« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama Once Again Shifting the Blame on Gas Prices

This week, President Obama and Interior Secretary Salazar returned to familiar territory, once again chastising energy companies for maintaining an inventory of undrilled Federal leases.

Obama challenges oil companies to drill existing leases

WASHINGTON – The White House on Tuesday pushed back against the oil and gas industry’s claims that the Obama administration is blocking domestic energy development, releasing a new analysis showing that 46 million acres of federal lands and waters leased for drilling are sitting idle.

According to the Department of Interior report, oil and gas companies are actively drilling or have launched development on less than a third of the 36 million acres they have leased offshore, and on just over half of their onshore leases. …

With gasoline prices and the economy looming large at the ballot box this year, the administration has been emphasizing its commitment to an “all of the above” energy policy and especially touting its support for domestic natural gas production. …

“We continue to make millions of acres … available for safe and responsible domestic energy production on public lands and in federal waters,” said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in a statement. “We also want companies to develop the tens of millions of acres they’ve already leased but have left sitting idle.”

So shut up and drill the leases you already have!

In this post I will try to demonstrate just how disingenuous that position is.

Over at the website of energy consultant Wood Mackenzie, I found an oil and gas map of the Gulf of Mexico that will help illustrate my point:

Wood-Mackenzie Oil and Gas Map of the Gulf of Mexico (€675).

The red splotches are gas fields and the green blobs are oil fields. Pipelines are shown as lines. Now, it’s hard to make any sense of the Gulf-wide map above, so let’s consider a detail, roughly the area in the red box (each block on this map measures roughly 3 miles by 3 miles):Lo and behold, all acres were not created equal. Oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico province do not occur everywhere, but only where there is a serendipitous confluence of geologic factors: favorable structures, permeable rocks and some kind of trap to keep the oil or gas from escaping.

Other observations:

  • Most of the prominent and promising geologic features have already been drilled.The structural framework of the Gulf of Mexico is fairly well understood. Future drilling may find new fields in between the ones that have already been found, but in general they are deeper, less prominent, and more risky than the ones discovered earlier.
  • Something like 90% of the area is non-productive. If you blindly throw a dart at the map, 9 out of 10 times you will not strike oil or gas. Explorationists use highly detailed seismic surveys to gain a precise structural understanding of a prospective area. A 200 foot error in placement of a well could mean the difference between a discovery and a dry hole.
  • Given the current low market prices for natural gas, few operators are looking for gas prospects. That further limits the area which is prospective for oil, but many of those blocks containing gas prospects are already under lease. Those leases were entered into by the operator when the price of gas was much higher, but they are no longer economically attractive. They still count against the “undrilled leases” statistic.

Mark Green with the Energy Tomorrow blog had an informative post earlier this week that explains why industry needs a considerable inventory of undrilled leases to support its exploration effort. It is a given that many of the leases will ultimately never have any value, but without a crystal ball, it is impossible to tell the gems from the duds. While I would recommend that you read Mark’s post in its entirety, I will take the liberty of stealing a great graphic that depicts the “winnowing” process of sorting the best drillable prospects from a large inventory of prospect “ideas”:

Surely Messrs. Obama and Salazar are intelligent men. They are capable of understanding the information contained in this simple blog post. Moreover, many of the undrilled lease blocks that they complain about have been leased multiple times in the past.

Because it has been intensely drilled, we can make a reasonable good educated guess of how much oil and gas remain. What we don’t have a very good feel for is how much oil and gas there is on the 85% of the Outer Continental Shelf that President Obama and Secretary Salazar have no plans of opening for leasing. Until the day comes that those areas are opened for exploration and drilling actually occurs, we will have no way of knowing their true potential.

Mr. Green closes with a quote from Ken Cohen of ExxonMobil:

“It is hard to escape the conclusion that this study, along with the ‘use it or lose it’ legislation, is a thinly veiled political ploy … because there’s already a ‘use it or lose it’ law on the books. Politicians who don’t want to open up access to U.S. energy resources also don’t want to be blamed for high gas prices – so trying to convince Americans that oil companies are sitting on precious oil resources is their strategy. We’ve seen this before, and we’re seeing it again now.”

Cross-posted at stevemaley.com.


COMMENTS

  • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

    What happened to his claim to want to force energy prices to “necessarily rise”?

    Oh, those pesky unintended consequences…..

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      Obama needs someone to blame. It has nothing to do with actual drilling. He knows that the current pace of activity is about all you could expect from an area that has been open to leasing 20+ years.

