« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Dear RedState: Thank you from DeVore for California.

Tomorrow is primary day in California. By that evening, we’ll know whether Carly Fiorina, Tom Campbell, or Chuck DeVore is the choice of California Republicans to face off against Barbara Boxer in November. This election year is our last, best chance to dethrone the malign queen of the California left, with her black heart and bad ideas — and I hope we make the right choice. I hope we choose Chuck DeVore.

In fact, I think we will. The peculiar dynamics of 2010 aren’t captured by any poll, and we’re taking this effort down to the wire.

But I’m not writing this as a last-minute push for Chuck DeVore. I’m writing this to thank you. RedState mattered in this primary, for all the right reasons.

Let’s rewind back to September 2009. Carly Fiorina had formed her exploratory committee, and was boasting to private audiences about her recruitment by the NRSC. Chuck DeVore’s campaign was wholly staffed by volunteers, and widely expected to be a non-factor. He would neither affect nor influence Fiorina’s smooth path to the nomination. His years of conservative activism would mean nothing next to the celebrity newcomer and her millions.

Then RedState happened.

On October 1st, 2009, a group of RedState editors got together and endorsed Chuck DeVore. I want to thank them by name: Aaron Gardner. BS. Haystack. Caleb Howe. Mark Impomeni. Dan McLaughlin. Dan Spencer. Neil Stevens. Leon Wolf. These men resisted the blandishments of celebrity and cash — and rest assured, there were strenuous efforts by the Fiorina campaign on both counts — and stood up for the tested conservative.

That got some important attention. And when Carly Fiorina bragged again — this time on the record — about her NRSC backing, well, that got some more attention. RedState’s steadfastness for conservatism, and Carly’s arrogance, brought the DeVore campaign its first big coup.

Senator Jim DeMint and the Senate Conservatives Fund endorsed Chuck DeVore on November 3rd, 2009. That alarmed the Fiorina campaign, which never expected meaningful support for an ordinary guy over the celebrity dilettante: it promptly moved its planned formal candidacy announcement from November 6th to November 4th, in an attempt to step on the DeMint news.

Then, just a few weeks later, Erick Erickson personally endorsed Chuck DeVore. He’s stuck with Chuck since, and I want to publicly and explicitly thank him for that as well.

And that’s when everything changed about Carly Fiorina.

It’s important to recall where Carly Fiorina stood in the first few weeks of her campaign last fall. A brief refresher on just the highlights:

  • She supported the Wall Street bailouts.
  • She was on record conditionally supporting the Obama stimulus.
  • She declared herself agnostic on Obamacare.
  • She refused to say where she stood on amnesty for illegals.
  • She supported cap-and-tax.
  • She refused to say whether she’d overturn Roe v. Wade.
  • She was on record supporting taxation of Internet sales.
  • She declared her support for Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to SCOTUS.

  • That’s just the tip of the iceberg: if you want the full indictment with copious sourcing, head here.

    The point here is not to expose Fiorina’s liberal record yet again, but to point out that by the New Year, she was vigorously denying all of this. Carly Fiorina didn’t just change her mind: she changed her mind, and then denied there was any change.

    To be explicit, RedState successfully pressured, directly and indirectly, a major national figure into changing her tune on just about everything.

    Now, I don’t endorse lying per se. I certainly prefer a candidate like Chuck DeVore, who doesn’t have to lie about a thing, and certainly not about his conservative principles. But if candidates in a Republican primary feel they have to lie about their liberal records, and pretend to be a conservative — this is a good thing.

    Carly Fiorina’s self-reinvention as a conservative proved two things: that this party, even in California, is hostile to liberals; and that you, the conservative grassroots, have the power you ought to have. I only know one thing for sure about Tuesday night: Tom Campbell is going to lose. Isn’t it great to know that whether it’s Chuck or Carly, the winner will be on the record having proclaimed conservatism?

    That is excellent. When Ben Domenech, Mike Krempasky, and I founded RedState six years ago, this is precisely what we hoped to accomplish. We wanted a place where conservatives could exert influence on behalf of conservatives: and we wanted to press liberals to act conservative.

