« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Egypt’s revolution is not over.

Egypt’s revolution is not over.

As I write this, Hosni Mubarak’s reign as autocrat of Egypt ended mere minutes ago. The scenes on Al Jazeera English — the only international-news channel worth watching for the past month — are of a delirium in Cairo’s Tahrir Square. It is a panorama of popular victory unseen since Germans clambered up the Berlin Wall, and it may be just as epochal.


Lost in the ecstasy over the dictator’s departure is the troubling reality of what, specifically, Egypt’s now-former Vice President Omar Suleiman just announced on Egyptian state television. Mubarak is gone, yes — but his powers devolve to a military junta headed by General Tantawi. The “Supreme Military Council” that now rules the country represents the same stratum of the Egyptian elite that Mubarak himself emerged from, and that sustained every Egyptian autocrat since 1952. Egyptians may have swapped one tyrant for an entire council of them.

All is confusion, of course. At this writing, wire reports state that the junta will sack Egypt’s Cabinet, dissolve its parliament, and rule directly in collaboration with the Supreme Court. The dismissal of even the attenuated and discredited organs of Egyptian democracy, such as they were, would be a grave matter. No doubt Edmund Burke looks down from heaven and rejoices at the end of a dictator — and recoils at the end of institutions.

Here is the hard truth about Egypt now: if the revolution was merely to depose Hosni Mubarak, it has won. But if it was to seize liberty, it is not over. Signs of a long and protracted “transition” period are already emerging, not just in the early actions of the junta, but in the statements of Egyptian opposition leaders themselves. Mohamed ElBaredei, one of the figureheads of the anti-Mubarak movement, just opined to Al Jazeera English that he expected a caretaker government would convene, and rule Egypt for about a year until elections could be held.

This statement discredits ElBaredei in revealing a shocking disconnection between him and the experience of ordinary Egyptians over the past several weeks. Institutions matter, certainly, and orderly transitions matter, absolutely: but the surprising lesson of this revolution — which no rational observer could have expected — is that Egyptian civil society is healthy, robust, assertive, and ready for democracy and liberty now.

The question before ElBaredei and the patrons of the Egyptian elite is not terribly different from that facing the Egyptian junta: when do Egyptians deserve liberty? If the only options offered by Egypt’s elites are “later” and/or “never,” then the revolution may well turn against them. We in the West have seen this before, in Romania after 1989, when the institutional-elite successors to the deposed dictator had to enforce their rule with the fists and truncheons of miners from the hinterland.

Yet if that happens, having drunk the victory over Hosni Mubarak, what will Egyptians fear?

I speak of worst-case scenarios throughout here. The advent of direct military rule should never be welcomed, but it does not inevitably portend the end of democratic hopes. If Egypt’s new military rulers swiftly dismantle their own ascendancy, they will go down in history as the most admirable Arab generals of any era. They must be pushed to do so. If the likes of ElBaredei will not do it, the men and women celebrating now across Egypt must do it. They have the habit of revolution for liberty now — let them not abandon it.

For their part, America and the rest of the world ought to hold the new junta to a single standard: its progress toward a rapid demise in favor of a fully democratic and liberal state. It’s not reasonable to hope for this, especially given the Obama Administration’s own dilatory rhetoric since this revolution began. (We will not speak of its policy until one exists.) Nonetheless, it is what ought to be done, and that will be generally recognized either after it successfully occurs, or after Egyptians are suppressed under a new autocracy.

So congratulations, Egypt. Tonight is yours. Tomorrow, though, belongs to the junta, and the elites who choose to collaborate with it. The days to come will show the world whether you fought and died to free yourselves of Hosni Mubarak — or to be free.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • annas

    in the street did not look too “fairly well educated” to me!

  • drivlikejehu

    The fact is that Egypt’s problems have little to do with their system of government. A major cause of the upheaval is the dramatic worldwide rise in food prices- largely due to the Fed- and there’s nothing a democratic Egypt can do about it. The Egyptian population is fairly well-educated but they are lacking in the skills most needed.

