Generally speaking, it seems, watching a celebrity try to process world events is like watching a chicken try to drive a car — they just can’t do it.
Case in point: Anne Hathaway.
In July, Anne took to Instagram to comment on the tragic murder of a woman who happened to be black. She took the opportunity to teach all white people about their privilege (here):
“The murder of Nia Wilson- may she rest in the power and peace she was denied here- is unspeakable AND MUST NOT be met with silence. She is not a hash tag; she was a black woman and she was murdered in cold blood by a white man. White people- including me, including you- must take into the marrow of our privileged bones the truth that ALL black people fear for their lives DAILY in America and have done so for GENERATIONS. White people DO NOT have equivalence for this fear of violence. Given those givens, we must ask our (white)selves- how ‘decent’ are we really? Not in our intent, but in our actions? In our lack of action?”
Therefore, all white people have power and privilege, and all fearing-for-their-lives black people do not.
Such comments by a white celebrity only serve to suggest that they 1) Have never known poor whites and 2) Don’t associate with any black colleagues (who are, of course, powerful and privileged).
Anne, by the way, is worth $35 million.
In response to the storming of the border Sunday, she provided analysis on Instagram:
“My country gassed children.”
Oh, boy. Here we go.
“There are words for my horror. To those who will immediately speak of ‘doing it the right way,’ who will ‘blame the parents for putting the children in this position,’ or say ‘they were storming the wall,’ and ‘they were throwing rocks’: the only human response to this monstrous use of force against LEGAL asylum seekers- against children- is condemnation, shame, and rage. For those that still believe in voting for the man who recommended using lethal force on families fleeing violence and persecution: this is the policy you like?”
View this post on Instagram
My country gassed children. There are no words for my horror. To those who will immediately speak of “doing it the right way”, who will “blame the parents for putting the children in this position”, or say “they were storming the wall”, and “they were throwing rocks”: the only human response to this monstrous use of force against LEGAL asylum seekers- against children- is condemnation, shame, and rage. For those that still believe in voting for the man who recommended using lethal force on families fleeing violence and persecution: this is the policy you like? @nytimes
Firstly, of course, Anne’s country did not “gas” children. Its officers threw canisters which emit unpleasant fumes and work to disperse crowds — in this case, a mob attempting to storm the U.S. border. “Gassing” is what the Germans murderously did to Jews in the Holocaust. Compared to that, tossing a canister of irritating smoke outside in order to break up a horde (here) is like farting in an elevator.
Here are a few other points:
- All of Anne’s phrases in quotes are actually correct.
- Tossing canisters of tear gas is not force. It makes the air unpleasant, and makes people skedaddle.
- They are not asylum seekers. According to left-wing MSNBC, “Some of them may be eligible for asylum in the United States, but they are in the minority of this caravan” (here).
- Storming our border is not a “legal” act.
- I’ve said before that politics is largely one giant straw man argument. And Anne can’t spin it into gold. The answer to her question, “For those that still believe in voting for the man who recommended using lethal force on families fleeing violence and persecution: this is the policy you like?” is simple. How can people support a man who recommended using lethal force on families fleeing violence and persecution? That’s easy — He didn’t do that:
- He didn’t “recommend” using lethal force — he gave approval to use lethal force if there is no other way, and he specified that he hopes it doesn’t come to that (here).
- They aren’t families. As per Fox News, “The total number of migrants in Tijuana alone break down this way: 6,062 total, comprising of 3,877 men, 1,127 women and 1,058 children.”
- As already mentioned, the vast majority of them aren’t “fleeing violence and persecution.”
The real world tried to reach out to Anne on Instagram:
“And I will vote for this man again!! You sound pathetic!!”
“I see quite a number of people in that picture who aren’t running. And yes, this is the policy I like. Storming the borders and assaulting officers is not the way you show another country you will respect its laws.”
“Cry me a river already. Shame on the parents who would drag their children over 1,000 miles on an assumption. Since you’re so outraged, why don’t you let them stay at your house??? Typical Hollywood. All talk, zero action.”
“Hilarious. Please send an invite to all these invaders.”
“Well how about we just send all of them to your house?”
“Do you slap yourself to sleep at night? Asking for a friend.”
One response was particularly good, recalling a certain 1993 Texas tragedy:
“It is the parents’ fault for putting their kids in harm’s way, knowing they were criminally trying to enter America illegally. Go study history as well! Clinton and Obama sued tear gas big time on kids…Clinton did it in Waco as part of the Waco massacre and Obamas did it dozens of times!! Two-faced morals much?”
Perhaps Anne — who I like in movies — should just enjoy her $35 million. But if she wants to take a trip to the border and show ’em how things are done, there’s a limo waiting. With a rooster as chauffeur. Cock-a-doodle-doofus.
Find all my RedState work here.
Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below. For iPhone instructions, see the bottom of this page.
If you have an iPhone and want to comment, select the box with the upward arrow at the bottom of your screen; swipe left and choose “Request Desktop Site.” You may have to do this several times before the page reloads. Scroll down to the red horizontal bar that says “Show Comments.”