« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Scandal Redux: Catholic Relief Services Edition

For those who haven’t been watching, there’s another scandal brewing in the Catholic Church — this time with Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and the promotion of some very un-Catholic things.

The good folks over at Life Site News just uncovered a rather unsettling relationship between CRS and an organization called the CORE Group, but there seems to be more to the story than a simple working relationship.

Two weeks ago, Life Site News revealed that CRS gave a $5.3 million grant to a pro-abortion, pro-contraception, and pro-homosexual organization known as CARE.   It’s bad enough that CRS has been so rigidly defensive about giving large sums of money to such a vicious enemy of The Church, but far worse than that is the fact that every argument CRS presented totally collapses in the light of its relationship with the CORE Group.

In short, CRS claims that the money granted to CARE was not “fungible,” so it couldn’t have been used to fund birth control; the money came from the government, so Catholic funds didn’t go to CARE; CRS does not support or participate in CARE’s birth control promoting programs.  John Rivera, CRS’s communications director summed it up by saying, “We do not fund, support or participate in any programming or advocacy that is not in line with Church teaching, including artificial birth control.”

According to the information provided by Life Site News, CRS’s statement is completely untrue.

Catholic Relief Services is a dues-paying member of the CORE Group.  In addition to that, CRS’s senior technical advisor in nutrition, Mary Hennigan, is on the board of the CORE Group and CRS’s Global Director of Health and HIV, Dr. Shannon Senfeld co-chairs the CORE Group’s “working group” on HIV/AIDS.

Why is this a problem?  Because the CORE Group itself heavily promotes birth control, which means that Catholic donations to CRS went to pay for the membership in this organization (this IS fungible).

Sadly, there’s more.

According to the CORE Group’s description of its board of directors,

The CORE Group Board of Directors is the governing body of the organization and is dedicated to advancing CORE Group’s mission, values, strategies, goals, priorities, and policies.

As a member of the “governing body” of CORE Group, CRS’s senior technical advisor in nutrition would be a part of the decision-making for the organization, including philosophies, policies, and projects.  And one of those projects is a working group on “Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health,” which actively promotes contraception.

In fact, nearly 50% of CORE Groups budget for fiscal year 2011 went toward “family planning” and “Maternal and Child Health,” (MCH) and its MCH programs are specifically designed to be integrated with “family planning.”

It’s bad enough that CRS is paying its own money into an organization that so heavily promotes birth control to poor people in third world countries, and with board member oversight of the organization, CRS cannot claim ignorance.

But the saddest and most shocking aspect of this whole thing is found in a single document on the CORE Group’s website.  CORE Group produced a document titled, “Improving Access To and Use of Quality: Voluntary Counseling and Testing (VCT) Services,” through its HIV/AIDS working group, which is co-chaired by CRS’s Global Director of Health and HIV.

Not only was this document produced through a project that CRS had direct oversight for, but the acknowledgements identify two CRS employees, Rolando Figueroa, Regional Technical Advisor for the Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office and Kristin Weinhauer, HIV/AIDS Technical Advisor, as having reviewed the document.  Just take a look at the document is all about.

Page 21 says, “Prevention services can offer male or female condoms, advice about how to negotiate safer sex, etc.”

Page 39 says, “Safer sex. A client who tests negative should be counseled on how to stay negative. The counselor should remind the client about the various risk behaviors for HIV and explain about safer sex, the use of condoms, and how to negotiate safer sex with one’s partner.”

Page 55 under the heading “A Few Recommendations,” says, “HIV prevention education. In wider programming, increase public awareness about condom use and sexual behavior change, especially among the reproductive age group.”

Page 57 says, “Youth VCT also needs to be integrated into youth-friendly contraception and reproductive health services, including diagnosis and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.”

Page 58 says, “As noted above, young people are especially vulnerable to HIV, for a number of reasons:

  • limited knowledge of sexuality, reproductive health, and contraception
  • cannot afford condoms or are denied them by retail outlets or clinics

Page 60 says, “the following issues should be addressed and/or given special emphasis when counseling young people:  the proper use of a condom.”

There is no doubt, in this situation, Catholic Relief Services is funding a staunchly pro-birth control organization with its own money, it has direct oversight of the entire organization through its board membership, and it specifically oversaw the publication of a document promoting condom use.  None of the defenses it used regarding CARE apply here at all.  And if CRS is so intimately connected with this birth control providing organization, where else is it doing things it claims it doesn’t?

