« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Warren Buffet Wants to Pay More Taxes

Download Podcast | iTunes | Podcast Feed

On today’s edition of Coffee and Markets, Brad Jackson and Ben Domenech are joined by Francis Cianfrocca to discuss the proposed “Department of Jobs,” and Warren Buffett’s plea to the government to make him pay more in taxes.

We’re brought to you as always by BigGovernment and Stephen Clouse and Associates. If you’d like to email us, you can do so at coffee[at]newledger.com. We hope you enjoy the show.

Related Links:

A Jobs Agenda, Anyone?
White House Debates Fight on Economy
Stop Coddling the Super-Rich

Follow Brad on Twitter
Follow Ben on Twitter
Follow Francis on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • potkas7

    If Warren Buffett really want to do something useful about the national debt he should buy government bonds and voluntarily retire them. He could buy them at a discount thus increasing his bang for the buck. That way he could specifically target what he wants his money spent on instead of simply surrendering a bigger percentage of his income to be taken for purposes over which he has no control. And he could choose between Federal Debt or state and local debt to give aid to those sectors he deems most worthy or in greatest need.

  • Finrod

    All he has to do is fill in the right line near the end of the 1040 form, the one to donate to (trying to) pay off the debt, and he can pay as much as he wants. No one’s stopping him.

    If he isn’t already doing that, what right does he have to ask that taxes be raised on others too?

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    “I don’t really want to pay more in taxes, but my political ideology requires that I at least give it lip service. I can always shelter my money offshore. Didn’t you guys watch 60 Minutes last night . . . ?”

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Buffett is BS-Artist until he calls for a 5% per anum Net Worth tax. Not income; net worth. All of it. I wish some Tea Party Populist would call these rich lefties ont hat BS and actually bring that bill to the floor of the H of R. Let’s see how excited Sen. Kerry, Sen. Feinstien and the rest of the Liberal Yacht-Club Caucus are about that suggestion.

  • Charles Cianfrocca

    I say, 5% on net worth if it’s over $1BN. The billilonaires’ tax. I can’t imagine it would ever pass, but it sure would be fun seeing which liberal billionaires who are always bucking for higher taxes, supposedly on themselves, would be for or against it.

    In the mean time, tell Mr. Buffett that here’s what he can do: write a check to the treasury for whatever he would pay under whatever new tax he proposes, and explain in writing where he got the numbers. You want ‘em? You first. Follow your own lead — let’s see what it actually looks like before we tell the government of, by, and for the people that we want it for everyone.

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    First, we need to greatly reduce (I prefer elimination) of corporate income taxes (especially for retained earnings). Second, we need to raise the cap gains/dividend/other rates to equal income tax rates (although with base broadening, the rates would come down so we should meet somewhere in the middle). What we have right now is a disincentive for the so-called job creators to actually invest in a business venture that may create jobs because both their income from it and the business income it generates will be taxed at 35% while they can invest instead in stocks and get a 15% rate on a similar expected rate of return (in other words, I would need to expect a 30% greater gain from the business than from a stock investment to get the same after tax income under today’s code). This simply is government not letting free markets work by selecting a winning form of income over other forms of income.

    As to Francis’ last point, about trading higher marginal rates on millionaires for substantial reform of medicare et al, I would also take it, as we have shown over the last 30 years that it isn’t that hard to lower taxes, but that it is almost impossible to cut entitlement benefits. Having said that, the entitlement reform would have to be significant and linked to the taxes (ie voted on together). Once we solve the long-term entitlement funding issue and get the budget back towards balance, cutting taxes should be much easier (although as I stated above, I think we need major tax reform now, to get the free market back into play).

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    These people are experts at appearing generous.

  • http://www.usdebateboard.com usdebateboard

    Warren Bluffer pays $7M in taxes. Even if we double his effective rate to around what he says his “help” pays, say 35%, his $7M in taxes becomes $14M.

    Government spends about $4B per day. How many minutes does Warren’s contribution run government for? How many super-rich friends does he have to make up the difference, anyway?