    RedState, you raised up Chuck DeVore, and made a new conservative (at least for the primary) of Carly Fiorina. You should be proud. Whatever happens tomorrow — you have my thanks. Well done, RedState. Thank you, my friends.


    Okay, one last parting item. Here’s Chuck DeVore speaking at the Israel Solidarity Rally today, in front of Israel’s consulate in Los Angeles. This is who he is — and this is who you supported, RedState. I hope you’re proud.

    Chuck DeVore at the Israel Solidarity Rally in LA! from Joshua S Trevino on Vimeo.

    COMMENTS

    • http://twitter.com/JoeKenHa joekenha

      This site has been wonderful to read every morning.

      Stay strong and keep up the good work.

    • havasu

      To paraphrase your article: tomorrow will be a no-lose for the RedState movement (unless of course Chuck garners 2% of the vote, which is hardly likely).
      One may argue fine points among the three candidates, (though I think that Chuck is the best option); one cannot argue the influence that careful, well thought-out conservative commentary and involvement now commands. We don’t need a third party; we need two, identifiable ones that are recognized and defined by their actions. Ours, one hopes will increasingly be one of principled action (would that someone would clone Governor Christie despite my opposition to human cloning!). Theirs will remain one of opportunism and victimhood.
      Win or lose, Devore’s experience will be noted, and Fiorina’s as well. The Crists, Specters and Bennetts are being cleaned out. RINOs pretend conservatism at their own risk.
      Well done, gentlemen; well done indeed.

    • momo

      casting my vote for Chuck!!!!

    • Adjoran

      The fact remains that in the LA Times initial poll of the race in late October ’09 (before Campbell’s entry), Fiorina and DeVore were tied at 27%. The next several polls after Campbell got in show DeVore in single digits until April, when he moves into the 14-16% range for several polls. The presumably final Fields poll shows him at 19%, his highest since before Campbell got in.

      So the campaign effort, aided by heavyweight DeMint, RedState, and others, has valiantly moved this year from a poor third place to a strong third place. Why, it’s even possible he might take second! What’s that get, again? Some lovely parting gifts and a home version of our game?

      No disrespect intended to Chuck DeVore himself. As I have repeatedly stated here and elsewhere, he is the best conservative candidate in the race, would be the best Senator by far, and would have a decent chance of beating Boxer in the fall. In the Fiorina-DeVore head-on-head contest, I’m definitely for Chuck.

      But his campaign lost all steam when Campbell entered the race, for whatever strange reason – one would suppose Campbell would draw more of the natural support for Fiorina, but it didn’t work out that way. And poll after poll after poll showed it wasn’t going to work out for DeVore, and it was a race between Campbell and Fiorina.

      Perhaps Erick and the RedState folks who “stuck with Chuck” deserve points for loyalty, a virtue in its own right, but insofar as the goal is to advance the Republican agenda and to put forth the best candidate with a realistic chance to win, a certain naivety is exposed. By late April or early May, after Palin’s endorsement of Fiorina, the die were cast for all to see who would only look. At some point reality simply cannot be ignored. It was Fiorina, or Campbell with his questionable ties to groups connected with at least anti-American and anti-Israel propaganda, and at worst involved with terrorist organizations.

      Best wishes and congratulations to Josh and DeVore and the campaign for fighting the good fight. They are good people, good conservatives, and I pray we have not heard the last of them as we continue the journey, step by step and inch by inch, to reclaim our country.

    • SIConservative

      Realistically, though, I hope you write a damn good endorsement of Fiorina given how much you’ve been bashing her the last few months. Fair enough in a primary, but it really should’ve stopped a week or two ago when it became clear that she’d be the nominee.

    • Kudzu

      Git’r done

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      It’s pretty unfair and unrealistic to expect him to quit doing his job.

