpracticed man would revolt. – Andrew Jackson

 
 

That could be done, but it means delaying any abortion

lineholder (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:32AM EDT (link)

until the mother is within the “window” of time during which an abdominal ultrasound would be effective. A period of time of one week. That’s all. One week.

If that was stipulated, do you really think the left would ease off on their squawking over it? No, they wouldn’t. They would whine about a woman’s “loss of rights” all the same.

The bigger point is that the abortion industry doesn’t want any regulatory measures that require external oversight. They’d be perfectly content for every abortion provider to be a monstrous Dr. Gosnell, as long as the abortion takes place.

Sounds like we're arguing about the same thing

anjinconsulting Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:47AM EDT (link)

ANY threat to the accepted practice, ANY restriction or constraint no matter how sound or sane, and how minuscule or inconsequential its effect on the desired outcome is not tolerable to the industry or to it’s benefactors in the political world.

I think you have to give these clowns every opportunity to show their true colors before the election and then let the voters make the call.

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. – George Santayana

No man has any more intrinsic right to offical station than another. Those who hold government jobs for a long time are apt to acquire a habit of looking with indifference upon the public interests, and of tolerating conduct from which an unpracticed man would revolt. – Andrew Jackson

True to some extent, anjinconsulting, but most people

lineholder (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:54AM EDT (link)

really don’t think of abortion as an industry (which it is). Neither do they understand what accreditation is or how an accrediting body acts in the role of providing oversight for activities.

Without fully understanding all the facts, I’m not sure they’ll recognize the “true colors” as you have expressed it.

I know I probably sound like a broken record because I keep posting this information over and over again, but it’s the best way I can think of for the time being to get the truth out there.

 
 
 
 

GOP Lacky

aposematic Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:35AM EDT (link)

Life under McDonnell in VA is pretty simple as McDonnell will do whatever the GOP establishment elites dictate as he aspires for his own GOP establishment elite position. Funny thing in the VA GOP (maybe not funny as it may be GOP SOP everywhere): To belong you must swear on your children’s lives you will accept all proclamations, dictates, and policy positions from the VA GOP leadership without question.

aposematic in VA

 

Amazing. Just as I finished writing my diary on McDonnell, I see this.

Martin Knight (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:46AM EDT (link)

Will do some research …

 

Then what?

citizenjerry Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:48AM EDT (link)

So what happens when a politician becomes someone that nobody trusts? Sadly, it seems checking your ethics at the door is one of the requirements for public office.

If your in VA

anjinconsulting Wednesday, February 22nd at 11:58AM EDT (link)

You don’t vote for him and you remind folks that he is an invertebrate.

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. – George Santayana

No man has any more intrinsic right to offical station than another. Those who hold government jobs for a long time are apt to acquire a habit of looking with indifference upon the public interests, and of tolerating conduct from which an unpracticed man would revolt. – Andrew Jackson

 
 

birds of a feather

antisesquipedalion Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:32PM EDT (link)

watched this guy recently on TV, not knowing who he was. I was struck by his ability to either deflect or not answer. what a dud

 

maybe McDonnell accidentally watched Jon Stewart Tuesday night

lizzie Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:46PM EDT (link)

with a withering satire on transvaginal ultrasound in Virginia.

especially effective was the contrast with Gov McDonnell’s own words about the intrusiveness of TSA patdowns.

Before I get smacked-down here, just wanted to note the coincidence in timing.
After all, Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show” polls as the most trusted news source in America. And, Stewart’s satire is increasingly bipartisan, although I am still recovering from Stephen Colbert’s satire on Obama joining Darth Vader on the Dark Side for caving on Super-PACS. First time anyone has visually depicted Obama with devil-horns in a stairical piece?.

the laugh will be on the other foot soon

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 1:02PM EDT (link)

99% of all abortion clinics require a transvaginal ultrasound. This just goes to show how effective charlatans can be in convincing idiots of most anything.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

Romney's Influence?

steeltube Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:49PM EDT (link)

I just read the piece in question (and the comments) and have to say I cannot see much of a connection here.

Isn’t this all much more likely due to a poorly crafted bill combined with some internecine VA GOP issues?

I can't help what you won't see

streiff (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:57PM EDT (link)

I think explaining McDonnell’s change of position from Friday to Tuesday is rather hard to explain in the context of “a poorly crafted bill combined with some internecine VA GOP issues.”

The bill has already passed the Senate. The only issue is whether McDonnell will sign it. Friday he said he would. Yesterday he would only agree to consider it.

If you have reason that isn’t silly for this volte face, please let us in on it.

“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”

 
 

Not to be too-nit picky here steriff,

Matt Genk (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:49PM EDT (link)

but a more accurate title would have been “VA Governor Bob McDonnell Hangs VA Conservatives Out to Dry.” I firmly believe that the VA GOP (RPV) is about as pro-choice as a Southern States party could be.

