« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Washington Post Goes All-In On Left Crazy: Welcome Think Tanked!

Taking "In the Tank" to a Whole New Level.

Many of us received a spam email this morning from the Washington Post, announcing they’d hired yet another left-wing thug cheerleader (snazzy uniform optional) for yet another made-up reporting gig that will inevitably degenerate into yet another look-at-the-dirty-racist-conservatives event. After adding Greg “I Think Union Violence Is Progressive” Sargent and Ezra “The Constitution Is, Like, Really Old and Stuff” Klein, and the late Dave “Kyle MacLachlan After Floating Face Down in a Pool for a Day” Weigel, there is simply no way that the Post thinks anyone is buying the act, and is instead catering to a dwindling audience of baby boomers and Gen-Xers who still don’t get all this internet stuff, but want to be reassured that Republicans are icky. Hey, with the for-profit college goldmine running dry, the Graham family needs to keep from being roasted alive by the shareholders. If you can sell worthless degrees to poor kids, you can cater to left-wing geezers.

So, a big welcome to Think Tanked! If we’re lucky, we’ll hardly know you.

The ridiculous part is that, as with the Post‘s prior additions to its cutting-edge online site — now redesigned to look more like a failing newspaper, but I repeat myself — there is simply no way to disguise the fairly clear left-wing advocacy at work here. Let’s start with the press release:

Allen McDuffee is a New York-based politics writer. Part reporter, part investigative journalist, part blogger, Allen has written for The Nation, Huffington Post, AlterNet, Raw Story, New York Observer, In These Times and Truthdig, among others.

Now, I know that to a lot of Post print readers, these must seem like Sunday supplement sections to the local newspaper, sort of like Parade, but with fewer personal massager ads. Anyone living in the 21st century, however, would know that these are left-of-center publications much like Pravda was only a pro-Soviet Union newspaper. (The analogy was deliberate.)

But! The worse part, by far, is that anyone with access to Mr. Google, Think Tanked‘s old site (warning: hate site), and Allen McDuffee’s (the author of Think Tanked) Twitter feed can see that this is just the same old song and dance again. In other words, the Post’s editors either don’t know about these things — given the quality of their site these days, a real possibility — or they think we don’t, which, again, given the quality of their site, is a real possibility.

So let’s walk it through.

There’s the Twitter feed. Oh, what a gold mine that is.

The GOP should be put to the noose.

The Bush Administration benefited from not killing Bin Laden.

Andrew Breitbart should lose a Grammy. (Hey, it probably made sense when he wrote it.)

The Iraq War “catastrophe” was “caused” by the party that “needs proof” Bin Laden is dead.

He hates Erick Erickson.

Rachel Maddow is dreamy.

He hates Frank Gaffney.

He hates Paul Ryan.

Paul Wolfowitz’s position on Libya is like Bill Clinton’s on cigars.

Did he mention he hates Paul Ryan?

He hates Sarah Palin.

The Muslim Brotherhood is awesome.

Did he mention that he hates Sarah Palin?

Dear crazy lefty, have I introduced you to my friend? She’s not fat! (Sorry, just thought that was funny.)

Koch Brothers opening a lobbying office in Madison, Wisconsin, makes him sick to his stomach.

There’s so much more, including a weird back and forth with some other psychotic lefty about Trig Palin that is hard to summarize and disturbing to read. But that last — like so many others about the Kochs — should have sent eyebrows skyward at the Post, if for no reason other than that Koch funding is the same bete noir on the left as Soros funding is on the right. In other words, if his constant fits over the Kochs are real — and given that he’s cool in making a no-fat-chicks disclaimer in the same space, I think we can safely assume that — then someone at the Post should have said, Huh. Maybe we shouldn’t hire this guy to cover a subject he hates? Maybe? Maybe the whole Dave Weigel thing was an object lesson?

Ha ha, yeah, I know. Even on the internet comedy can come through.

Then there’s his web site — or more accurately, his penultimate site. Search for Koch. Revel. The New Yorker and Mother Jones(!) are treated as objective sources. And so on.

There’s more fun, though — with no fat chicks! That’s important! — in one of his older sites. Behold the now-diagnostic obsession with an adult woman who has more than one child. And Ann Coulter. And Bill Kristol (“Billy”). And Sarah Palin again. (Did you know he hates her?) And Ann Coulter again.

Do you know that before a law firm of any size will hire you, they’ll Google you? True story. I’m guessing the Washington Post company should get hiring tips from its lawyers. Or stop pretending that anyone on the right could conceivably be fooled by this fellow — by any reasonable measure, he makes the sub-literate Sargent look like a Nobel Laureate by comparison.

In closing, a personal note.

