« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The NBA Meets the Moratorium

President Obama’s callous indifference to his drilling moratorium’s negative impact on Louisiana is worthy of the “Let Them Eat Cake” Hall of Shame. When pressed by Gov. Bobby Jindal to reconsider the drilling ban and corresponding shallow water permit foot-dragging on the state’s economy, the President responded by suggesting that laid off workers might apply for BP funds, or failing that, unemployment compensation.

The President and the Ivory Tower Gang of advisers he’s selected understand neither Basic Economics nor the Law of Unintended Consequences. Sometimes effects of a bad economic policy are felt in unexpected places.

Case in point: The New Orleans Hornets of the NBA.

For a couple of years, it has been widely rumored that the majority interest in the Hornets franchise (currently sporting a 13-6 record) would be sold to minority owner Gary Chouest. Chouest currently owns 35%, and would take out George Shinn in a deal that would value the franchise at $300 million.

Now, Chouest suddenly has cold feet. He’s opted not to buy Shinn’s interest.

Gary Chouest, reportedly a billionaire, lives in Galliano, LA. He’s the owner of Edison Chouest Offshore, which owns a worldwide fleet of boats which serve the deepwater drilling industry.

Chouest is concerned about a potential work stoppage, according to sources, as the league’s players and owners renegotiate the collective bargaining agreement, set to expire at the end of this season.

Sources also indicated that the billionaire shipping magnate does not think he can devote the time needed to run an NBA franchise as its sole owner and operate his private business at the same time. His company, global marine service company Edison Chouest Offshore, was hit hard by the moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf after the BP oil spill. [Source.]

The NBA is reportedly trying to find an investor group to keep the franchise in New Orleans. Good luck with that. [UPDATE: The NBA has reportedly agreed to purchase Shinn's interest in the team.]

I don’t blame Gary Chouest. Even if he could write a check for Shinn’s interest, as a businessman, he’s entitled to choose his investments. With his primary business in some distress, the last thing he needs is a $300 million distraction.

The team has the contractual right to leave New Orleans if average attendance is under 14,700 by January 31. Current attendance is 900 per game shy of that mark. Who knows how much the moratorium contributed to lower attendance?

Of course, the players and coaches don’t stand to be hurt, but for the city and the state the team’s $75 million payroll is in jeopardy. Who knows how big the economic impact of the loss might be?

BP’s spill fund won’t help concession workers, ticket-takers or t-shirt sellers. None of them qualify for unemployment compensation, either.

An NBA franchise is a high-profile example. All over this economy, business owners large and small make incremental decisions. The impacts are hard to measure individually, but the cumulative effect can be crippling.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • tankertodd

    So if a butterfly flaps its wing in Rev Wright’s church in Chicago, a ticket taker in New Orleans becomes unemployed?

    • Ann_W
  • dennism

    … Britain, the country that put the “B” in “BP,” the future king is engaged to marry Kate Middleton. As if they need another $20 million a year mouth to feed…

  • GreyCloak

    Obama’s Moratorium was almost purely political, and it HURT employment.

    Good luck to the Hornets getting money from BP or Feinberg … the link to oil spills is pretty tenuous (if not nonexistent).

  • ex Dem from Miami

    Shinn needs to get this sale done this year to avoid a long term capital gains tax increase.

    All kinds of neat consequences from having the Dems in charge. Never quite sure if they are really unintended…..

  • walter_hanson

    Keep in mind Obama doesn’t care about the Hornets since he’s a Bulls fan and he didn’t carry Louisiana in 2008.

    Not to mention if the guy is a billionarie he’s probably not paying enough in taxes to begin with.

    Walter Hanson
    Minneapolis, MN

  • smagar

    …the only state along the Gulf Coast where there’s lots of opposition to more offshore drilling is Florida…a prime prize in 2012.

    The other states on the Gulf are hopelessly Republican, and therefore of no consequence.

    How am I doing here?

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir
    • edniceville

      The issue in Florida is that many “NIMBY”s don’t want to see oil rigs from our snow white beaches. Not all of us feel that way, but, those who do make the most noise, a minority as they are. The bigger issue is that most of the Gulf off the Florida coast is a Military Test Range for missles, munitions and aircraft testing. If you were an oil rig worker, would you want this stuff going on over your head and potentially dropping in your lap? While I am a strong proponent of offshore drilling, I am also a retired AF member who understands the vital need for that range. The real question is can we reduce the size of the range and still carry out the missions it has, and still get to the oil? I submit that we already have the technology to do so. After all, are not the Chinese already drilling from Cuban waters and stealing our oil?

      • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

        Yes, I believe that they are not. At least not yet.

        Here’s an interesting (and current) link on the status of Cuba’s licensing. Petronas is apparently farther along the path than the other licensees, The CNPC (Chinese) blocks are in deeper water farther offshore and have yet to be awarded.

        And if they’re drilling in Cuban waters, they’re exploiting Cuba’s resources, not stealing ours.

        • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

          solely by restricting Americans from drilling offshore are sorely mistaken. Moreover, those that think the mere presence of pristine beaches will bring the tourist money need to understand that only after Americans could travel in oil-fueled cars did Florida’s economy boom.

          • gekster
          • acat

            Point the search engine of your choice at “ixtoc well” … and tell me just how the U.S. is supposed to protect the Gulf of Mexico beaches from .. Mexico.