    • Kudzu

      After I heard her call Devore a liar about his miitary status, which I personally debunked on AKO, I’m all for bashing her. She’s a CINO and we know it. She’ll be a Republican Barbara Boxer…ala a Californian Olympia Snowe

    • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

      …. there was always the one guy at PT who gave up in the final thirty seconds, and just sort of laid there while everyone else was knocking out the last few pushups, or whatever we were doing. I won’t lie, sometimes that guy was me. It was always someone.

      It’s not like that last half-minute made much of a difference in terms of physical conditioning. But it betrayed an attitude — the mindset of a quitter — that would kill in combat. And it would ill-serve the quitter in life, too. A man who won’t fight, especially in extremis, is a man whose efforts, convictions, and principles aren’t worth much.

      All of which is to say, SIConservative, you need to understand something. The polls don’t close until late tomorrow evening. Until they do –

      We.
      Will.
      Fight.

    • SIConservative

      Yes, he is doing his job. He’s still responsible for what he does, though. I’m not suggesting that he should’ve resigned, but the campaign should’ve changed course when they saw the writing on the wall. To the extent that he is a part of that campaign, it’s not unreasonable to expect that he assume some responsibility for what it has been doing.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Let’s face it: You’re just prejudiced against the DeVore team.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      You seem to forget that over half of the votes are yet to be cast.

      Only a complete moron would do as you suggest, and complete morons are rare.

    • Diogenes314

      But spin away, little top.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      That’s why you’re doing everything you can to alienate people from Fiorina.

      If you’re so sure your girl will win then stop posting, you idiot, until you’re ready to make nice.

    • Diogenes314

      But his campaign lost all steam when Campbell entered the race, for whatever strange reason – one would suppose Campbell would draw more of the natural support for Fiorina, but it didn?t work out that way.

      Name recognition. Period.

      In a state this size, that and money will always be the two greatest factors, like it or not. Especially in a three-way race.

    • greghalvorson

      I agree with you–what are these people thinking? Polls are wrong? They are fooling themselves.

    • Diogenes314

      If so, you’re kinda clueless. I already said that I was voting DeVore (even though I expect CF to win) now that I’m relatively certain Campbell is toast.

      But by all means, feel free to smear and misrepresent the probable nominee. Fortunately for Chuck (and Carly for that matter) their fans had no influence on my decision.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Because comments like yours above have no conceivable purpose but to inflame.

      I’d be happier if you just stopped posting on this race entirely if that’s all you’re going to do.

    • SIConservative

      20-point gaps don’t close in a week. Even you acknowledged not too long ago that this race was over. Erick said a month ago that he’d suggest DeVore drop out if the numbers simply weren’t there two weeks from then. He changed course, but I’d argue that he had it right the first time and should’ve followed through. Fiorina will have to face Boxer in five months, and while she will surely face much of the same criticism that Team DeVore has leveled at her, it’s not helpful to have the campaign of a guy losing by an insurmountable margin to take a kitchen sink approach in the closing days of a 20-point primary. The sooner the circular firing squad turns on Boxer, the better. That is, of course, assuming that Campbell does the right thing and endorses Fiorina, as I hope it’s safe to assume DeVore will.

      As for prejudice against Team DeVore, that’s not true. I have been more accommodating of Fiorina than many, perhaps because I put a lot of stock in Sen. Coburn’s endorsement. Even so, I expect that DeVore would make the better Senator. His campaign simply failed to catch fire, though. After the Palin endorsement, Fiorina became the nominee-apparent, and I think that the healing should’ve started earlier than it did. I would like to have seen DeVore drop out and endorse Fiorina last week, but short of that it would’ve been better had they run a purely positive campaign in the final week to ten days.

    • Diogenes314

      of the comment I was responding to, in your opinion?

      To enlighten?

      And if I was Machiavellian enough to inflame voters into voting for DeVore, (instead of just pointing out hysterical disinformation) would that be a bad thing?

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Fiorina gained her 20 point lead in a snap.

      Haley went from fourth to first.

      Moves happen.

      And the polling evidence suggests it’s possible in DeVore’s case. His favorability numbers have rocketed up the same way Fiorina’s have, and in fact Field says that undecideds lean DeVore in electability.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      I did put this one in the refrigerator and I stand by that.