      • APA Guy

        Here’s the other dirty little secret Obama’s people (and for reasons unknown, Republicans) don’t want you to know:

        New drilling leases on federal lands provide oil royalties…the #2 source of funding to the federal government (2nd to income taxes only).

        I thought big oil wasn’t paying its fair share? You’d think Obama would hand out new drilling leases and rake in the royalties…but no, he just wants someone to blame.

        Pathetic…both Obama for his deplorable tactics and Republicans for failing to point all this out.

      • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

        ….I was being snarky…. :P

  • westcoastpatriette

    As usual, nothing this administration says can be taken at face value, but one must dig to find the truth behind the rhetoric. Thanks for eye opener, Steve.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      … is that the vast majority of the “light blue” blocks are under lease.

      There are dots that look like a bulls-eye that indicate where dry holes have already been drilled.

  • http://conservativemormonmom.blogspot.com ew88

    I love seeing the hard data. Especially after the exposure a few months ago of Obama’s domestic oil exports in the past three years (found at CNN Money) at a time that our domestic gas prices are so high, one must wonder what Obama’s really going for. If he cared about the economy or jobs, he’d lift the oil-drilling moratorium on federal lands, accept Keystone, and allow domestic oil to be used domestically. Prices would plummet, we would have spending money! If on the other hand, this is about the environment as he’d like you to believe, why do you believe we’re saving the environment when we’re instead buying oil from distant, hostile, human-rights violating countries with less stringent environmental standards then our own? That doesn’t fly. It must be the ensuing economic hardship driving citizens of the United States to turn to their government instead of relying on themselves. He’s buying votes with dependency for his reelection, after which we’ll make a swift and seemingly natural transition to socialism despite the failure of socialism everywhere it’s been tried. Not that he doesn’t try to talk himself out of this, as you point out.
    www.conservativemormonmom.blogspot.com

  • Stan(ley) Pruss

    Is it known whether there is shale under the present drilling targets that might have trapped oil or gas?

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      Yes, there are plenty of shales in the Gulf of Mexico. I’m not sure if one can be singled out as the predominant source rock for the sandstone reservoirs.

      That’s one problem.

      The main issue is one of cost and economics. An onshore shale well costs ~$10 million. Economics are tight and depend on the wells producing for a very long time at low rates.

      An offshore well would cost at least 3 times as much, assuming you could operate off an existing platform. A new platform would add a lot more to the cost, and offshore operations are expensive. Usually you like to produce at high rates & get out, which is opposite the shale philosophy.

      Another issue: the onshore shale plays are producing much older rocks than exist at moderate depths offshore. Younger rocks do not have the strength of older rocks and probably would not frack as well.

      Offshore siltstones have been producing for many years. Shales are the finer grained cousins of siltstones; many of the rocks described as shales really have a significant content of silts and coarser grained material. Offshore silts haven’t needed horizontal wells, and offshore fracking can be quite expensive.

      • Stan(ley) Pruss

        When people claim that we will run out of hydrocarbons, even sfter we appear to know of centuries of shale on land, how much more may be available to the distant future with even better tools.

  • earlgrey

    I haven’t bought for a couple of weeks though.

    Aib on another forum was bragging about how oil drilling is higher under Obama than it was under bush. My answer to that was to remind her of the 10 year claim liberals use to say there is no point in drilling in new spots because it takes 10 yrs to benefit? Is that right? Is Obama seeing a be edit of bush’s policies here, and since when did liberals support driiling for oil?

    • Dave_A

      an insufficient number of refineries – one had to be shut down, and the supply of gas dropped.

      • acat

        Was paying $4.25/ga in Feb/March, paid $3.97/gal today.

        Decided to splurge and actually fill the truck, ‘stead of just putting in $50 at a time….

        Mew

      • citizenkh

        It really is the Continental Divide which makes the West Coast a different ballgame without onerous regs and taxes.

        You also need to remember (if you don’t already know) that you don’t just run any source or type of crude through any refinery. They are configured for years of operating on a certain window as to type of crude.

        California has depended on the high cost of dismantling a refinery and subsequent environmental cleanup (much of it caused by the Government during WWII) to keep them operating. Chevron has already paid an associate of mine to give them a cost for closure and removal of the one in El Segundo due the plethora of nuisance lawsuits and fines by local governments and environmentalists.

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      So if that’s “gone down”, well, … Most people would say that gasoline is still very high.

      World class fields can take 10 years or more to develop, that’s true.