            Mew

        • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

          Sideways drilling technology has improved markedly in recent years; also oil reservoirs connect to some extent. I don’t think the Chinese could steal ALL our oil from Cuban waters, but surely they’ll get some of it. A true expert would be able to go into more detail I am sure.

          • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

            BS in Petroleum Engineering
            32+ years in the Gulf of Mexico
            Registered Professional Engineer

            Not a Wikipedia expert as is so common on the internets.

          • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

            But you are arguing that under no circumstances does the technology allow them to steal our oil from securely and legally within Cuban waters? That seems contrary to every analysis I have ever read anywhere else.

            That they ARE not YET, I can perfectly well believe, no problem there. That they CAN not, no.

          • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

            At the present time, they have no drilling rights at all.

            The concessions they are negotiating for do not abut US waters so it is impossible for “them” to drain anything on our side.

            The owners that do abut US waters could drill wells right up to the international boundary and drain a common reservoir and there would be nothing we could do about it. It would also be legal.

            Can wells be directionally drilled across a lease line? Now, that would be illegal. I’ve never seen it happen, but it was Saddam’s pretext for invading Kuwait in the ’90s.

            But first a promising geologic structure would have to be found, and for stealing to occur, that structure would have to slop over the boundary line.

            The only company on the Cuban map that is so situated is the Angolan company, which is still negotiating. As their lease is in 5,000 ft of water (a la Macondo), I wouldn’t lose a lot of sleep about it.

            As far as the Chinese “stealing” from us, note that they are operating legally now in US waters as a (non-operating) lessee. They also recently announced a major acquisition from Chesapeake in south Texas. They are tying up reserves in Colombia and elsewhere. They have legitiamte prospects to pursue and I’m sure they’re not worrying themselves with stealing a few drops from us in 5,000 ft of water.

  • GreyCloak

    … and neither Republican Governor Rick Scott nor Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio are going to go against years of citizen opposition to drilling off their pristine shores.

    A Democratic candidate is unlikely to win any other Gulf State … although Texas is going to pick up a few Electoral votes, so it may have some consequence.

    • smagar

      “that” being the resistance of Florida citizens to more offshore drilling.

      If Florida’s wishes are respected, and there’s no new drilling off its shores—that pretty much makes the southern Atlantic and east Gulf coast areas off limits to new drilling. Florida has muy, muy big shores.

      The national GOP needs Florida, so we can only push so hard.

      The Democrats, on the other hand, risk the wrath of the rest of the country if they’re perceived to be stoppping domestic offshore exploration. Few Americans go to the Florida beaches; ALL Americans drive cars and pay for the gas that goes in them.

      • GreyCloak

        18.9 million JUST LAST SUMMER!

        80.9 million in all of 2009.

    • smagar

      I’d set up an offshore oil rig as close to the Florida shores as possible, with a HUGE PRC flag on it and a gi-normous picture of Mao on the superstructure.

      • edniceville

        and it is already happening.

    • uselogic

      A reasonable limit such as 25-35 miles and another round of $4+ per gallon gas and I think some of our NIMBY folks might come around. Besides, the polls reported on this are usually newspaper polls and are horribly slanted to make it seem like they the drilling would be at the breaker line. The questions they ask are ridiculous and our papers are just to the right of 1970′s Pravda.

  • jackhammer

    in a progressive world…for how long?

    I have fights with the billionaire owner of my company a lot 8surprisingly he still keeps me around), and one of his favourite lines is “Everyone is free to choose their profession”. he doesn’t really live by this adage in how difficult he makes it for me to maintain relationships with business partners, when he has battalions of lawyers jump on everything….as a lot are dropping us due to bureacracy left right and center….but I constantly remind him of this wehn his business plans rely on “finding a sucker”.

    There is no free lunch….somethign unsustainable cannot be sustained forever….and all the other sayings totally apply.

    But since most of the progressive ideas are neo-utopian or megalomaniac ideas of how to rule the world…like all of those they require a seperation form reality or from the concept that others could choose differently.

    I keep goign back to this one UVA Psych professor’s research about how conservatives actually are better at truly empathizing with other peoples views….http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/haidt08/haidt08_index.html

    The left, in general cannot fathom that we believe what we believe. So it doesn’t even come into their contingency plans when they are laying out their ideals. When they find out that we might actually think and act differently, they still cannot understad it, and think it must be an abhorrency, and should therefore be banned.

    Well you can’t run around banning everything.

    they truly think that their ideals would make the world a better place, and for most of them, I would think that intention is genuine. I think they are misguided, or their ideas are not fully thought out, or too intolerant, but I don’t doubt most of their motivations (the political class which usurps this to maintain centralized power is another thing).

    Sadly, they rarely give us the same benefit of the doubt,a nd that is their downfall.

    Just as God gave us free will, even to choose things that are unwise, unholy, or not good for us, so too we must understand the possible choices in any circumstance are myriad. which is why the video games people quickly figured out you should program in the eventuality that in a cop chasing robbers game, you have to allow for the guy playing the cop to shoot the grandmother, or jump off the roof just to see what happens.

  • godot

    I feel so bad for the players. How cant they be expected to focus on winning another championship with this level of economic uncertainty? They have got it bad.

    • jackhammer

      when have the hornets ever won a championship?