« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Uprising of the Small-c conservatives

It’s a blatant “tell”. The Big Lie, that the current anti-statist uprising is composed of extremist ideologues, is a media favorite, but they hammer it knowing full well the opposite is true. Their message is designed to frighten and discourage the average voter from joining the uprising. In reality, the movement largely comprised of “small-c conservatives”, and their large numbers and sudden vocal activism scare the bejeezus out of the Ruling Class.

By nature, small-c conservatives color within the lines. They are hard-wired to play by the rules. They show up at work on time and do an honest day’s work. They go to church. They pay their taxes. They pay their mortgages. They keep their kids in school. They save for their own retirement – they’ve always suspected that Social Security wasn’t reliable, so they’d better take care of themselves.

On the other hand, Capital-C Conservatives have always been vocal political activists. They may be Movement Conservatives, Fiscal Conservatives, Social Conservatives or NeoConservatives, but in every case there is a fairly well developed philosophy or ideology that defines and motivates them.

Small-c conservatives are conservative, first and foremost, by temperament. In the past, they were largely discomfited by the conflict of our two party system. Their main political involvement, voting, was not a revolutionary act, but a civic duty. The more radical elements might have gone so far as to put up a yard sign or donate $25 to a candidate of either party.

The philosophy of the small-c conservative is pretty simple:

  • Fair is fair.
  • A deal is a deal.
  • I’ve worked hard, and I deserve what I’ve earned.
  • America, while not perfect, is a great country.
  • The American Dream worked for me and is a promise I want to keep alive for future generations.

The current regime in Washington threatens all that.

But small-c conservatives are nobody’s fools. They see that a staggering chunk of tax dollars and public debt bailed out people who gamed the system (or tried): well-connected investment bankers and recipients of NINJA loans. General Motors, onetime symbol of the best of Industrial America, was taken by force from its owners and handed to the UAW, who were largely responsible for its poor fiscal health in the first place. Small-c folks know that “pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it” is a Congressional mindset that endangers our freedom. They know instinctively that “income redistribution” ultimately can’t be about distributing from the top 1% to the other 99%; the plan is to rob producers and savers and reward everyone else until we’re all equally poor.

Adding insult to injury, small-c conservatives sense that the current regime somehow blames them for the plight of the have-nots. Being called a raaacist hateful bigot and xenophobe is pretty offensive when it’s all a lie.

The small-c conservative will be heard on November 2. This will be their election.

Because, you see, there are never enough Capital-C Conservatives to carry the tide. We’ve always needed the small-c folks to vote our way, and in normal times moderate (or moderate-sounding) Democrats know how to say enough of the right things to get some of the small-c vote.

But these are not normal times. Real extremists have taken over the Democratic Party and radicalized it. Moderate and conservative Democrats (if there ever was such a thing) have been neutered.

The Tea Party is just the tip of the iceberg. The Left and the Ruling Class have taken the small-c conservative for granted for so long that the sign-waving and vocal activism of the Tea Partiers seems somehow out-of-bounds to them.

We’ve heard a lot of jabbering about an “enthusiasm gap”. Hogwash. Conservatives have a sense of urgency, not enthusiasm. They feel that if they miss this opportunity to confront the threat, they may never get another one.

COMMENTS

  • Bill S

    Now let’s hope the Capital-C Conservatives don’t take the small-c conservatives for granted like the Left has.

    • napensnake

      In 2012, we get another shot at them. A lot of “Big-C’s” survived primaries because of lack of opposition. We keep the pressure ramped up and, with any luck, we will have another batch of scalps in two years.

  • fpete13527
  • http://www.alyssakaeding.com Alyssa Kaeding

    Have you read, “The Ruling Class” yet by Angelo Codevilla? It is essentially an expanded version of your article and I think you would enjoy it.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir
  • wethepeoplevstheprogressives

    For a little thought provoking reading on a Sunday night. Very well said IMO. Oh n thx Alyssa I know the book but in the grand scheme of things hadn’t read it yet. Putting it on my list now!

  • Cheryl
  • jstjoan

    …that stuck with me. This election is not a referendum on Obama. It’s a restraining order. So true.

    • Adjoran

      in the current Weekly Standard.

  • Locked and Loaded

    I do want to present a thought of my own.

    From the viewpoint of this small-c conservative, the “fairly well developed philosophy or ideology that defines and motivates” the Capital-C Conservative is more appropriately termed a pathology. The Capital-C’s want to take piecemeal, co-opt, and change what it is that makes up a small-c conservative. They want to say, “Get on board, but you must be willing to put up with some of these other things.” They’ll call it pragmatism, working across the aisle, etc.

    It leaves a true conservative thinking, “Hey, why must we have fiscally draining and unsustainable social programs that don’t work? Why must we kowtow to small populations seeking to establish victimhood? (They can learn to color inside the lines like everybody else – or else!)”

