« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Se habla ‘moratorium’? Tengo ‘$1 billion’, amigo!

With the backing of the Obama Administration, the U.S. Export-Import Bank intends to guarantee $1 billion in loans to PEMEX, the Mexican government’s national monopoly oil company. The reason for the loans is to encourage PEMEX to buy supplies and services from American providers.

Despite President Obama’s moratorium on U.S. deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S. Export-Import Bank intends to guarantee $1 billion in loans to PEMEX, the Mexican state oil company, to bolster the company’s oil drilling in the region.

The bank, which is the official American export credit agency, loaned more than $1 billion to PEMEX in 2009 — when the company was the bank’s largest borrower — in support of its drilling activities. That year, the bank also guaranteed two loans totaling $300 million made by a commercial lender.

Support for American companies is laudable, but that support would be a lot more direct and complete if the Department of the Interior were to lift the deepwater moratorium, and clarify permitting standards which have brought a de facto moratorium to shallow water drilling by American companies in the American sector of the Gulf of Mexico.

The Export-Import Bank said the moratorium doesn’t affect its pending deal with PEMEX.

“None of these projects involve deepwater drilling,” bank spokeswoman Maura Policelli told FoxNews.com in an e-mail.

Ha-ha. Mexico’s Ixtoc well was a shallow water well, too. When it blew out in 1979, it blew for 9 months, more than twice as long as the Macondo well, which was in water a mile deep.

“Before deciding whether to approve applications for financing, Ex-Im Bank performs rigorous environmental, safety and financial due diligence activities, including on-site inspections” Policelli said

“After financing is approved, the bank monitors the company’s financial, environmental and safety activities and performs on-site inspections as often as twice a year,” she said.

Oh, give me a break. We’ve got a bank that’s going to perform due diligence on a loan. They are not in any kind of position to pass judgment of PEMEX’s safety and environmental practices, much less guarantee compliance. “Twice a year”? Now that’s vigilance. Ex-Im’s due diligence of PEMEX will give new meaning to the word “perfunctory”.

PEMEX is notoriously lax and politically-influenced. It is hamstrung by its labor unions. They are a notorious slow-pay, and have a history of nationalizing American assets when they fall behind on payables. National oil monopolies are in the position of having no competition, and do not operate under the rigor of governmental permitting and oversight that govern U.S. companies operating is U.S. waters.

Why does the Adminsitration think that PEMEX can be trusted to operate responsibly in the Gulf of Mexico, but U.S.-based companies cannot? Is it because they’re not Republicans?

H/T dennism

Cross-posted at VladEnBlog.

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    They let hundreds of thousands of people per year to enter our country illegally….then turn around and give our tax dollars to them.

    They shut down our domestic off-shore oil drilling but lend billions to prop up the oil drilling of a country that is supporting their citizens to invade our country.

    And drilling in the same gulf waters that we are now prevented drilling in. What am I missing?

    In 1979, the Sedco 135F was drilling the IXTOC I well for PEMEX, the state-owned Mexican petroleum company when the well suffered a blowout

    http://home.versatel.nl/the_sims/rig/ixtoc1.htm

    • throwback59

      our Beloved Leader warned us about.

      • izoneguy

        Yes I am here sitting on my stack of bibles cleaning my Nitro Mag Bone Collector.

    • partyof1

      oh I’d say about 23,000 American jobs

      http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704488404575441760384563880.html

      give or take

  • Common_Cents

    Is it possible our policy at the highest levels would be to continue to deplete foreign oil and keep as much of ours as a strategic reserve as possible?

    • Locked and Loaded

      Could be, but it sure wouldn’t be in keeping with the BO MO.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

      Petroleum reserves are not like an inventory of tangible goods. The resource estimate tends to grow as it is exploited.

      And to retain the option of ever exploiting our domestic resource, we have to maintain infrastructure, technology, and know-how. If we let those things gondormant for a generation, they’re dead.

      • Achance

        but I don’t think they mean it; they don’t want US development of energy or anything else.

        There’s been some making resources off limits in the past to eliminate new sources of competition. The Chugach National Forest in Alaska was created specifically to eliminate the coal patents there so that Alaska coal could not be mined to supply the then-coal fired US Pacific fleet. That also took out the only known oil province in Alaska at the time, the Katalla region on the Gulf Coast. When another promising prospect was discovered on the Arctic Slope, it was promptly designated Naval Petroleum Reserve 4, now Petroleum Reserve Alaska, and made essentially off limits to further exploration and development. The ONLY reason Prudhoe Bay was discovered and developed was that some smart people around at Statehood stole a march on the US and claimed the Prudhoe Bay area as State land before the US could lock it up.