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946

 

Ask George Allen what happens when talk of national office goes to your head

Jack_Savage (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 12:54PM EDT (link)

As for the Virginia GOP, they benefited greatly in the last few elections from a populace who could think for themselves and is generally conservative. They had enough of Barack Obama and took it out on any available Democrat they could. The party apparatus itself is full of moderate Republicans and is semi-dysfunctional, and flatters itself to think it had much to do with the ascendancy of the GOP in elected office in Virginia.

Streiff is exactly right. This is about national political aspirations, and the national GOP imploring McDonnell to reign in those crazy conservatives in Richmond – most of whom have gambled their political careers on this principled stand.

If I were a conservative in the GOP today, no matter where, I would wear my Kevlar jacket backwards. We are far more likely to be felled by knives in the back than shots from the front.

 

I thought we were happy warriors

wantthegopback Wednesday, February 22nd at 2:09PM EDT (link)

The comments from about all concerned on this are depressing. If we cannot cheerfully promote conservatism among ourselves, how can we ever expect to generate candidates who can do so, especially to non-conservatives?

I’m a punk. Email me at ryantboyd@me.com

 

Gov. McDonnell's office issued the statement below

paint_it_red (Diary) Wednesday, February 22nd at 3:51PM EDT (link)

Statement of Governor Bob McDonnell on SB 484

RICHMOND – Governor Bob McDonnell issued the following statement today regarding SB 484, a bill before the General Assembly that would require an ultrasound prior to an abortion being performed.

“I am pro-life. I believe deeply in the sanctity of innocent human life and believe governments have a duty to protect human life. The more our society embraces a culture of life for all people, the better country we will have. Over the course of my 20-year career in elected office, I have been glad to play a leading role in putting in place common-sense policies that protect and defend innocent human life in the Commonwealth. One of those bills was Virginia’s informed consent statute, of which I was the chief patron in the House of Delegates, finally seeing its passage in 2001. This session, the General Assembly is now considering amending this informed consent statute to include a requirement that any woman seeking an abortion receive an ultrasound in order to establish the gestational age for appropriate medical purposes, and to offer a woman the opportunity to voluntarily review that ultrasound prior to giving her legal informed consent to abortion.

Over the past days I have discussed the specific language of the proposed legislation with other governors, physicians, attorneys, legislators, advocacy groups, and citizens. It is apparent that several amendments to the proposed legislation are needed to address various medical and legal issues which have arisen. It is clear that in the majority of cases, a routine external, transabdominal ultrasound is sufficient to meet the bill’s stated purpose, that is, to determine gestational age. I have come to understand that the medical practice and standard of care currently guide physicians to use other procedures to find the gestational age of the child, when abdominal ultrasounds cannot do so. Determining gestational age is essential for legal reasons, to know the trimester of the pregnancy in order to comply with the law, and for medical reasons as well.

Thus, having looked at the current proposal, I believe there is no need to direct by statute that further invasive ultrasound procedures be done. Mandating an invasive procedure in order to give informed consent is not a proper role for the state. No person should be directed to undergo an invasive procedure by the state, without their consent, as a precondition to another medical procedure.

For this reason, I have recommended to the General Assembly a series of amendments to this bill. I am requesting that the General Assembly amend this bill to explicitly state that no woman in Virginia will have to undergo a transvaginal ultrasound involuntarily. I am asking the General Assembly to state in this legislation that only a transabdominal, or external, ultrasound will be required to satisfy the requirements to determine gestational age. Should a doctor determine that another form of ultrasound may be necessary to provide the necessary images and information that will be an issue for the doctor and the patient. The government will have no role in that medical decision.

I have requested other amendments that help clarify the purposes of the bill and reflect a better understanding of prevailing medical practices. It is my hope that the members of the General Assembly will act favorably upon these recommendations from our office. We will await their action prior to making any further comments on this matter.”

“It is not good to cultivate a respect so much for the law as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right.” Henry David Thoreau

“The means we use must be as pure as the ends we seek.” Martin Luther King Jr.

“If you want peace, work for Justice.” Pope John Paul II

 

"Mandating an invasive procedure in order to give informed consent is not a proper role for the state. "

Spiker Wednesday, February 22nd at 3:58PM EDT (link)

Good job, Bob!

 

Three questions

naraht Wednesday, February 22nd at 7:44PM EDT (link)

In this bill, does the opportunity to view the ultrasound mean real time video or is a printed image after the ultrasound is done acceptable?

In this biill, is a clinic allowed to put the question “Do you want to see the ultrasound?” on the initial form filled out in the waiting room along with the 30 other questions like whether they smoke, did they know the father, do they have any venereal diseases and what they guess the number of weeks is?

