bailouts
Posted at 1:38pm on May 8, 2008 Naked Free Markets
A Little Moral Hazard Goes a long, long, way
By blackhedd
Global financial markets have been in disorder for nine months now. (The birthday of the crisis is August 8.) There are widespread indications that the most fearsome disruptions, in the credit and interbank lending markets, are now abating around the world, thanks to aggressive and unprecedented actions by monetary authorities. Of these, the Bernanke/Geithner Federal Reserve deserves the lion's share of the credit.
It's entirely true to say that the world of finance has been fundamentally changed by the Fed's response. But for good or for ill? And what should happen next? As it turns out, this is an incredibly important question that carries an extraordinary amount of political risk. And it needs to be fully aired in the current political campaign.
Milton Friedman repeated the observation that change only happens at moments of real or perceived crisis. He astutely added that when change comes, it's based on whatever ideas happen to be lying around at the time. Today, those ideas are overwhelmingly on the side of massive new regulation of not only financial markets, but also of the real economy.
Is there an alternative? Read on...
Posted in bailouts | Economy | financial markets | naked markets | regulation — Comments (41)/ Email this page » / Read More »
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Recent comments
Oh, Please
by Steve in TennesseeIf this is true, then there's way Hillary would be his VP
by bkDoes anyone else get the feeling...
by Vladimirour kindred spirit undermines that, as GC was immersed!
by gamecockSuperficial similarities, nothing more. <nt>
by Leon H Wolfnice work, speciallist
by bloochNuclear Dirt Bomb
by SteveLAno, but we could get 95 - nt
by gamecockThat's easy
by E Pluribus UnumDid you notice this crapola is from 2006? n/t
by Vladimir5 5 5 nt
by JadedGood news...good news indeed :stroking kitty: mwaahhh!
by JadedOMG! For a brief second, I thought you meant you're a LAWYER!
by streetwiseAbout that wetting your pants in a dark suit thing:
by AchanceI don't agree that Bush is solely reponsible...
by aceintxAnd, again...
by birdmojoand, again...
by birdmojoAbout the same as my grandfather during WWII
by bloochWho would believe she'd say something like that?
by mikefiskIF (big IF) this is true
by Shoebox