    • GreyCloak

      Blame the oil companies first: the cost to drill and lift oil out of foreign fields is WAY less than the cost to do the same in the US. (But then, you DO have to transport it.)

      Blame the Gummint second: the Greens have been ignored for quite a while, and the BP spill gave Obama the chance to turn on his own words and throw the Greenies a bone.

      Blame The People last: if we are so stupid as to believe the “terrible dangers” of drilling in our own backyards, we DESERVE to be riding bicyles.

      As for “reserves” … the US pumped the most oil in the world for decades, but the “easy finds” have run out. The Gulf and Prudhoe Bay still have oil., but without a drilling industry (in a few years), the ability to GET that oil will disappear. The Gummint is incapable of planning a YEAR ahead … to credit it with “planning for reserves” is a venture into Wonderland!

    • nam6768

      First, there are some real good people here at RedState. I enjoy the articles and comments (by most).

      In response to Common_Cents. I read an article back in the mid to early 60′s saying just that. “Use up all the Arab oil then wwe will have our vast iol fields to supply the world.” or something close to it. Morris Udall was Sec. of Interior at the time.

      The article was in “Men’s Magazine”. Delt with shale oil & such. I was moved to write the Sec. of the Interior about the story. Got a very large envelope of reports and a reply from him.

      Could be something to this. Or, not.

  • qixlqatl

    and I wanted to ask you about it, but I was so spitting mad I couldn’t post it without getting myself banned.

    This administration is STUCK ON STUPID

    • izoneguy

      J O B S – for Mexicans

      • partyof1

        “The Workshop was the first to report last October that more than 80 percent of the first $1 billion in [stimulus] grants to wind energy companies went to foreign firms.

        http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/stimulus_green_jobs_revolution_is_happening_in_china.html

        So Obama borrows a trillion from China, to send much of that money back to China to create jobs in China. But the debt will be paid back by Americans.

        Well, at least we’re in there somewhere.

        • davesinsanantonio
  • Adjoran

    because we might find enough to keep prices reasonable, and continue using fossil fuel (which leftists hate unless they can tax it vigorously) until new technologies come along.

    This would avert the never-ending series of energy crises which give them the opportunity to tax and regulate ever more.

    Naturally Obama prefers “stimulating” a foreign state monopoly to actually allowing enough oxygen for our domestic free market to breathe because he hates capitalism even more than he hates America.

    Dinesh D’Souza has an article in Forbes @ http://tinyurl.com/389ay2d in which he argues Obama is informed by “Kenyan anti-colonialism” – which comes as close as anything to explaining the bizarre “thinking” of the Buffoon-in-Chief.

    • Adjoran

      the Brazil national oil company – for offshore drilling down there. No connection to the US market at all, it’s their oil and they will keep it, we just get to pay them to drill it. And now another $1 billion to PEMEX, this guy sure knows how to stimulate growth – in foreign countries, with our money.

      But maybe these are subsidies Americans just won’t take?

      • qixlqatl

        One of the major investors in Petrobas (? that Brazilian oil co.?) is George Soros. Hmmm, go figure…

  • davesinsanantonio

    or any other conditions, on an oil rig??? So, how are they gonna do “due diligence”?!?!?
    My second point, giving money to other countries to help their economies, at the expense of our own, is in keeping with Obummer’s desire for a “one-world” economy and government. If we are all the same, it is easier to control us. That is the end goal. And, “the end justifies the means”. He is willing to do whatever is necessary, or even available, to further that goal. Lie, cheat, steal! If it helps the cause it is moral and right. Actually, I think he would rather lie than tell the truth; it is part of his sociopathic personality.

  • miroco

    A lifetime as a freelancer in Texas brings experience and understanding Yankees(Anybody the other side of the Red River) never understand. Mexico nationalizes, companies pay us to recover trucks and equipment, we hire Mexicans to help us, they hate their gov. more than we do. U.S. should annex Mexico so Obama can screw it up OR Texas should secede then annex Mexico, we like Mexicans way more than Yankees—like traitors from Maine etc.