« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Canada to Kyoto: ‘Sayonara!’

On Monday, Canada’s Environment Minister Peter Kent announced that his country would exercise its legal option to end its participation in the Kyoto Protocols. The Protocols were a United Nations initiative, adopted in 1997 with a goal of rolling carbon dioxide emissions back to 1990 levels in an effort to stop Global Warming. Failure to meet those goals would incur stiff monetary penalties.

Canada will not meet its 2012 goal, so as a treaty member it would incur penalties of $14 billion in 2012, or $1,600 for every Canadian family. Kent characterized Kyoto as an “impediment”, citing the absence of the world’s two largest carbon-emitting countries, China and the U.S., from its membership.

(The United States never ratified the Kyoto Protocols. China was exempt from the penalties. China’s carbon emissions are now highest in the world, eclipsing U.S. emissions by nearly 50% in 2008.)

Canada Withdraws From Kyoto Protocol
(NYT link may require subscription/registration.)

“To meet the targets under Kyoto for 2012 would be the equivalent of either removing every car, truck, ATV, tractor, ambulance, police car and vehicle of every kind from Canadian roads or closing down the entire farming and agriculture sector and cutting heat to every home, office, hospital, factory and building in Canada,” Kent said. [Emphasis added.]

To quote Lloyd in Dumb and Dumber, “So you’re saying there’s a chance!”

[Prime Minister Stephen] Harper’s Conservative government is reluctant to hurt Canada’s booming oil sands sector, which is the country’s fastest growing source of greenhouse gases and a reason it has reneged on its Kyoto commitments.

Canada has the world’s third-largest oil reserves, more than 170 billion barrels. Daily production of 1.5 million barrels from the oil sands is expected to increase to 3.7 million in 2025. Only Saudi Arabia and Venezuela have more reserves. But critics say the enormous amount of energy and water needed in the extraction process increases greenhouse gas emissions.

Kent said Canada produces “barely 2 percent” of global emissions and said the previous Liberal government signed onto Kyoto in 1997 without any intention of meeting its targets.

But Canada’s population of 35 million is just 0.5% of global population, which makes them carbon hogs almost on a par with their neighbors in the U.S.

But wait; there’s still hope for the polar bears:

Kent’s announcement comes a day after marathon climate talks wrapped up in the South African port city of Durban.

Negotiators from nearly 200 countries agreed on a deal that sets the world on a path to sign a new climate treaty by 2015 to replace the first Kyoto Protocol, which expires at the end of next year.

Check out the coverage at wattsupwiththat.com.


Cross-posted at my blog.


COMMENTS

  • snowshooze

    Providing true leadership.

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    …that we never joined it in the first place.

  • sbm1

    In the wake of Fukushima, a reactionary Germany said they are going to close all their nuclear powerplants by 2022. They already shut 8 down.

    What does this mean…EON, as a major power company has already announced they are laying off 6000 people in Germany,a nd the other power companies will follow….

    It isn’t easy going green!

  • rickdeckard

    The developed nations in the west, and the US in particular, get efficient burns out of fossil fuels that engineers could only dream of 50 years ago. It was applied science that made reduced emissions from petroleum possible. Not a treaty, not some self appointed intergovernmental panel, but real science and engineering produced in laboratories owned by profit driven corporations.

    As long as our governments continue to agree to agree in principle while waffling on the details of their bogus contracts, the world will remain a safer place.

    Given the next generation of crazy talk coming out of the Durban conference, chances are good that Kyoto 2.0 will offer leaders even mo’ better reasons to reject it after their very public proclamations of support.

    • rickdeckard

      Market based solutions will also bring alternatives to petroleum on line with fewer disruptions to the global economy than any top down plan imposed by a New World Order. This will happen because of supply constraints on traditional energy sources, not because of an ongoing extortion scheme run by marxists operating out of the UN.

  • johnt

    Al Gore and the climate Religious media lay an egg.
    It’s one thing to insult skeptical indivduals for ignoring the “plain evidence”, a bit of crude name calling & insinuations of insanity, and who would no better than they, but an entire nation, and not the only one? Best to bury your head in the sand and not think bad thoughts. You can’t ask the Death Wish left to consider their fixations.

    • izoneguy

      • izoneguy

        • johnt

          If Newt gets the nomination I vote for him. As to who is preferable, I like Perry but things would be better absent his attacks of vapor lock. Yes, I would vote for him as well. I refer back to the garbage in the WH, to his party and the media, both doing their utterly destructive worst. and decisons come easier.