So why does this squabble over “birth control” matter to non-Catholics?  Because once again, we have a presumably Catholic institution doing some very un-Catholic things.  The scandals run fairly high — the funding of left-wing groups under the Catholic Campaign for Human Development, the heretical “Nuns on the Bus” grand tour around America, and revelations that CCHD funding went to train then-community organizer Barack Obama back in 1986 — politically divisive efforts, all performed in the name of the Catholic Church.

Faithful Catholics — as well as their priests and bishops — are aware of the problem and have been for years.  Doing something about it is a bit trickier than a business boardroom.  But as Richard John Neuhaus so eloquently put it regarding yet another scandal tarnishing the reputation of the Catholic Church in America:

Fidelity, fidelity, fidelity!

Wise words regarding what it means to be a Christian in public life, especially at a time when so many seem to desire compromise, abrogation, and self.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • edintexas

    The Church, in the US, has been infiltrated by the Left for decades. It isn’t surprising that CRS engages in activities which are opposed by Church doctrine.

    • streiff

      so many of the administrators of Catholic lay organizations are basically 1960s hippies who are still searching for the Summer of Love with Social Justice.

  • dacabral

    “Faithful Catholics

    • methodius

      But it is not only in the Roman Church that this complacency exists. I am a pastor in a conservative Lutheran church body that has had its fights with traditional liberal theology and politics. We have, to date, won most of those battles, but we are loosing the war at the local level. Far too many people at congregational level are allowed to publicly spew and act upon whatever liberal garbage they choose without too much fear of church discipline.

      And why should they fear? They see church leaders back down time and again against the likes of Pilosi and other church “faithful”. While we do not seek witch hunts or for the Law to rule in our churches (we are a church based on the GOSPEL of Jesus Christ and discipline is not a weapon or tool for “getting rid of those whom we dislike”). The lack of discipline in the church at large is, however, actively destroying the Gospel and allowing it to be replaced with social justice, works righteousness, and an overriding fear of loosing those dollars in the plate or at the end of a law suit.

      And for those of you who do not understand church discipline is was designed by Christ to 1) Bring the erring brother back to the fold by showing them that they are in error; 2) Protect the congregation as a whole from the spread of false teachings; and 3) Protect the veracity of the truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the world outside the church. Those who purposefully ignore and publicly rally against the teaching of their church are our version of the RINO’s many of you so often complain about on this site. It is true that you cannot serve two masters be it money or a philosophy contrary to what is believed, taught and confessed by the Church to which you claim to belong. Our version of “Fidelity! Fidelity! Fidelity!” is Faithfulness! Faithfulness! Faithfulness!

  • Pingback: Claretta Weekley

  • Pingback: Eric Llanes

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: maid service software

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes barça

  • Pingback: zakopane noclegi

  • Pingback: Sizegenetics testimonials

  • Pingback: home distilleries

  • Pingback: Randki internetowe

  • Pingback: http://arctic-megapedia.ru/yukagir/en/index.php/User_talk:Cv

  • Pingback: gardening

  • Pingback: Zierfischfutter

  • Pingback: กล้องวงจรปิด

  • Pingback: useful content

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: BBCAT

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis 30 seconds mars

  • Pingback: play now

  • Pingback: check which

  • Pingback: Koi

  • Pingback: florida foreclosure attorney

  • Pingback: Payday Loans Online

  • Pingback: diet 8t

  • Pingback: Aquaristik Bücher

  • Pingback: new york asian escorts

  • Pingback: would you agree

  • Pingback: Fusevision.com.sg

  • Pingback: la fuente original

  • Pingback: Video on Demand

  • Pingback: chair repair

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: หอพัก

  • Pingback: their explanation

  • Pingback: buy inexpensive wow gold

  • Pingback: bump out home addition

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: aquarium filter

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: mobile advertisements

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: strona z randkami

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: Doctors

  • Pingback: rose macaron

  • Pingback: footballuniversity football summer camps

  • Pingback: therapists in san diego

  • Pingback: service satisfaction survey

  • Pingback: trading the forex market

  • Pingback: sentria kirby vacuum bags

  • Pingback: master cleanse measurements

  • Pingback: affordable emergency pediatric dentist

  • Pingback: buy vending companies in minnesota

  • Pingback: click HERE

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: fix laptop

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: Teddy Hartrick

  • Pingback: Arkadaslik

  • Pingback: Brant Aschenbrener

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: Blog

  • Pingback: european food

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: Teeth Whitening Products

  • Pingback: check this kind of out

  • Pingback: payday loan online

  • Pingback: SEO Services Australia

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: Leslie Hodges

  • Pingback: chemical free dry cleaners

  • Pingback: virtual private server

  • Pingback: wealth through internet marketing

  • Pingback: weddings in italy

  • Pingback: fascinating coaching

  • Pingback: Laptop

  • Pingback: your origin here

  • Pingback: great

  • Pingback: Chancellor

  • Pingback: Bari

  • Pingback: Belk

  • Pingback: small investment opportunities

  • Pingback: weblink

  • Pingback: alfileres de novia

  • Pingback: Julie Leiendecker

  • Pingback: Diseño web barato

  • Pingback: Audric

  • Pingback: Forest

  • Pingback: Gaye

  • Pingback: find a date

  • Pingback: Detox at Home

  • Pingback: Diamanta

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: las vegas chapter 11 bankruptcy

