Guns
Posted at 11:55am on May 8, 2008 The Best Commentary You Will Read on Marvin Harrison and the Second Amendment
By Ben Domenech
This link to KSK has language that is NSFW. There, fair warning. Now go read it - it's the best response to silly anti-Second Amendment columns you're going to find: total ridicule.
Posted at 9:41pm on Apr. 12, 2008 "Me and My 30'06..."
The copyright below is 1995, by the way. Obama's not the first one to get guys like this wrong, you see.
By Moe Lane
It's a song by W.J. Bethancourt III, who is one of the Banjo Gods; he's also known as Ioseph of Locksley. For the SCAdians reading this; yes, that Ioseph of Locksley, which is why I'm not going to violate his copyright by reproducing the whole thing. But the lyrics are still... of note for a certain condescending junior Senator from Illinois, so let me pass along the first and last stanzas:
I like to punch holes in pieces of paper
At a thousand yards or so
Me and my thirty ought six have a good time
That's where I like to go
I don't care for fishing, and I don't drink at all
Nor camping far out in the sticks
I just like to punch holes in pieces of paper
Me and my thirty ought six![snip]
So please, Mr. Congressman, think about me
As you sit 'neath the Capitol dome
I'm just one guy of two hundred million
Sitting back here at home
I'm no one important, I'm not very rich
But -I VOTE- on Elections Day's mix:
Punching small holes in pieces of paper ....
Me and my thirty ought six!(Sample tune here)
Mind you, Mr. Bethancourt's not "bitter." Indeed, that's the whole point.
Moe Lane
PS: Good banjo album, by the way: it can be ordered here.
Posted in Guns | Liberals | Naked Banjos | Obamafiles — Comments (2)/ Email this page » / Read More »
Posted at 2:38pm on Mar. 24, 2008 Attention DC Residents: Don't Let the Police In!
By Mark I
David Freddoso notes in The Corner that the authorities in Washington DC must be a bit nervous about the way the oral arguments in District of Columbia vs. Heller went at the Supreme Court last week. If they were confident that the District's handgun ban would survive the Constitutional challenge, why would they be implementing a new program to try and get as many guns as possible forfeited before the Court's ruling comes down in June?
A crackdown on guns is under way in the District. Police are asking residents to submit to voluntary searches in exchange for amnesty under the District's gun ban.
The program is starting in the Washington Highlands neighborhood of southeast Washington on Monday and will later expand to other neighborhoods. Officers will go door to door asking residents for permission to search their homes. (emphasis mine)
Now, we at RedState certainly don't want to advocate any lawbreaking, but I hasten to point out that the program is voluntary (see bolding). DC residents don't actually have to...you know...let the police in. Fourth Amendment and all that. No warrant = no entry.
Chances are good that by June, this "crackdown" will be a moot exercise anyhow.
Posted at 6:57pm on Jan. 14, 2008 Notice Anything Missing?
By Dan McLaughlin
CNN.com's list of "What to put between you and burglars" seems to be missing a particular home-security device - see if you can guess what it is. (Hint: it's the one mentioned in the Bill of Rights. It's also the only one left once the burglars are actually inside the house.).
Posted at 5:51pm on Nov. 20, 2007 High Hopes, Pass the Carrot Cake
By Thomas
Apropos of Alex's note on the Supreme Court's decision to grant cert in the D.C. gun case:
We all realize, I hope, that this won't resolve whether the 2nd Amendment is, gag, incorporated, right? I mean, whether the 2nd Amendment enshrines an individual right or a collective one (so to speak) is still only a Federal question, and is only applicable here because D.C. is (and will remain forever if I have my way) a Federal protectorate.
If the Court decides that it is an individual right, they're going to have to stand Miller on its head, or just flat-out overrule it. I'm not sure this Court goes there.
(As to incorporation: I know, but I'm not convinced this Court is going to expand the incorporation doctrine. Actually, I just hope they won't, even though I love the policy result.)
Posted at 3:01pm on Nov. 9, 2007 Murder in Finland. (A shocker, despite permissive gun laws.)
By Mark Kilmer
Finland is become a firing range. Eighteen-year-old Pekka-Eric Auvinen rampaged through his high school Wednesday, killing six of his fellow students and two members of staff before turning .22 caliber pistol on himself.
Now, it should be noted that this most important part of this story from the BBC is that Finland's gun laws are nothing if not out-and-out LAX.
Posted in finland | Guns | Liberals | murder — Comments (0) / Email this page » / Read More »
Posted at 8:39pm on Mar. 28, 2007 Attention Wayne LaPierre: Your NRA Folks In Georgia Are Frigtards
Heck of a way to ruin the pro-2nd Amendment Coalition!
By Erick
The NRA, desperate to revitalize its flagging membership (a victim of its own great success), discovered a terrible travesty that only it could see -- some employers were daring to tell their employees that the employees could not bring their guns onto their employers private property, including the evil Wal-Mart. How dare these evil employers set rules for conduct on their private property.
So, the NRA drafted S.B. 43, pitting private property rights against gun rights and then had its activists begin harassing allies in the state legislature who actually thought private property rights were more important than gun rights of employees on private property.
The law was opposed by realtors, the Chamber of Commerce, other business allies, and a number of other groups and individuals usually on the same side as the NRA who actually think that governments should not tell private property owners what they can and cannot do on their land. The result? The NRA stabbed the GOP in the back by negotiating with Democrats who'd been threatening to highlight the fact that a local employee was killed this past Tuesday in Atlanta by another employee who brought a gun to their place of business. The GOP ran the NRA out of town. The NRA burned its bridges with some of its best allies in the state legislature, and now the NRA is crying over its treatment. In the process, the NRA said S.B.43 is the only bill it really cared about this year and will grade legislators commitment to guns only on that bill.
Note to the NRA: Grow up [and if this weren't a family site, there'd be a "the . . . ." between those two].
Posted in Guns | State Politics — Comments (70)/ Email this page » / Read More »
blog advertising is good for you
Washington Times
blog advertising is good for you

get your job site
at simplyhired.com



Recent comments
Like Rumsfeld's critics would have approved new spending (nt)
by Neil Stevens:Shrug: We're capricious. <NT>
by Moe LaneWhich "Red state"...?
by Don_JuanCool, I appreciate it
by E Pluribus UnumLet's be charitable then
by Neil StevensI wish I'd used that siggy first
by Andysforsmalgov...That would be funny if he wasn't so right.
by Joliphantrevealing my ignorance
by E Pluribus UnumWhy do
by xavierthisonelastForget John Edwards. A
by MenloActually, I'd be all for Boxer as Sec. of the Interior
by RandomGuyIowahawk's take.
by birdmojoI look forward to it n/t
by TomlinsonDouthatHmmm...
by zroxxIf you mess with ME your messin' with me
by speciallistStaying on message
by sinz52Indeed, it's not.
by birdmojo5
by xavierthisonelastI couldn't agree more, but
by rgregmKagan's new book is sitting on my shelf
by blackhedd