« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Today in Washington – May 12, 2010

Solicitor General Elena Kagan will be making some house calls for one-on-one courtesy meetings with Senators.  I can’t tell you how many times over the past two days I hear conservatives say “yeah, Kagan is bad, but if she is defeated or withdrawn, we will get somebody worse.”  As many teams are finding out right now in the NBA and NHL playoffs, never look past the team you are playing today to prepare for an opponent in the next round you may not face.  LeBron James of the Cleveland Cavs is finding that out the hard way right now – Go Celtics.

Today in the Senate will continue amending the Financial Deform bill,  S.3217 – ObamaBailout 2.0, and votes are expected throughout the day.  According to Congressional Quarterly (Subscription Required) other issues coming up today are a House vote on satellite TV, an African rebel Army bill and a science/technology bill.  The House will mark up the 2011 DOD Authorization bill in committee.  The Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill and Global Warming legislation will also be high on the agenda of Washington insiders. 

Issues to watch today:

  • Elena Kagan – The White House propaganda machine is in full force and they want you to believe that the left is upset with the nomination of Elena Kagan to make her look more centrist to Senators.  Politico reports today “if President Obama wanted to energize the dispirited left wing of his party, he picked the wrong woman: Chicago federal judge Diane Wood was the darling of many progressives. Liberals are likely to rally around Kagan when she comes under attack – but the left’s response so far has been mixed, muted and skeptical. So slim is her public record, higher-ups at MoveOn.org have been prevailing on lawmakers to grill Kagan about her views during private one-on-one meetings to ensure she’s not a stealth conservative, according to staffers.”  Is there any reasonable belief that Kagan is a “stealth conservative?”  It is more likely that Kagan is a stealth left winger who will be a rubber stamp for Obama Administrative challenges before the high court.  You have to remember that Kagan is Obama’s Solicitor General right now and there is not much of a paper record to judge Kagan’s views on her judicial philosophy.  If President Obama nominated her, he is confident that she is not a “stealth conservative.”  Sadly, it appears that these private, non-transparent, one-on-one meetings with liberal Senators will lead to private assurances from Kagan that she is a staunch liberal.  If liberal Senators do not come out of these one-on-one meetings with concerns — then conservatives should be concerned.
  • Don’t Drill Baby Drill- The Kerry-Lieberman Global Warming bill dramatically scaled back compromise language negotiated by Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to open up more offshore oil drilling.  The Hill reports today that “the authors have included new protections to appease several coastal-state Democrats who ramped up their opposition in the wake of last month’s spill, including a provision that allows states to veto drilling plans under certain conditions.”  The released draft “requires greenhouse gas reductions while offering major new incentives for nuclear power, coal, natural gas and offshore drilling.”  This bill has moved to the left and it seems difficult for the Senate to pass a Global Warming bill in the wake of the ClimateGate and the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
  • Financial Services Deform – Senator John McCain’s (R-AZ) amendment to end government support of government sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, failed on a 43-56 vote.  How a comprehensive financial reform bill can pass without addressing the crony capitalism, private profits and taxpayer funded debt, of Fannie and Freddie shows that the elite in Washington will do anything to protect one of the enterprises that helped cause the 2008 meltdown on Wall Street.  Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) is working on a managers package of secretly negotiated amendments to the bill for consideration at the end of the process. Complete work on the bill is not expected to meet Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-NV) deadline of this Friday and this bill most likely will still be on the Senate floor next week.

COMMENTS

  • Bill S

    The Democrats are going to get their way on a court nomination eventually, no matter what we do (unless, of course, they were to nominate a child rapist or something…) So I see no productive reason to put a hard-core press on to oppose Kagan. Yeah, she’s probably going to be a problem for us on the court for decades to come. But what are the odds of getting anyone better? It appears “next to none”. I hear what you’re saying on the “don’t look past”, but this is the difference between strategy and tactics – you can’t just act tactically…you must have a strategy that covers the current situation and the situations to come.

    Regarding Obama’s SCOTUS nominees, I believe we should assess where they stand on the “unacceptable spectrum” and act upon that. In this case, Kagan seems to be somewhere in the middle – certainly not acceptable by conservative standards, but we are not going to get someone who IS acceptable on that standard, period. Therefore, the lesser of two evils seems to be the proper course of action. At this point, based on the sketchy bits of info that are available, Kagan seems to fall in that category.

    I don’t have a problem with the GOP putting up something of an objection to her. But I think a drawn out, “bloody” fight against Kagan stands to do more harm than good.

    • bantamwait

      Defeating Kagan may be the way to go. But we need to have a STRATEGY–to think more than one move ahead. Brian, tell me WHY we must oppose Kagan (given Bill’s point that somebody is going to get confirmed eventually), and WHAT the game plan should be once she is defeated. msctex (below) has an inkling of a strategy, which is better than nothing, but I’m not convinced.

  • swami7774

    Especially the “go Celtics” part!

  • Achance

    that Tim Gill has spent on gay rights advocacy and associated left wing candidates over the last several years. This is the payback to the gays and NO Democrat will say a discouraging word about her. It is also highly unlikely that there will be any spirited Republican opposition in the Senate because they don’t want to be facing an opponent with the kind of money that will be focussed on anyone who stands in the way of the gays getting “their” SC justice.

    If you don’t know who Gill is, you should and can start here: http://www.gillfoundation.org/about/

    And that’s just one of the interlocked groups.

  • msctex

    “I can?t tell you how many times over the past two days I hear conservatives say ?yeah, Kagan is bad, but if she is defeated or withdrawn, we will get somebody worse.?

    The above is the logic of a different sort of mind. The Progressive/Liberal mind operates in a constant state of desperation, as deep down, it knows it can only get away with this nonsense for so long. Experience has taught them they are always run out of town on a rail. So, they will put forth the most damaging, destructive affront to common sense they can FIRST, such as the notion of a Supreme Court Judge with no judicial experience. It is the thinking if a mind with nothing to lose, and no real concern for how much damage it does. Just apply “What the hell? What have we got to lose?” to every decision, and you can think the way these people do, and accurately predict their next move.

    These are the death throes of an entire school of thought, and it is not going down without a fight. We just need to be constantly aware honor and integrity were washed away from their thought processes, necessarily, long ago.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    Is it feasible by the legislative calendar, for Rs to fight, stall, and argue the confirmation into the fall, such that if Kagan is defeated or becomes unconfirmable it would be impossible to get a replacement through the process before the next Senate is seated?