« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Harold Hamm and the North Dakota Miracle

Unlike most of his peers, Harold Hamm didn’t get his start in the oil field with degree in geology or engineering. Hamm drove a truck. Maybe the lack of a college degree made it easier for Hamm to imagine the possible and focus on making it happen.

“Imagining the possible” allowed Hamm to build the nation’s 14th-largest oil company, Continental Resources, based in Enid, OK. (The company plans to move its headquarters to Oklahoma City in 2012.)

Hamm is the subject of The Wall Street Journal’s Weekend Interview: “How North Dakota Became Saudi Arabia

Hamm and Continental are credited with unlocking the crude oil of the Bakken Shale of North Dakota and Montana. He believes it is possible that the Bakken’s ultimate bounty of oil will surpass Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay and may even reach 24 billion barrels, roughly equivalent to the current-day total proved reserves of the U.S.

I’m not sure I buy that, but I don’t feel like betting against Mr. Hamm, either. He currently ranks #33 on the Forbes 400, and if his success in the Bakken holds, he’ll soon be in Warren Buffett territory.

Recently, Hamm was rubbing shoulders with Buffett, Bill Gates and other mega-millionaires at a White House “giving summit”.

When it was Mr. Hamm’s turn to talk briefly with President Obama, “I told him of the revolution in the oil and gas industry and how we have the capacity to produce enough oil to enable America to replace OPEC. I wanted to make sure he knew about this.”

The president’s reaction? “He turned to me and said, ‘Oil and gas will be important for the next few years. But we need to go on to green and alternative energy. [Energy] Secretary [Steven] Chu has assured me that within five years, we can have a battery developed that will make a car with the equivalent of 130 miles per gallon.’” Mr. Hamm holds his head in his hands and says, “Even if you believed that, why would you want to stop oil and gas development? It was pretty disappointing.”

Washington keeps “sticking a regulatory boot at our necks and then turns around and asks: ‘Why aren’t you creating more jobs,’” he says.

Examples of the “regulatory boot” include:

  • Excessive permitting delays for environmental and other reviews.
  • Sarbanes-Oxley accounting rules, which could result in jail time for a CEO like Hamm for a field-level mistake, like misreported production.
  • Criminal charges against Continental and six other operators for the deaths of 28 birds. (Not the extinction of 28 species, but the deaths of 28 individual birds.) Continental has pleaded not guilty. Its case involves the death of a single common sparrow-sized bird. Wind turbines kill thousands of birds every year; when is the last time you heard of the Fish and Wildlife Service going after a wind farm?

Given the nation’s current economic challenges, it is incomprehensible to Hamm that this Administration is doing everything in its power to limit oil and gas, while dumping money into a green energy sector that shows little promise beyond the value of political payback.

Mr. Hamm believes that if Mr. Obama truly wants more job creation, he should study North Dakota, the state with the lowest unemployment rate in the nation at 3.5%. He swears that number is overstated: “We can’t find any unemployed people up there. The state has 18,000 unfilled jobs,” Mr. Hamm insists. “And these are jobs that pay $60,000 to $80,000 a year.” The economy is expanding so fast that North Dakota has a housing shortage. Thanks to the oil boom—Continental pays more than $50 million in state taxes a year—the state has a budget surplus and is considering ending income and property taxes.

Obviously, oil has made Harold Hamm a very wealthy man. But one prolific field in the western part of the state may one day make North Dakota the nations leading oil producer while creating tens of thousands of good jobs. Hamm also points out that there are 10 million landowners receiving royalty payments on production from their property.

For the first time in two generations, energy security could be within our nation’s grasp. At a time when jobs are so sorely needed, reasonable oil and gas development could be an unparalleled engine of economic growth. Could be.

Let’s send Barack Obama packing and make it happen.

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.


COMMENTS

  • tomatopundit

    Presuming that President Obama?s venture socialism policies fall under their own corrupt and illegal weight, and that recent domestic energy developments continue apace, American could be prepped for an upgrade to Empire 2.0. Let’s work to make it happen.

    http://tomatopundit.com/2011/10/01/can-america-upgrade-to-empire-2-0/

    • banzaibob

      I like that. Now where is that Darth Vader suit.

  • Green_Lantern

    feel-good story Steve. This isn’t pie-in-the-sky stuff either, it’s “the possible”. What an amazing difference we can make in our country and our lives by drilling some oil and getting back to work.

    Right now we’re going through the factionalism that was predicted to be the main downside to a republic-style government from de Tocqueville all the way back to Plato. We just need to make sure our “faction” wins.