      There are more rigs looking for oil now because the price of natgas is historically low relative to oil. Oil production is up entirely because of private initiatives on private lands under state jurisdiction. Nothing can be more misleading than Obama trying to take credit. Early in Obama’s Administration Tim Geithner referred to “overproduction” of oil as a bad thing. Their tax policies that they’ve attempted to implement are designed to cripple domestic exploration.

      So the sun still rises and the tides still ebb and flow — is that Obama’s doing too?

      • earlgrey

        It depends on who you ask. Thanks for the feedback.

      • acat

        “Boy, Obama sure does want to get re-elected, he’s gotten gas prices down.”

        Mew

        • westcoastpatriette

          I would have choked on that one and had a hard time keeping my mouth shut.

          • acat

            He’s a “the game is rigged, vote the bums out” type, so will be opposing Obama on that principle.

            It’s not a *great* reason to vote .. but it’s enough. I will keep working on him, though.

            Mew

          • citizenkh

            is not just about crude oil price and availability. It is also about logistics (availability and cost of transport with pipeline being preferred) and the refineries themselves. East Coast refineries WERE generally geared towards import of light sweet crude from the Middle East, North Sea and West Africa.

            Gulf and West Coast refineries are a mixed bag. A dozen & a half are very flexible and can refine very heavy (far less expensive crude) like that from Venezuela or Canada otherwise good for making asphalt. A few inland refineries have spent a ton of money over the last decade to enable them to refine cheaper Canadian crude.

      • citizenkh

        the cost of removing the production facilities after a field plays out.

      • romeg

        There was a noticeable increase in rainfall in the Southeast after Obama took office that, for a time, seemed to alleviate drought conditions.

        We are ever so grateful.

    • gekster

      nt

      • ohiohistorian

        Ever wonder why some states pay so much more for gasoline? For example, you go from NC to SC and the price drops dramatically. All I can say is, Utopia must be Really Expensive, man!

  • cwright2910

    Reminds me of the Peanuts cartoon where Lucy is holding the football for Charlie Brown… All BO wants is to buy time, and make the uninformed believe that he is doing something… If the Oil Companies think that he is actually serious, they’re not very smart… Go ahead Oil Companies, Kick the ball… I’ll hold it still for you… I promise…

  • renny

    prices as high as possible through Nov.

    • romeg

      and federal law will punish them if they do.

      • wumingren

        That’s part of the scheme that the Left tries to hide, that the law does not allow “Big Oil” to manipulate gas prices. The Left likes to make noises about those bad old oil companies messing with prices, and yet, those oil companies can’t do anything to oil prices but add or subtract the amount of oil that gets to market. Guess who plays the supply game to control prices. It’s OPEC and the other state-controlled oil suppliers.

  • thx1138v2

    Since our refineries are being shut down because it isn’t cost effective to implement the EPA’s new rules, it doesn’t much matter how much oil we have. We would just have to ship it overseas to be refined and then re-import the fuel products.

    Who you gonna blame that on, Mr Obama?

    • citizenkh

      refineries have shutdown because they are antiquated. Then there is all the new refining capacity which just recently came online in TX & LA. They can refine less expensive more difficult crude oil such as from Venezuela or Canada which East Coast refineries cannot.

      • citizenkh

        by law the oil crude oil which can be exported is that produced from Alaska.

    • btpull

      and it would create domestic economic activity

    • wumingren

      I have often said that Canada should just flip us the middle part of the maple leaf for our refusal to build the Keystone Pipeline, and just go ahead and build a refinery right there. Then, instead of pumping crude oil to us, the ship refined gasoline, diesel, heating oil, etc., as a value-added product, thereby keeping all the profit and jobs for themselves. I wouldn’t play the game Obama wants to play at all.

  • ombd

    ‘Shifting the Blame’ may become the epitaph for his Administration. Particularly since now Obama’s started blaming the voters … again. Now I wonder how that might work out in November … http://bit.ly/qVdDUt

  • romeg

    have been blaming the voters ever since the elections in November 2010.

    They rail against the “Tea Party Republicans” as if some faction had suddenly infested the House of Representatives when, in reality, “The People Have Spoken” is the only thing that happened.

    Even Deep Royal Blue Massachusetts elected a Wascally Wepublican to “Ted Kennedy’s Seat”. And, disappointing though he might have been in the interim, I believe we should do all we can to help him keep that seat from being occupied by the epitome of Nanny-State government, Elizabeth Warren, aka “Pauwau” [http://www.20000-names.com/female_native_american_names_2.htm]

  • freedomfighter21

    From Washington to bush, every president had it hard. All of them had issues, laws, and regulations, and obstacles that in their opinion were executed thee wrong way by the president before. And all but 2, Carter and Obama, never blamed anyone, they just took it upon themselves to fix it. Obama has to blame someone, otherwise America will know who is at fault. He has had the opportunities to fix our energy problems and have yet to execute any logical plans. With the election near he must lie, deceive, blame, and evolve his ideas to gain voters.

    • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

      So that is what Obama has instead of testicles

      • edintexas

        NT

    • Dave_A

      And only Obama has whined about it…

      Reagan inherited the Carter Recession (with associated inflation and obscene gold-price bubble)….

      Bush Sr inherited the S&L meltdown (and saw it resolved in a very TARP-like manner)….

      BJ inherited the 1992 recession from Bush Sr

      W Bush inherited the 2000 recession/dot-com-bomb from BJ

      And Obama inherited the great housing meltdown from every president since Carter who failed to reform the GSEs and fix the CRA.

      Only Obama has whined about it – the other Presidents just fixed it according to their various ideologies…

      • uselogic

        By 1992, U.S. was fully out of the recession with every quarter of 1992 turning in at or above 4% GDP growth. A fact, unfortunately, lost on a 62% of the population.

        Including a lot of friends I tried to point this out to. Emotion over logic.

  • ohiohistorian

    A guy is walking around looking for something under a street light. His friend comes up and asks him what he lost. He says his wedding ring. After 10 minutes of additional looking, the friend asks him “where did you lose it”? The guy points to a place about 50 feet down the dark street. His friend then asks “Why are you looking here, then?” The response is “because the light’s better”.

    Obama wants the industry to drill where the government has offered leases, not where the trained geologists believe there to be oil.

    President 0 is now a Constitutional scholar, a noted economist (Keynesian, of course) and now a petroleum geologist. Got all of this in law school at Harvard, and we as a country should be grateful that he is so smart .

    • funwithknives

      but you just ‘may’ have unintentionally not included a few of Barry’s other specialties.
      To wit:
      Biblical Scholar
      Diabetes amputation specialist.
      Foreign Relations expert , ‘par excellance’
      Automotive Maintenance Technician.
      Historical savant
      Insurance Actuary
      Multi-Cultural Consultant,and Advisor
      ….and a real whiz at malaprops, in Geographic names and such.

      {Sorry ,…ran out/losing interest……..}

      .

      • ohiohistorian

        We need to keep remembering what a multi-talented President we have. Thank you for clarifying the list. I invite other clarifications as well.

        • uselogic

          Also:
          Ocean rise abater
          Planet healer

  • commonsenseobserver

    Was because drivers decided not to fill their tanks as much as before due to skyrocketing prices, leading to demand being balanced with supply again?

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

    • http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php kralizec

      When prices on any good reach a certain level there is a natural reduction in the use of that product. In the case of something as critical as gasoline where there are arguably no economically viable alternatives, it is often expressed through a reduction of recreational travel by retail consumers and better logistical planning on the part of commercial consumers.

  • ihateliberals

    taking it away from him. It is an election year and Obama subscribes to “All is fair in love and war” war being Politics. Just one more diversion to try to throw the voters off guard. The weak ones will fall prey to this, that is the shame of it.

  • rightlane1111

    Do you all remember when oil was selling on the NYSE for $150 a barrel and the gasoline price was $4.05. Now oil on the NYSE is around $93-95 after Bolling/Palin exposed speculation without margin and of course Obama took credit for it…but I digress. My gas is $3.45…so I save 60 cents per gallon and a barrel went down $57 dollars?

    What I am asking is this…when the NYSE was registering a price of between $93-95….I was buying gas for under $3.00 per gallon???

    • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

      According to the Energy Infromation Administration,

      In July of 2008, the national average retail price of gasoline was $4.062/gal. 75.8% of that cost ($3.08) was the cost of the crude oil. The other components of the pump price were refining 3.2% ($0.13), distribution and marketing 11.2% ($0.45) and taxes 9.8% ($0.40).

      In the most recent month, March 2012, the price was $3.852. Crude oil was 65.7% ($2.60) of the retail price, refining 15.7% ($0.60), D&M 5.9% ($0.23) and taxes 10.8% ($0.42).

      Crude oil is traded on the NYMEX, not the NYSE.

      The price usually reported is the West Texas Intermediate benchmark. It is currently trading at a discount to Brent Crude, an international benchmark. Nationwide, refineries paid an average $115/bbl for crude oil. Most of the refineries are on seacoasts, so they pay something closer to the world price, not WTI.