      But DeVore supporters, and particularly the campaign, have every reason to keep trying until the close of the polls tomorrow.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      I wouldn’t mind DeVore winning a bit.

      But if you impair unity after the primary you do harm.

      What Josh says isn’t going to give people emotional reasons to stay aloof from Fiorina. They know who he is and what his job is.

      It’s only people sticking up for Fiorina who can accomplish that, much as RedState-based backers of Mitt Romney and Ron Paul turned people off of those candidates.

    • joayn

      Just imagine, Fiorina wins. Just imagine the kind of ads Boxer will run against her.

      The most damaging being (IMHO):
      Fiorina not voting.
      Fiorina’s failed tenure at HP and all that entails (jobs overseas is a biggie).
      Fiorina’s termination from HP.
      Fiorina’s generous compensation package.

      Just imagine, Boxer using Fiorina’s own ads against her, and deservedly so. The ads, of course, tout Fiorina as:

      A successful business person, who rose to success (receptionist to CEO), and who KNOWS about creating jobs. Take it from there, Babs.

      Career politicians and opportunisticWashington insiders. Take it from there, Babs.

      Carly cares about you and the state of the nation. Take it from there, Babs.

      Now, just imagine a debate between the two. If you watched the debate on May 9th between Fiorina, DeVore and Campbell, how do you think Fiorina would fare?

      Between the three, Chuck DeVore would crush “dumb-as-a-box-of-rocks” Boxer. His knowledge and experience would be overwhelming to say the least.

      And Carly? How would she handle Boxer? Don’t know? Yeah, me too. It would be a real popcorn show, though. Boxer versus Fiorina. An equal match-up for sure.

      But Boxer versus DeVore? A painful defeat. Hers.

      Now, if California Republican voters would only imagine that and dump the “Carly’s-the-only-one-who-can-beat-Boxer” cynical, untrue and unrealistic statement …

      My choice on June 8, 2010 is Chuck DeVore. He is THE ONLY ONE who can defeat Boxer.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      A novice will have a tougher time, but Babs is just really really terrible.

      If Fiorina wins I don’t want us writing this race off.

    • SIConservative

      If it were in the single digits, negative campaigning for the last week would’ve been fair enough. Of course if the race between Fiorina and Campbell were in single digits, I’d like to think DeVore would’ve already bailed and endorsed her. We’ll never know, though. Either way, attacks on Fiorina had their time and place and should be done by now. Josh is doing nobody any favors by continuing to bash her, especially on a site on which readers have already made up their minds for the primary. The only thing he’s doing with the last minute digs here is to make it harder for DeVore supporters to close ranks.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      If Fiorina voters have DeVore as a second choice, and she’s ahead, they need her to bleed support.

      Going negative helped her climb over Campbell after all.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
    • SIConservative

      For several months, I’d agree that you did mostly good. I’d say only, but I think there were a couple of times when I suggested that one or another of your criticisms against Fiorina were unfair. It could’ve been other people in the comments, but that really doesn’t matter. In the last week or two, though, I think you’ve done more harm than good, as we have five months until the far more important fight. If Fiorina wins in November, it’ll be by a hair, and we can’t afford any division in the ranks or delays in turning the circular firing squad on Mrs. Boxer. What you’ve done up til now, though, is a moot point. As I said, I look forward to reading your endorsement of Fiorina either tomorrow or the following day.

    • SIConservative

      Frankly, I think any discussion of electoral strategy for the primary is a moot point given the last few polls. Assuming for the sake of argument, though, that it is possible that Fiorina loses, Campbell could win just as easily as DeVore, with whom he has been running about even. Campbell could get to 35% based on his last minute electability push and DeVore taking votes from Fiorina. DeVore’s people ought to be ashamed of themselves if that happens. Honestly, though, I don’t think it will. I don’t think DeVore’s people see that as a realistic possibility either, though, and I’d like to think that he would’ve endorsed Fiorina a few days ago if they did. My guess is that they’re trying to get DeVore’s second place finish to be as strong as possible to set him up for a future run. Unfortunately, though, that could leave our nominee weakened heading into the general.

