http://twitpic.com/2u31ki

http://twitpic.com/2u37co

http://twitpic.com/2u39jy

No one, no one was paid, or ordered to attend the Beck rally. In fact, most democrats are socialists, almost all in public office are liars, and all approve of the theft of money from men and women who work for so as to give it to people who don’t or won’t, but only after it has first been handled my middle-men who are the aforementioned socialists and thieves. You seem to fit in the rank and file there somewhere.

Your next point?

As a party, the Democrats have embraced socialism and, as a result, have the commies fully endorsing them.. [Egg and Chicken Theory defined.]

“Progressivism:” is nothing more than socialism in wrapping paper.

But, if you don’t understand that, you probably are on the wrong site.

Heres’ an easier one for you: http://www.roysac.com/blog/2007/08/political-systems-for-dummies/

or worse, extolling the Jim Crow South’s worst excesses and lynchings, as progressive academics are wont to do, we’ll talk. When you find a coordinated effort on the part of the military (to name a conservative government organization) to use your tax dollars to facilitate protests of military funding cuts, as you see federal government unions do, then we’ll talk. When one of our leading candidates for President seeks out premier Stormfront and racist luminaries to help with his bid for higher office in a conservative district, as Barack Obama did with Bill Ayers, then the comparison can stand. The equivocation rings false until such a time that you can bring evidence to bear that matches the above.

And no, not all Democrats are communists and socialists: I highly doubt that much more than a very small minority are. However, it is no mistake that the communists and socialists within the Democratic Party are incredibly overrepresented in the leadership and activist wings of the Democratic Party and the activist progressive movement.

You will now retract that absurd lie, and you will apologize for trying to smear your political opponents for doing the thing that your own side is doing: breaking bread with murdering, genocidal scum.

Next post.

Moe Lane

PS: Don’t even think about trying to drag in the LaRouchies, either. Those are *your* side’s crazies, too.

this is the constituency of the Democrats???

This is who ACORN and other Leftist organizations get charged up to go to the polls for SOCIAL JUSTICE. ‘

The Far Left and Democrats cannot deny that they are Socialists, this was on display for everyone to see. They want this country to be like the Socialist States in Europe.

And if any Storm Front or other idiots come to a Tea Party they are asked to leave or take down their signs

Then your account may survive long enough to get to another comment.

The 2008 Democrat Party Platform is essentially the same as the 2005 CPUSA Program. The two parties are so similar in their goals that the CPUSA has not run its own candidate for President in in ages. I don’t know when was the last time they ran their own candidate instead of just endorsing the Democrat, but it was a long time ago. If the Democrat is close enough to communism for the Communist Party of the USA to wholeheartedly endorse them instead of running their own candidate, then they are for all practical purposes the same as communists.

Follow that logic?

Now here is the logical representation of the conclusion.

Communist=Democrat

The reflexive property tells us that the following is equally true.

Democrat=Communist

See if you can argue about that without bringing Stormfront and other National *Socialist* buttheads into the argument.

“A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” –Alexander Hamilton

Study at Redstate University

right now a lot of people on this site are just focused on doing the best we can in November. Side arguments that dampen enthusiasm or cast conservatives in a negative light, are just not welcome right now. It is either join the fight or get out of the way.

Of course it is important to be honest in our arguments and support. The danger of democrat/progressive rule has already been shown and clearly defined. We have to Stop the Damage. The choice as to who to vote for in the general is crystal clear.

Mkay. Would you please quantify through compare and contrast how Barack Hussein Obama was qualified, thus garnering your confidence and your vote, yet Sarah Palin was unqualified?

This has been rehashed endlessly, but I find it fascinating every time I see or hear someone call the governor of the state commanding the greatest deposits of natural resources and land mass in the country, elevated by the people from mayor of a city – a woman who is a self-made small business owner elected to be the CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF A STATE – is “unqualified” to be VICE-President…

…while the same exact person says that a race-hustler academician elevated from the neighborhood on the fast-track through the CHICAGO GUTTER MACHINE, with NO academic track record, NO executive experience, NO traceable past aside from Socialist politics, who allows his half-siblings to live in third-world filth while doing NOTHING to help them – IS qualified to be PRESIDENT of the United States of America.

Sorry, I shouldn’t even allow my buttons to be pushed, but for Pete’s sake. Intellectual honesty, please.

(really wish I had Moe Lane’s gift for phrase-turning today…)

Let me make this simple.

I don’t believe you when you say you’ve been reading Red State for “quite some time now” – unless that’s a measure for under a week, you have lousy reading comprehension, or your head is unusually thick with lies. The simplest explanation is you’re a moby.

First things.

If the rectal-cranial-inversion goons from stormfront were at a rally, the media would have been all over it. Period. They’ve made a habit of trying to tie racists to beck and the tea partiers since the beginning of the movement – including sending in their own haters and trying to film them. Since it didn’t make the news in a notable way, either submit a URL to a news service story showing stomrfront was present, or retract the allegation.

If you did enough research on McCain to determine he’s got two modes – candidate/pander and official/backstabber – but thought Obama was an improvement, then you didn’t do a damn bit of research on Obama. Having done a half-assed job, you now assert that “it’s not your fault”.

As for Palin’s qualifications, I think she was overqualified, by Cactus Jack Garner’s measure at least. Look it up. That’s something you’ll have to do to join this conversation, so get used to it.

Finally, I still have no idea where you stand. You haven’t shown any fiber, haven’t taken and defended a position, haven’t declared any belief that I can see. Do you, in fact, stand? I can’t tell.

Last things.

I don’t give a rat’s ass for what other people say about me. That’s just public opinion, and nobody ever made a name for himself by following that will-o-the-wisp, though Clinton surely tried.

Mew

why even bother posting on this site? You can find a home somewhere else for sure. Some liberal/progressive site would love to have you for a cheerleader. Their posters are getting scared, you can maybe cheer them up.