« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Mideast Turmoil and the Corn Ethanol Connection

No Blood For Biofuels!

Could ethanol-driven food price increases be at the root of recent unrest in Egypt and the greater Middle East? An article by Robert Bryce in the Energy Tribune explores the connection between the Iowa Presidential Caucuses, ethanol subsidies, and the rising tide of discontent:


Biofuels Driving Up Food Prices As Iowa Primary Approaches

This year, the US corn ethanol sector will consume 40 percent of all US corn – that’s about 15 percent of global corn production or 5 percent of all global grain – in order to produce a volume of motor fuel with the energy equivalent of about 0.6 percent of global oil needs. …

The quantity of grain to be consumed this year for US ethanol production – 4.9 billion bushels – boggles the mind. That’s more than twice as much as all the corn produced in Brazil and more than six times as much as is grown in India. Put another way, that’s more corn than the output of the European Union, Mexico, Argentina, and India combined.

Observation: Some people believe that a 0.2% increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide can disrupt global climate. I’m skeptical about that. But it’s altogether believable that diverting 15% of global corn production might disrupt the global economy and lead to mass unrest in the developing world, enough to topple governments.


In recent weeks, we’ve seen food-price hikes and protests that are reminiscent of 2008. There have been food riots in Algeria and Mozambique. Last month, some 8,000 Jordanians protested in the streets of Amman and other cities to protest rising food prices. In Egypt, the world’s biggest wheat importer, wheat prices are up by 30 percent over the past 12 months. This week, protesters took to the streets in India to protest surging food costs..

Politicians of both parties let the Iowa tail wag the energy dog when it comes to corn ethanol subsidies and market mandates:

… President Obama, in his State of the Union speech, said “we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels.” Meanwhile, the Iowa Caucus, the nation’s first presidential primary is now less than one year away. And Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the US House, who’s dearly hoping that he can be a viable candidate for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, was recently in Iowa cravenly wooing the ethanol producers and slamming “big city” critics of the ethanol industry. Alas, there’s little reason to expect much bravery out of Gingrich’s fellow Republicans on Capitol Hill. Speaker of the House John Boehner recently told reporters not to expect cuts to the ethanol subsidies because they are “not in the discretionary spending pot.”

Outside of corn farmers and Presidential candidates, everyone (including even Al Gore!) seems to realize that corn ethanol is an engineering, environmental and economic disaster. The bad thing about central planning is that when it screws things up, it screws them up on a grand, even a global, scale.

Cross-posted at VladEnBlog.

Follow VladimirRS on Twitter

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Michael Dugas

    Taking or food and using it to augment gasoline is stupid on its own. But when that action removes a huge amount, of what in some areas of the world is a major dietary staple, from the food chain and then causes the price of that remaining corn to drastically rise in cost causing needless suffering for lousy policy.
    At home alone, everything from the corn fed meat we eat to the corn food products we consume goes up in price.
    And the irony of it all is…We the People are pretty much paying for it all!
    Think about it. Tax Dollar Subsidized farming involved, the Tax Dollar Subsidized Ethanol Industry and the taxes you pay at the pump purchasing that mandated product! Man we’re doing it to ourselves!
    They’re taking our money from us and giving it to certain industry’s, having those industry’s make a product that they force you to buy if you need it and then make you pay tax on that product!
    Man what a deal huh.
    And then get this…..that product that they mandate we use, it’s causing our food to be more expensive!
    1.) High Unemployment
    2.) Out of Control Energy Costs
    3.) Inflation The Rise in Cost of Basic Needs
    4.) No Leader at the Helm

    We sure ain’t getting our dollars worth!

  • Adjoran

    So the immediate answer is “Yes, corn ethanol contributes to the problem.” It was already causing food price discontent in Mexico nearly two years ago.

    Even if you think ethanol is worthwhile, it still makes no sense to make it from corn. It’s more expensive, more damaging to the environment, and creates disruptions in food supplies opposed to sugar ethanol. We could import all we want, cheap and green.

    It’s about paying off big Ag like ADM, and wealthy large farming operations for political contributions, not energy or environment – it’s the only way it makes sense.

  • http://westforwestwing2012.com heartlander

    …ethanol does NOTHING to actually help the one thing it’s supposed to, which is our energy situation. No! When you total up all the petroleum that goes into producing the ethanol (tillage, fertilizer, pesticides, irrigation, harvest, transport, processing, more transport), it barely breaks even, energy-wise, and in many cases, actually comes out negative! In other words, we would have been better off just using the petroleum for fuel in the first place rather than sinking it into producing ethanol!

