« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Reid Wants to Attach Export-Import Bank Provision to Bipartisan Jobs Bill

Last week, the House passed a slam-dunk jobs bill (H.R. 3606) 390-23.  The bill reduces red tape, securities regulations, and reporting requirements on small companies that desire to go public.  It also eliminated some of the new regulations implemented under Dodd-Frank and Sarbanes-Oxley on companies that generate less than $1 billion in annual revenue.  With all the unctuous complaints about partisanship, one would expect the Senate to harness this rare opportunity to work together and pass the bill expeditiously.  With Harry Reid in charge of the Senate, all bets are off.

Reid announced that he would bring the House bill to the floor, but would attempt to attach a non-germane amendment to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank, which expires May 31, through 2015 and raise its loan limit from $100 billion to $140 billion.  He is taking a no-brainer bill and sinking it with a poison pill.  What’s worse, the consideration of the House jobs bill was supposed to be the prize to Republicans for agreeing not to block Obama’s judicial nominees that are being rammed through the Senate in short order.

Unfortunately, the Ex-Im corporate welfare bank is not necessarily a poison pill for many Republicans.  In typical pale-pastel fashion, House leaders planned to bring a separate Ex-Im bill to the floor that would enact one-year reauthorization at $113 billion.

At a time when we are fighting against Obama’s corporate welfare, why are we picking winners and losers in the market by extending taxpayer loans to entities that are too risky to receive private-sector loans?  When we are scouring Obama over his loans to failed solar energy companies, why are we agreeing to expand the Fannie Mae of corporate welfare?

Republicans must call out Harry Reid for his duplicity and must stand united against the Ex-Im Bank reuthorization.

COMMENTS

  • dajeeps

    Curious about this because there’s a possibility that the Fed has banks so buggered up with IOR/IOeR (interest on reserves and excess reserves) that confidence in more ordinary kinds of financing is low. The situation in Europe doesn’t look promising either. They might be able to get loans from Asia or Australia, maybe. I’m just speculating, however. I haven’t seen any data on the kinds of loans banks here are making and just going with a gut instinct based on what info I have available, which is non-specific. It’s worth some investigation because the last thing we need would be to depress trade by not re-authorizing, at least for a short term, if there is any reality there.

    Harry Reid is generally full of crap, but on this topic, I can’t be certain.

    • up2news

      Great info here: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Margaret/My%20Documents/Ex-Im%20Bank.htm

      It states that it is of no cost to taxpayers. Wonder how they give the loan if not with our money – oh I forgot they print it.

      This is as dangerous a bank as the World Bank and the Federal Reserve. We need to kick them all out.

      • up2news

        Found this on search: Ex-Im Bank

        BACKGROUND:

        What is Ex-Im Bank? Ex-Im Bank is an independent federal agency that helps create and maintain U.S. jobs by filling gaps in private export financing at no cost to American taxpayers. The Bank provides a variety of financing mechanisms, including working capital guarantees, export-credit insurance, and financing to help foreign buyers purchase U.S. goods and services.

        Ex-Im Bank operates without taxpayer funding and earns revenue that helps reduce the deficit. By charging fees and interest on all loan-related transactions, Ex-Im Bank is self-sustaining and is able to cover all operation costs and potential losses while also producing revenue. The Bank has generated $3.4 billion for U.S. taxpayers over the past five years.

        Export financing helps create or save American jobs. In fiscal year 2010, Ex-Im Bank authorized a record high of approximately $24.5 billion in loans, guarantees and insurance, (including $5 billion for small businesses) supporting an estimated 230,000 American jobs at 3,300 American companies.

        There is a lot more but I love the fact that they are self sustaining – why do they need a loan then?

        • dajeeps

          No doubt.

          The Ex-Im bank probably got seed money when it was established and makes loans on the basis of fractional reserve, like any other bank. It can go along fine until it starts taking losses that exceed revenue/assets. At that point it can get a bailout from the Fed, or the taxpayers are on the hook, because it is a government bank. In other words, it doesn’t become a tax liability until that point.

          The problem with these banks, in general, is that they can turn into giant slush funds that enable crony capitalism. The loans Solyandra got were through a government bank like this one that the Dept. of Energy is allowed to use. In theory, it isn’t a bad idea, they just end up abused.

          It’s not that am for keeping these kinds of banks. In fact, I favor shutting them all down. I just question the timing for this particular one, that’s all. There are plenty of people who want things like this to change, like yesterday, and I don’t blame them. I just don’t want to end up cutting off our nose to spite our face in the short run. I’d rather keep some of the stuff that might be doing some good for the time being and plan to phase them out as our financial system starts to heal so it can take up the slack.

  • iluvit

    If it were so great he would put it up to stand on it’s own merit rather than attach it as a poison pill. What are you thinking? You seem to be saying that this stimulus or this pork is ok and this or that pork is not. If you just remember to let free market forces rule things will be just fine. If a loan is too risky, then it should not be made.

    • dajeeps

      that we just went through next to the mother of all financial crises, second only to what happened in1931. Since the Fed sterilized all the extra reserves it created by paying interest on both required and excess reserves, paying them to hold onto money, and they are; and our economy is quite a mess, it seems like the prudent thing to do to at least look at what that bank is doing before tossing it in the dust bin.

      Excuse me for being rational and wanting to see the facts about what we’re talking about before taking everything at face value.

  • SFDennis

    I agree, they must. But when have they shown the backbone to do what they must do?

  • johnt

    At times, many times, I think all too many Reublicans are naive to the point of the absurd. Reid may fear the jobs bill due to it’s working , having a positive effect. R’s may receive credit if and when it does & just as important, believe it, it will deprive him & Democrats in general of one more opportunity of causing pain. That’s in line with Obama & more than a few of their policies.

  • http://teresainfortworth.wordpress.com/ Teresa in Fort Worth, TX

    …that’s what they do…..