« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Don’t Tell the NRA, but Fred Upton is Anti-Gun

As we noted last week, Fred Upton is not running on his record as a moderate Republican in the August 7 primary against Jack Hoogendyk.  He is eschewing decades’ worth of big government values so he can hold onto his seat in Congress.

One of the most common stratagems employed by moderate Republicans (and Democrats) in an effort to ingratiate themselves to conservative voters is to tout their support from the NRA.  In May, Fred Upton sent out mailers, which were overtly political (with his congressional Frank), that flaunted his credentials as an A rated pro-gun congressman from the NRA.  The mailers reveal the vacuous content of Upton’s record, as well as the foolish electoral approach pursued by the NRA.

Most of the bullet points on Upton’s mailer contain minor legislative initiatives – ones that are supported by every Republican and a number of Democrats.  He has not exhibited any unique leadership on these issues more than several hundred other members.  The only consequential issue that he boasts is his cosponsorship of a bill to allow concealed weapon permit holders to carry across state lines.  The problem is that he supported the wrong bill.

The bill Upton is referring to is H.R. 822, sponsored by Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL).  This bill passed Congress last November with support from 272 members, including all the NRA-backed Democrats.  The problem with this bill is that it undermines the states that have some form of “Constitutional Carry” – those states that don’t require a permit in order to carry.  H.R. 822 would require a travelling gun carrier to hold a permit in order to benefit from the reciprocity law.  This would disqualify many concealed gun carriers from states like Vermont, Alaska, Arizona, Wyoming, and Montana.  The better bill is H.R. 2900, sponsored by Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA), which recognizes the concealed carry laws of those states.  Upton is nowhere to be seen on that bill.

This is not exactly a pro-gun record that is worth spending thousands to communicate to your constituents.  Yet this is what it means to be an A-rated member from the NRA.

Here is Fred Upton’s real record on guns, courtesy of Gun Owners of America:

  • Brady waiting period. Fred Upton was one of the few Republicans to vote for the Brady Act — a law which imposed a five day waiting period on gun owners before they could buy a handgun (November 10, 1993). This law also imposed a background registration check on all guns, meaning that the FBI now gets the names of every single person who buys a gun through a dealer.
  • Semi-auto ban. Rep. Upton supported Bill Clinton’s crime bill which contained a ban on more than 180 types of semi-automatic firearms (August 21, 1994).
  •  Warrantless searches and seizures. Every gun owner knows that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is one of the biggest abusers of gun rights in the country. Nevertheless, Fred Upton voted for a bill — aptly numbered HR 666 — which would give the ATF a green light to search for and seize the weapons of gun owners in violation of the Fourth Amendment, as long as agents were acting in “good faith” (February 8, 1995).
  • Anti-gun CDC research by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Gun owners have long-suffered from politicized researchers who use taxpayer funds to produce biased studies aimed at undercutting the Second Amendment rights of all Americans. Regardless, Rep. Upton supported a Democrat amendment to continue funding anti-gun research by the CDC (July 11, 1996).
  • Lautenberg gun ban. Amazingly, Fred Upton voted to disarm millions of gun owners for life for small (misdemeanor) offenses in the home — “offenses” as slight as spanking a child or yelling at a spouse. This lifetime ban, in certain cases, can even be imposed without a trial by jury (September 28, 1996).
  • Gun Free Danger Zones. Upton voted to impose a half-mile wide disarmament zone around every school in America. While these “gun free” zones have been ignored by criminals, they have discouraged teachers and principals from protecting children, and in some cases, even threatened to penalize them breaking the law in order to protect students (September 28, 1996).
  • Banning private firearm sales. Fred Upon supported legislation that would have banned the private sales of firearms at gun shows, unless buyers submitted to background checks that would effectively give the FBI a gun owner registration list (June 18, 1999).
  • Supporting UN gun control. Congressman Upton has opposed various efforts to keep the United Nations from imposing gun control upon the United States. (Upton’s four anti-gun votes against defanging the UN were cast in 1997, 2001, 2003 and 2005.)
  • Supporting an expansion of the National Parks gun ban. Upton voted to greatly enlarge National Park Service lands, and thus, expand firearms restrictions into millions of additional acres of land (March 25, 2009).

Cross-posted from The Madison Project

COMMENTS

  • Republican_Michigander

    They don’t always get it right. Compared to Schwarz, Upton IS pro-gun, but Upton has a mixed record. He’s not nearly as good as Jack Hoogendyk who should have gotten the endorsement.