  • Pingback: honda 50cc dirt bike

  • Pingback: Very yrev test

  • Pingback: xenon auto

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: Chancellor

  • Pingback: buy likes using paypal, no username or password needed

  • Pingback: Your #1 urban lifestyle destination

  • Pingback: www.eztraffic.org

  • Pingback: Shoz tech

  • kamiller42

    Before condemning CRS, I suggest reading their statement on the issue. I have and I find the defendant innocent.
    http://newswire.crs.org/crs-disputes-lifesitenews-article/

    Their points about these funds is this:
    1) The funds were never their funds to begin with.
    2) In order to receive funds X, they had to administer program Y with funds Y.
    3) Said program does not violate Catholic doctrine, even if the ultimate executor of said program does.
    4) The funds are not fungible because the money is required to be spent specifically for non-violating program. In other words, if the funds are allocated for $5 million for food, there must be a receipt for food with a $5 million total. The money is budgeted, allocated, and administered for goods and services not contrary to Catholic teaching.

  • streiff

    That is why we don’t, or didn’t, contribute to the UN Population Fund. Any money spent in cooperation with an agency that supports abortion while providing other services, de facto, supports abortion because that agency no longer has to fund food, medicine, or whatever. It is a very simple concept.

  • PowerToThePeople

    nor do I have an issue with birth control, but I will agree that if you preach something from the pulpit and make it the law of the church, you do not turn around and support groups that go against church doctrine.

    But what I can not understand, as you pointed out, is why smart people can not seem to understand how money going to a company does benefit the entire company even if supposedly not spent on items that you are against. For example:

    If company A has budget of 1000 dollars and that allows company to pay for employees, product, and expenses but does not allow company to expand into abortion, but then company gets 1000 dollars from donor B who gets guarantee that his money will only go towards what the company originally spent the budget on, his money will cover the above budget while the original budget money now goes to abortion. In essence, he just started the abortion wing of company A even if technically his money goes to cancer prevention. It is just not that hard to understand,

    As you stated, money is always fungible.

  • kamiller42

    There are two problems with your conclusion.
    1) CRS did not give any of its funds to CARE. It played middle man and gave other people’s money as part of a larger project the two are working on. If you have a complaint about the destination of the money, take it up with the “other party,” not CRS.
    2) Giving to the UN Population Fund provides no assurance the funds will be spent on projects antithetical to Church teaching. It’s like putting money into a general budget.

    And there is another facet to this story I didn’t notice the first time. This story is from Life Site News. I’m pro-life, but that site does not have the highest journalistic standards. They have had erroneous reports before. LifeNews.com is a more reliable source.

  • kamiller42

    If CARE did not receive this money, it simply would not have engaged the endeavour. We’re talking about missionary work here. They are not corporations in the business sense. So, no. By them receiving these funds does not mean the prevention of an abortion budget shortfall.

    If a donor says “Here’s $1,000. Go buy toothbrushes for this region,” the organization is expected to go buy $1,000 of toothbrushes and distribute them, and there better be a receipt.

    In this case, the project CRS and CARE are working was reviewed by reliable pro-life third parties. The conclusion is there is nothing scandalous going on.

  • streiff

    but you are really misstating how things work, and it especially isn’t in this case.

    As to your other points.

    1. If you are “middleman” you are responsible. That is very basic Catholic theology. That is why counselling someone to have an abortion or driving them to have an abortion is materially the same as performing or getting an abortion. And the money, as I’ve stated earlier, is fungible.

    2. You unwittingly make my point IRT UNPF. The UNPF undertakes a lot of activities, nearly 100% of which are actually antithetical to Church teaching. If you give money to the general fund you support those activities. If you give the money earmarked for a licit purpose, all you have done is free up the money that would have been spent on that purpose and made it available to kill Chinese babies or some other noble effort.

    3. I actually have more of a problem with your lack of integrity and that matters much more than what you think about Life Site News.