« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Oil, The Bugs, and Climate Change

Scientists have discovered a hitherto-unknown oil-chomping microbes in the cold, briny depths of the Gulf of Mexico. As a result, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to find free oil out in the Gulf, either on the surface or in a subsurface plume, a little more than a month after the flow from the Macondo well was controlled.

If you’re a bacteria, the BP spill was like Thanksgiving and Christmas dinner all in one. Nom-nom.

Which really shouldn’t come as a surprise to one who knows a thing or two about the natural environment of the Gulf. Given that a million or so barrels seep by natural processes every year into the Gulf, one would expect that specialized organisms would evolve to process it.

But it did come as a surprise to the professional hand-wringers, the environmentalists whose predictions come in a predictable mode (dire) and whose emotions know only a single chord (panicked). The same environmentalists whose “progressive” politics and thirst for control trump their commitment to scientific truth.

Note the parallels with the Climate Change debate. Just as the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem is vast and largely unknown to science, so the worldwide climate system and the interactions of the atmosphere and the oceans are poorly understood. The predictions of the Climate Changers can never be nailed down. The goalposts are constantly shifting.

Those skeptical of the cataclysmic predictions for the BP spill have been vindicated, and it’s taken just over three months. The worst consequences have been self-inflicted, by a hysterical media community and an Administration in Washington who latched onto the spill as a pretext for making the oil industry its whipping boy.

I’m willing to bet the AGW crowd is wrong, too, but it takes generations to prove it. They have designs on hog-tying the U.S. economy; they’ve gone all-in at this point, and they’ll be damned if they let little things like facts get in the way of their policy juggernaut.

Newly discovered microbe is eating the Gulf oil spill

Terry Hazen, a microbial ecologist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who published a groundbreaking study of microbial activity Tuesday in the online research journal Science Express, has had a team of researchers out in the Gulf since May 25 collecting water samples. They noticed a dramatic drop-off in the amount of oil in the Gulf immediately after the well was idled July 15, and now they can’t find any oil in the ocean.

“In the last three weeks we haven’t been able to detect a deep plume anywhere,” Hazen said. “We can’t see it now. We can’t see anything at the surface. We can’t see anything in the deep subsurface either.” [emphasis added]

Meanwhile, Hazen’s team of researchers believe that the large amount of natural oil seeps in the area have helped the bacteria to adapt to oil in their environment over a long period of time, so when the BP blowout came long, they thrived. Even as the amount of oil in water increased the longer the well flowed, microbe levels remained constant, suggesting that they were able to keep pace with the oil.

“The bugs in this area have become adapted to using oil as a carbon source,” Hazen said.

Cross-posted at VladEnBlog.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://www.thehayride.com MacAoidh

    …or maybe Carol Browner’s or Lisa Jackson’s.

    We’d get more realistic policy.

  • travelguy

    Dang it. Don’t those bugs know that depending on carbon based energy (especially oil – the horror!) is a huge problem for the environment? We need a program to convert them over to solar energy immediately.

  • RedBeard

    Who knew this? Why weren’t we told? All our wailing and gnashing of teeth, gone to waste.

  • Scope

    will be calling for an anti-obesity program for the fat bugs. Then the EPA will put them on the endangered list. Then the entire Gulf will be deemed a protected habitat.

  • mustango

    I still remember Rush’s statements at the onset of the spill to the effect that something very much like this would happen, being sardonically re-quoted in anticipation them becoming one of the infamous statements of history, like Bill Gates’s (possibly apocraphyl) “640K ought to be enough for anyone”.

    So much for infamy!

  • uhangtight

    you got something there…? Protected habitat…. ain’t no drillin’ allowed here, anymore! It’s protected by the Feds…

  • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

    ?The bugs in this area have become adapted to using oil as a carbon source,? Hazen said.

    Worse yet, he will want to trade them on his Carbon Credit commodity exchange.

    Idiot. LOL

  • erp617

    The water at the Exxon-Valdez spill are pretty cold too, so where were these bugs then? Figments of media feverish minds that’s where, just like these. Don’t believe anything they say.

    • earlgrey

      I don’t think you can make such a rash assumption/comparison.

    • Achance

      in the Gulf of Alaska and Prince William Sound, summer surface temps are rarely even above 50 degrees; I know, I’ve been in that water!

    • eastbaylarry

      The damage was almost immediate. That and the colder temps prevented the bugs from doing much to help.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

      Which broke this spill into tiny droplets.

      The BP spill is very dissimilar from Valdez.

      Not that there’s any convincing you of that.

      • Scope

        There are some that argue without using scientific reasoning or rationality, they just know that it’s all wrong. The spill, from my understanding, did not have any immediate impact on anything, except the media. There is a reason for calling it off-shore deep water drilling. The well was at least 50 miles from shore.

        From the scientific studies you cite, these microbes have been eating the oil laying at the bottom of the ocean, where the temps are very cold, and in deep colder water long before the spill, from seepage on the ocean floor. The point, cold water doesn’t affect the microbes. Is it not true that bacteria multiplies rapidly in warm temps, but, is not killed, and can survive in cold temps as well. Hell, I just read that bacteria can survive a trip to the space station.

        • Scope

          2 + 2 really does = 4.

  • Richard Mullins

    it wasn’t cool at the time and that Marine Biologist at Texas A&M Galveston and I can’t remember the guys name at the University of Houston, seemed to be the only ones talking about it. Well they have been proved and if anyone here has seen that video, it in the previous diary on this subject(I think that was earlier this month).

  • Raven

    Knew about these microbes in the 40s. That’s why they did those waste water lagoons at all the refineries.

  • rdog1

    The G_d of creation, of Israel, of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, IS and AWESOME GOD!!!

    Every contingency is built into His Creation to protect the Earth and all who live here!!!

    Praise is HOLY NAME!!!

    rdog1

  • taxpayer1234

    Nom nom, indeed!

    As to the oil-eating microbes, are they unique to the Gulf because of the large amount of natural oil seepage? If there isn’t the same amount of oil seepage in offshore Alaska, the critters might not exist in sufficient numbers there. That may be another reason why the Valdez spill caused so much more damage.

    Nom nom!!!

  • kchand

    Will microbe flatulence now become a major issue?