    NRA is too in love with incumbents.

  • freemanja1991

    Historically goes with a safe bet, and almost always favors incumbents. Any dem who hasn’t sponsored a control bill with probably get their endorsement. It is not right and they fix it when members complain.

    • rockytop9

      I cancelled my NRA membership years ago, I think it was before they endorsed Harry Reid and then un-endorsed him when members became irate. That’s just one example of the fake gun rights organization called the NRA. There are other good organizations locally and nationally that really do watch out for gun rights. I belong to the Virginia Shooting Sports Assn but even they are a big defender of the NRA. The National Assn for Gun Rights is another that seems on the up and up.

      • rabun1016

        n/t

  • kowalski

    This is one area where I’ll keep the sig. line and tell them I think they’re really all wet. I don’t really understand how he could have gotten the A rating.

    …Wayne? Chris? Any of you guys at the NRA or NRA-ILA like to comment?

    • rockytop9

      The NRA is like the republican party, all talk and no guts. Just send them membership fees and donations and they will take care of your gun rights just like the publicans will watch over you and have big partys’ in places like Vegas. Too bad the uppity-ups in the NRA are such stupid losers because down in the trenches there are some really good hard working Americans that keep the NRA afloat.

  • Russ Martin

    and RINOs so that they will always be able to claim that the 2nd Amendment is “under threat”. Otherwise, their membership (and dues) would decline.

    There is simply no other reason for them to support a “pro gun” democrat over a “pro gun” republican.

  • Viet71

    It is a single-issue lobby.

    Don’t join NRA unless you are a Second Amendment devotee.

    Life member here.

    • Russ Martin

      when they called me and asked me to renew their membership. I declined and informed them that I wouldn’t as long as they continue to support incumbent dems over “pro gun” republican challengers.

      Their rationale defies logic. If they are truly a single issue lobby for the 2nd Amendment, it only makes sense that given the choice between a pro gun democrat and a pro gun republican, they would support the republican. Any time they help get a democrat elected (over a pro gun republican), they endanger the 2nd Amendment.

      • Viet71

        Find your own space.

      • kowalski

        Mr. Horowitz is making some pretty strong charges (backed up with facts) but a lot of the votes and timeline in question comes from the 1990s.

        That isn’t to say people shouldn’t be skeptical. I do wonder where the “A” rating comes from. Based on the past 10 years? The past 20 years? The past eighteen minutes? That would be interesting to know.

        As an NRA supporter I’d like to hear the rationale on this one…

    • bk

      But there are two problems with it:
      1) Someone who hasn’t held office will never get an endorsement over an incumbent or someone who held a previous office and who has cast some pro-gun votes.
      2) They endorse Democrats, who then vote for leadership of that chamber that is rabidly anti-gun. To me that cancels out whatever the person has ever voted for that the NRA scored.

  • conservativelibertarianrepublican

    Support GOA (Gun Owners of America)

    • Viet71

      Just yes or no, please.

      • conservativelibertarianrepublican

        I would have to say yes.

        • Viet71

          n/t

      • drawer22

        There being no definition of “assault rifle” (other than, possibly, “scary-looking”), there is no way to answer your question definitively. (The “Assault Weapons Ban” is a misnomer.) However, Gun Owners of America (GOA) DOES support the purchase of rifles (and other firearms) by American citizens.

        The “assault rifle” designation is a term concocted by liberals. It apparently encompasses all semi-automatic, rifled (a barrel having lands and grooves) long arms (hand-carried firearms other than handguns and shotguns). In that context, the GOA supports the purchase of such arms.

        In the context of there being no definition of “assault rifle,” the GOA DOES NOT support the purchase of that which is undefined.

        Too, while the military forces have adopted the term, in that context, an “assault rifle” is one which is capable of selected firing – either semi-automatic or fully automatic fire (like a machinegun). In that context, there are already limitations placed on the purchase of such firearms by citizens (the so-called “Class 3 license”). The GOA supports the lawful purchase of such firearms by persons licensed by our federal government to do so.

        To answer your question: “Yes” & “No,” depending on context.

        Cogito, ergo armatus sum.

  • kowalski

    Maybe I’m a little dim, but I thought the last point would have been an asset, not a liability the way it’s phrased here. Anyone have a comment on that?

