AP featured image
File – In this Dec. 8, 2014, file photo, Sister Loraine Marie Maguire, of Little Sisters of the Poor, speaks to members of the media after attending a hearing in the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in Denver, Colo. Attorneys for Little Sisters of the Poor and four Oklahoma Christian colleges announced Thursday, July 23, 2015 that they will appeal the previous week’s ruling from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver that found that President Obama’s health care law adequately protects them from having to provide coverage of contraception for their employees. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, file)

One of the many odious parts of Obama’s Affordable Care Act was his administration’s attempt to use health care, particularly women’s health care, as a cudgel to demolish any organized opposition to abortion or contraception. Under the guise of defining minimum benefits required to be offered by health insurance plans, abortion and contraception were baked in.

For instance, employers were required to provide women with ‘preventive care and screenings’ without ‘any cost-sharing requirements.’ Fair enough, you might say, but it went on to charge the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) with the responsibility of determining what that ‘care and screenings’ looked like. No huge shock when it was ruled that access to birth control pills was essential preventive care.

In light of the Burwell  v.  Hobby  Lobby  Stores decision, which ruled that forcing employers to provide birth control coverage potentially violated the First Amendment, the Obama administration constructed a test to be used by employers seeking the exemption to comply with the SCOTUS decision. Churches automatically received an exemption, religious orders did not but they could ‘self certify.’ The Catholic religious order, the Little  Sisters of the Poor, refused to self-certify:

They challenged the self-certification accommodation, claiming that completing the certification form would force them to violate their religious beliefs by “tak[ing] actions that directly cause others to provide contraception or appear to participate in the Departments’ delivery scheme.” Id., at 1168. As a result, they alleged that the self-certification accommodation violated RFRA.

The Trump administration promulgated a policy exemption that allowed the order to avoid either providing contraceptive coverage or self-certifying. The Little Sisters were happy but the Pennsylvania state government wasn’t. It filed suit and a pro-abort federal judge ruled that the exemption was illegal and…wait for it…issued a nationwide injunction. The federal government appealed to the Third Circuit and New Jersey joined the lawsuit also demanding that an order of celibate religious women be required to purchase health insurance that provided contraceptive coverage. The Third Circuit agreed with Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Today the US Supreme Court, in a 7-2 ruling, (read the decision here) affirmed that the Trump administration had the authority to make the exemption.

“We are overjoyed that, once again, the Supreme Court has protected our right to serve the elderly without violating our faith,” said Mother Loraine Marie Maguire of the Little Sisters of the Poor, whose employees work in the group’s facilities. “Our life’s work and great joy is serving the elderly poor and we are so grateful that the contraceptive mandate will no longer steal our attention from our calling.”

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement that the decision was “a big win for religious freedom and freedom of conscience.”

“Since Day One, the Trump Administration has sought to lift burdens on religious exercise for people of all faiths,” she said, adding the administration would work to allow “women who lack access to contraceptive coverage because of their employer’s religious beliefs or moral convictions to more easily access such care” through federal programs.

The decision is potentially much broader than just a single order of nuns.

The critical thing about the decision is that you are presumed to be acting in accordance with your faith, you don’t have to prove it to the satisfaction of some fat fascist pro-abort in some government agency. And as to Ginsburg’s statement, there is literally no countervailing right or interest that involves contraception when it comes into conflict with an enumerated right.

This is going to be portrayed as some Romney-esque ‘war on women’ but it is a positive development in restoring the right of Americans to live their faith rather than reducing, as Obama tried to do, faith to some sort of cultural artifact that could be harnessed for purposes of political identity but which was not lived at all.

streiff
Managing Editor at RedState
Former infantry officer, CGSC grad and Army Operations Center alumnus.
RedState member since 2004.
polite emails to [email protected] Jerk emails will be blocked.
Follow me on Twitter
Read more by streiff