« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Offshore O&G Lease Sale: Small Companies Stay Away in Droves

On Wednesday of the week just past, the Department of the Interior conducted the first sale of oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico since BP’s Macondo oil spill. Measured by the statistics touted in Interior’s press release, the sale would appear to be a rousing success:

NEW ORLEANS – The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management announced that its Western Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas Lease Sale 218, held [December 14] in New Orleans, attracted $337,688,341 in high bids and included 20 companies submitting 241 bids on 191 tracts comprising over a million acres offshore Texas. The sum of all bids received totaled $712,725,998. This announcement is consistent with steps President Obama announced in May 2011 to expand domestic oil and gas production safely and responsibly.

By comparison, the previous Western Gulf sale, Sale 210 in August 2009, saw high bids totaling $115 million for 164 tracts. More money for more tracts: what’s not to like?

A detailed look at the leasing history, however, reveals a different story. While deepwater remains active, the shallow water Gulf saw little leasing action. Many of the shallow water bidders from recent sales stayed home for Sale 218.

Administratively, the Gulf of Mexico is carved into thousands of tracts or “blocks”. A typical block is 9 square miles. Leases for “open” (unleased) blocks are offered in sealed bid auctions, normally twice a year. The semiannual regularity of the sales was disrupted in 2010 by the Macondo spill.

Figure 1 shows the number of tracts receiving bids in the last three Western Gulf of Mexico sales, broken out to show the split by water depth. Sale 218 saw renewed interest in deepwater blocks (water depth greater than 500 feet), with 179 blocks receiving bids compared to 130 in the last pre-Macondo sale. Two companies, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil, accounted for 125 of those high bids.

But in the shallow waters of the “Shelf” (water less than 500 feet deep), only 12 blocks received bids, down from 34 in 2009 and 67 in 2008.

A similar trend is evident if we consider the number of companies bidding for operating rights on new leases (see Figure 2). In the 2008 sale, shallow water tracts drew bids from 32 companies. That number declined to 18 companies as oil and gas prices fell in 2009 from their 2008 peaks. But in 2011, only 8 companies bid for shallow water leases. The number of companies bidding on deepwater leases actually grew to 12.

“Big Oil” rules the deepwater. Shallow water has become the domain of smaller independent companies, many of them privately-held. None of the shallow water operators are household names; nonetheless, their jobs and capital investment supports the economies of several states across the region and contributes to the nation’s domestic energy supply.

Macondo was a deepwater event. Some 40,000 wells have been drilled on the Gulf of Mexico Shelf, and in the last 40 years the total volume spilled from Shelf wells, drilling and producing, is less than the Macondo well was probably spilling per day. The risk of deepwater operations is several orders of magnitude greater than on the Shelf, yet the regulatory regime is little different.

We should not be surprised to find that the burden of increased regulation in the offshore falls disproportionately on smaller operators. As they curtail their activity or focus their attention elsewhere, the shallow water drilling contractors and small service companies who work for the operators will feel the pain.

While it may be mature as an exploration province, the Gulf of Mexico Shelf remains an important storehouse of resources and a potential source of jobs. Regulatory overkill threatens to finish it off for good.

Cross-posted at my blog.


COMMENTS

  • DerKrieger

    …environmentalists and their water carriers in government.

    When will they be required to tell us what they are for rather than justo what they’re against?

    They hate oil yet they are unable to offer a viable alternative. Their hatred of fossil fuels is crippling our economy but they couldn’t care less.

    Who funds these groups? Other than us via the EPA.

    How can we fight them? How can we have their status as having standing removed so they can’t sue energy companies on our behalf?

    They have become enemies of free people.

    • ohiohistorian

      They love the Chevy Volt, powered by their beloved windmills and solar panels, until they are required to look at them off from their coast. Then they hate them also.

      Meanwhile, they fly their private jets around fueled with Big Oil’s product (to date, no fully bio-oil-derived kerosene has been qualified for flight), run their houses off from the grid while they pay “carbon collection” taxes (Al Gore pays them to Al Gore) and travel in gasoline (or occasionally diesel) limousines. That is why they are called limousine liberals.

      • funwithknives

        (repeatedly)The U S Navy is using yearly general funding, out of budget, to finance experimental Bio’s, and bring online Bio Fuels.
        Admittedly ,various demonstration flights have been flown using Kerosene and bio-, but they are just that; Demonstrations.
        Hard to figure out where these magic elixirs will come from, in the quantities needed.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      When will they be required to tell us what they are for rather than just what they?re against?

      As soon as they say what they’re for (central planning, collective ownership of capital & the dictatorship of the proletariat), some of us might point out that their goals sound mighty familiar.

    • 4perry

      We fight them by electing a man that knows what the problem is and will do something about it…..that being Govenor Rick Perry. His energy policy is what this country needs.