…..Moe Lane said above that it was strange that, when Sestak, first made his comments about the job offer, that the White House didn’t come out swinging then, and say, “Hey, we just spoke hypothetically–nothing wrong with that.” And technically there isn’t–politicians have been doing this since the time of the Caesars. So, my question is–”What are they REALLY trying to hide?” In other words, what is more embarrassing than them offering Sestak a job off the record, and him refusing? (This NEVER should have become this big a scandal–as both Megyn Kelly and Charles Krauthammer state. The WH could have made this go away months ago.)

Well, what’s more embarrassing is Bill Clinton winking and nodding and telling Rahm Emanuel that he would go talk to Joe Sestak and try to convince him to dropout, but then actually telling Sestak— “RUN dammit!! You can easily beat that SOB Specter. He has the personality of a toad! Besides, no one in PA, Republican or Democrat, likes him.”

Now, what makes me think that Bill Clinton did this? Well, the fact that the Obama campaign called him and Hillary “RAAAAACISTS!!” throughout the Democratic Primary (remember, Bill Clinton was “the first black president”, so this would REALLY piss him off), the fact that the entire Democratic establishment and the liberal MSM were trying to pressure Hillary to drop out of the race (so Sestak is not the first to fall victim to this tactic), and the fact that the Obama campaign pushed the story that Hillary wanted Obama to get assassinated (see link below).

http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0508/Hillary_cites_RFK_assasination_in_explaining_why_shes_still_in_race.html

Furthermore, Joe Sestak was an extremely loyal Hillary supporter who stayed with her until the bitter end, and who was perpetually on TV defending her (when most of her supporters had left). Sestak even referred to himself as a “serious” Hillary supporter. (See the link below which quotes Sestak as saying this, plus it points out that Sestak helped Hillary win Bucks county by 15 points–something that I’m sure that Obama hasn’t forgotten).

http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news_details/article/28/2010/may/17/bumpy-ride-for-democrats-1.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Sestak

So, my question to you all is, who do you think that Bill Clinton would have more loyalty to? Some upstart Chicago politician that called him and his wife “racists” and implied that his wife wanted him assassinated? Or, a guy who stood by them through thick and thin and helped Hillary carry Bucks county by 15 points–when everyone else in the DNC and the MSM was telling her to get out of the race? Just a thought.

Oh, and one more thing. Two days before the Sestak/Specter election, Bill Clinton was in Johnstown, PA campaigning for Mark Critz. Now, when he was there, Clinton NEVER mentioned Specter’s name (Obama’s choice for Senate) once. Furthermore, Critz’s district went HEAVILY for Hillary, so just by being there, Bill was doing a serious get out the vote drive for Sestak (he didn’t have to say anything–once the people who voted for Hillary heard he was there, they knew what to do).

And, finally, the reason why I think that Bill Clinton totally kneecapped Obama and stabbed him in the back, is because, frankly, it’s something that I would do. I could totally see myself, if I were in Bill Clinton’s position, smiling sweetly at Obama and Rahm and saying–”Why of course I’ll talk to Sestak.” (and then, conveniently leave out what I planned on telling Sestak). I believe that revenge is a dish best served cold–and I’m sure that Bill Clinton does as well.

And yes, if it were to be revealed that Bill Clinton convinced Joe Sestak to run and helped him win behind Obama’s back, that would be a whole heck of a lot more embarrassing than Obama offering Sestak a job and him refusing. Why? Because it would make Obama look weak–like he just got pwned (which I think that he did). Just a thought.