Hillary Clinton smiles as she is introduced at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., Friday, May 25, 2018. Harvard University’s Radcliffe Institute honored Clinton with the 2018 Radcliffe Medal. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)
Democrat politicos, liberal commentators and the mainstream media all love to gush about the supposed political savvy of Hillary Clinton, but those of us in the cheap seats who marvel at her uncanny ability stick her foot in her mouth at every opportunity see things from a much more realistic perspective.
She did it again this week, but first let’s look at some prior examples of Clinton’s “foot in mouth” tendencies in action.
Over the last several months, she’s said a number of things that caused the irony meter to explode. For example, in April after the release of the Mueller report, she stated anyone else “certainly would have been indicted” if they had been caught doing the type of things Trump had been alleged of doing (newsflash: she skated for her wrongdoing in 2016).
In recent weeks, Clinton has had the audacity to lecture people against “witness intimidation” in the midst of speculation that Clinton pal Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself (some have suggested the Clinton machine had a hand in his death). And just last week when the articles of impeachment were announced, Clinton tweeted that “no one is above the law”, which left a lot of people scratching their heads considering the laundry list of things she’s gotten away with.
So with all that in mind, it should be no surprise whatsoever to anyone that Clinton took to the Twitter machine Thursday to promote a liberal website devoted to trying to prove President Trump asked for foreign interference in advance of the 2020 elections:
Make sure your family and friends see the evidence for themselves:
The president asked a foreign power to interfere in the 2020 election for his own political gain.
Americans deserve free and fair elections. He must be held accountable. https://t.co/ul8GzrsOKG
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 12, 2019
But her latest lecture on Trump’s alleged impeachable offenses rang hollow with people who are more than familiar with her checkered political history:
Instead of sending everyone to a propaganda site, why don't you email your friends and family the IG report which shows that you paid a British Spy to gather bullshit from a foreign power to influence the 2016 election…
but still lost.
— Carpe Donktum🔹 (@CarpeDonktum) December 12, 2019
At least he didn’t sell them any uranium.
— Gerard Batten (@GerardBattenUK) December 12, 2019
Who paid for the Steele dossier?
— The Rave (@DaveTheRaveV) December 12, 2019
Should you be held accountable for rigging the Democrat primary against Bernie Sanders in 2016?
— Daniel Bostic (@debostic) December 12, 2019
— Manny Gonzalez (@Magonzal4279) December 12, 2019
Beyond all of that, Clinton has literally spent the last 3 years trying to discredit Trump’s election victory by alleging that he’s an illegitimate president, much in the same way liberals treated George W. Bush after the 2000 elections. Undermining election results without evidence simply because you can’t handle the fact that you lost is interference in its own right, no matter how much liberals want to claim otherwise.
When it comes to the impeachment inquiry process and election integrity, Clinton really should sit such debates out. But she can’t, because more than anyone else on the left TDS consumes her. So much so that she still hasn’t ruled out challenging him again in 2020.
Do yourself a big favor, Hillary Clinton. Don’t go away mad. Just go away.