      • http://libertynews.com/ mbecker908

        refining jumped by a factor of 4.6??

        Shale?

        • http://stevemaley.com Steve Maley

          The total downstream cost (refining plus distribution & mktg) is $0.83 vs $0.58. Don’t know what accounts for the change.

          But I notice that in Dec 2011 on that same table that refining margin was -1.5%. Obviously it’s a number that fluctuates a lot.

          Refining is normally considered the low-margin end of the business.

          • acat

            refinery shutdowns earlier this year? ISTR* 4 in the northeast that were “no longer economically viable”.

            I *also* recall, a couple years back, a big local (Chicago area) stink over BP’s plan to do more refining at their Indiana plant, with the result that additional ammonia would end up in Lake Michigan. (my mechanic refuses to buy BP to this day…)

            IIRC **, the Chicago tempest resolved when one of the state schools gave BP a process to extract the ammonia – gratis – and BP promised to use it. I’m going out on a limb and guessing that “using the process” isn’t as cost-effective as dumping whatever compound contains the ammonia …

            Mew

            * I Seem To Recall
            ** If I Recall Correctly

    • rightlane1111

      I do know that it is not traded on the NYSE.,,,,but when I check my stocks…what is going on…I always look at the price or oil/gold/bonds and money ratio. Sorry…I should have said financial page…where it is all balled up into one.

  • Pingback: Gregg Haye

  • Pingback: Isaac Fegurgur

  • Pingback: Charles Wish

  • Pingback: Claud Sabino

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: commercial cleaning company

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Auto Forum

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes de moda

  • Pingback: noclegi zakopane

  • Pingback: skype pobierz

  • Pingback: Serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: wzór cv

  • Pingback: wedding hairstyle

  • Pingback: camping essentials

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: Fischfutter

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes recien nacidos

  • Pingback: แทงบอล

  • Pingback: กล้องวงจรปิด

  • Pingback: προσφορές επίπλων

  • Pingback: Links Eintragen

  • Pingback: Mining

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay L.A, CA

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: musica cristiana de 33 dc

  • Pingback: LawCrossing

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis nueva

  • Pingback: important site

  • Pingback: ps3

  • Pingback: florida foreclosure attorney

  • Pingback: kozmetika

  • Pingback: payday loans online

  • Pingback: Fusevision.com.sg

  • Pingback: at Msn

  • Pingback: publicado aquí

  • Pingback: furniture reglue

  • Pingback: Video on Demand

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: I was scanning this

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: crown molding for kitchen cabinet tops kissimmee

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: florida no fault car insurance

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: mobile phone advertising

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: randka

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: Power Point

  • Pingback: steveclarksondreammaker

  • Pingback: http://www.aprilshowersmovie.com/2009/01/16/april-showers-behind-the-scenes-swat-entry/

  • Pingback: landlord report property management software

  • Pingback: find virgin olive oil for cooking

  • Pingback: jewellery stores

  • Pingback: online payday loans instant approval

  • Pingback: read what he said

  • Pingback: scrapebox how to use

  • Pingback: Pop Over To This Website

  • Pingback: article

  • Pingback: lcd screen

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: Britt Unkn

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: Arkadas Ara

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: najlepsza randka

  • Pingback: advice

  • Pingback: online payday loan

  • Pingback: Mining Technology

  • Pingback: Audrey Diaz

  • Pingback: drycleaner

  • Pingback: starwars7

  • Pingback: partnership

  • Pingback: wedding planner italy

  • Pingback: made your mood

  • Pingback: madden 13 guide

  • Pingback: Spyware

  • Pingback: the intensive report

  • Pingback: twitter funny

  • Pingback: internetten

  • Pingback: Genevieve

  • Pingback: Thanksgiving Day

  • Pingback: spectrum investment advisors

  • Pingback: Terence Macoreno

  • Pingback: Darwin Glatt

  • Pingback: Justa Andrews

  • Pingback: alfileres de boda

  • Pingback: Fisher Review

  • Pingback: go these

  • Pingback: Diseño web

  • Pingback: ps3

  • Pingback: Franklin

  • Pingback: Ignacio Godeaux

  • Pingback: It Gives you nutrients from 17 fruits

  • Pingback: Bari

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: las vegas bankruptcy law firm

  • Pingback: norwegian casino

  • Pingback: ecommerce service in delhi

  • Pingback: xenon

  • Pingback: honda 400ex specs

  • Pingback: keto diet

  • Pingback: Gaylord