« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Poll: 72% Disagree With Obama Oil Spill Policy

Even Dems agree Obama has chosen the wrong path.

According to a new Bloomberg poll, American public opinion on the BP oil spill reflects common sense and a rejection of the Obama Administration’s legalistic overreaction.  

While public objections to a drilling ban echo the views of Republican leaders such as Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, the sentiment is strong regardless of political leaning: 85 percent of Republicans, 73 percent of independents and 65 percent of Democrats oppose a ban, according to the poll.

Jindal, whose state has been hardest hit by the spill, says a prohibition on drilling is an overreaction that will turn an “environmental disaster into an economic catastrophe,” costing as many as 20,000 jobs in Louisiana alone.

“We need the federal government to do their jobs to ensure drilling is done safely without killing thousands of jobs for our people,” Jindal said in a statement July h13.

But surely the affected Gulf Coast residents don’t agree … Do they?

[M]ost residents of the affected counties weren’t turning their backs on offshore drilling. By 60-38 percent, they opposed the Obama administration’s six-month moratorium on drilling (it got far more support nationally); and more, three-quarters, said drilling should resume at its existing level, or be expanded, in the future.

There was broad criticism of the federal government’s spill response in the affected counties (72 percent rated it negatively), and even steeper criticism of BP (82 percent said it has done a bad job; this poll was completed before the new cap was in place). In sharp contrast, more than six in 10 residents rated their local and state governments’ responses positively.

As angry as they may be at BP, Gulf Coast residents have the sense to realize that punishing the entire industry will ultimately cost the region good-paying jobs.

And Americans are grownups who realize that nothing is free. They know that by adopting an official national NIMBY policy, we are setting the stage for $8/gallon gasoline and a prostrate economy for the foreseeable future.

Cross-posted atVladEnBlog.

COMMENTS

  • chihank

    Obama’s response to the oil spill should be sinking him. However, people still give 50/50 approvals according to Gallup. Unbelievable. It goes to show how much the influence the MSM still has on independents.

  • joecollins

    Title says it all.

  • http://www.thehayride.com MacAoidh

    …<a href=it went down in the House Natural Resources Committee by a 26-22 vote.

    The 26 Democrats who voted to destroy the economy of coastal Louisiana were:

    Rep. George Miller (D-CA)
    Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA)
    Rep. Dale Kildee (D-MI)
    Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR)
    Del. Eni Faleomavaega (D-American Samoa)
    Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ)
    Rep. Grace Napolitano (D-CA)
    Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ)
    Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ)
    Del. Madeleine Bordallo (D-Guam)
    Del. Del. Gregorio Sablan (D-Northern Marianas)
    Rep. Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
    Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM)
    Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY)
    Del. Donna Christensen (D-Virgin Islands)
    Rep. Dianna DeGette (D-CO)
    Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI)
    Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA)
    Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA)
    Rep. Joe Baca (D-CA)
    Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-SD)
    Rep. John Sarbanes (D-MD)
    Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH)
    Rep. Nikki Tsongas (D-MA)
    Rep. Frank Kratovil, Jr. (D-MD)
    Del. Pedro Pierluisi (D-Puerto Rico)

    Feel free to thank them for their compassionate votes to put tens of thousands of their fellow Americans out of a job.

    Committee chair Nick Rahall (D-WV) and committee member Jim Costa (D-CA) voted for the amendment. It’s especially nice to know that the margin of defeat for the amendment came from five “non-voting” delegates, including three from islands in the Pacific liberated in part by Louisianans during World War II.

    • http://www.thehayride.com MacAoidh

      http://thehayride.com/2010/07/cassidy-amendment-to-kill-obamoratorium-defeated-in-committee/

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    I heard a story on BBC radio tonight about an FM talk radio station in Mobile, Alabama, 106.5fm. BBC is playing pieces from the Gulf station which has a live morning show (the rest is syndicated) where people call in. The BBC was motivated because people in the UK have great interest in the oil spill, the people in the Gulf, and their BP pensions. The BBC hosts did a good job, but of interest they said, “Alabama is in the south, the deep south, which is hardly Obama country.” I wondered why they’d characterize it like that to people of the UK, except they also said that all Obama seems to be doing is blaming BP for everything.

  • trumpetplayer

    I have insights into the oil industry that most people don’t have. From 1993 until 1994 I invested in the oil fields of Michigan. Yes there IS oil in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. You have 3 reefs. The “Antrim”= 800 to 1500 feet deep and the Niagran & Traverse Reefs which are 3000 to 9000 feet deep. My investment was in “Working Interest” meaning that I paid for “Spuding”, drilling, test rig, pipe line connection, maintainance costs and capping the spent well with mud and cement. Carelessness as implied by Obama is not tolerated because I as an invester would LOSE money BIG TIME. The “anti blowback” device is a check valve which keeps the “hydrocarbons” from escaping into the environment. It is a mechanical device just like your car. These CAN fail from time to time. You never know when that will happen!
    This can happen on land and has before. Also the press talks about a “Mile deep well”. That is the depth of the pipe B4 they drill into the reef and reach what we call “Bottom Hole”. So it is likely 3-6 miles deep. Also there is “Bottom Hole Pressure” which in my wells was 3000PSI. It is this pressure of gas that causes the oil to rise up through the well just like in your drinking straw!. The “Relief Wells” are what we in Michigan call an “Offset Well”. BP is “horizontally” Drilling into the damaged well in hopes of relieving enough bottom hole pressure to make plugging with mud & cement possible. It is hard to inject mud & cement into a well with a BHP of 3000+ PSI. My advice to BP is to use one of those “relief” wells as a “production well” to regain some of their losses. They will be in the reef anyway and there IS oil & gas there anyhow.
    Banning drilling because of ONE industrial accident is stupid. Obama seems to think that you can have a “Safe Well”. There can never be a 100% “Safe Well” anymore than a 100% “Safe Cigarette”. I do believe that Obama DELIBERATELY delayed the use of skimmers etc so as to say “This is what happens when we depend on fossil fuels”= so called man made “Global Warming”
    I have not and will not boycott ANY BP station because of this accident. My wells came up “Wet” or dry. If anyone wants 4,000,000 year old sea water, I can get you a good deal!

  • patriotbob

    Or should we say IMPOSTOR?