« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Barbour on Energy (and Salazar’s Puzzling Reponse)

On Wednesday, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour spoke to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on energy policy:


Barbour says Obama cheers for higher gas price

“This administration’s policies have been designed to drive up the cost of energy in the name of reducing pollution, in the name of making very expensive alternative fuels more economically competitive,” Barbour said…

Barbour cited a statement by Nobel laureate Steven Chu regarding his attitude toward energy prices: “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.” That was in 2008, before Chu was named President Obama’s Secretary of Energy; Obama’s supporters and apologists maintain the comment does not reveal Administration policy.

But consider this current comment by a high Administration official:

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, when asked about Barbour’s comments Wednesday, said “nothing could be further from the truth.”

“We are doing what we can in terms of domestic production,” Salazar said. But “at end of the day … what we can produce domestically will not have an impact in terms of the price of oil because it is set on the world market.”

Oh, really, Mr. Salazar?

With all the talk about imports and dwindling reserves, we sometimes forget that the U.S. is still the #3 producer of oil in the world. Global oil production is about 85 million barrels per day; in the U.S. we make 5 million barrels or so, plus a couple million barrels of natural gas condensate and other liquids.

The U.S. is also the #1 consumer of oil, about 19 million barrels per day.

The price of a barrel of oil is set on the world market according to the laws of supply and demand. As has been discussed previously, oil is said to be a price inelastic commodity. Increases in price do little to dampen demand. In a supply shortfall, competitive buyers quickly bid up the value of each available barrel.

So a shortfall in domestic production means that we’ll have to import more, which, absent a significant excess supply overhanging the market, will directly and immediately increase prices. Conversely, any new domestic oil we bring to market should ease that price pressure.

It’s one thing for a bureaucrat to be misinformed, but Salazar is the Secretary of the Interior. As such he is the chief policymaker for the Federal Offshore. The Gulf of Mexico alone accounts for some 30% of domestic oil and 15% of natural gas production. In addition, the DOI oversees the vast, mineral-rich Federal holdings in the Mountain West.

The Secretary of the Interior has more impact on the price of oil than any other single individual in the nation.

A stroke of Salazar’s pen could put 15-20 rigs to work in the Gulf of Mexico almost immediately. A stroke of Salazar’s pen could open up leasing in the Mountain West. A stroke of Salazar’s pen could set our energy industry free from the government-mandated navel-gazing of the last 10 months.

Gov. Barbour is right: high energy prices were always part of the Obama Administration’s vision for the green energy future. Gasoline prices are headed north. We could do something to improve our situation, creating real jobs in the process, but instead the current regime continues to act as though they are powerless in the face of world events.

Cross-posted at VladEnBlog.

Follow VladimirRS on Twitter

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    For a Republican Secretary of the Interior to stroke the pens.

    Salazar is a marxist boob for Obama and will try to destroy as much as he can, while he can.

    • ohiohistorian

      At a minimum, I think he took the same economics courses that Obama took. Obviously taught by an economist of the school “those who can, do, those who can’t, teach”.

      For having been a Senator of a purple state, Salazar understands nothing.

  • dmacleo

    iirc the lack of refineries is why ramping up drilling would not directly affect todays prices. if so its just a play on words to protect himself.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

      The price of gasoline tracks the price of crude oil, for which there is a global market. We import 10-12 million barrels a day to run through our refineries. If we cut our production by a half million barrels a day, that half million barrels will have to be replaced by imports. And we’ll be competitively bidding for them with the other industrialized countries.

      Our refinery capacity is not quite sufficient to cover our consumption, so we also import some refined products.

      • ohiohistorian

        We are importing refined products from Mexico and (I think) Canada. We do have a refinery shortfall. However, you are right in that the price of those imports will be blended into the lower-cost domestic oil to give us all a break in price.

        • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

          In the U.S. we have 17 million barrels per day of refining capacity. It is operating at about 88% of capacity, so the refinery inputs are about 15.5 million barrels per day. (Source.)

          Of that input, 8 or 9 million barrels a day must be imported. (Source.) You will notice if you click that link that our imports and exports of refined product are nearly in balance.

          The bottom line is this. Global crude oil production is 85 million bpd. Our 15 have to come from somewhere. If we lose 1 million bpd of domestic production, global production is only 84 million and we have to go on the world market to make up the 1 million bpd. That means we have to outbid China, Europe, Japan and whoever else needs it.

          Ergo, the price goes up.

          Our refinery capacity really doesn’t have a thing to do with it.

  • z06gal

    inept this administration really is. They continue to top their own idiocy with the passing of each day and I shouldn’t be shocked but I am. Unreal

    • jakota

      Criminal Intent
      Malice aforethought

  • danimal98367

    prices would necessarily skyrocket.” – Senator Barack Obama.

    But no, that’s not the policy.

    • ohiohistorian

      Obama said,

      “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, ELECTRICITY RATES would necessarily skyrocket.”

      Can find no place that he said nothing about motor fuel. Please quote accurately; let’s nail him for what he said, not for what we can misquote him on.

  • Adjoran

    that in order to serve in his Administration, you must be a leftist nut who knows absolutely nothing about the job you are given to do.

  • dennism

    “It’s important to note that there is considerable spare oil production capacity globally, and we and other major economies possess substantial strategic reserves of oil. If necessary, those reserves could be mobilized to help mitigate the effect of a severe, sustained supply disruption.”

    A. Michael Moore
    B. Sarah Palin
    C. Tim Geithner

    Hint: “turbo tax”

  • CJB68

       That was no exit; it was only a bulb, and it just went out.

  • flannery

    Salazar is not only a contemptable person his Department is in contempt of the US District Court in New Orleans. Isn’t it time to quit believing that drilling permits are being processed and hold Salazar in criminal contempt? Put the guy in jail for a while, let’s see if the permits move.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Thank you.

    ColdWarrior