    And that’s not even to mention that corn is one of the “thirstiest” crops we grow. The Ogallala aquifer, the largest deep aquifer in the U.S., is being drained largely to grow irrigated corn. And some of the worst, if not THE worst, rates of soil erosion are from hilly land planted to corn. It takes nature many centuries to produce one inch of topsoil — but for the sake of ethanol, we’re sending uncounted tons of good, rich Iowa topsoil down the Mississippi River to be deposited at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.

    How our grandchildren are going to curse this foolish generation!

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

      Corn is also a very soil-depleting crop. In the old days, farmers would rotate crops so as not to ruin the soil. Now, they plant corn every year, and pump the soil up with natural gas-derived fertilizers.

      The fertilizer runs off and ends up in the Gulf of Mexico, where it feeds a summertime algae bloom. The algae depletes the water of oxygen, creating a dead zone the size of a northeastern state – last year I think it was the size of New Jersey.

    • bk

      Consumer Reports reported ~25% lower mpg with E85 than with gasoline in a test they did. So we still end up using just as much gasoline in our vehicles as before!

  • graemephillips

    Rather than criticising people over corn-derived ethanol, why don’t you instead come up with a better way of ensuring American energy supplies? With the exception of exploration activities in Alaska for a resource we know to be finite, Tea Party-esque people are busy opposing everything that might help constrain the USA’s dependence on foreign oil. The USA is an expansive country with lots of land that could still be used for corn cultivation. Also, Tea Party-esque people are busy opposing California’s high-speed rail project: – the trains would run on electricity, which could be supplied from California’s abundant solar and hydroelectric resources, rather than the imported oil used to power cars. Stop standing on the sidelines criticising and doing nothing. Instead, help develop viable solutions to the problems at hand!

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Do you have anything useful to contribute?

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

      This is a story about how top-down solutions don’t work. There are tons of unintended consequences that well-meaning Big Gov’t types are historically bad at anticipating.

      American private capital is on the verge of giving us energy security for the first time since 1970, but because of junk science and a statist desire to control peoples lives some like you want to force top-down solutions on them they don’t really want.

      And another thing: please don’t lecture me about what I should be doing on the energy front. I’ve dedicated my education, my career, and a substantial fraction of my net worth in domestic oil and gas so that you can heat and cool your home, illuminate your squiggly light bulbs, and drive your Prius to Light Rail Organizing meetings.

      You’re welcome.

    • CJB68

         I remember a few years back, before Obama was even considered a presidential candidate, when then-president George W Bush made the suggestion of using grass clippings from landscaping and lawn mowing as an ethanol source.  Just about everyone on the opposite side of the divide was laughing at him.

         I’d gladly take a job at a processing plant that converts fresh grass clippings, if the process were made feasible.  Heck, just about every waste produce that we leave behind could be converted to some form of ethanol or another.

         The other problem confronting us right now with these alternative fuel sources is the efficiency of the engines that’re supposed to be running off of them.  Current models actually use more ethanol per mile than the petroleum-based motors do with gasoline or deisel.  Also bear in mind that you’ll need to burn an awful lot of petroleum just to get the whole ethanol production system started.

         My dad often lectures people on the feasibility factor of these things.  Even your electric train needs to burn a lot of power just to get to the speed that it’s supposed to reach.  How many rivers do you think we’ll need to dam up to produce that hydroelectricity?  How many hills do we need to clear for the solar panels?

         This could end up being another case of the “cure” being worse than the disease it’s being touted to eliminate.

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    In fact, Bloomberg (as big into global warming as you can get) said rising food prices always kill people. So to your point, death and turmoil have been planned.
    2/11/08, (Reuters) – “A new U.S. energy law will cause an increase in global food prices and lead to starvation deaths worldwide because it continues to promote corn ethanol, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said on Monday.

    “People literally will starve to death in parts of the world, it always happens when food prices go up,” Bloomberg told reporters after addressing a U.N. General Assembly debate on climate change.”…

  • plwinteregg

    On top of all of this, our mileage goes down when ethanol is added. So now we all pay for a more expensive fuel, subsidized by our higher taxes, for a fuel that performs poorly.

    Engineers will tell you they hate the stuff, for in spite of the changes that have been made to your vehicle and what you have been told, ethanol still takes a toll on many of the critical parts of your vehicle’s fuel systems and engine.

    Paying more for food and worldwide unrest? Why not? The whole thing is a game to buy votes, anyway.