How the *bleep* is the state supposed to regulate whether the ultrasound tech/abortionist is giving accurate answers to the number of weeks? Have women who are pregnant and know the day they conceived go undercover and then after the estimate is made “change their minds”? (Is the ultrasound tech/abortionist required to *tell* the woman how many weeks along they are)

How about asking women to tick a Yes/No box and sign?

Martin Knight (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 6:34AM EDT (link)

Not particularly difficult.

Depends on when

naraht Thursday, February 23rd at 6:56AM EDT (link)

If it has to be signed while the ultrasound tech is examining, that is one thing, If it can be added as just one more tick box on the initial forms, especially if at the end of a list of likely no questions (like when you give blood), then are there other things which can be done that will make more of a difference?

After the examination.

Martin Knight (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 7:14AM EDT (link)

Were you offered the option to look at your ultrasound?
[ ] Yes [ ] No

 
 
 
 

Just one more justification for "Not Romney".

ihateliberals Thursday, February 23rd at 6:29AM EDT (link)

even his potential staff are turn-coats. They are like fish out of water flip-flopping around. I pray that Santorum can win everything from here out and that Romney is put to rest. The established GOP is turning to the left and Romney is pulling it right along with him. We don’t want or need more leftist. The Democrats have a sufficient supply and we don’t need Liberal Republicans. That would be like having a Jewish Pope.

Jewish Pope

naraht Thursday, February 23rd at 7:03AM EDT (link)

The first one (St. Peter qualifies)

 
 

I hear you!

celador2 Thursday, February 23rd at 11:34AM EDT (link)

I have had a dread in my gut after seeing Bob McDonnel a month ago on Fox. He took an unnecessary swipe at social issues. Some who want to drop them set up a dichotomy–pollar opposites– that does not exist. They say that a fully integrated policy view promoting fiscal conservatism can not work with a state or large body of residents with social issues, and social issues must be abandoned. Since social issues take so little time its a betrayal for convenience on McDonnnell’s part..

Bob did support the state legislature on life. Back when he was governor VA.

Now I see what Bob McDonnell meant on Fox when he sneared at social issues as getting in the way of an economic recovery or whatever. A man who got where he is as Christian conservative no longer cares. Pure and simple.

Timelss Moralist Dante reserved the last rung of Hell for trechery.

I hope if the Gov and VP wannabe Bob still has a conscience he keeps that in mind.

I do not support this coward for VP.

cel

 

AG VA may lead state and nation

celador2 Thursday, February 23rd at 12:03PM EDT (link)

The one man or woman to trust to date in repealing Obamacare is AG VA Ken Cuccinelli who got the ball rolling right after it was signed March 2010. AG Bill McCullum did the same in Florida.

Ken says the governor and Lt gov cut a deal not to run against each other in 2009. MCDonnell pays back the Lt gov. Mcdonnell may back the Lt gov for governor. Ken is also running for governor VA. But all his time is spent doing his job and that includes Obamacare law suit. Ken does not trust Romney. I see that skepticism as a sign of hope and light.

Florida saw a fluke in 2010 in the AG race. For all the good tea party spirit and money did there were times the wrong choice may have won. I think Pam Bondi was a bad pick for AG. A lightweight with a sound bite ready on Greta OTR panel she had high TV name recognition and won AG.

Pam took over the lawsuit Bill McCullum began. Pam now supports Romneycare or Romney’s plan, there is confusion. She is a big Romney surrogate and there is no doubt there. She is not a strong advocate for Obamacare repeal in my opinion.

That leaves AG Ken in VA
Ken is the man I look to to hold the line on Obamacare and Romenycare models. Tyranical health care need not be inevitable. And Ken Cuccinelli may be the next governor VA. If he is elected I look to his backing the legislature and supporting life.

Ken leads the nation on his ACA lawsuit to repeal ALL of Obamacare and may lead VA to a higher quality of life if elected governor.
.
I subscribe to Ken’s newsletter for Court opdates on Obamacare and much of what I posted on Va politics including his critiicism of Romney and the Governor-Lt gov deal was taken from that newsletter.

I never thought about Bondi

Scope (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 12:29PM EDT (link)

taking over the Fla Obamacare lawsuit, which was joined by 26 other states. That is a scary fact, with her being a Romney supporter. I wonder who will be arguing the case for the Fla. lawsuit at the SC in March. It has been a major focus for Cuccinelli here in VA.

Cuccinelli was the one that first brought up regulating VA abortion clinics as hospitals. It did pass the legislature. Of course Gov. McDonnell gets the credit for it because it happened in his state while he was Gov. VA also voted to defund Planned Parenthood. We were moving along beautifully with the pro-life issues, mostly pushed by Cuccinelli, until now when McDonnell is afraid to make any controversial moves that might jeopardize his possible VP candidacy.

I can’t wait to work for and support the next VA Gov. Ken Cuccinelli.

