Brown is being way too nice

He has a lot ammo to attack her on as her days of AG. She failed to go after that priest who was molesting all kids

All corruption in that state capitol. Where has she led?

He needs to attack her

Bright setting; he said what he needed to but in a positive way. He made his point. Yes, negative ads work because they leave false words and images in peoples’ mind, if they don’t know or seek the truth. But there comes a point where the ad is so dark and out there, that reasonable people can see it for the distortion it is.
It seems that the uniqueness of the time and place in Mass upcoming election, lends itself to going to Scott Brown, as the benefit of the doubt. The people are already surrounded by the results of the negative and failed Leftist policies, otherwise the Independents would not be polling as they are, in our favor.

Let us do a fair comparison, check the facts and you decide. I do not want to jump to conclusions without checking the facts.

Look at NSDAP, composed by Adolf Hitler and Anton Drexler, the union labor party, The Nazi Party. Well right from the start the union labor party seems to have something in common with culture of corruption Coakley.

So here is the NSDAP to look at

http://www.hitler.org/writings/programme/

#9 All citizens shall have equal rights and duties

Martha Coakley strikingly similar

#2 Equal Rights and Opportunity – Martha Coakley believes our democracy is based..

http://marthacoakley.com/about/Issues/details/20

Look at NSDAP, #13 We demand the nationalization of all (corrupt) businesses which have been formed into corporations

Martha Coakley strikingly similar

#3 Martha believes the best way to get our economy back on the right track is to tackle the economic crisis head on and to take all necessary steps – ravaged by risky investments, unfair tactics, and market uncertainties. By making bold and wise (government?) investments in health care, energy and education..

http://marthacoakley.com/about/Issues/details/21

However, I could continue but it is up to you decide if there is any more similarity

http://marthacoakley.com/about/Issues

But, do not stop there, take a look here for some more similarity here

http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm

# 2. – A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.-, right from The Communist Manifesto. Yet now we have on federal income taxes, top 5% pay 53.25% of all income taxes, the top 10% pay 64.89%, the top 25% pay 82.9%, the top 50% pay 96.03% and the bottom 50%, they pay a paltry 3.97% of all income taxes. – Tax the rich – such a typical democrat party line yet they accuse their opponents of tax cuts for the wealthy.

Then there is the political spectrum of less government on the right and more government on the left. Fascism Socialism Nazism Communism all belong on the left. Culture of corruption Coakley has made it clear that she is on the left many times. Brown has said he is less government, on the right, the opposite of culture of corruption Coakley.

Correct me if I am wrong, if status quo Coakley wants to make a comparison to Nazism it seems that, she has more in common with Nazism then Brown.

Yep, with a HT to Instapundit, the JammieWearingFool gets a screen shot of the Coakley ad…

If you’re having trouble reading it, the disclaimer says: “Paid for by the Massachusettes Democratic Party

I liked the ad.

I’m pretty sure most people in the Bay State already know about Martha’s crappy record on crime….I think he comes across as very decent and likeable, NOT business as usual. Admittedly, I’m very responsive the the decency factor.

If he wins, I’m likin’ him as a Presidential candidate at some point.

Great post though, linked at Reaganite Republican

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/

When I click it, I get “This video has been removed by the user”.

Her web site has no reference to it. Her YouTube channel lists it, but gives an error when clicking it.

The Nazi reference must not have played as well as she thought.

By the way, Brown’s response was great and was the correct way to respond.

that no Nazi reference is acceptable? Idiots.

I loved Brown’s demeanor last night and in that ad. I feel it was money well spent donating to him…

…Coakley is clearly in trouble. Why else bring out the almight ‘Nazi card’?

http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=9444

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QmyCyxD1lM

I didn’t see the first one, but the lockstep makes me think that is it.

Coakley in trouble? Pharma and HMO lobbyists to the rescue

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Coakley-in-trouble-Pharma-and-HMO-lobbyists-to-the-rescue-81067542.html#ixzz0cPrmKAPT

With Democrat Martha Coakley in trouble in the Massachusetts special election to fill Ted Kennedy’s seat, Democrats could lose vote No. 60 for President Obama’s health-care bill. In response, an army of lobbyists for drug companies, health insurance companies, and hospitals has teamed up to throw a high-dollar Capitol Hill fundraiser for Coakley next Tuesday night.

