« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

BP’s Macondo Disaster, One Year Later

On April 20, 2010, an explosion and fire on the Transocean drilling rig Deepwater Horizon caused the deaths of 11 rig workers. The subsequent blowout flowed uncontrolled to the Gulf of Mexico, ultimately spilling an estimated 5 million barrels of crude oil over the next 100 days. The regulatory aftermath continues to this day.

“Vladimir” wrote dozens of diaries at RedState on the engineering, environmental, economic and political aspects of the spill and its aftermath. The first was “Please Pray for the Missing Eleven” published a year ago tomorrow. It was soon followed by “Why Was BP Drilling in 5,000 ft of Water?” which looked at the disconnect between our voracious appetite for hydrocarbons, and our relative lack of concern as to its source (as long as it’s available and affordable). Vlad’s diary “The Pro-Environment Anti-Environmentalist” recapped several earlier diaries, highlighting the contrast between the predictions of scientific doomsayers and journalistic hysterics on one hand, versus a solitary blogger with a smattering of knowledge of earth science on the other.

The anniversary is an opportunity to look back on what we’ve learned. For if a failure is to be anything other than pure tragedy, we must learn the lessons it conveys.

Our economy uses an incredible amount of energy – some 95 quadrillion BTUs in 2009. Efficient and affordable energy sources (especially oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear energy, which together account for 93% of our energy) are hazardous to deal with because they cram the potential for a large release of energy into a small volume.

Extracting and transporting that energy comes with risk. Politicians may talk about eliminating risk, but engineers know this is foolish, so they speak in terms of minimizing risk. If we as consumers and citizens insist on zero risk, we may as well all move back to mud huts.

Macondo was a singular event. Perhaps BP skimped on well design. Perhaps Transocean failed to maintain the BOP properly. But the fact remains that in 40,000 some-odd wells drilled since 1970, only 1,800 barrels of oil hit Gulf of Mexico waters from well blowouts, up until Macondo.

The reason that the factoid above always references “since 1970″ is that is considered to be the modern era of offshore oil and gas regulation, post-Santa Barbara and post-Bay Marchand, two catastrophic blowouts offshore California and Louisiana, respectively. The 1970s saw the development of the “Surface-Controlled Subsurface Safety Valve” (SCSSV), a sort of emergency valve designed to close in case of a catastrophic event, like an explosion or hurricane. SCSSVs did their job admirably during the hurricanes of 2005 and 2008.

The oil industry learns its lessons.

How much have we learned in a year? Certainly new standards will be in play for deepwater well design. Critical well control systems like blowout preventers and riser disconnect packages will be redesigned and properly maintained. Two new systems for emergency deepwater containment will be available to attempt well containment if needed.

No need for a “boot on the neck”, Mr. Salazar. We may be a bunch of Aggies and Okies and good ol’ boys from LSU, but don’t make the mistake of thinking we’re stupid. No one wants to risk putting himself and his employer through that. As BP proved, the stakes of failure are simply too high.

BOEMRE is looking to greatly beef up the ranks of its inspectors. All well and good, but don’t expect that to be a panacea. BOEMRE inspectors are like the state troopers of offshore operations. They don’t certify results (like a building inspector might when you build a house). They write tickets, they don’t direct the activity.

To extend the analogy a bit further, consider the state trooper in highway safety. We ask troopers to monitor operations. They don’t design the highways or determine the speed limits. They don’t design cars or tire treads. All that is done by engineers.

There have been spectacular engineering failures before, like the Tacoma Narrows bridge collapse in 1940 and the Hyatt Regency walkway collapse (which killed 114 and injured 216 dancing partiers) in 1981. In each case the profession has used the failure to understand the deficiencies of design and to promulgate new design standards. The petroleum industry would be no different in its forensic work.

But the process was subverted by government.

The first wave of “SWAT team” inspections of deepwater drilling operations found only a couple of very minor problems on two of 33 rigs. Regardless, the deepwater moratoria were imposed under the supposed cover of an endorsement by the National Academy of Engineering, which endorsement was loudly repudiated by the NAS panel. The moratoria were not supported by Sen. Bob Graham or William Reilly, co-chairs of the President’s packed-with-environmental-lawyers Oil Spill Commission. Rafts of new requirements and standards were imposed by BOEMRE fiat before the exact nature of the BP failure had even been determined.

Of the ten “new” permits that have been approved since February, only one is for a brand new well that has been permitted since the disaster. Most have merely served to renew activity on wells that were in progress a year ago.

Even though shallow water drilling presents a minuscule environmental risk compared with Macondo’s giant oil blowout, activity by shallow water operators remains moribund. One reason is the permitting slowdown, but operators also fear that Congress may set financial guarantee requirements so high that they will not be able to continue in the game.

As a result of delayed rig and permitting activity, we’ll produce on average 330,000 barrels per day less in 2011 than was expected we would one year ago. Next year, that figure will jump to 550,000 barrels per day. That’s 10% of domestic crude oil production.

A year later. In some ways, we’ve learned a lot; in others, nothing at all. That’s a tragedy.