    The representative form of government works very well under the right conditions, but those don’t exist in Egypt or other Arab countries. Without the possibility of material prosperity, people will turn to the radical Islamists- basically due to the lack of viable alternatives.

  • http://spendenforcer.com/ vortigernpendragon

    Unfortunately, I think the problems are just beginning there. You have a young restless population living in an economy that has very little opportunity for growth. No matter what happens with the government, I feel the people are only going to become more restless.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-LMB55c3wU

  • Raven

    The problems created by the Fed would have far less impact.
    Egypt’s economic problems predate the current global economy.

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    The fed had little to do with the current food price problems, which are much more related to harvest failures in Russia/Australia and our stupid ethanol policy than anything the fed has done.

  • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

    What we conservatives should really be pushing for is not democracy per se, but the Rule of Law, in which everyone is equal before the Law, no matter their race, creed, family, job, education, wealth, or sex. If the Law is unfair then life will be unfair to Egyptians and they will not be free, no matter that they can vote on the political party of the plantation guards.

  • Raven
  • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

    Democracy is a postive result of building a society correctly. It can’t be pursued in a vaccuum. Currently, according to Pew Research, 77% of the Egyptian population has no problem with legaling executing a person for converting away from the Islamic religion. 80% feel fine with stoning adulterous women. (No similar groundswell exists for executing priapetic married men). What they will elect will reflect these biases.

  • drivlikejehu

    Obviously there are a lot of factors but the increase in food commodity prices tracks very closely with the increase in the US money supply. Printing money is bad for other reasons (inflation), but the status of the USD as a reserve currency has a number of damaging side effects. Just because you have a central bank doesn’t mean it has to be horribly incompetent. Paul of course opposes the Fed’s existence, which is a much broader and more debatable issue.

  • snowshooze

    Well…
    It may well be over.
    The Egypyian Military now rules Egypt. Any-way-they-wanna.
    Thanks to the Egyptions in general, and Obama specifically!
    Thanks for all the help guys!!! We are in like Flynn!
    Somebody, quick! Call Obama and tell him where to send that next check!!!
    So…
    Great job there, Obama.
    What do you do for an Encore???

  • andybarnes

    http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1874/egypt-protests-democracy-islam-influence-politics-islamic-extremism

    Is this the Pew study you’re referring to?? Surely not, since it says basically the opposite of what you’re claiming.

  • grandma

    into the fire, I fear. I fear for not only them, but for Israel now, and for the U.S.

  • azred

    http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=1184

    Of course it’s only a response from Muslims, so you can dilute that percentage by ohh 5.4% (the non-Muslim Egyptian pop).

  • morristhewise

    It is foolish for the chickens to celebrate now that the fox has become in charge of designing the chicken coop.?? The lucky fox will just have to wait at the chicken coop door as the freedom loving chickens exit into his mouth.

  • andybarnes

    Apologies to Repair_Man Jack?snark retracted.

  • Adjoran

    ” . . . the surprising lesson of this revolution ? which no rational observer could have expected ? is that Egyptian civil society is healthy, robust, assertive, and ready for democracy and liberty now.”

    On the basis of what? Half a million protesters in a country of 85 million? Where there is NO independent judiciary, NO true property rights (90% of privately owned land is without legal title, even if there were courts to enforce it), NO right to private contract, NO constitutionally guaranteed rights, NO civilian oversight or control of the military. Where more than 80% of the women have had their genitals mutilated. Where 85% of the people, according to opinion polls, wish to undo the Camp David peace treaty with Israel, and nearly as many believe al Qaeda are muslim heroes.

    “Democracy” in Egypt now, or in the foreseeable future, would amount to “One man – one vote – one time.” These “democratic revolutions” tend to be usurped by the minority which is armed and ruthless and determined to take power. See for reference the Russian October Revolution of 1917, the Iranian revolution of 1979, the Nicaraguan Sandinista “elections,” the post-Soviet Russian transition, the Lebanese Cedar Revolution, and probably a few others I’m forgetting right now.

    Egyptians should consider themselves lucky to be ruled by the military if the alternative is a radical islamist regime, even if democratically elected.