Of the 22 names on the host committee–meaning they raised $10,000 or more for Coakley–17 are federally registered lobbyists, 15 of whom have health-care clients. Of the other five hosts, one is married to a lobbyist, one was a lobbyist in Pennsylvania, another is a lawyer at a lobbying firm, and another is a corporate CEO. Oh, and of course, there’s also the political action commitee for Boston Scientific Corporation.

Here are some of Coakley fundraiser hosts with some of their current health care clients:
Thomas Boggs, Patton Boggs: Bristol-Myers Squibb

Chuck Brain, Capitol Hill Strategies: Amgen, BIO, Merck, PhRMA

Susan Brophy, Glover Park Group: Blue Cross, Pfizer

Steven Champlin, Duberstein Group: AHIP, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis
Licy Do Canto, Raben Group: Amgen

Gerald Cassidy, Cassidy & Associates: U. Mass Memorial Health Care

David Castagnetti, Mehlman, Vogel, Castagnetti: Abbot Labs, AHIP, Astra-Zenaca, General Electric, Humana, Merck, PhRMA.

Steven Elmendorf, Elmendorf Strategies: Medicines Company, PhRMA, United Health

Shannon Finley, Capitol Counsel: Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Blue Cross, GE, PhRMA, Sanofi-Aventis.

Heather Podesta, Heather Podesta & Partners: Cigna, Eli Lilly, HealthSouth

Tony Podesta, Podesta Group: Amgen, GE, Merck, Novartis.
Robert Raben, Raben Group: Amgen, GE.

If Coakley pulls it out, this is the crowd that will have brought her here. If health-care reform passes, this is the crew that will have won.

at the 28 second mark in the tiny print, Massachusetts is spelled Massachusettes.

I think this is something the blogs should run with…

And there should be….

Keep the pressure on…Coakley removed the video! We are winning and she’s running scared.

If anything its nice to see the dems spend $560,000 on a locked in easy win. I love the guys at DKOS worrying about a safe seat inn MASS.

A year ago never dreamed we would be forcing them to expend cash/time/volunteers in the bluiest state of the union. The NRSC name on an ad would be no help here, Brown is doing just fine.

McAwsome next.

I will be (UGH) phone-banking for the dude. Anybody else?

http://hillbuzz.org/2010/01/12/tuesday-open-thread-january-12th-2010/

Click 12 on the caledar and read their article about Caroline Kennedy – like, it’s really, like, funny.

I am so sick of the libs using this argument to get their candidates in. It may have worked in 2006 and 2008, but it isn’t going to work in 2010.

Hey Dims we are going to hang this economy and your radical policies around your neck in 2010 and 2012 and march to victory.

Boston Herald has a poll up asking who they think won the debate last night. As of 4:15 here are the results:

6% – Martha Coakley

89% – Scott Brown

3% – Joseph Kennedy

3% – Nobody won, it was a dud
Total Votes: 1,926

there’s something to be said about keeping it positive. We’ve had a boatload of negative this past year, and I believe Brown is showing wisdom, as he did last night.

Accentuate the positive, but keep her history up front.

Coakley’s ad is nothing more than a partisan appeal. The hard core Bush haters, the frothing pro-choicers, etc. That was the same approach Deeds took in VA. It appeals only to those who would vote for her anyway. The moderates and middle voters who value a positive tone, a change in politics as usual, and a focus on issues that are bread and butter are turned off by petty partisan ads such as hers.

Brown’s ad by contrast is brilliant. He doesn’t bother exclaiming what’s already in the press in his favor (Coakley’s misspelling the name of their state, his victory in the debate) nor does he try attacking her. Two negative ads in MA is a wash and the default vote goes to the Democrat. He has to go positive.

He takes the opportunity to define himself. Health care and jobs are his priorities. The images show he cares about the working man. Coakley is part of the political machine. The music is from U2, which is going to be popular in a heavily Irish town, particularly among middle age voters. He’s the bread and butter candidate talking from his own kitchen. He looks like someone you could sit down and have a beer with or the professional guy at the office you can always count on to get his job done. He paid attention to these little details where, I believe, swing voters are won on the margins. Not sure it’ll be enough in MA, but at a minimum, it starts to make conservative inroads.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2010/01/12/2172083.aspx