Vladimir is gone now, dead at the ripe old age of 6 and 1/2 years. I gently euthanized him one night, smothering him with a pillow as he slept. His work goes on.

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.

Follow VladimirRS on Twitter

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • juumanistra

    A stout and knowledgeable man who you did not disagree with lightly, lest you end up feeling the wrath of his Transylvanian namesake. A loss for us all.

    And if we want zero risk, then the only option is to forget about mud huts: Do you have any idea how dangerous the kilns required to bake clay bricks are? Fire is something that is not trifled with. Best go back to living in trees and eating raw meat, for it’s the only way to escape the hazards of man-created fire.

    • YnotNOW

      Steve/Vladimir, please keep giving us the inside scoop to counter the enviromentalist and government “green” hype and distortion.

      And to echo juumanistra, the mud-hut era was the “difficult, brutal and short” life that truly had huge risks every day. Every technological hurdle of modern life has some risks, but those risks are almost always less than the previous way of life. The biggest risk is NOT moving forward.

    • YnotNOW

      Steve/Vladimir, please keep giving us the inside scoop to counter the enviromentalist and government “green” hype and distortion.

      And to echo juumanistra, the mud-hut era was the “difficult, brutal and short” life that truly had huge risks every day. Every technological hurdle of modern life has some risks, but those risks are almost always less than the previous way of life. The biggest risk is NOT moving forward.

  • wpeterkin

    A lot of the reporting on this entire incident was fraudulent to begin with. First, no one knows how much actual oil was spilled. What comes from a well is an emulsion of water and oil, the ratio of which is not really known without a well test, only done after the well is completed. This well was never completed. It could have been spewing 90% water, or 90% oil, or any other ratio. Without that well test, the actual oil released is nothing but a wild guess, and most of those guesses assumed worst case scenarios.

    Second, BP was blamed for everything. While I’m no fan of BP, that was patently wrong. They “owned” the well for sure. But they only had one man on that rig and he had no operational control over the drilling operation at all. The “company man” is there to monitor expenditures for the owners and not a whole lot else. The rig owner, Transocean in this case, has operational control. It was Transocean who employed the people on the drilling floor that were killed and those same people were responsible for monitoring pressures downhole and even manually activating the blowout preventer if necessary. We will never know why they failed because they are all gone.

    No company ever wants to lose what BP has lost in this disaster. The billions of dollars, the ongoing lawsuits, and the loss of reputation can destroy a company. You can bet your life that every offshore driller is learning from this disaster to try and prevent a future one. However, people are not perfect no matter what efforts are made. Overall, the safety record of the industry has been excellent. Our government is destroying tens of thousands of workers and hurting our economy by its knee-jerk reaction to this accident. That is a as big a tragedy as the spill itself.

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

      I’ve heard no reasonable person suggest that the well wasn’t flowing 100% oil & gas.

      I haven’t seen the log myself, but based on talking to people that have, there is every expectation that the reservoir contained 50+ million barrels, and it could flow for a long, long time before making water.

      Add to that the fact that from the killing operation & measured pressures, they had a pretty good idea of the fluid in the wellbore. It’s not difficult to tell oil from water, and if it were water, BP would be letting everyone know.

      As for letting BP off the hook because “they only had one man on that rig”, that is patently false. I believe they had 4 company men, plus at the time they had several vice-presidents of BP aboard to celebrate the DW Horizon’s long-time accident-free operation.

      But more importantly, Transocean was a contractor. By contract, BP was in operational control of water was going on on the rig. They were responsible for the design, planning and execution of the entire operation. They had a legion of people in Houston overseeing the operation, and the role of the company men was to see that BP’s plan was executed in a safe and responsible manner.

      Now, that being said, Transocean is also potentially culpable. It’s their rig and equipment, and if it turns out that they failed to properly maintain the BOP and/or riser package, they’ll have to answer for that. Ultimately, the offshore installation manager for Transocean was the captain of the ship and responsible for the safety of the crew & rig, which is an important veto if BP were to decide to do something reckless.

      But BP was the operator, which means “the buck stops here”.

  • dennism

    I imagined Vladimir’s demise along the lines of Jarrett (James Cagney) in “White Heat”… standing on a gigantic globe-shaped gas storage tank, Jarrett fires into the tank and shouts, “Made it, Ma! Top of the world!” just as it goes up in a massive explosion eerily similar to the Macondo disaster… in short, that Vladimir brought about his own downfall.

    Instead, I’m shattered to learn that it was more like the climax of “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” where the Chief (Will Sampson) smothered McMurphy (Jack Nicholson) with a pillow. I now have to reconcile myself to a much more ironic image of Steve taking a proactive role in gaining his emancipation… a grated window (bondage) giving way to a giant Water Pik.

    The reader/viewer is forced to ask himself/herself, was Vladimir/McMurphy real or imaginged? Alter ego or inner demon?

    • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Steve Maley

      Vlad had recently been lobotomized, just like McMurphy.

      Blogging imitates art.