« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama’s Magic Math for Savings and Call for $1.5 Trillion in New Taxes

Download Podcast | iTunes | Podcast Feed

On today’s edition of Coffee and Markets, Brad Jackson and Ben Domenech are joined by Francis Cianfrocca to discuss Obama’s deficit reduction plan based on faulty math and his call for $1.5 Trillion in new taxes, the newest controversial figure in the Solyndra scandal and the college kids that invaded Wall Street this weekend.

We’re brought to you as always by BigGovernment and Stephen Clouse and Associates. If you’d like to email us, you can do so at coffee[at]newledger.com. We hope you enjoy the show.

Related Links:

Fed Ponders Jobs, Inflation Targets
The European dream lies in ruins
Obama deficit plan aimed at Democratic base
Obama Proposing $1.5 Trillion in New Taxes
Solyndra, the logical endpoint of Obamanomics
#OccupyWallSt: Just A Saturday Stroll Through The Park…

Follow Brad on Twitter
Follow Ben on Twitter
Follow Francis on Twitter

The hosts and guests of Coffee and Markets speak only for ourselves, not any clients or employers.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • johnt

    n/t

  • jaykali

    It won’t work but at least it makes the choie all too clear for people. If Obama was politically smaller he would adopt some Republican ideas, ala Clinton in hopes of winning re-election. That would be a chess move Republicans would actually have to think about. Like what if they had an actual serious tax reform policy – that would be something that could actually be a win for Democrats.

    I think Business leaders absolutely hate his guts. I think the populace isn’t falling for gimmicks and populist rhetoric.

  • bk

    The left will try to make it a “they want to protect billionaires” fight, but Obama is totally kicking the can on SS. The GOP needs to turn it into the “Obama plan to bankrupt social security” fight.

  • Jack_Savage

    Every single time the House Republicans are asked about this, they should say “Look, this is class warfare, and raising taxes on the brink of a double dip recession is not wise, but we need to see what the Senate passes in order to comment.”

    And leave it at that, until the Senate passes something, WHICH THEY WON’T. Then watch while Democrats gut each other like fish until November of 2012, all the while passing legitimate jobs bills and budgets in the House.

  • usadying

    Obama knows this is dead in the water. Is he killing two birds with one stone? Resuscitate the enemy to motivate his base, and….? What executive order or department regulation is coming out at the same time? Maybe Labor Union Report’s Dept of Labor regulation?

  • GregInFla

    == FINANCE

  • jaykali

    They really got us in to this mess. Isn’t it great that we have politicians that pit us against each other? My neighbor is doing better than me, he must not be paying his fair share even though he is in a higher tax bracket which means he progressively pays more. It’s not enough that he pays more on his income with the same percentage, his percentage needs to be higher.

    The Buffett thing is stupid. First he is not a hedge fund manager, right? The only loophole I am aware of is that hedge fund managers can get away with only having to pay capital gains, that is a loophole that I think should be stopped.

    But Buffett is an a business owner. He pays capital gains on top of corporate taxes and also investment income which is taxed pre-investment. So it’s lying to say that Buffett only pays 15% and his secretary pays 20% or something. ALSO if his secretary only makes 60k then she probably pays like 7-8% after deductions and whatnot depending on her tax situation. No one actually pays their real tax bracket. I know I usually pay like 10-11%.

    I am so tired of the so-called ‘Buffett’ example, makes me crazy. They are selling that Billionaires don’t have to pay as much. Now if you want to means-test social security/medicare and make people pay on their whole income for SS/Medicare EVEN though they won’t be receiving it so it is a pure transfer of wealth-OK I guess we’re stuck with that. I envision that will be one way we ‘FIX’ for medicare/SS, altho I think that is a travesty bc that is not how it was planned out. It was not a program to transfer wealth, it was basically a safety net program where people ‘in effect’ pay for their own services throughout their working career even tho its more of the Ponzi variety than it is a ‘savings program’.