    And nothing wins people over like prosperity.

  • Xasteius

    My 2nd cousin makes batteries for a living. He actively makes fun of wind turbines and solar power.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      ~

      • Green_Lantern

        we call that being “educated beyond your level of intelligence”.

        • http://www.twitter.com/AWG9_yoyo yoyo

          …that this ENTIRE Administration has been “promoted [light-years] beyond thier level of incompetence.”

      • aesthete

  • weyland

    ….can you fix? I’m interested in reading more. I always thought shale reserves could never compete with OPEC, but this makes me curious.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      @

  • Raven

    that we know about, than Saudi Arabia has ever had. That the entire Middle East has ever had.

  • weyland

    From the article:

    How much oil does Bakken have? The official estimate of the U.S. Geological Survey a few years ago was between four and five billion barrels. Mr. Hamm disagrees: “No way. We estimate that the entire field, fully developed, in Bakken is 24 billion barrels.”

    That’s pretty impressive — more than the sum total of all currently-known US oil reserves.

    However, it’s still very small compared to global reserves, or indeed the reserves claimed by OPEC countries (even if one takes the latter numbers with the necessary grain of salt). With this in mind, I think the article rather overstates its claims.

    More fundamentally, even if Bekken *does* contain 24 million barrels, that could only supply the USA for 3 years — if we continue to use oil for energy. If we could find alternative sources of energy (nuclear is my fave), then we could reserve oil for the really important uses — i.e., raw material for plastics, etc.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      One is that we have only 2-3% of the reserves but we consume 25%. I call that one The Big Energy Lie. Our reserves are low only because we have made policy decisions that have prevented us from converting resources into reserves.

      The other is this calculation that XYZ Field is not significant because it represents only X years of supply. That makes absolutely no sense. Energy supply is about diversity. We have hundreds of thousands of producing wells, and good sources of external supply (e.g. Canada). In reality, your 100% of supply for 3 years is 5% of supply for 60 years, and that’s pretty significant.

      • weyland

        …but is there any realistic estimate of the *resources* the US has? (As opposed to reserves)?

        • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

          I’m not sure what the estimate is. Seems like the estimate is 80+ billion barrels in the offshore that’s off-limits, then there’s Alaska, the rest of the Lower 48, etc. If you count western oil shale (which has nothing in common with the oil in the Bakken shale) then the number’s in the hundreds of billions.

          The success of the Bakken illustrates that oil and gas are being found in places nobody expected, so they were never contained in any previous estimates.

          All of the numbers are S.W.A.G.s. the only way to find out if they’re really there, and in what quantity, is to drill them. And as Harold Hamm points out, there is a lot of reserve growth in existing fields, as people are pretty good about finding better mousetraps.

          • weyland

            …I had no idea there was such a disparity between resources and reserves. Shame there isn’t a better way of predicting reserves, however — the whole argument comes down to this. I guess this is an area where exploration companies must be investing heavily.

          • juumanistra

            The overwhelming bulk of the “[w]estern oil shale” Steve refers to is tied up in the Green River Formation, which been estimated to contain a “modest” 800 billion barrels of potentially extractable petroleum. The more optimistic estimates have pegged the magic number between 1,200 and 1,800 billion barrels. We’re talking about numbers comparable equal to or exceeding OPEC’s reserves. Things start getting a little silly at that point.

            All of that said, extraction remains the hard part, and the economics are barring serious state intervention. Then again, that also depends on who you talk to, as I’ve heard Shell say multiple times that they’ve managed to perfect a process for viable shale exploitation at ~$40-60/bbl.

  • weyland

    In my last paragraph: 24 million should have been 24 billion. And my 3 years number is based on a consumption of ~20 million barrels per day.

    • weyland

      …forgot Reply To This. D’oh.

  • jjhlh1

    just waiting to be tapped. This is such good news. And the global implications are enormous. We now import less than 50% of our oil, down from 66% two years ago. And by 2017, investment bank Goldman Sachs predicts the US could be poised to pass Saudi Arabia and overtake Russia as the world’s largest oil producer.

    The US could have 2 trillion barrels of oil waiting to be drilled. South America could hold another 2 trillion. And Canada? 2.4 trillion. That’s compared to just 1.2 trillion in the Middle East and north Africa.

    http://www.npr.org/2011/09/25/140784004/new-boom-reshapes-oil-world-rocks-north-dakota

  • cowboyjonw

    The other bad part of that is that the U.S. could be drawing billions into the royalties but this bunch does want to do it

  • Pingback: Handyortung