    Through this co-opting, this pick-and-choose Capital-C Conservatism, we small-c conservatives have now been forced to look over our shoulders at every turn. We know there are turncoats within our ranks. They want to be called Conservatives, and they want us small-c conservatives to lend them validity, no matter what other putrid ideas they intend to push. It’s time these types learned we are sick and tired of being jerked around. They had better get all their small-c bonafides in order, or make plans to go home.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

      In my case, I’d call myself a Fiscal Conservative, because in my working life I’ve seen how bad tax policy can kill jobs & investment, whereas a pro-business tax policy & laissez-faire attitude can grow jobs.

      So it wasn’t really a philosophy, but something I learned. I was a small-c guy at heat, and my level of political activity reflected that.

      And I believed in small government and strong defense. “The business of the U.S. Is business.”

      My awakening along the way was not so abrupt. In chronological order, my formative events and people were: Watergate, oil embargo, malaise, Ronaldus Maximus, “read my lips”, Hillarycare, the blue dress, hanging chads, 9/11, the Iraq war.

      “Fake but accurate” got me started blogging. Obama got me started giving dough.

      • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

        However, you being a bit more … er … aged than I, my list is a little more, shall we say, recent.

        “New World Order”, Desert Shield/Storm, HillaryCare, 3rd Perot-y Candidate, Tax Increases that negate COLA Increases, Blue Dress, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 9-11, Iraq War, and my three kids (7yo, 6yo, & 3yo).

        My potential had always been there, but Pelosi/Reid/Obama served as the MnO2 to the sea of H2O2….The tea party (small t, small p) serves as our flaming torch.

  • Adjoran

    your own well-developed conservative philosophy upon the “small-c” types. After all, they deserted us in ’92, ’96, ’98, ’06, and ’08. They may be coming back in force this year, but the Reagan and ’94 “revolutions” did not produce anything resembling a lasting conservative consensus.

    The real test will be when Obama shuts down the government over the GOP’s refusal to fund his “priorities” and Grandma doesn’t get her Social Security check. Where will they stand then?

    • congressworksforus

      As a small c Conservative, I can tell you that I woke up when I recognized just how dangerous (a) our current government is, and (b) how bad our current economic trajectory is.

      I am one of the few that is tired of “we have to protect social security for those in, or near retirement.” Bull. Those people repeatedly voted for the liars and thieves that put us in this mess, so they can damned well do their part to get us out of it.

      And if that means a Social-Security check “furlough” for Grandma, so be it. THAT is how angry we are right now.

    • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

      wasn’t a conservative alternative on the ballot.

      And, as far as grandma’s SS check, that’s never been on the table. It’s my kids’ SS checks that are going away and they aren’t planning on getting them anyway.

      • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

        if Obama shuts down sending out SS checks for any reason Democrats will storm the White House and hang him from a cherry tree not Republicans.

    • blooch

      with the party of the elephant for years, Like the elephant, we don’t forget. We have watched patiently, voted diligently and witnessed wave after wave of Republicans crash furiously onto the shore, then recede into accomodation, “bipartisanship” and impotence.

      I have seen the hardening of Leftist radicalism, starting in the Reagan years and continuing up to the present, rewarded with the acquiescence of the GOP on almost every front. We cannot have a two party system if both parties are in general philosophical agreement and merely fight professional wrestling matches every couple of years. For too long, we have had the luxury of not having to face the consequences of this behavior, but that time appears to be over for too many people.

      The GOP must realize that everything is on the line now. The Left, under Obama, has forced this polarizing confrontation. They have acted brazenly, and with great sacrifice, on their convictions, and it is time for our guys to see them and raise them. The Dems are not demoralized this cycle. They are merely complacent, because they have once again gotten everything on their agenda. They are counting on Business As Usual and a fresh crop of Republican scapegoats. I bet they are actually looking forward to the scenario in your second paragraph.

      The way I see it, the ROE have either changed, or they haven’t. If they haven’t changed, the GOP is doomed no matter what we do. If the ROE have changed, the first party to react accordingly can accomplish a great real very quickly. The Left seems to be persuading itself that it’s just Business As Usual, and they’re doing their best to convince the elite Right of this. My money is on the nervy gamblers who are willing to call their bluff.

      I’m not looking for a lasting conervative consensus. Nothing ever lasts. Although progressivism and totalitarianism certainly seem to last, it is an artificial durability which is aided by an air of inevitability. What I am looking for is a brilliant, devastating counterstroke at the right time which shatters that illusion and sets back their cause long enough for me and my own to live free…a counterstroke which may serve as an example for those who are faced with a mess like this in the far future.

      • uhangtight

        These are the things I have been thinking and feeling for so many years…

        Hopefully, this will be the year of the beginning counter punch.

        • blooch

          I’ll just start aiming for her head.

    • http://www.twitter.com/RS_yoyo yoyo

      and the thing that I have now that I didn’t in 92, 96, and 98…?

      I have three young children that I am responsible for, now, that I FULLY intend to protect for at least the next 50 or 60 years*. They are ages (almost) 7, 6, and 3.

      In the 90′s, although I may not have supported you, I certainly did not desert you. I was a young (read: stupid) E-3/E-5 in the Navy and getting … er … drunk seemed a little more important at the time. For that, I am sorry. But I was, at least, paying attention.

      *I will not delude myself into believing that I will make it beyond 97yo – at least with all of my “faculties”, so to speak.