    Maybe Florida moving their primary early wouldn’t be such a bad thing, after all. Perhaps there would be a candidate with the cajoles to look Iowans in the face and say NO.

  • The_Gadfly

    but given recent events with other posters, shouldn’t we be avoiding alarmist diaries on the front page?

    I recall there was a big brouhaha about this the last time oil prices were shooting though the roof and food prices were rising. After the dust settled it turned out the change in food prices was more directly attributable to the increasing oil prices than the increased diversion of corn for ethanol. In fact, a 2009 CBO study showed that while ethanol production has an effect, that effect is swamped by other factors:

    From April 2007 to April 2008, the increasing
    demand for corn to produce ethanol contributed, in
    CBO?s estimation, between 0.5 and 0.8 percentage points
    to the 5.1 percent increase in the price of food overall as
    measured by the component of the consumer price index
    for all urban consumers (CPI-U) that measures food
    prices.18 That is, the growing use of corn for ethanol
    accounted for about 10 percent to 15 percent of the
    increase in the CPI-U for food over the April-to-April
    period.

    http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10057/04-08-Ethanol.pdf

    Artificially supporting ethanol is stupid for the economic disruptions it causes in the market, more stupid because its a bad choice for producing ethanol if you assume ethanol ought to be our fuel base, and most stupid because there is insufficient data for a reasonable conclusion about anthropomorphic global warming. But we shouldn’t try to tie this to the events in the Middle East without solid data and reasoning. Demagoguing is a tactic of the left, and should remain with them. If we seek to have reason prevail, me must use reason to defeat it.

    Also, while the bulk of graemephilips post is pure leftist tripe, the one fact he did post is that we have lots of fallow farmland that can be moved into useful production if we choose do so. A look at the reasons for the government programs which dislocate those resources is certainly worth the time.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

      …did you read the link?

      But the events of the last few weeks — corn futures at near-record highs and social unrest related to food prices ? are nearly identical to the mayhem that occurred in 2007 and 2008. Back then, at least 15 studies, including ones by Purdue University, the World Bank and the Congressional Research Service, exposed the link between increasing ethanol production and higher food prices. Soaring food prices led to violent protests in Egypt, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Haiti, Mauritania, Ethiopia, Madagascar, the Philippines and Indonesia. And worries about adequate food stocks led several countries to ban food exports.

      New studies are, once again, finding a direct link between the corn ethanol scam and higher food prices. In December, a study by two US agriculture economists, Thomas Elam and Steve Meyer, found that corn prices are being pushed dramatically higher by demand from the ethanol sector. Elam and Meyer, who have done consulting work for the meat industry, found that without the ethanol mandates, the average price of corn would now be lower by more than $2 per bushel. And they conclude that ?biofuels policy has caused significant cost increases for all users of feedgrains.?

      So it kind of depends whose studies you choose to believe.

      Plus, this is the guy you’re arguing with. I don’t think he’s a wing nut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bryce_(writer)

      • The_Gadfly

        before where everybody had just gotten their pink slips.

        I don’t regard the World Bank as an bastion of logical thinking. They are more likely to be advocating for the leftists as they have done often in their history. And having been to University, I am more skeptical of professors and their studies than I am of a journalist at the Washington Post.

        I have a couple of problems with the thesis, first that it started as a meme at the nutroots sites that somehow got adopted by conservatives as an effective way to push back against ethanol production. The second is that when oil prices dropped, so did food prices and the riots and the threats of riots likewise subsided. Ethanol production didn’t fall during that period. Which means that what is driving the prices is the same thing that has driven unrest for the better part of my lifetime: rising oil prices as a result of Middle East instability because leftist forces in the western world refuse to let us produce the kinds of energy that would stabilize those prices regardless of what is happening in the Middle East. As someone directly involved in the oil industry, you of all people should be aware of how sensitive farm prices are to oil prices, because it is not just the rising costs of fuel for tilling, planting, and harvesting that drive food prices. Add speculation driven by fear-mongering on top of that and you have a recipe for disaster.

        If you want to fix the problem, it’s critical to aim at the correct target. And while ethanol subsidies are a worthy target for those interested in reigning in government waste, if you are trying to fix dislocations in food prices in foreign markets it isn’t the primary cause, shutting down oil production in the US is.

  • dennism

    Colonel Gaddafi isn’t accusing the US of wanting to invade to steal his corn.

    And speaking of kernels, that guy has been a colonel as long as I can remember. Looks like if he was competent he’d be a general by now.

    And talk about crazy, don’t get me started. His people are fleeing for sanctuary… IN TUNISIA. http://instantrimshot.com/