Thanks , kudos to Ken and all of you in VA

celador2 Thursday, February 23rd at 1:38PM EDT (link)

Pleased to meet you! LOL Its a joy to hear about defunding VA PP and the abortion clinics being regulated as hospitals. That is so nice to hear.There was popular support as GOP picked up seats. Good work by Ken on those counts. McDonnell is jealous maybe and wants to bask in the glow but not have abortion supporters and liberals against him if VP nominee..

I am so impressed with Ken but typically it takes a while. He led this lawsuit when no one thought he ‘d be granted standing. In fact i too had doubts liberal courts would allow anyone to sue until someone got a fine from IRS in mail April 2015 as HHS argued. He was on Greta the day O signed ACA. VA passed a state law which gave him standing. Oh, when judge Roger Vinson struck down ALL ACA oh, man!

He took a risk that has paid off, the suits have moved the limits of what we discuss on ‘commerce clause’ scope. And no one else had. Ken did.

The more I see and read of Ken the more impressed I am. I say this because I share his views and that sounds self serving. But anyway he hosted one debate along with Bondi , AG OK and FNC’s Huckabee on constitution. Candidates replied within a block of time. It was the highest quality debate I saw this season.

Florida scares me too. Bill McC is not AG or governor. He backs Newt and I know of him better than Bondi.

Who actually goes before the court? We await that choice. Much depends on their skill and experience.If Bondi has never been before an appeals court then forget being lead. In fact the more experienced the better. We may see Liberty lawyers and Jay Sekelow involved at Supreme court.

An extra half hour they will have. I assume media will cover outside and that AG VA will play a major role that day that they argue in June. GOD bless them, everyone.

Yes, the Huckabee debate was by far the best

Scope (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 2:13PM EDT (link)

Someone had posted that it was Reince Preibus, RNC chair. that agreed to the number of debates, and the majority of liberal hosts. Unfortunately it is too late to change any of that damage.

I thought it was interesting that yesterday, the day of the 20th debate, being hosted by CNN’s John King for the third time, that the all Romney all the time National Review posts an article talking about how destructive the debates this season have been for all of the GOP candidates. They hate Gingrich, and can’t stand the fact that Romney gets beat in almost every debate by Newt. So now at debate number 20, they complain. What idiots.

Glad that you have such a favorable opinion of Cooch. He can use all the help he can get when his campaign hits the road for VA Gov. He can’t do any campaigning until the legislature is out of session. Bolling almost had a heart attack when Cooch said he was going to challenge him for the seat. Bolling is acting like a child and won’t speak to Cooch, even though they have to still work together. Bolling will have a lot of support from McDonnell, the crooked VA GOP, and the party elders in VA that insist you wait your turn. Bolling knows he is going to have a hard time trying to beat Cooch as Cooch is very well liked here by the majority of Virginians. I expect Bolling to run a scorched earth campaign just like Romney’s.

I’m not voting in the March 6 primary here in VA. I will laugh my head off though if Paul beats Romney. From what I’m reading, the delegates won’t matter as they will all go to Romney, even those Paul may gain.

 
 
 
 

They nailed him with comparisons like TSA airport searches

Juggernaut (Diary) Thursday, February 23rd at 12:24PM EDT (link)

as a comparison suggesting the GOP wants women raped but no one should be molested at the airport. The real heat comes from fear of losing seats to dems as they ramp up the hater machine in hopes women will and independent men will shift the vote this fall. Sure McDonnell wants to be VP or a cabinet job. I think he’s more presidential than the final 4.

Dems and liberals have come out of the shells siding with OWS, and they’ve built a small army of zealots and broad thinkers who fight in a manner that the GOP has yet to take the upper hand with. We’re going to have to ramp up counter attacks, encourage more to join in the fight. This issue does give them ammunition to fight hard and anger people who switch sides on election day. Sure many forget, till they see the negative ads near election day. We need more conservative media as well as we have to find a way to push the MSM to the center.

I don’t see this bill going to the governor, at best they should focus on requiring abortion patients to watch films of live abortions and sonograms of volunteers assuming they don’t already.

RomneyCare is Right Wing Socialism –

Romney “severely conservative”? That’s the opposite of a “compassionate conservative” like George W. Bush? Actually, we know what a severely conservative is. It’s Dick Cheney and Mitt Romney is no Dick Cheney.

PAP smears and cancer tests

celador2 Thursday, February 23rd at 1:51PM EDT (link)

PAP smears are invasive and involve a surgical removalof tissue, but I assme liberal do not consider them rape and have them on a regualr basis. Cancr tests involving ultra sound wands also are the same as these bogus rape charges. So these ultra sound wands are used for other diagnostics.

The attendant is a female and sits beside the patient with a computer and wand. The patient is draped lying down. The technical attendant moves wands but looks at computer screen for various locations to move the wand. The computer beeps along the way.

.