« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Republican Leadership Conference, Day 1

The speakers for Day 1 of the Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans included luminaries such as Mike Huckabee, Michael Williams, and Ted Cruz, along with our own Erick Erickson. I’ll confine my remarks to the presidential candidates.

Newt Gingrich

Newt has a vision and a plan that appeal to this fiscal conservative. President Gingrich would hit the ground running in his first week with a series of executive orders designed to roll back the Leftist domination of the last 80 years. In particular, he proposes to eliminate all of the “czars” and to fight the tyranny of the judicial branch by eliminating federal judgeships.

Newt understands that the only way out of our country’s fiscal abyss is to unleash the incredible potential of the American economy. His plan:

  • No tax increases
  • Set the tax rate on capital gains to zero
  • 12.5% corporate tax rate
  • 100% expensing for new capital equipment
  • Permanently abolish the death tax

Newt would also move to repeal Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank, two measures which unnecessarily hobble our economy. He’d replace the EPA with the Environmental Solutions Agency, dedicated to finding workable solutions rather than erecting roadblocks.

It would work. But it’s what Newt didn’t say that troubles me, and would keep me from enthusiastically supporting him as a candidate.

Newt’s embrace of ethanol subsidies may help his chances in Iowa, but it leaves me cold. I’m not sure where he stands on Climate Change.

Then there’s the matter of his disappearing campaign staff. The first test of a presidential candidate is his ability to manage a campaign. If you can’t sustain the loyalty and enthusiasm of paid staff, it raises serious questions about how you’d perform in office.

I want to like Newt, I really do. He’s a deep thinker, a philosopher and historian. We’ll see how this plays out.

Thad McCotter

Rep. McCotter is on the straw poll ballot. Notable quote: “The era of Big Government is not over, it is imploding.”

My reaction? Too cerebral. I see why Dennis Miller likes him.

Gary Johnson

The former governor of New Mexico was a successful entrepreneur and job creator before selling his company and entering politics. Of particular note was his use of the veto – some 750 times, 1/3 of those against Republican bills.

Johnson lost me on his endorsement of the Fair Tax and his push for legalized marijuana. My fear is that legalizing dope would do little to stem the violence on the border, but it would make Americans a lot less concerned about the problem.

More to come in Day 2: Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum. Stay tuned.

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.

COMMENTS

  • gawken

    That’s news to me. What’s he going to replace them with?

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley
    • BigRedConservative
  • Menlo

    If the President had the power to abolish the judicial branch, I’d declare my support here and now. Last I checked though, the Constitution requires one, and all federal officials (and probably 95 percent of voters) unfortunately like it that way.

    I’ve often commented that I have no respect whatsoever for the nation’s judiciary, and I would love to see it go. However, anyone who thinks any President could do that (or get elected if he said he would) is delusional.

  • http://www.skiloveland.com skicougar

    I am quite certain only Newt knows through experience what he can and can’t do immediatley, with or without a senate; what he can do to shake off some of the Obama chains around the country.

    Now, it’s up to you to believe if you think he researched and put down in books is what he’ll do or what some comment he made on a sunday show is likely to become policy.

    Geez, after GW and Obama; you’d think we’d be past hanging on the last word spoken.

  • jiminga

    and attributed to Newt can only be accomplished with a Republican Congress (both houses) and many will be quite controversial. For example, dropping the corporate tax rate to 12.5% would require revenue to rise somewhere else. And we’ll all need to research elimination of federal judges….who would try federal offenses?

    Fiddling with the tax code will only exacerbate our problems. The code needs a major restructuring and simplification. But his flashcards sure get attention!

    Seems to me Newt is making promises he can’t keep in a desperate attempt to regain relevance.

  • Darin_H

    Elimination of federal judges elimination of ALL federal judges.

    • Darin_H

      html ate my characters…

      “Elimination of federal judges ‘does not equal’ elimination of ALL federal judges.”

  • skorrent1

    On climate change. He sits right next to Pelosi and declares it to be a crisis. Something “we” (the government) have to do something about.

  • cpaguy

    Given the “scientific” evidence that was out there a few years ago, I don’t really begrudge him on his view then. We now know that a lot of that evidence was manipulated.

    I am interested on his view of the issue now.

    It will be something that sticks out about Newt in the back of my mind, but lets be honest, his personal life is going to be his downfall.

    It is kind of a shame too, I think Newt has a lot to contribute. Guys like Benjamin Franklin would have been villified just like Newt was. Luckily, the media is a lot diffent now than it used to (not to excuse bad behavior, however).

  • avgjo

    His support of any mandate leaves me very leery of him. It’s unconstitutional, period.

    Ethanol is also a non-starter. It is starving the poor in the 3rd world, and it is hurting the poor (non-parasitic) here BADLY. As a Christian, I cannot shake the creepy implications of sacrificing God’s bounty at the altar of Gaia.

    At any rate, he is a smart fellow, and some of his ideas, like the ones you mentioned, are desparately needed. He has also said two things that don’t get enough attention about the ’12 campaign. It needs to be an organized effort, utilizing technology as well as old-fashioned techniques to get the grassroots out. IT also needs to be coordinated with the Senate and House races to get the majorities needed to undo BO’s crap. It is this kind of thinking that is sorely needed on the right; we don’t have enough of it, and that’s why we continue to win key battles but lose the war.