    • tracycolorado

      CHUCK DEVORE has my vote , the only logical choice

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      You start off with the assumption that strategy is moot, in order to make your argument that DeVore should give up.

      The fact is you have no valid argument.

    • pittbull

      We can still lose this war.
      (General George Smith Patton Junior)

    • SIConservative

      There are two strategies involved: primary and general election. The case I’m making is that the primary has effectively been over, so for purposes of the general election, DeVore should’ve changed course.

    • pittbull

      P.S. Thank God for Rush Limbaugh.

    • joayn

      But I don’t.

      If Fiorina wins, of course I will vote for her. But it’s hers to lose. I just hope she’s prepared for the fight of her life.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
    • http://obamacom.blogspot.com/ jas411

      [I did my best to transcribe this powerful video speech for any who want to use it]

      My name is Chuck DeVore and I’m a Lt. Colonel in the US Army Reserve.

      And I want you to join with me in saying the folowing:
      ?Free Gilad Shalit!?
      ?Free Gilad Shalit!?
      ?Free Gilad Shalit!?
      ?Free Gilad Shalit!?
      (The crowd respondes; ?Free Gilad Shalit!? )

      YES!!!!!

      We gather here to support Israel because we support America!
      We know from our experience that israel’s enemies- are America’s enemies.
      We know from bitter lessons they hate Israel for the same reasons they hate America.
      They hate a free society.
      They hate religious liberty. And they hate people who will not bow down to their oppressions!

      Make no mistake. Defending Israel is defending America.

      If Israel disappeared tomorrow – who believes that the terrorists would disband?
      Who believes that the target would not simply shift from Tel Aviv to Los Angeles?

      We used to tell ourselves that what happened in Israel could not happen here.
      That was before 9-11.
      That was before Fort Hood.
      That was before Times Square.
      That was before a dozen Islamists plans and plots to slaughter Americans in their homes, schools, and streets.
      Let us say this unequivocally and unashamedly and emphatically – What Israel did to the Gaza flotilla was right, it was legal, and it was Moral!

      It is never wrong to blockade a terror state, it is never wrong to defend your existence, it is never wrong to stop a movement that thinks the Holocaust was
      simply a good start.

      The fight between Israel and Hammas is a fight between civilization and barbarism, it as simple as that.

      Our Grandfathers left their homes and families to travel half way around the world to defend freedom. And it was on this day 66 years ago that they landed in Normandy Beach in their righteous quest to destroy the Third Reich.

      If this generation of Americans does not fight Islamists who seek to complete the Third Reich’s work we dishonor the memory and sacrifice of our grandfathers.

      But I Know- I KNOW – that Americans love liberty and that our contempt towards tyrants burns bright.
      That is why our very identity as Americans compels us to stand with Israel- and against Israel’s enemies.
      Americans stand against Israel’s enemies for the same reason it stood against Nazism, and fascism, and Communism.

      I say clearly that the enemies of Israel are just as genocidal. Just as tyrannical and just as savage as those defeated movements.

      The defenders -the defenders – of the gaza flotilla say it was a humanitarian mission.
      The SAY they were PEACE activists.
      THEY LIE!

      What humanitarian mission opens sea lanes to terrorists, to Hammas.
      What Peace activist lynch Israeli soldiers.
      What Humanitarian mission refuses to co-operate with lawful authorities.
      What Peace activists chant about Mohammeds massacre of the Jewish tribe.
      The Gaza flotilla was not about peace.
      It was about War.

      It was about establishing a supply route to Hammas.
      It was about supporting the eradication of the Jewish state.
      It was about seeking and (getting?) combat with young Israeli men who earnestly desire Peace.

      The Gaza flotilla is in short- the greatest international fraud since the plight of the (garbeled) Germans.

      There is only one thing about the Gaza flotilla that contributed to peace, and that, is when the IDF, stopped it, Dead in the water!

      jas411- greybeard