    • kowalski

      By expanding the National Park Service lands that would have made the lifting of the ban more difficult? So it was a preemptive move on his part to prevent the ban from being lifted by expanding the lands under NPK jurisdiction to *prevent* the ban being lifted?

      I think it’s an interesting point and I’d like to hear what the story was there.

      • jakeofalltrades

        By expanding the size of the national parks, he expanded the areas in which guns are restricted, thereby, increasing the total gun control in the nation.

        • commonsenseobserver

          Same for the CDC.

          And I see the point of background checks, though the rest are a step too far. Always thought those with psychological problems or a serious criminal record ought to be nudged away from exercising their Second Amendment rights.

  • http://www.PanhandlePatriots.com gaybinator

    FROM FATWALLET.COM:
    It is back: NRA Lifetime Memberships $300

    Three possible ways to qualify:
    1. Retired Veteran
    2. Disabled Veteran
    3. Be referred by a current lifetime member.
    4. NRA Life Members can sign up “family members and relatives” for Life Membership for $300 each.
    ( I signed up my brother last year )
    If you dont know a life member go to any gun store or gun range and ask any NRA Life Membership sponsor you.
    5. All thay have to do is to call the NRA at 1-800-672-3888
    6. Press 3 for the lifetime dept.

    Or you can call the NRA Tell them a relative suggested you upgrade to a lifetime membership for $300.
    Give them the referring relative lifetime member’s NRA #, give them your NRA info, give them your credit card info.

  • jakeofalltrades

    which were found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court – the first time I can remember since the New Deal that any act of the federal government was found to be beyond the scope of the Commerce Clause.

    For a Republican, to vote for an unconstitutional gun control law, that is then actually found to be unconstitutional by SCOTUS, should be a black spot – or a scarlet letter – upon him for life. Just like McCain-Feingold and the aforementioned.

  • boonerdan

    In addition to his anti-gun past, Fred has also become a “born again” conservative on environmental issues, just in time for a tough primary. A little closer look reminds us that Mr. Upton brought us the light bulb ban and the poisonous CFLs.

    If Upton wins this primary, it will confirm my fears about this November.

  • iitywybad

    In my younger working days, I purchased a life membership in the NRA for $700 and proudly wore the NRA leather jacket. I contributed extra funds every time I got a request. Now I’m sorry I spent the money and wish I could get it back and give it to CCRKBA and Gun Owners of America. They are true patriots.

    Unlike Wayne LaPierre, they would never enter an alliance with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. The NRA might be a single issue organization, but if the NRA is not smart enough to figure out that even Pro Gun democrats are going to vote the way they’re told, the NRA is too dumb to get ANY more of my funds.

    There are no democrats left – they are all liberal socialist communists. When the Communist Party of the United States supports the nominee of the democrat party in two elections, it should tell everyone just where the democrat socialists communists are coming from.

    Fred Upton is not a conservative – no conservative would ever vote to ban a light bulb.

  • Dave_A

    The NRA has the power they have because they ARE a single issue ‘Gun Lobby’….

    The GOA has the complete LACK of power they have because if you’re not a far-over libertarian they brand you ‘anti-gun’ (even if you’ve never actually voted for a literal gun-control bill)….

    NRA’s policy of ‘unless you stab US in the back, we support you as an incumbent’ is the root of their massive lobbying power & their ability to influence legislation nationwide.

    They should NOT change their policies & become a partisan lobby. By the numbers, they help us more than they hurt anyways, because being pro-gun and a far-leftie is nearly impossible.

  • ihateliberals

    After Charlton Heston left the NRA and donations started falling they adopted a policy of “Do what it takes to get membership”. They compromised their support by staying with the incumbents in DC regardless of Republican or Democrat and whether or not they were extremely Liberal. The final death blow for me was when they endorsed Harry Reid. How could any sane organization or person endorse the Anti-Freedom harry Reid. Harry is the worst senate Majority leader in my lifetime and I am getting pretty old. I am also a Mormon and how Harry Reid can stand behind the legislation he does which is 90% Anti-Church teachings is beyond me. The AARP has entered the same realm as the NRA. I am now a member of Guns & Patriots and Gen-A. They are slowly building recognition and they definitely stand for the same values that i do at at least very closely.

    • Dave_A

      ntxt

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        Votes to the left of Kucinich on everything but guns but votes straight up NRA on guns then goes back to his district and talks blue dog democrat with A NRA rating then runs back up to capital and votes yellow dog Democrat.

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: Brant Aschenbrener

  • Pingback: Willena Honsberger