Back in the heady days of RedState’s founding — back when everyone, and not just Keith Olbermann and his cat, called us RedState.org — we had a relatively small number of things going for us: A ridiculously large editorial stable; a lot of camaraderie; the Democrats’ insane decision to nominate John Kerry for the Presidency; an up-and-coming, brilliant, and condescending commenter named streiff; and the Washington Post. We were largely a bunch of late twenty-somethings and early thirty-somethings (except Domenech, whom we believed to be eight and the result of a secret government super-writer program), but that didn’t mean we thought that the Post was center-right, or even center, or neutral, or objective. But they were fair. You had the impression that they actually tried to give our side an even shake, for good and for ill.

Of course, Bush had the unmitigated gall to win, and pull a heck of a lot of Republicans into office with him. This had the same impact on the American Left that Sarah Palin has by breathing, thereby proving once and for all that we have not actually eliminated rabies in humans. Not coincidentally, as our side of the aisle degenerated into policy disputes about things that would never come to pass, the frothing animals went into overdrive, becoming the place where all of the energy online was in play, sort of like how your intestines are where all of the energy in your body is in play after chasing a burrito with a shot of hot grease. It was a remarkable descent into madness, and an effective one, for two election cycles.

That the Post fell with them is both predictable — they’re chasing a business model, aping the online left, that petered out three years ago, which is like continuing to publish a newspaper — and more than a little sad. I used to presume that they were playing me as straight as they could. I didn’t think they’d go the New York Times route as full party organ. Kinda sad, but they probably won’t be around much longer anyway.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • smagar

    Those kinds of readers do, indeed, want to see Republicans mocked in print. They’re also utterly unconcerned if the media is unfair to Republicans and conservatives.

    Remember the ONE POTUS press conference before Congress voted on Porkulus? Things weren’t going too well for The One at that point. If the reporters at that ONE POTUS press conference had held Obama’s feet to the fire, if they’d emphasized the plan’s many flaws in their questions….Porkulus might have been derailed.

    What did the WaPo’s reporter ask about? Alex Rodriguez and steroid use. (I guess it was ESPN’s night to ask qustions about the stimulus plan?)

    The WaPo did run an editorial about the plan, dripping with concern over it—-AFTER the Congress voted on it. When it was safe to do so.

    I used to devour the Post daily, because I thought it tried to be fair. Well, times change. Too bad.

    • Doc Holliday

      but I will not. The Post is so left their Sports page is left (Wilbon, Kornheiser) and their Style section is left too http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/132664/stylish/byron-york

      Even in 1970 it was called “Pravda on the Potomac”

      • ihateliberals

        rotate to the left. They ooze blue slime form the blue states. Knowing that the Post is leftist isn’t news it is that they think they have the public fooled. People only buy the Post for the classifieds.

    • Doc Holliday

      “The WaPo did run an editorial about the plan, dripping with concern over it?-AFTER the Congress voted on it. When it was safe to do so”

      this is a classic drive by move. They post negative articles AFTER a Dem is elected or a Dem initiative is passed. Then they can later say they ran both positive and negative articles on the subject.

    • Doc Holliday

      btw, he goes off on race at every possible chance. The Post’s sports page goes left all the time.

      • Doc Holliday

        I see that Wilbon left the Post recently after 20 years there. His last column is all about “racism” too. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/06/AR2010120606607.html

      • gunslingr45

        Ican?t tell you specifics of what he said, but he may be a racist?
        Why that makes perfect NON sense. I listen to Rush most days and I have NEVER heard him say anything racist. Not one thing. If he were racist he would have slipped up in one of his many years on the radio. So that makes Michael Wilson a liar and most likely a reverse racist in my book.

        So many RINO?s so little time!

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack
  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    http://www.cjr.org/the_kicker/timess_bruni_becomes_papers_fi.php

    The Kicker ? May 24, 2011 12:17 PM
    Times?s Bruni Becomes Paper?s First Openly Gay Columnist

    They think that hiring one “moderate” columnist suffices, so that they can otherwise recapitulate their biases….

    • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

      Frank Bruni blogs election night, cataloging Ratherisms (?If you try to read the tea leaves before the cup is done, you can get yourself burned?) and proving liberal media bias rampant!

      If there is a God, and He or She or It is kind, Kerry will win, because no benevolent deity would deny reporters and readers the pleasure of chronicling and following Teresa Heinz Kerry as First Lady.

      Of course, a just God would also keep them out of Ohio in December. Then again, they are journalists and deserve to be punished. . .

      http://wonkette.com/24836/frank-bruni-better-than-ad-nags

  • cja99

    Who the heck reads or listens to the State Run Media anymore. They are soooo biased and it’s more like reading gossip columns than anything else – pathetic! As far as the Washington Compost goes, forget it, wouldn’t waste my time.